Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Supercooled Large Drops (SLD)”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Supercooled Large Drop Velocity Measurement in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

An experiment was conducted in the Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) at the NASA Glenn Research Center to measure the velocity of supercooled large drops (SLD) in the test section of the tunnel. Previous experiments in the IRT suggested that supercooled large drops passing through the test section of the tunnel do not move at the same velocity as the surrounding air flow. The difference between drop velocity and tunnel air velocity is called slip velocity. The slip velocity is important for determining the exact nature of SLD icing simulation in the IRT. It can impact the ice growth process because of its effect on drop cooling rate during transit from the spray bars to the test section. It can also affect the amount of splashing that occurs upon impact. Slip velocity is an important flow parameter to determine how far the current facility capabilities can be extended into the SLD regime. Initial measurement data analysis of the drop velocities indicates that drops with diameter larger than about 100 to 200 µm experience velocity slip.

SLD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SLD Instrumentation in Icing Wind Tunnels – Investigation Overview

A collaborative effort to better understand cloud characterization probes in Supercooled Large Drop (SLD) conditions, as well the ability to simulate these conditions in several icing wind tunnels, was undertaken by NASA, NRCC, CIRA, ECCC, FAA and Met Analytics, Inc. Both drop sizing and liquid water content, LWC, were measured with various probes using current to emerging technologies. To ensure the best possible data quality from the newest probes, the probe manufacturers, SEA, Inc. and Artium, Inc. were invited to support testing and data analysis efforts. A common set of probes was identified to test in each of the three participating facilities: NRCC’s Altitude Icing Wind Tunnel, NASA’s Icing Research Tunnel and CIRA’s Icing Wind Tunnel. From the common set of probes, a subset were identified to use for comparison across the three facilities. These were the CDP-2 and 2D-S for drop sizing, and the Multi-wire for LWC. The LWC value was also checked by measuring the ice accretion thickness under hard rime conditions on a NACA-0012 airfoil. A common test matrix with sweeps in both LWC and median volume diameter, MVD, was developed. Each facility achieved these conditions as determined by their own calibration. The MVD ranged from 20 to at least 200 um, and LWC ranged from 0.5 to 3 g/m3. The comparison probes tested at common conditions in each facility were intended to allow for a direct comparison, and check of potential facility bias.

Icing Wind Tunnel↗
NASA NTRS2018

Further Examinations of Bimodal SLD Ice Accretion in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a 72-inch chord NACA 23012 airfoil model resulting from an exposure to a Supercooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each accretion. The icing conditions used in the test matrix were based upon previously measured ice shapes on the same model to connect the current database to previously measured information. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from equivalent mono-modal drop size distributions were obtained and compared. Results indicate that the ice shapes resulting from the bimodal drop size distributions had higher mass and volume values than their mono-modal distribution equivalents as well as having icing limits that extended further back on the chord of the model.

Aircraft↗
NASA NTRS2019

The Influence of SLD Drop Size Distributions on Ice Accretion in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a 21-inch chord NACA0012 model and a 72-inch chord NACA 23012 airfoil model resulting from an exposure to a Supercooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each accretion. The icing conditions used in the test matrix were based upon previously used conditions on the same models but with an alternate approach to evaluation of drop distribution effects. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from equivalent monomodal drop size distributions were obtained and compared. Results indicate that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions had similar shapes, but the bimodal distributions had greater mass and volume measurements and icing limits that extended further back on the chord of the model.

Potapczuk, Mark G.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Bimodal SLD Ice Accretion on Swept NACA 0012 Airfoil Models

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a swept 15-inch chord NACA0012 model and a swept 36-inch chord NACA0012 airfoil model resulting from an exposure to a Supercooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each accretion. The icing conditions were based on a series of reference conditions that were previously used to generate ice shapes on these models. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from equivalent monomodal drop size distributions were obtained and compared. Results indicate that the ice shapes and mass values from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions were the same within the range of repeatability for the conditions tested in this campaign.

Icing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Bimodal SLD Ice Accretion on a CRM Midspan Wing Section Model

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a 65 per cent scale version of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Supercooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from equivalent monomodal drop size distributions were obtained and compared. Results indicate that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions had equivalent mass and volume, as expected with this approach. Note: No audio portion for this record, additionally slide 9 has a playable video but must be downed in order to view.

