Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Sulfide electrolytes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Sulfide electrolyte additive enables multi-ionic transfer pathways in alkaline iron redox

Traditional alkaline iron (Fe) batteries rely on the conversion reaction between Fe and Fe(OH) 2 but suffer from hydrogen generation upon Fe formation on charging. Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox is a promising anode reaction for alkaline Fe batteries, as it alleviates the formation of hydrogen gas during charging. However, achieving complete Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox with a one-electron transfer reaction is challenging due to the formation of electrochemically inert Fe 3 O 4 materials. Here, we demonstrate that an alkaline sulfide-containing electrolyte facilitates the reversible multi-ion transfer and transport pathways within (and beyond) the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox system, including Fe(OH) 2 /Fe 3 O 4 conversion, intercalation of hydrosulfide into layered Fe(OH) 2 , and hydrogen deposition, mediated by hydroxyl ions, hydrosulfide anions, and protons, respectively. This multi-ionic charge storage mechanism delivers a compelling discharge capacity of up to 330 mA h g −1 , as determined by chronopotentiometry measurements at a current density of 0.1 A g −1 , exceeding the theoretical iron redox capacity solely relying on Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox (∼299 mA h g −1 ). Our study will highlight the potential of alkaline iron redox as a green anode reaction for various aqueous energy storage systems by utilizing a scalable and low-concentration hydrosulfide electrolyte additive.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Adverse Effects of Trace Non-polar Binder on Ion Transport in Free-standing Sulfide Solid Electrolyte Separators

Sulfide solid-state electrolyte (SE) possesses high room-temperature ionic conductivity. However, fabrication of the free-standing, sheet-type thin sulfide SE film electrolyte to enable all-solid-state batteries to deliver high energy and power density remains challenging. Herein we show that argyrodite sulfide (Li 6 PS 5 Cl) SE can be slurry cast to form free-standing films with low (≤5 wt%) loadings of poly(isobutylene) (PIB) binder. Two factors contribute to a lower areal specific resistance (ASR) of the thin film SEs benchmarked to the pristine powder pellet SSE counterparts: i) 1–2 orders reduced thickness and ii) reasonably comparable ionic conductivity at room temperature after the isostatic pressing process. Nevertheless, an increasing polymer binder loading inevitably introduced voids in the thin film SEs, compromising anode/electrolyte interfacial ion transport. Our findings highlight that electrolyte/electrode interfacial stability, as well as the selection of slurry components, including sulfide SE, binder, and solvent, play essential roles in thin film sulfide electrolyte development.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Integrated electro- and chemical characterization of sulfide-based solid-state electrolytes

Sulfide solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) represent a critical advancement towards enabling next-generation lithium metal batteries. However, a profound knowledge gap remains in understanding the structure–property relationships inherent to these sulfide SSEs. Electrochemical assessment and spectroscopic tools, such as Raman spectroscopy, offer bench-top ready, non-invasive, powerful avenues for operando and in situ analyses. Despite this potential, the integration of these methodologies, particularly for real-time interrogation, is markedly under-investigated. This review endeavors to catalog the use of diverse electrochemical techniques and spectroscopic tools in elucidating the structural and functional nuances of sulfide SSEs. Through the harmonization of these multifaceted evaluation strategies, our objective is to chart a course towards optimized sulfide SSEs, thereby aiding in the development of informed protocols for a deeper comprehension and understanding of the structure–property relationship and interfacial engineered design of solid-state batteries using sulfide-based SSEs.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Methods and materials for protection of sulfide glass solid electrolytes

A sulfide glass solid electrolyte sheet can be protected from reaction with moisture by a thin metal layer coating converted to a thin electrochemically functional and protective compound layer. The converted protective compound layer is electrochemically functional in that it allows for through transport of lithium ions.

