Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Slat Gap Filler”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Slat Noise Control Using a Slat Gap Filler

The leading edge slat of a high-lift system is one of the main noise contributors on many commercial aircraft during approach. This paper continues our previous studies on the gap filler for passive noise control on the 30P30N high-lift airfoil. An improved implementation of the gap filler was applied to minimize the effects of flow leakage encountered in the previous work, which resulted in spurious noise content in the far-field acoustic spectra. To evaluate the effect of passive flow control on the acoustics generated by the unsteady flow field, anechoic wind tunnel experiments are conducted on the two-dimensional, three-element high-lift airfoil with a gap filler mounted to the slat. The slat geometry modification associated with the gap filler alters the flow field in the cove region that dominates the generation of the acoustic field. A single angle of attack (훼푘=8◦) and three flow speeds corresponding to Reynolds numbersof푅푒푐=1.2푒6,1.5푒6, and1.71푒6are selected as the test conditions. Steady surface pressure measurements are conducted to assess the effect of the treatments on the overall lift. Acoustic array measurements are used to evaluate the influence of the gap filler on the radiated noise. Delay and Sum beamforming is applied to locate the noise sources on the model and to provide the integrated spectra. The gap filler is found to eliminate the narrowband peaks in the acoustic spectra and, also, to yield a 10 dB reduction in the broadband noise in comparison with the baseline case. Time-resolved Particle Image Velocimetry results show that the flow features are significantly altered with the presence of the gap filler, which leads to a more stable slat cove shear layer and, thus, to weaker pressure and velocity fluctuations.

Yang Zhang↗

Development of a SMA-Based, Slat-Gap Filler for Airframe Noise Reduction

Noise produced by unsteady flow around aircraft structures, termed airframe noise, is an important source of aircraft noise during the approach and landing phases of flight. Conventional leading-edge-slat devices for high lift on typical transport aircraft are a prominent source of airframe noise. Many concepts for slat noise reduction have been investigated. Slat-cove fillers have emerged as an attractive solution, but they maintain the gap flow, leaving some noise production mechanisms unabated, and thus represent a nonoptimal solution. Drooped-leading-edge (DLE) concepts have been proposed as "optimal" because the gap flow is eliminated. The deployed leading edge device is not distinct and separate from the main wing in DLE concepts and the high-lift performance suffers at high angles of attack (alpha) as a consequence. Elusive high-alpha performance and excessive weight penalty have stymied DLE development. The fact that high-lift performance of DLE systems is only affected at high alpha suggests another concept that simultaneously achieves the high-lift of the baseline airfoil and the noise reduction of DLE concepts. The concept involves utilizing a conventional leading-edge slat device and a deformable structure that is deployed from the leading edge of the main wing and closes the gap between the slat and main wing, termed a slat-gap filler (SGF). The deployable structure consists of a portion of the skin of the main wing and it is driven in conjunction with the slat during deployment and retraction. Benchtop models have been developed to assess the feasibility and to study important parameters. Computational models have assisted in the bench-top model design and provided valuable insight in the parameter space as well as the feasibility.

Turner, Travis L.↗

Development of Slat-gap and Slat-cove Filler Treatments for Noise Reduction Assessment on the High Lift Common Research Model in the NASA LaRC 14x22

Airframe noise is an important issue during the approach and landing phases of flight because engines are throttled back, and airframe sources become an equal or greater contributor to environmental noise. The leading-edge slat component of the high-lift system for transport aircraft has been identified as a prominent source of airframe noise. Noise production mechanisms and potential treatments to mitigate airframe noise have been areas of active research for nearly three decades. Two promising technologies for slat noise reduction are the slat-gap filler (SGF) and slat-cove filler (SCF). Previous work was done using a 2D section of a transport class aircraft wing to demonstrate their feasibility via benchtop and computational models. A wind tunnel test campaign was recently undertaken to test the SGF and SCF technologies in a flight-like environment by installing dynamically scaled treatments on the 10%-scale High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL), which is representative of a commercial twin-aisle transport aircraft. Advancement of the SGF and SCF technologies to overcome challenges of integration with 3D airframe structures, computational simulations of the CRM-HL predicting the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance and structural loads, and design of wind tunnel model hardware with features accommodating noise treatments were conducted in parallel. Details of innovations in the SGF and SCF technologies for 3D airframe feasibility will be described. The loads the treatments must sustain in flight and the influence of those loads on the design is also discussed. Finally, the design of wing leading-edge assemblies to treat the 10% CRM-HL with dynamically scaled SGF and SCF components is presented. The treatments were successfully tested in 2020/2021 providing a demonstration of leading-edge noise reduction using components that would allow slat articulation.