Icing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15µm to 460 µm. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

Icing cloud instruments↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15m to 460 m. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

o Aircraft Icing↗
NASA NTRS2021

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15um to 460 um. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

o Aircraft Icing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Supercooled Large Droplet Ice Formations from Flight Research

This presentation shows ice formations resulting from research flights in supercooled large droplet conditions (SLD) using NASA’s Twin Otter research aircraft. The flight research was part of a 3-year collaboration between NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the National Center for Atmospheric Research. SLD conditions were occasionally encountered in the flight testing and those results are reported herein. The presentation was part of a SLD Engineering Tools Development Workshop in 2004 and is being routed through STRIVES retroactively for public dissemination on NTRS.

Twin Otter↗
NASA NTRS2000

Freezing Rain as an In-Flight Icing Hazard

Exposure to supercooled large drops (SLD-subfreezing water droplets with diameters greater than approx. 50 microns) can pose a significant threat to the safety of some aircraft. Although SLD includes both freezing drizzle (FZDZ) and freezing rain (FZRA), much of the SLD research and development of operational SLD forecast tools has focused on FZDZ and ignored FZRA, regarding is as less of a hazard to aviation. This paper provides a counterpoint case study that demonstrates FZRA as a significant in-flight icing hazard. The case study is based on flight and meteorological data from a joint NASA/FAA/NCAR SLD icing research project collected on February 4, 1998. The NASA Twin Otter Icing Research Aircraft experienced a prolonged exposure to "classical" FZRA that formed extensive ice formations including ridges and nodules on the wing and tail, and resulted in a substantial performance penalty. Although the case study provides only a singular FZRA event with one aircraft type, it is clear that classical FZRA can pose a significant in-flight icing hazard, and should not be ignored when considering SLD issues.

Bernstein, Ben C.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Preliminary Study of Inter-Facility LWC Differences in Appendix C and Supercooled Large Droplet Conditions due to Calibration Instruments

The simulation of clouds containing Supercooled Large Droplets has received increasing attention due to the introduction of Appendix O and future associated requirements for means of compliance. Supercooled Large Droplet conditions can cover four orders of magnitude in drop sizes, imposing a larger instrument measurement challenge than for Appendix C conditions. Wind tunnel facilities have adopted different instrumentation for liquid water content measurement, with fundamentally different principles of operation. In order to explore the comparability of the different instruments used for Appendix C and SLD measurement, and its impact on confidence in measurements used for means of compliance, a project was established to conduct a series of dedicated tests at three wind tunnel facilities. To date, liquid water content measurements have been completed using a Multi-Element sensor as the common instrument at two of the facilities. The data have provided preliminary information suggesting that substantial inter-facility differences likely exist in liquid water content estimates in Supercooled Large Droplet conditions that appear to be largely attributable to the choice of calibration instruments. These results are dependent on the assumption that the Multi-Element probe would produce equivalent measurements at the two facilities if the liquid water content were the same, regardless of other environmental differences that may exist between the two facilities. Planned further testing with other liquid water content measurement techniques may provide further information to confirm or refute the results of this study.

aircraft icing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Test Results for the SEA Ice Crystal Detector (ICD) under SLD Conditions at the NASA IRT

The Science Engineering Associates hot-wire Ice Crystal Detector was tested under Appendix C and Supercooled Large Drop Conditions at the NASA Icing Research Tunnel, with the purpose of comparing the measurements to the tunnel LWC calibration, and to test the performance of the mixed-phase retrievals of the probe. The liquid water content measured by the total water content sensor of the probe agreed well with the tunnel calibration over a wide range of MVDs, not unexpectedly since the tunnel was calibrated with a similar Multiwire hot-wire probe. A scale factor difference of about 7% was attributed to the lack of an efficiency correction for the Ice Crystal Detector at smaller median volume diameters, and typical sample area uncertainties of liquid water content devices. In addition, the simultaneous equations that are used to retrieve liquid and ice water contents were tested under liquid and glaciated conditions. Using constant ice and water efficiencies for each wire, the equations were found to produce a large and false ice water content retrieval in large median volume diameter liquid cases. By applying a liquid efficiency to the liquid water content sensor that varied with median volume diameter, retrievals were improved such that false ice water content was less than ±10% of the total water content out to the 460 μm median volume diameter limit of the testing. The probe was also tested in glaciated conditions by freezing out a small median volume diameter spray. Using constant ice efficiencies for the two sensors provided from aircraft measurements, the retrieved ice water content was about 40% higher than expected for the case presented, likely due to the ice efficiencies that were used from aircraft measurements of natural clouds being too low for the tunnel’s glaciated sprays. Application of ice efficiencies that vary with particle size and potentially other parameters will be explored for future improvement of retrievals.

