Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Shaker Test, Operational Vibration Environment, Substructuring, Force Reconstruction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Balancing Impedance and Controllability in Response Reconstruction

One concept in smart dynamic testing is to match the impedance that a component experiences between test and the environment of interest, but this begs the question: how much of an impedance match is needed and could there be too much? In a prior work, the authors performed MIMO testing with a small component connected to various assemblies, each of which had a differing degree of similarity to the actual flight boundary conditions. The results showed that the fidelity of the response at locations away from the control accelerometers was highly sensitive to the impedance. This work presents further case studies to explore these ideas. Subsequent tests are presented for an assembly that presumably matched the impedance even better, and which was also much more flexible, and the results obtained are even worse than when no attention was given to the impedance. Hence, the work presented here suggests that one should seek a balance between 1.) matching the impedance and 2.) improving the controllability of the component of interest. The concepts are explored using both test data of a benchmark component, for which the environment of interest was recorded as the component flew on a sounding rocket.

Shaker Test, Operational Vibration Environment, Su↗
DOE OSTI2023

Balancing Impedance and Controllability in Response Reconstruction with $\mathrm{TS-IMMAT}$

In a prior work the authors proposed a variant on the Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Test (IMMAT) in which a fixture is defined, called the Transmission Simulator (TS), and the desired environment is matched at a set of sensors on the TS. If the motion of the TS is matched then the response of the rest of the component will also match, provided that the attached component has the same dynamics as it did when the environment was measured. Hence, one would like the TS to be flexible so that it reproduces the boundary conditions that the component of interest experiences during flight, but the more flexible the TS, the more shakers might be needed to control its response. This work presents a derivation that gives expressions for these two potential error sources in TS-IMMAT. Then, various case studies are presented, both on simulated and real hardware, to understand the importance of each error term in practical testing. The theory explains the phenomena that were observed when using measurements from a component that flew on a sounding rocket. The environmental response was measured and then various fixtures were attached, each comprising more of the next assembly, or the hardware to which the component was attached in flight. MIMO testing was repeated with each fixture and the results were compared to seek to understand the role of the impedance match in this type of testing. Here the results show that the number of modes that are active in the transmission simulator is also very important, and so the best solution balances these two considerations. An improved method of simulating the MIMO test is then proposed, so simulations can be used to predict what fixture, or transmission simulator, will give the best results in a TS-IMMAT test.

42 ENGINEERING↗