airframe noise reduction↗

Effects of Porous Gap Fillers on Leading-Edge Slat Noise of 30P30N. Part II: PIV Measurements

The leading edge slat of a high-lift system is one of the main contributors to the airframe noise during approach conditions. This paper, the second of two parts, continues our previous studies on the slat gap filler as a passive noise control device on the two-dimensional, 30P30N multielement airfoil. Whereas the earlier study was focused on the effects of an impermeable gap filler that completely blocks the flow through the gap, this follow-on assessment is devoted to permeable slat gap fillers that allow limited amounts of flow to pass through the gap. Part I of this two-part abstract described the aerodynamic and acoustic effects of the permeable gap fillers, as inferred from both the measurements of static and unsteady surface pressures and the microphone array data for the radiated noise. To understand the physical mechanism responsible for the noise reduction documented in Part I, as well as for the accompanying aerodynamic penalty due to the porous gap fillers, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) is used in this paper to measure the flow details in the slat-cove region of the 30P30N model. A single angle of attack (𝛼 = 5.5◦) and a chord based Reynolds number of 1.71𝑒6 are selected as the test conditions. The PIV results show that the slat flow features are significantly altered with the presence of the porous gap filler, resulting in a more stable slat-cove shear layer and, thus, reduced velocity fluctuations with a successive decrease in the permeability. The porous gap filler with the lowest permeability acts similar to the solid gap filler. However, flow separation is observed on the upper side of the porous interface, which leads to an aerodynamic performance penalty via a reduction in lift on the main wing.

slat noise↗

Fully Coupled Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Adaptive Shape Memory Alloy Structural Technologies for Airframe Noise Reduction

This final report documents work performed by ATA Engineering, Inc., (ATA) to develop computational models and analyze the coupled fluid-structure response of two types of noise treatments applied to the leading-edge-slat component of a high-lift system typical of modern transport aircraft. The first treatment is a slat-gap filler (SGF), which closes the gap between the suction surfaces of a deployed slat and an aircraft main wing, and the second treatment is a slat-cove filler (SCF), which replaces the recirculating flow on the slat cove with a surface that promotes flow attachment. The representative airframe chosen for this work was NASA’s High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) in a baseline high-lift configuration. Superelastic shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been identified as enabling materials for these structural treatments. Since the technology elements rely upon having a highly reconfigurable structure, designs were assessed for their static aeroelastic deflection as well as their dynamic aeroelastic stability using coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and nonlinear computational structural dynamics (NL-CSD) tools. Specifically, fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems were solved computationally using the CFD solver Loci/CHEM and the NL-CSD solver Abaqus. As a part of the overall project, a similar capability was implemented using the CFD solver FUN3D coupled to Abaqus, although that work is documented in a separate report and that FSI framework was not used to analyze any of NASA’s SGF and SCF configurations. The technical approach consisted of solving for the flow field around the entire vehicle using a global CFD model, followed by extraction of relevant local subdomain data for CFD and NL-CSD co-simulations. The SGF design was analyzed using both 2D and 3D co-simulations to predict quasi-static aeroelastic deformations and to assess dynamic aeroelastic stability, whereas the SCF was analyzed in 2D only. SGF static aeroelastic response predictions focused on characterizing the deformed shape, with maximum displacements predicted to be on the order of magnitude of the technology element panel thickness. SGF dynamic aeroelastic response predictions used Partial Floquet analysis of the temporal evolution of selected nodal displacements to quantify the sign and magnitude of aeroelastic damping. Results suggest that the CRM-HL operating conditions would result in a dynamically stable response. The simulated dynamic pressure was also increased up to a factor of about four, and resulting responses suggest that predicted dynamic stability would be achieved with some margin.

