Results for “Stealth surfactants”

DOE OSTI2026

Interfacial Inversion of Stealth Surfactants

Amphiphilic macromolecular surfactants segregate to liquid–liquid interfaces, thereby reducing the interfacial tension and free energy. Here, we investigated “stealth surfactants” in the form of core–shell bottlebrush polymers comprised of pH-responsive diblock copolymer side chains forming a hydrophilic core and a hydrophobic shell, enabling solubility in oil. At liquid–liquid interfaces, these polymers undergo a structural “inversion”, with hydrophilic blocks segregating into the aqueous phase and hydrophobic blocks residing in the oil phase. The reconfiguration kinetics and surfactant properties are influenced by multiple factors, including the molecular weights of the backbone and side chain components, the hydrophilic-to-hydrophobic balance of the side chains, and the pH of the aqueous phase. An observed nonmonotonic dependence of interfacial tension with time is attributed to a progressive structural inversion, where the projected area of the macromolecule onto the interface decreases. To validate this inversion hypothesis, interfacial properties were characterized by sum-frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy, which revealed configurational changes of the core–shell bottlebrush polymers at the fluid interface and revealed a pH-dependent interfacial coverage. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations supported these experimental findings, showing that the pH-responsive core and hydrophobic shell assume a time-averaged configuration with orientations parallel and perpendicular to the plane of the interface, respectively. These findings open routes to design multistimuli-responsive polymeric surfactants and compatibilizers, expanding their potential applications in advanced interfacial systems.

Stealth surfactants↗

DOE OSTI2023

Star Block Copolymers at Homopolymer Interfaces: Conformation and Compatibilization

Star block copolymers (s-BCPs), comprised of multiple linear diblock copolymers joined at a central point, are shown to segregate to the interface between two immiscible homopolymers that are identical to the blocks of the s-BCPs. The s-BCPs undergo a configurational transition at the interface, with different blocks of copolymers being embedded in their respective homopolymers, thereby bridging the interface and promoting adhesion. A series of 4-arm s-BCPs were synthesized with hydrogenated or deuterated polystyrene (PS/dPS) as the core block and poly(2-vinylpyridine) (P2VP) as the corona block, which was directly placed at the interface between the two homopolymers. Neutron reflectivity (NR) was used to determine the concentration profiles of the PS homopolymer, s-BCP core blocks, and P2VP total segments under equilibrium. The investigation varies the molecular weight (MW) and the total number of s-BCPs at the interface. Self-consistent-field theory (SCFT) was also employed to calculate the concentration profiles of the components at the interface, which were in excellent agreement with experimental results. The NR showed that the interfacial width between the homopolymers increased with the increasing number of s-BCPs at the interface up to a saturation limit. Beyond this limit, additional s-BCPs were released into the corona-miscible phase as unimolecular micelles. For a comparable interlayer thickness of s-BCPs at the interface, lower MW s-BCPs generated a broader interface. SCFT analysis suggested that, at the same packing density, the arms of the low MW s-BCPs align more parallel to the interface, while the arms of high MW s-BCPs adopt a more normal orientation, like their linear BCP counterparts. Furthermore, it was also observed that the core blocks, constrained by the junction points, were oriented more parallel and closer to the interface than the corona blocks. The phase behavior of the polymer blends revealed that s-BCP additives can efficiently reduce the domain size, with the low MW yielding smaller domain sizes due to the greater reduction in the interfacial energy and the high MW arresting phase separation due to their higher binding energy and a jamming of the interfacial assemblies. Asymmetric double cantilever beam (ADCB) tests demonstrated that s-BCPs promoted adhesion more efficiently than their linear BCP counterparts due to stronger binding energy per molecule, suggesting a more efficient compatibilizer for polymer upcycling. In conclusion, the results from these studies provide fundamental insights into the assembly of s-BCPs at homopolymer interfaces, the reduction of domain size, and promotion of adhesion, providing a strategy for the use of s-BCPs as stealth surfactants and universal compatibilizers.

interface↗