THE PROBLEMS OF SPACE RESEARCH
Space research problems in space materials, guidance and control components, propulsion, electric power source, and solar flares
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Space research problems in space materials, guidance and control components, propulsion, electric power source, and solar flares
Space research - astronomy, lunar & planetary research, biology, solar atmosphere, sterilization and celestial mechanics
Space research and effect on other branches of science, especially applied mechanics
Space research requirements - space laboratory for providing information for future manned space flight
Space research centrifuge for measuring zero g and g sensitive time dependent phenomena, discussing radius, mechanization and integration into space vehicle
Recent space research in physical sciences - literature summary and discussion
The Universities Space Research Association received an award of Cooperative Agreement #NCC5-356 on September 29, 1998. The mission of this activity, know as the Cooperative Program in Space Sciences (CPSS), is to conduct space science research and leading-edge instrumentation and technology development, enable research by the space sciences communities, and to expedite the effective dissemination of space science research, technology, data, and information to the educational community and the general public. To fulfill this mission, USRA recruits and maintains a staff of scientific researchers, operates a series of guest investigator facilities, organizes scientific meetings and workshops, and encourages various interactions with students and university faculty members.
The Universities Space Research Association received an award of Cooperative Agreement NCC5-356 on September 29, 1998. The mission of this activity, known as the Cooperative Program in Space Sciences (CPSS), is to conduct space science research and leading-edge instrumentation and technology development, enable research by the space sciences communities, and to expedite the effective dissemination of space science research, technology, data, and information to the educational community and the general public. To fulfill this mission, USRA recruits and maintains a staff of scientific researchers, operates a series of guest investigator facilities, organizes scientific meetings and workshops, and encourages various interactions with students and university faculty members.
Northeast High Magnet School of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is a proud sponsor of the Space Research Center (SPARC). SPARC, a model program of the Medical, Engineering, and Aerospace Magnet school, provides talented students the capability to successfully exercise full simulations of NASA manned missions. These simulations included low-Earth Shuttle missions and Apollo lunar missions in the past, and will focus on a planetary mission to Mars this year. At the end of each scholastic year, a simulated mission, lasting between one and eight days, is performed involving 75 students as specialists in seven teams The groups are comprised of Flight Management, Spacecraft Communications (SatCom), Computer Networking, Spacecraft Design and Engineering, Electronics, Rocketry, Robotics, and Medical teams in either the mission operations center or onboard the spacecraft. Software development activities are also required in support of these simulations The objective of this paper is to present the accomplishments, technology innovations, interactions, and an overview of SPARC with an emphasis on how the program's educational activities parallel NASA mission support and how this education is preparing student for the space frontier.
The mission of this activity, known as the Cooperative Program in Space Sciences (CPSS), is to conduct space science research and leading-edge instrumentation and technology development, enable research by the space sciences communities, and to expedite the effective dissemination of space science research, technology, data, and information to the educational community and the general public. To fulfill this mission, the Universities Space Research Association (USRA) recruits and maintains a staff of scientific researchers, operates a series of guest investigator facilities, organizes scientific meetings and workshops, and encourages various interactions with students and university faculty members. This paper is the final report from this now completed Cooperative Agreement.
In 1989, the Space Studies Board created the Task Group on Priorities in Space Research to determine whether scientists should take a role in recommending priorities for long-term space research initiatives and, if so, to analyze the priority-setting problem in this context and develop a method by which such priorities could be established. After answering the first question in the affirmative in a previous report, the task group set out to accomplish the second task. The basic assumption in developing a priority-setting process is that a reasoned and structured approach for ordering competing initiatives will yield better results than other ways of proceeding. The task group proceeded from the principle that the central criterion for evaluating a research initiative must be its scientific merit -- the value of the initiative to the proposing discipline and to science generally. The group developed a two-stage methodology for priority setting and constructed a procedure and format to support the methodology. The first of two instruments developed was a standard format for structuring proposals for space research initiatives. The second instrument was a formal, semiquantitative appraisal procedure for evaluating competing proposals. This report makes available complete templates for the methodology, including the advocacy statement and evaluation forms, as well as an 11-step schema for a priority-setting process. From the beginning of its work, the task group was mindful that the issue of priority setting increasingly pervades all of federally supported science and that its work would have implications extending beyond space research. Thus, although the present report makes no recommendations for action by NASA or other government agencies, it provides the results of the task group's work for the use of others who may study priority-setting procedures or take up the challenge of implementing them in the future.