Fluid Structure Interaction↗

Aeroelastic Stability Assessment Methodology and Application to Slat Noise Treatments on the High-Lift Common Research Model

This work supports a larger effort at NASA to reduce airframe noise and, thus, environmental noise around airports. The leading-edge slat of conventional high-lift systems is a prominent source of airframe noise, and two technologies were previously identified as promising for noise reduction without significant aerodynamic or weight penalty: the slat cove filler (SCF) and the slat gap filler (SGF). NASA fabricated a 10%-scale semispan aircraft model for wind tunnel testing based upon the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). NASA embarked on a test campaign with the 10% CRM-HL to determine the noise reduction effectiveness and other performance metrics of 3D SCF and SGF treatments in flow conditions representative of flight. The highly flexible SCF and SGF treatments posed a risk to the model and aeroelastic instability would compromise research integrity, so aeroelastic stability assessment was required. This work briefly describes the 10% CRM-HL, design of the SCF and SGF treatments to the model, and supporting fluid structure interaction (FSI) research. Relations for static and dynamic aeroelastic similitude are then developed for convenience of reference, and simplifications are introduced of particular utility to the cases considered in this study. The similitude relations are employed to assess the stability of the treatments under wind tunnel flow conditions based upon known behaviors from the supporting research. It is shown that the treatments are safe for test under the anticipated wind tunnel flow conditions with significant margins/factors of safety. It is furthermore demonstrated that the SCF is more susceptible to aeroelastic instability than the SGF, which has implications for flight feasibility.

Similitude↗

Phased Array Characterization of Slat Noise Radiation from a High-Lift Common Research Model

A test campaign was conducted in the open-jet test section of the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel on a 10%-scale, semispan version of a High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) incorporating a leading-edge slat, trailing-edge flap and removable high-fidelity main landing gear. Far field acoustic measurements were obtained on baseline and acoustically treated model configurations using a traversing 97-microphone phased array that viewed the pressure side of the airframe. A modified version of the DAMAS deconvolution method incorporating corrections for shear layer acoustic wave decorrelation was employed to determine the locations and strengths of relevant noise sources along the span of the slat and in the vicinity of the flap edges and landing gear. The main goal of the test campaign was to use the array data to evaluate the effectiveness of various slat noise reduction concepts. It was found that slat-gap fillers produced significant broadband noise reduction for all Mach numbers and airfoil angles of attack that were investigated. Mach number scaling revealed an approximate velocity to the sixth power relationship for the slat noise at higher frequencies. Directivity measurements obtained from integration of DAMAS pressure-squared values over defined geometric zones around the model showed that baseline slat noise radiation approximated a dipole as a function of polar emission angle, becoming approximately omnidirectional with the introduction of the slat-gap filler. The test campaign clearly demonstrated the noise reduction benefits that can be obtained by applying appropriate treatments to leading edge slats on commercial transport-class aircraft.

William M Humphreys, Jr.↗

Effects of Porous Gap Fillers on 30P30N Leading-Edge SlatNoise. Part I: Surface Pressure and Acoustics

The leading edge slat of a high-lift system is one of the main contributors to airframe noise during approach. In a previous experimental study, we assessed the performance of an impermeable slat gap filler as a passive flow control device to reduce the slat noise associated with a two-dimensional, three-element high-lift airfoil. The present paper, the first of two parts,represents a follow-on investigation to assess the relative efficacy of permeable gap fillers thatallow successively higher amounts of flow to pass through the gap. To evaluate the influence of this passive flow control device on the acoustics generated by the unsteady flow near the slat, experiments are conducted in an anechoic wind tunnel by mounting a gap filler to the slat element of the two-dimensional 30P30N high-lift configuration. Measurements are performed at a single geometric angle of attack (𝛼𝑘=8◦) and three different flow speeds that correspond to Reynolds numbers of𝑅𝑒𝑐=1.2𝑒6,1.5𝑒6, and1.71𝑒6, respectively. Steady surface pressure measurements are used to gauge the influence of the permeable gap filler treatments on the overall lift. The effect of each treatment on the radiated noise is analyzed via acoustic array measurements, followed by delay-and-sum beamforming to locate the slat noise sources and to provide the integrated acoustic spectra. The porous gap fillers are found to eliminate the narrowband peaks in the acoustic spectra and, also, to yield a 10 dB reduction in the broadband noise in comparison with the baseline case with no gap filler. The porous gap filler with thelowest permeability acts similar to the impermeable gap filler examined previously. However, the aerodynamics and noise reduction both degrade with increasing permeability. An accompanying abstract describes the particle image velocimetry measurements of the flowfield within the slat cove and on either side of the permeable gap f

