A modified QuEChERS sample processing method for the determination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in environmental biological matrices
Not Available
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Sorbents cleanup”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Sorption kinetics and stability of conventional adsorbents for mercury remediation
In-situ remediation of mercury at numerous contaminated sites worldwide is a challenging and costly endeavor due to the persistency of this contaminant. In this study, we evaluated eight commercially available sorbent media ranging from carbon-, clays- and silica-based materials (PBC– Biochar, eSorb – Sorbster, nsPAC – Powdered Activated Carbon, fsPAC – Powdered Activated Carbon with Mackinawite, F300 – Filtrasorb 300, Si-SH – Silica Thiol, eBind – RemBind, Q-Clay – Organoclay PM-199), for their effectiveness in sorbing mercury (Hg 2+ ) and mercury complexed with dissolved organic matter (Hg-DOM). Under the chosen experimental conditions of this study, results showed that in the absence of DOM, the kinetic rates of Hg 2+ sorption onto the evaluated sorbents were in the order of 0.31 min-1 (Si-SH) to 2.98 min -1 (nsPAC), whereas in the presence of DOM, the rates varied from 0.16 min-1 (F300) to 0.95 min -1 (nsPAC). The measured sorption capacity for Hg 2+ in the absence of DOM varied from 3.02 mg/g (Q-Clay) to 35.15 mg/g (Si-SH), whereas in the presence of DOM, calculated partition coefficient (KD) ranged from 69.7 mL/g (Q-Clay) to 41,510 mL/g (Si-SH). Furthermore, kinetic data suggest liquid film diffusion was the rate-limiting steps governing mercury sorption onto the studied media. Overall, the obtained study parameters (kinetics/isotherm) are particularly important in informing robust engineering designs for deployment of the vast majority of evaluated sorbents. Thus, sorbent-based strategies offer viable solutions for cost-effective cleanup of mercury at industrially contaminated sites.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
The Impact of Sorbent Amendments for Mercury Remediation on the Viability of Soil Microorganisms
Mercury (Hg) remediation across contaminated environments in the United States is an ongoing project. As part of the Hg cleanup strategy at East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC), located in Oak Ridge, TN, the deployment of sorbents is considered. However, the impact of sorbents on soil microorganisms is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the effect of sorbents on soil microorganism viability and biofilm formation to assess soil health during sorbent application for Hg remediation. We specifically investigated the effect of two engineered sorbents, Organoclay PM-199 and Organoclay MRM (which are manufactured from clay minerals formulated for various remediation applications), on two gram-negative organisms ( Serratia marcescens and Burkholderia thailandensis ) isolated from the Hg-contaminated EFPC bank soil. Pure cultures of S. marcescens or B. thailandensis were amended with 5% (w/v) and 25% (w/v) PM-199 and MRM, respectively, for 9 days. The samples were harvested, and bacterial cell viability was determined using a BacLight staining kit. Results showed that the growth of sorbent-amended S. marcescens was inhibited in contrast to that of unamended control. Furthermore, biochemical assays were used to analyze bacterial biofilm formation and integral biofilm components. Our results suggest that biofilm formation by sorbent-amended S. marcescens was negatively affected. In contrast, B. thailandensis amended with low concentrations of MRM showed enhanced growth and notable differences in biofilm morphology. These results suggest that the use of organoclay PM-199 and MRM at higher concentrations in field studies may hinder the growth of specific soil microorganisms.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
Factors affecting cleanup of exhaust gases from a pressurized, fluidized-bed coal combustor
The cleanup of effluent gases from the fluidized-bed combustion of coal is examined. Testing conditions include the type and feed rate of the coal and the sulfur sorbent, the coal-sorbent ratio, the coal-combustion air ratio, the depth of the reactor fluidizing bed, and the technique used to physically remove fly ash from the reactor effluent gases. Tests reveal that the particulate loading matter in the effluent gases is a function not only of the reactor-bed surface gas velocity, but also of the type of coal being burnt and the time the bed is operating. At least 95 percent of the fly ash particules in the effluent gas are removed by using a gas-solids separator under controlled operating conditions. Gaseous pollutants in the effluent (nitrogen and sulfur oxides) are held within the proposed Federal limits by controlling the reactor operating conditions and the type and quantity of sorbent material.
Rollbuhler, R. J.↗
Methanol from Integrated Direct Air Capture and Ceramic Electrolysis (MIDACE)
The Methanol from Integrated Direct Air Capture and Ceramic Electrolysis (MIDACE) project advanced a novel system concept for integrating pressurized co-electrolysis of steam and crude carbon dioxide captured directly from ambient air using a sorbent technology. The co-electrolysis produced syngas provides feedstock for a gas-to-liquid methanol synthesis reactor. The system recovers waste heat from the reactor and electrolyzer into regenerating the direct air capture sorbent. The purpose of the project was to demonstrate critical integration elements of the design and perform a technical study illustrating how a large-scale installation could achieve the $800/ton program target for green methanol production. The concept addresses the program objective to consolidate operations by combining crude CO 2 cleanup, hydrogen production, and partial CO 2 reduction steps within a carbon tolerant high temperature electrolyzer. The design lowers costs by simplifying the methanol recovery cycle, reducing carbon losses from venting, reducing sensitivity to catalyst selectivity, and avoiding syngas compression.
10 SYNTHETIC FUELS↗