Visco, Steven J.↗
DOE OSTI2024

Methods and materials for protection of sulfide glass solid electrolytes

A sulfide glass solid electrolyte sheet can be protected from reaction with moisture by a thin metal layer coating converted to a thin electrochemically functional and protective compound layer. The converted protective compound layer is electrochemically functional in that it allows for through transport of lithium ions.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2023

Hot Pressing of Reinforced Li-NMC All-Solid State Batteries with Sulfide Glass Electrolyte

The performance of solid-state batteries (SSBs) with sulfide solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) is limited because they are 10 - 30% porous. Porosity limits energy density of the composite cathode and provides a conduit for Li-metal deposits through the separator if operating specifications (e.g. current density, operating temperature, and pressure) are not strictly controlled. This project focused on demonstrating that hot press cell processing and appropriately formulated sulfide glass SSEs can help eliminate porosity to enable SSBs with energy density of ≥ 350 Wh/kg. The objective of the project was to research, develop, and test SSBs capable of achieving program performance metrics by implementing appropriately formulated sulfide glass SSEs and hot press cell processing in a dry room environment. In the composite cathode, hot pressing helps eliminate porosity to increase energy density by enabling thick composite cathodes with high active material loading. In the separator, hot pressing helps eliminate porosity that may otherwise provide a conduit for Li metal deposits to short the cell.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Predictive Engineering of Interfaces and Cathodes for High-Performance All Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

The primary goal of this project is to leverage data-driven methods and machine learning strategies to develop accurate multi-physics models for all-solid-state Li-S battery (ASLSB) materials that can capture electrochemical and transport phenomena over atomic to mesoscopic length/timescales. These models will be rigorously validated by synthesis and advanced characterization experiments. The team will leverage the predictive power of these models, alongside synthesis/characterization experiments and battery fabrication to address longstanding issues at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces in ASLSBs. The project’s proposed technology involves the following: (1) halide-doped solid sulfide electrolytes that can concurrently provide high Li + ion conductivity and suppress dendrite growth; (2) novel mesoporous cathode composed of super-P and carbon nanotubes co-infiltrated with sulfur and sulfide electrolyte, which hold potential to allow high sulfur loading and optimal ion/electron pathways; and (3) functionalization of sulfide electrolyte with ionic liquids to improve physical contact and minimize impedance at the cathode/electrolyte interface. Successful development of proposed predictive models (at multiple scales) will bridge this knowledge gap and will advance fundamental understanding of reaction chemistry, kinetics, charge transfer, and dendrite growth at electrified SSIs. This will enable predictive design of effective strategies to mitigate interfacial problems in ASSLSBs, including poor interfacial contact, interfacial impedance to Li + ion transport, and poor electron/ion conduction within cathodes. Ultimately, the fundamental knowledge gained will lead to development of high-performance ASSLSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Interlayer Design for Halide Electrolytes in All‐Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries

Abstract All‐solid‐state lithium‐metal batteries (ASSLMBs) are promising for transportation electrification due to their superior safety and high energy density. Lithium halide electrolytes provide excellent processing flexibility, high ionic conductivity, and anodic stability (>4.1 V), making them highly compatible with high‐voltage cathodes, surpassing sulfide electrolytes (<2.1 V). Nevertheless, halide electrolytes suffer from low cathodic stability and form an electronically conductive interphase with lithium, resulting in a critical current density (CCD) of nearly zero. Herein, Li 3 YbCl 6 electrolytes are synthesized that are kinetically stable with lithium by forming an electronic insulating solid electrolyte interphase. Guided by critical overpotential criteria, a PI 3 interlayer is designed that transforms into Li 6 PI 3 upon contact with lithium, substantially reducing the interfacial resistance of Li 3 YbCl 6 against lithium to 34 Ω and achieving a high critical overpotential of 114 mV. By substituting Yb with Lu, Li 3 LuCl 6 electrolytes with Li 6 PI 3 interlayers reach a CCD of 1.0 mA cm −2 at a capacity of 1.0 mAh cm −2 , comparable to sulfide electrolytes but with higher oxidation stability. Additionally, Li 6 PI 3 enables stable cycling of Li//Li cells with Li 3 LuCl 6 electrolytes at 0.5 mA cm −2 for 400 cycles and maintains 86.5% capacity in Li//LiCoO 2 cells after 220 cycles at 30 °C, paving the way for high‐performance ASSLMBs.