slat noise↗

Overview of Aeroacoustic Testing of the High-Lift Common Research Model

This paper presents an overview of the experimental data obtained in a 2020/2021 aeroacoustic test of the high-lift variant of the common research model. The breadth of the aerodynamic and acoustic measurements is highlighted along with some key results. Aerodynamic data were observed to be consistent with previous observations, and the acoustic measurements were repeatable once some background noise and shear layer issues were resolved. The primary purpose of the test was to evaluate the noise reduction potential of slat noise reduction devices, and a slat-gap filler was found to produce substantial noise reduction over a broad frequency range. The gap filler was designed to meet practical implementation considerations at full scale and constructed out of shape-memory alloys that would allow the slat to be articulated. However, additional structural testing will be required to demonstrate the performance of the gap filler during slat deployment and retraction. Over 3,500 test points were collected during the test, and only a small fraction of the experimental data has been processed in a preliminary manner. Nonetheless, the results presented demonstrate the quality of the dataset and reveal some insights about slat noise.

Aeroacoustics↗

Computational Modeling of a Mechanized Benchtop Apparatus for Leading-Edge Slat Noise Treatment Device Prototypes

Airframe noise is a growing concern in the vicinity of airports because of population growth and gains in engine noise reduction that have rendered the airframe an equal contributor during the approach and landing phases of flight for many transport aircraft. The leading-edge-slat device of a typical high-lift system for transport aircraft is a prominent source of airframe noise. Two technologies have significant potential for slat noise reduction; the slat-cove filler (SCF) and the slat-gap filler (SGF). Previous work was done on a 2D section of a transport-aircraft wing to demonstrate the implementation feasibility of these concepts. Benchtop hardware was developed in that work for qualitative parametric study. The benchtop models were mechanized for quantitative measurements of performance. Computational models of the mechanized benchtop apparatus for the SCF were developed and the performance of the system for five different SCF assemblies is demonstrated.

Turner, Travis L.↗

Fully Coupled Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Adaptive Shape Memory Alloy Structural Technologies for Airframe Noise Reduction

The objective of this work is the development of computational models and analysis of the coupled fluid-structure response of a slat gap filler (SGF) noise treatment applied to the leading-edge-slat component of a high-lift system typical of modern transport aircraft. The representative airframe chosen for this work is NASA’s High-lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) in a baseline high-lift configuration. Superelastic shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been identified as enabling materials for these structural treatments. Since the technology elements rely upon having a highly reconfigurable structure, designs must be assessed for static aeroelastic deflection as well as dynamic aeroelastic stability using coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and nonlinear computational structural dynamics (NL CSD) tools. The technical approach consists of solving for the flow field around the entire vehicle using a global CFD model, followed by extraction of relevant local subdomain data for CFD and NL-CSD co-simulations. The SGF design is assessed using both 2D and 3D co-simulations to predict quasi-static aeroelastic deformations and to assess dynamic aeroelastic stability.

Fluid structure interaction↗

Characterization of Slat Noise Radiation from a High-Lift Common Research Model

A test campaign was conducted in the open-jet test section of the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel on a 10%-scale, semispan version of a High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) incorporating a leading-edge slat, trailing-edge flap and removable high-fidelity main landing gear. Aerodynamic and far field acoustic measurements were obtained on baseline and acoustically treated model configurations using an ensemble of time-averaged and unsteady surface pressure sensors paired with a traversing 97-microphone phased array viewing the pressure side of the airframe. A modified version of the DAMAS deconvolution method incorporating corrections for shear layer acoustic wave decorrelation was employed to determine the locations and strengths of relevant noise sources along the span of the slat and in the vicinity of the flap edges and landing gear. The main goal of the test campaign was to use the surface pressure and array data to evaluate the effectiveness of various slat noise reduction concepts. It was found that slat-gap fillers produced significant broadband noise reduction with minimal aerodynamic performance penalties for all Mach numbers and airfoil angles of attack that were investigated. The test campaign clearly demonstrated the noise reduction benefits that can be obtained by applying appropriate treatments to leading-edge slats on commercial transport-class aircraft.

Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate↗

Assessment of Noise Reduction Concepts for Leading-Edge Slat Noise

The leading-edge slat of a high-lift airfoil can be a significant noise contributor during aircraft landing. This paper summarizes the effects of several passive noise reduction devices on the 30P30N high-lift airfoil. Experiments are conducted on a two-dimensional multi-element high-lift airfoil with leading-edge slat extensions, gap filler, and cove filler in an anechoic wind tunnel to evaluate the effect of passive flow control on the acoustics generated by the unsteady flow field. Slat geometry modifications associated with the treatments alter the flow field in the region that dominates the generation of the acoustic field. Three angles of attack (a(k) = 8°, 10°, and 15.5°) and three different Reynolds numbers (Re(c) = 1.2e6, 1.5e6, and 1.71e6) are selected as the test conditions. Steady surface pressure measurements are conducted to assess the effect of the treatments on the lift and drag. Unsteady surface pressure measurements along with the far-field acoustic array measurements are performed to evaluate the changes in near- and far-field pressure fluctuations, respectively. Delay and Sum (DAS) beamforming method is applied to locate the noise sources on the model and provide integrated spectra. Implementation difficulties with the gap filler led to structural integration deficiencies that prevented a fair assessment of this technology. Among the other passive devices, the cove filler s the most effective noise reduction, along with a negligible change in the aerodynamic metrics.

Zhang, Yang↗

Autonomous Slat-Cove-Filler Device for Reduction of Aeroacoustic Noise Associated with Aircraft Systems

A slat cove filler is utilized to reduce airframe noise resulting from deployment of a leading edge slat of an aircraft wing. The slat cove filler is preferably made of a super elastic shape memory alloy, and the slat cove filler shifts between stowed and deployed shapes as the slat is deployed. The slat cove filler may be configured such that a separate powered actuator is not required to change the shape of the slat cove filler from its deployed shape to its stowed shape and vice-versa. The outer contour of the slat cove filler preferably follows a profile designed to maintain accelerating flow in the gap between the slat cove filler and wing leading edge to provide for noise reduction.

Turner, Travis L.↗

Investigation of the 30P30N Slat Flow Field with Passive Control Devices Using Particle Image Velocimetry

The leading-edge slat of a high-lift wing is one of the main noise contributors during approach and landing. This paper describes an experimental investigation of the velocity field associated with multiple passive noise treatments, including slat-cusp extensions, a cove filler, and a gap filler, on a two-dimensional multi-element high-lift 30P30N airfoil. Previous work documented comparisons of both surface and far field pressure fluctuations in the presence of these devices with those for a baseline case at different flow conditions. However, important information related to the velocity fields was missing from the previous measurements, hindering our ability to elucidate the changes in the flow physics associated with the noise treatments. Therefore, two-component Particle Image Velocity has been used to investigate the influence of passive noise treatments on the flow fields. All measurements are taken at an effective, free-air angle of attack of 5.5 degrees and a stowed-chord-based Reynolds number of 1.71 × 10e6. The measurements show that the slat extensions shorten the slat-cove shear layer trajectory, resulting in reduced growth of disturbances within the slat-cove shear layer. This leads to a shift of tonal peaks to higher frequencies and a reduction in the tonal amplitudes. The gap filler blocks the flow path through the gap, causing the reattachment location to shift to the main wing leading edge lower surface. Consequently, the feedback loop associated with the flow-acoustic interaction in the baseline case is eliminated, and the turbulent kinetic energy in the slat-cove shear layer is significantly reduced. However, extensive flow separation is observed on the suction side of the gap filler, which does not eliminate the noise reduction benefit due to the gap filler, but does degrade the aerodynamic performance of the high-lift configuration. Finally, the overall flow field in the presence of the cove filler is similar to that in the baseline case at the design angle of attack, but the slat-cove shear layer is eliminated leading to a suppression of the cavity tones associated with the shear layer. This change accounts for the reduction in slat noise as measured in previous work.

Aeroacoustics↗