The Microgravity and Strategic research at Marshall s Biological and Physical Space Research Laboratory will be reviewed. The environment in orbit provides a unique opportunity to study Materials Science and Biotechnology in the absence of sedimentation and convection. There are a number of peer-selected investigations that have been selected to fly on the Space Station that have been conceived and are led by Marshall s Biological and Physical Research Laboratory s scientists. In addition to Microgravity research the Station will enable research in "Strategic" Research Areas that focus on enabling humans to live, work, and explore the solar system safely. New research in Radiation Protection, Strategic Molecular Biology, and In-Space Fabrication will be introduced.
International cooperation in space research
Investigators are using light, scanning and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) methods to investigate the effects of microgravity on the development, maintenance and aging of biological systems. The capabilities of the spacelab for life sciences research in space will be described. Among the many results to be discussed are the effects of microgravity on amphibian fertilization and early development, and on the rodent musculoskeletal and neural systems. Xenopus laevis eggs fertilized in space developed normally during and after an eight day spaceflight. Ultrastructural studies of rodent tissue demonstrated that spaceflight-induced atrophy of antigravity skeletal muscles renders muscle fibers susceptible to structural failure upon return to weight bearing postflight. Principle TEM changes in neuromuscular junctions are the decrease or absence of synaptic vesicles and degeneration of axon terminals. In bone, architectural rather than compositional changes may be the primary perturbation. Thus, many techniques used on Earth (such as density determinations) would not detect significant changes in bone strength. An increment in synaptic number and changes in synapse distribution occur in peripheral gravity sensors. There is a decrease in muscarinic cholinergic receptor density in the striatum. Striatal receptor changes suggest spaceflight-related alterations in motor activity. Opportunities for future life sciences research in space will be discussed.
Piloted simulators for space research including rendezvous, docking, lunar and Earth landing, lunar walking and orbital operations
For a number of years, space research has been primarily conducted with sounding rockets and orbiting satellites. The use of satellites has disadvantages related to cost and the long lead time from design to launch, while a drawback in the case of sounding rockets is the short flight time of only a few minutes. The development of the Shuttle led to the proposal to employ for space research an autonomous free-flying payload deployed and recovered by the Shuttle. The proposed payload, called SPEAR (Small Payload Ejection and Recovery), looked very much like a rocket payload. Subsequently, the payload developed into a more compact form, and its name became Spartan-1. Attention is given to the demands of space research, the Spartan-1 payload, the payload functional control system, the thermal control system, the Spartan-1 mission, and the future of Spartan.
This report describes the motivation for and a strategy to enhance the NATO Research and Technology Organisation's (RTO) current space research effort to reflect NATO's growing military dependence on space systems. Such systems and services provided by these systems are critical elements of military operations. NATO uses space systems for operational planning and support, communication, radio navigation, multi-sensor and multi-domain demonstrations. Such systems are also used to promote regional stability. A quantitative analysis of work related to space in the NATO RTO showed that during the period of 1998 - 2004, 5% of the research pursued in the NATO RTO has been clearly focused on space applications. Challenging environmental and organizational barriers for increasing RTO space research were identified. In part, these include lack of sufficient space expertise representation on panels, the military sensitivity of space, current panel work loads and the need for specific technical recommendations from peers. A strategy for enhancing space research in the RTO is to create a limited-life Space Advisory Group (SAG) composed of Space Expert Consultants who are panel members with appropriate expertise and additional expertise from the nations. The SAG will recommend and find support in the nations for specific technical activities related to space in the areas of Space Science, Remote Sensing Data Analysis, Spacecraft Systems, Surveillance and Early Warning, Training and Simulation and Policy. An RTO Space Advisory Group will provide an organizational mechanism to gain recognition of RTO as a forum for trans-Atlantic defence space research and to enhance space research activities.
Manned flight simulation for space research