Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Shuttle Centaur”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1987

Shuttle Centaur engine cooldown evaluation and effects of expanded inlets on start transient

As part of the integration of the RL10 engine into the Shuttle Centaur vehicle, a satisfactory method of conditioning the engine to operating temperatures had to be established. This procedure, known as cooldown, is different from the existing Atlas Centaur due to vehicle configuration and mission profile differenced. The program is described, and the results of a Shuttle Centaur cooldown program are reported. Mission peculiarities cause substantial variation in propellant inlet conditions between the substantiated Atlas Centaur and Shuttle Centaur with the Shuttle Centaur having much larger variation in conditions. A test program was conducted to demonstrate operation of the RL10 engine over the expanded inlet conditions. As a result of this program, the Shuttle Centaur requirements were proven satisfactory. Minor configuration changes incorporated as a result of this program provide substantial reduction in cooldown propellant consumption.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1987

RL10 ignition limits test for Shuttle Centaur

During routine development testing of the RL10A-3-3B engine a potential no-ignition condition was encountered when operating at certain propellant inlet conditions within the Shuttle Centaur G operating region. The conditions, the resulting investigative program, and methods to correct the potential problem are discussed. The Shuttle Centaur program was cancelled prior to completion of this effort. Although the RL10 engine in the Atlas Centaur vehicle is required by specification to operate over a wide range of propellant inlet conditions. The vehicle actually operates over a narrow range of conditions. This factor, combined with configuration differences between Atlas Centaur (or Titan Centaur) and the Shuttle Centaur RL10 engines, indicates the ignition problem does not exist for these vehicles. As a precautionary measure the vehicle manufacturer was requested to coordinate with Pratt and Whitney any anticipated changes in propellant inlet conditions from the current narrow range. An engineering change will be proposed for future RL10 deliveries to provide more consistent propellant flow to the igniter. This will permit operation of the engine throughout the wide range specification inlet conditions if desired.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1983

Role of simulation and emulation in the development of Shuttle-Centaur (STS-Centaur)

To support the task of integrating the Centaur liquid-fueled upper-stage space vehicle into the space shuttle program. A system to simulate and emulate the STS-Centaur avionic flight system and its supporting ground control and checkout equipment was selected and designated the systems integration facility (SIF). Located in San Diego, California, the SIF is composed of integrated simulators that form a composite control system complement to the STS-Centaur airborne and avionic support equipment. An off-line capability to verify the system design of the Centaur airborne support equipment (CASE) and the Centaur avionic flight system is provided as well as a realistic medium for the development and integration of ground checkout and airborne control software programs. Each simulator is composed of prototype hardware, where feasible, to maximize configuration likeness. Where emulated flight or ground hardware is used, it provides physical characteristics (loads, signals, etc.) equivalent to those of the flight hardware. The hardware and software implementation of the SIF are described.

Gordan, A. L.↗
NASA NTRS1987

All Shuttle Centaur engine and nozzle support plug vibration testing

Loads applied to the RL10 engines while in flight in the orbiter payload bay are significantly different from the load environment experienced in Atlas and Titan/Centaur applications. To predict the engine loads, a NASTRAN analysis was conducted. As part of this effort a vibration test program was accomplished to provide input to the analysis, and to verify engine durability. This program was completed in two phases. The first phase provided data and characteristics which were used as input to the analysis. The second phase subjected the engine to limit loads, and included hot firings before and after the vibration test. The test hardware, performance, and results are described.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2014