Chemistry↗
DOE OSTI2025

Binder Effects on Processing, Mechanical Properties, and Performance of Thin Sulfide Solid‐State Electrolytes

All‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) offer enhanced safety and energy density compared to conventional lithium‐ion batteries by replacing flammable liquid electrolytes with solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs). Among SSEs, sulfide‐based electrolytes exhibit high ionic conductivity and mechanical deformability, making them promising candidates for next‐generation energy storage. However, their practical implementation is hindered by interfacial instability, mechanical brittleness, and challenges in fabricating ultrathin electrolyte membranes (<30 μm) with robust mechanical integrity. Here, this study systematically examines the influence of polymeric binders—polyisobutylene, hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubber, and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS)—on the structural, mechanical, and electrochemical performance of thin sulfide SSE membranes. Key findings reveal that SEBS enables the fabrication of ultrathin, uniform membranes, while binder elasticity significantly affects structural stability during cycling. Operando stack pressure measurements indicate that binder properties directly influence adhesion force for LPSCl particles, influencing their stabilizing cycling period. These results underscore the critical role of polymer binders beyond mechanical reinforcement, positioning them as essential design variables in sulfide SSE engineering. By linking binder chemistry to processability and electrochemical performance, this study provides insights into optimizing sulfide SSEs, advancing their commercial viability in ASSBs.

argyrodite sulfide electrolyte↗
DOE OSTI2024

Surface treatment of a sulfide glass solid electrolyte layer

Chemically treating ionically conductive sulfide glass solid electrolyte separators or separator layers can improve performance. In particular, treatment involving chemically etching a surface or surface region of the sulfide glass separator to blunt, lessen or remove edge defects or surface flaws, and/or to enhance surface smoothness is cost effective, reliable and well suited for high production environments compared to physical methods of removing scratches or smoothing surfaces, such as mechanical grinding and polishing.

Visco, Steven J.↗
DOE OSTI2025

Pushing the Limits: Maximizing Energy Density in Silicon Sulfide Solid‐State Batteries

Here, for the first time, we demonstrate a silicon solid-state battery (SSB) architecture that achieves >400 Wh kg −1 , approaching the theoretical limit for silicon-based SSBs. This configuration features a 99.9 wt% micro-Si, a thin sulfide solid electrolyte (SSE), and a high-loading NMC811. Key to these results is strategically selecting and evaluating the processing techniques, whether wet or dry, for the negative electrode, positive electrode and thin sheet-type SSE. Excessive lithium incorporation into the silicon host, beyond the Li 3.75 +Si phase to form a LiSi composite, is essential to match the high capacity of the positive electrode. This SSB achieves over 1000 cycles for a 2 mAh cm −2 with ≈80% capacity retention and 94% capacity retention for 3 mAh cm −2 over 500 cycles at 25 °C. Post analysis identifies the primary capacity decay mechanisms as oxidation at the NMC/SSE interface and structural disruptions within NMC. Meanwhile, the Si electrode maintains a robust solid-electrolyte interphase layer, minimizing capacity decay. This study highlights the necessity for improved NMC coatings, lattice oxygen stabilization, and a durable positive electrode-electrolyte interface to improve the long-term stability of SSBs. Strategies leading to a single-layer pouch cell SSB exceeding 400 Wh kg −1 are developed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Suppressing Atmospheric Degradation of Sulfide-Based Solid Electrolytes via Ultrathin Metal Oxide Layers

Sulfide-based solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) are promising materials with superior Li-ion conductivity; however, their poor atmospheric stability limits commercial manufacturing at scale. Here, we investigate the impact of ultrathin metal oxide layers deposited via atomic layer deposition (ALD) on the stability of Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl). Al 2 O 3 layers grown directly on LPSCl particles significantly stabilize the surface chemistry and Li-ion transport properties relative to uncoated material upon exposure to both an ambient atmosphere (22% relative humidity, RH) and humidified O 2 (100% RH). Detailed investigations indicate that coatings impede the surface and bulk degradation kinetics of exposed materials, even for coatings as thin as ∼1 Å. Furthermore, this suggests that stabilization is due to more than just a physical barrier. Shifts in valence band edge positions of coated LPSCl indicate that ALD coatings alter the surface electronic structure and resulting oxidation tendency of underlying LPSCl, suggesting new avenues to improving the environmental stability of sulfide SSEs.