Three Orbital Burns to Molniya Orbit via Shuttle Centaur G Upper Stage

An unclassified analytical trajectory design, performance, and mission study was done for the 1982-86 joint NASA-USAF Shuttle/Centaur G upper stage development program to send performance-demanding payloads to high orbits such as Molniya using an unconventional orbit transfer. This optimized three orbital burn transfer to Molniya orbit was compared to the then-baselined two burn transfer. The results of the three dimensional trajectory optimization performed include powered phase steering data and coast phase orbital element data. Time derivatives of the orbital elements as functions of thrust components were evaluated and used to explain the optimization's solution. Vehicle performance as a function of parking orbit inclination was given. Performance and orbital element data was provided for launch windows as functions of launch time. Ground track data was given for all burns and coasts including variation within the launch window. It was found that a Centaur with fully loaded propellant tanks could be flown from a 37deg inclination low Earth parking orbit and achieve Molniya orbit with comparable performance to the baselined transfer which started from a 57deg inclined orbit: 9,545 lb vs. 9,552 lb of separated spacecraft weight respectively. There was a significant reduction in the need for propellant launch time reserve for a one hour window: only 78 lb for the three burn transfer vs. 320 lb for the two burn transfer. Conversely, this also meant that longer launch windows over more orbital revolutions could be done for the same amount of propellant reserve. There was no practical difference in ground tracking station or airborne assets needed to secure telemetric data, even though the geometric locations of the burns varied considerably. There was a significant adverse increase in total mission elapsed time for the three vs. two burn transfer (12 vs. 11/4 hrs), but could be accommodated by modest modifications to Centaur systems. Future applications were discussed. The three burn transfer was found to be a viable, arguably preferable, alternative to the two burn transfer.

Orbital trajectory design↗
NASA NTRS2015

Three Orbital Burns to Molniya Orbit Via Shuttle_Centaur G Upper Stage

An unclassified analytical trajectory design, performance, and mission study was done for the 1982 to 1986 joint National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)-United States Air Force (USAF) Shuttle/Centaur G upper stage development program to send performance-demanding payloads to high orbits such as Molniya using an unconventional orbit transfer. This optimized three orbital burn transfer to Molniya orbit was compared to the then-baselined two burn transfer. The results of the three dimensional trajectory optimization performed include powered phase steering data and coast phase orbital element data. Time derivatives of the orbital elements as functions of thrust components were evaluated and used to explain the optimization's solution. Vehicle performance as a function of parking orbit inclination was given. Performance and orbital element data was provided for launch windows as functions of launch time. Ground track data was given for all burns and coasts including variation within the launch window. It was found that a Centaur with fully loaded propellant tanks could be flown from a 37 deg inclination low Earth parking orbit and achieve Molniya orbit with comparable performance to the baselined transfer which started from a 57 deg inclined orbit: 9,545 versus 9,552 lb of separated spacecraft weight, respectively. There was a significant reduction in the need for propellant launch time reserve for a 1 hr window: only 78 lb for the three burn transfer versus 320 lb for the two burn transfer. Conversely, this also meant that longer launch windows over more orbital revolutions could be done for the same amount of propellant reserve. There was no practical difference in ground tracking station or airborne assets needed to secure telemetric data, even though the geometric locations of the burns varied considerably. There was a significant adverse increase in total mission elapsed time for the three versus two burn transfer (12 vs. 1-1/4 hr), but could be accommodated by modest modifications to Centaur systems. Future applications were discussed. The three burn transfer was found to be a viable, arguably preferable, alternative to the two burn transfer.

Orbital trajectory design↗
NASA NTRS1983

Stability analysis of Centaur-in-Shuttle composite corrugated adapters

This paper evaluates analytically the structural integrity of discretely-loaded, graphite-epoxy, corrugated adapters for the Centaur-in-Shuttle, where combined compression and shear are the critical loads involved. With normal build-ups in the thickness at load introduction boundaries, the structural integrity for both compression and shear buckling was little (or not al all) affected by the discrete load introductions. The analytical tool employed was the STAGSC computer code, and both bifurction buckling and nonlinear collapse options were used; the latter option was limited to shear since postbuckling strength in compression for plate-type structures is governed by crippling strengths, which is not attainable by existing computer codes.

Spier, E. E.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Real-time computer simulation/emulation for verification of multi-fault-tolerant control of Centaur-in-Shuttle

NASA has contracted with General Dynamics to design and develop an advanced Centaur liquid upper stage for support of the Galileo and Solar Polar interplanetary missions in 1985-86. The control of the Centaur while it resides in the Shuttle cargo bay must meet the STS safety requirements to be dual failure tolerant in all mission critical functions. The demonstration of the integrity of this control system in the event of multiple component failures and worst-case time-phase asynchroniety among the system's computers is performed by a real-time computer simulation. The simulation emulates the control hardware, subsystem interfaces, and imbedded software processes, wire-by-wire, to provide accessibility for fault insertion. Observability is provided via graphics and diagnostic software. Verification is the product of Monte Carlo simulation analysis.

Szatkowski, G. P.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Phobos/Deimos missions

Phobos and Deimos missions, examining lander and lander/orbiter configurations and Titan- Centaur and space shuttle-Centaur launch systems

Harrison, E. F.↗
NASA NTRS1982

The Centaur family

The Centaur upper stage has been used with Atlas and Titan boosters for a total of 66 launches, and is now being considered for future use with the Space Shuttle. Centaur's high-energy oxygen-hydrogen propellant combination provides the maximum performance capability for launching geosynchronous and earth-escape missions with both boosters. Shuttle/Centaur performance, combined with the demonstrated low-thrust operating capability of the Centaur engines, will allow gentle transfer of large communications spacecraft into geostationary orbit, thus significantly increasing the economies of communication satellites. This paper presents Centaur configurations, payload capabilities, and payload envelopes for future applications.

Rector, W. F., III↗
NASA NTRS1973

A preliminary analysis of a radar-mapping mission to Venus

A rather broad survey is reported of the Venus radar orbiter possibilities within the period 1983-1990. Minimum mission imaging requirements have been set by comparison with the improving capabilities of earth based radar systems and an examination of earth airborne radar imaging. This has led to a requirement for 80 percent coverage at a resolution of 100 m. A first main conclusion is that only the Shuttle-Centaur launch system would be capable of establishing a circular orbit under all possible launch conditions. Thus, orbit eccentricity has been introduced as a parameter throughout this presentation. An examination of typical radar designs has led to upper and lower limits on swath width of 100 and 50 km. A lower eccentricity of 0.2 was set by considering the current Viking propulsion system. An examination of solar perturbations indicates that orbit maintenance problems increase rapidly above an eccentricity of 0.5.

Mackay, J. S.↗
NASA NTRS1984

The Venus Radar Mapper (VRM) mission

The Venus Radar Mapper (VRM) mission is sponsored by NASA to put a single spacecraft in orbit around Venus to map the surface of Venus using a synthetic aperture mapping radar. The spacecraft is scheduled to be launched in April 1988 using a Shuttle-Centaur G combination. The spacecraft arrives at Venus in late July 1988 and begins its mapping mission which lasts for one Venus rotation or 243 days. This paper describes the VRM mission at its present state of design. The science objectives and project constraints are described. Key features of the spacecraft system and radar system are discussed. The interplanetary and mapping orbit design are covered. Navigation strategy is explained, including trajectory maneuvers and mapping phase orbit determination. Finally, the mapping sequences to optimize planet coverage are described.

Cutting, E.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Galileo Earth-Venus trajectory correction maneuver design

As a result of delays in the Space Shuttle program and a re-evaluation of safety concerns which resulted in cancellation of the Shuttle Centaur Upper Stage program, the Galileo mission to Jupiter has undergone a substantial redesign effort. Use of the Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) for injection has necessitated a complicated Venus-Earth-Earth gravity assist trajectory in order to reach Jupiter. One flyby of Venus and two flybys of Earth are required to compensate for the lower injection energy available from the IUS. As the spacecraft was not originally designed for the environment within 1 AU of the Sun, modifications to the spacecraft and operating procedures have been developed. This paper describes some of these changes and how they have affected the design and implementation of trajectory correction maneuvers on the Earth-Venus leg of the mission. A strategy of biasing the IUS target at injection to control the statistical velocity distribution of a subsequent trajectory correction maneuver is discussed.

Wilson, M. G.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Shuttle/Centaur - More capability for the 1980's

Design features of the Centaur upper stage for the Shuttle are described, noting interfaces with the Orbiter and intended missions. The Shuttle will carry the Centaur stage into a 241 km eastward orbit, open the payload doors, and by the fourth orbit rotate the Centaur 45 deg so it points out of the bay. An integrated support system will limit the actual equipment added to the Orbiter to 122 kg. Separation from the Orbiter will be effected by a spring-loaded mechanism that will impart a 1/3 m/sec velocity to the Centaur, which carries its own LOX/LH2 fuel supply for two RL 10A-3-3A engines. The fuel is moved to the bottom of the tanks by auxiliary thrusters which propel the Centaur forward. Planned missions for the Shuttle-Centaur are boosting the ESA Solar Polar Mission and launching the Galileo probe in 1986, possibly followed by a Venus radar mapper mission in 1988.