Atmospheric chemistry↗
DOE OSTI2025

Electrolyte strategies for practically viable all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

All-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries are a promising platform due to their high gravimetric energy density and enhanced safety. However, they face numerous challenges that currently obstruct commercial adoption. The key to overcoming these challenges lies in the rational selection and targeted development of solid-state electrolytes, where different materials classes present distinct trade-offs between performance and practicality. We assert that sulfide electrolytes offer the best compatibility with the cathode and anode requirements for practical sulfur cells, with halides and borohydrides also showing potential for use in the cathode with further development. We provide cell-level target parameters to ensure that the field moves consistently towards commercial relevance. Looking forward, we call for the adoption of the chlorinated argyrodite with a composition range of Li 6-x PS 5-x Cl 1+x (x = 0 - 0.5) as a standardized solid-state electrolyte to enable rigorous benchmarking across the field and accelerate battery development.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Recent Progress on Dominant Sulfide‐Type Solid‐State Na Superionic Conductors for Solid‐State Sodium Batteries

Abstract Over the past decade, solid‐state batteries have garnered significant attentions due to their potentials to deliver high energy density and excellent safety. Considering the abundant sodium (Na) resources in contrast to lithium (Li), the development of sodium‐based batteries has become increasingly appealing. Sulfide‐based superionic conductors are widely considered as promising solid eletcrolytes (SEs) in solid‐state Na batteries due to the features of high ionic conductivity and cold‐press densification. In recent years, tremendous efforts have been made to investigate sulfide‐based Na‐ion conductors on their synthesis, compositions, conductivity, and the feasibility in batteries. However, there are still several challenges to overcome for their practical applications in high performance solid‐state Na batteries. This article provides a comprehensive update on the synthesis, structure, and properties of three dominant sulfide‐based Na‐ion conductors (Na 3 PS 4 , Na 3 SbS 4 , and Na 11 Sn 2 PS 12 ), and their families that have a variety of anion and cation doping. Additionally, the interface stability of these sulfide electrolytes toward the anode is reviewed, as well as the electrochemical performance of solid‐state Na batteries based on different types of cathode materials (metal sulfides, oxides, and organics). Finally, the perspective and outlook for the development and practical utilization of sulfide‐based SE in solid‐state batteries are discussed.

Guo, Xiaolin↗
DOE OSTI2024

Phase Field Modeling of Pressure Induced Densification in Solid Electrolytes

Adoption of dense and homogeneous solid electrolytes can possibly mitigate the propagation of lithium dendrites and enable lithium metal anodes. Application of external pressure helps to minimize the sintering temperature in oxide ceramics and can potentially densify softer sulfide electrolytes even under room temperature conditions. Here, a previously developed phase field-based computational scheme for predicting the high-temperature sintering-induced densification of oxide ceramic solid electrolytes is extended in the present context to capture the influence of external pressure for densifying solid electrolytes. Two different bulk deformation mechanisms, namely, "reorganization" and "creep deformation," are dominant under external pressure, which is different from the surface and grain-boundary diffusion-induced densification of solid electrolytes that occurs during high temperature sintering. External pressure also increases the points of contact between the particles, which further enhances the propensity of diffusion-induced sintering process. Results obtained from simulations indicate that densification under external pressure is independent of the solid electrolyte particle morphology. Finally, a phase map is generated between applied pressure and temperature for achieving complete densification of oxide ceramics, which can possibly guide the synthesis of thin and dense solid electrolyte separators.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