Spurlock, O. F.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Programmatic and technical parameters associated with Shuttle/Centaur development and operations

The cost, schedule, technical, integration, and performance parameters associated with the development of the Shuttle/Centaur configurations, Centaur G and Centaur G-Prime, for compatibility with various elements of the STS are discussed. It is noted that the design concepts for these configurations involved the use of as much flight-proven hardware from the Atlas/Centaur program as possible. Forward and aft adapters were designed using graphite/epoxy composite structures for strength, weight, and thermal flow considerations. The Centaur integrated support system serves as the system interface for all systems between the Shuttle and Centaur from prelaunch through deployment of the Centaur in LEO. As a result of the Shuttle accident of January 28, 1986, the earliest possible flight for the Centaur mission appears to be December 1987.

Clark, Harry J.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Centaur propellant thermal conditioning system

An upgraded Centaur capability was studied by investigating three main areas: (1) Analytical and experimental investigation of promising capillary pumping concepts for passive cooling of cryogenic capillary acquisition devices resulted in selection, test, and empirical correlation of four wicking configurations. Only plate/screen-screen/plate and plate/screen-plate/screen configurations would function successfully under worst-case Centaur D-1S conditions. Weight estimates were developed for the passively cooled configurations and comparisons were made of passive and actively cooled capillary devices. (2) Thermal subcoolers for replacing pressurization and boost pump systems for three engine candidates and three Centaur D-1S missions were evaluated for several feed system configurations. Analysis included both transient and steady-state operation. Weight comparisons were made among feed system alternatives. (3) Existing experimental mixing studies to destroy thermal stratification were evaluated to determine the best mixing correlation to fit all available data. The correlation was then used to modify a computer program to size thermodynamic vent systems for Shuttle-based Centaur derivatives.

Blatt, M. H.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Design, development, and test of Shuttle/Centaur G-prime cryogenic tankage thermal protection systems

The thermal protection systems (TPS) for the Shuttle/Centaur were designed to provide fail-safe thermal protection during prelaunch, launch ascent, and on-orbit operations as well as during potential abort, where the Shuttle and Centaur would return to earth. The TPS selected used a helium-purged polyimide foam beneath three radiation shields for the liquid-hydrogen (LH2) tank and radiation shields only for the liquid-oxygen (LO2) tank. A double-walled vacuum bulkhead separated the two tanks. The LH2 tank had one 1.9 cm-thick layer of foam on the forward bulkhead and two layers on the larger-area sidewall. Full scale tests of the flight vehicle in a simulated Shuttle cargo bay gave total prelaunch heating rates of 29.5 and 12.9 kW for the LH2 and LO2 tanks, respectively. Calorimeter tests on a representative sample of the LH2 tank sidewall TPS indicated that the measured unit heating one would rapidly decrease from the prelaunch rate of about 300 W/sq m to a desired rate less than 4 W/sq m once on-orbit.

Macneil, Peter N.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Development and test of the Shuttle/Centaur cryogenic tankage thermal protection system

The Thermal Protection System (TPS) for the Shuttle/Centaur had to provide fail-safe thermal protection during prelaunch, launch ascent, and on-orbit operations as well as during potential abort where the Shuttle and Centaur would return to earth. The TPS selected used a helium-purged polyimide foam beneath three radiation shields for the liquid hydrogen (LH2) tank and radiation shields only for the liquid oxygen (LO2) tank (three shields on the tank sidewall and four on the aft bulkhead). An evacuated common intermediate bulkhead separated the two tanks. The LH2 tank had one 1.9-cm thick layer of foam on the forward bulkhead and two layers on the larger area side-wall. Full scale tests of the flight vehicle in a simulated Shuttle cargo bay, that was purged with gaseous nitrogen, gave total prelaunch heating rates of 25.9 kW and 12.9 kW for LH2 and LO2 tanks, respectively. Calorimeter tests on a representative LH2 tank sidewall TPS sample indicated that the measured unit heating rate would rapidly decrease from the prelaunch rate of 300 W/sq m to a desired rate of less than 4 W/sq m once on-orbit.

Knoll, R. H.↗