Air Craft Icing↗
NASA NTRS2021

Test Results for the SEA Ice Crystal Detector (ICD) under SLD Conditions at the NASA IRT

The Science Engineering Associates hot-wire Ice Crystal Detector was tested under Appendix C and Supercooled Large Drop Conditions at the NASA Icing Research Tunnel, with the purpose of comparing the measurements to the tunnel LWC calibration, and to test the performance of the mixed-phase retrievals of the probe. The liquid water content measured by the total water content sensor of the probe agreed well with the tunnel calibration over a wide range of MVDs, not unexpectedly since the tunnel was calibrated with a similar Multiwire hot-wire probe. A scale factor difference of about 7% was attributed to the lack of an efficiency correction for the Ice Crystal Detector at smaller median volume diameters, and typical sample area uncertainties of liquid water content devices. In addition, the simultaneous equations that are used to retrieve liquid and ice water contents were tested under liquid and glaciated conditions. Using constant ice and water efficiencies for each wire, the equations were found to produce a large and false ice water content retrieval in large median volume diameter liquid cases. By applying a liquid efficiency to the liquid water content sensor that varied with median volume diameter, retrievals were improved such that false ice water content was less than ±10% of the total water content out to the 460 μm median volume diameter limit of the testing. The probe was also tested in glaciated conditions by freezing out a small median volume diameter spray. Using constant ice efficiencies for the two sensors provided from aircraft measurements, the retrieved ice water content was about 40% higher than expected for the case presented, likely due to the ice efficiencies that were used from aircraft measurements of natural clouds being too low for the tunnel’s glaciated sprays. Application of ice efficiencies that vary with particle size and potentially other parameters will be explored for future improvement of retrievals.

o Aircraft Icing↗
NASA NTRS2003

Experimental Study of Supercooled Large Droplet Impingement Effects

Typically, ice accretion results from small supercooled droplets (droplets cooled below freezing), usually 5 to 50 microns in diameter, which can freeze upon impact with an aircraft surface. Recently, ice accretions resulting from supercooled large droplet (SLD) conditions have become a safety concern. Current ice accretion codes have been extensively tested for Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 25, Appendix C icing conditions but have not been validated for SLD icing conditions. This report presents experimental methods for investigating large droplet impingement dynamics and for obtaining small and large water droplet impingement data.

ICE ACCRETION CODE↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Preliminary Study of Inter-Facility LWC Differences in Appendix C and Supercooled Large Drop Conditions due to Calibration Instruments

The simulation of clouds containing Supercooled Large Droplets has received increasing attention due to the introduction of Appendix O and future associated requirements for means of compliance. Supercooled Large Droplet conditions can cover four orders of magnitude in drop sizes, imposing a larger instrument measurement challenge than for Appendix C conditions. Wind tunnel facilities have adopted different instrumentation for liquid water content measurement, with fundamentally different principles of operation. In order to explore the comparability of the different instruments used for Appendix C and SLD measurement, and its impact on confidence in measurements used for means of compliance, a project was established to conduct a series of dedicated tests at three wind tunnel facilities. To date, liquid water content measurements have been completed using a Multi-Element sensor as the common instrument at two of the facilities. The data have provided preliminary information suggesting that substantial inter-facility differences likely exist in liquid water content estimates in Supercooled Large Droplet conditions that appear to be largely attributable to the choice of calibration instruments. These results are dependent on the assumption that the Multi-Element probe would produce equivalent measurements at the two facilities if the liquid water content were the same, regardless of other environmental differences that may exist between the two facilities. Planned further testing with other liquid water content measurement techniques may provide further information to confirm or refute the results of this study.

aircraft icing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Characterization of Large Drop Velocity in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

This presentation presents experimental work conducted in the Icing Research Tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center to characterize the velocity of large drops in the tunnel test section. Some icing spray clouds with large-sized drops were generated with Mod1 nozzles at low nozzle air pressure of 2 to 4 psig for various tunnel air speeds. Drop diameters and drop velocities were measured via high-resolution imaging with a Particle Imaging Particle Tracking Velocimetry probe developed by Artium Technologies. The probe was mounted at four different locations aligned with the centerline of the test section from near the end of the contraction to the constant height test section part of the tunnel. CFD analyses were performed. It showed that the probe head geometry affects the local air flow between the prongs and in front of the probe. Initial analysis of the air velocity data during the test also indicated that the probe mounting stand has blockage effect on the local tunnel air velocity measurement by a Pitot static probe affixed on the mounting plate. Those findings were later verified in the Icing Research Tunnel using a new Pitot probe design with a linear motion system to measure the local tunnel air velocity with and without the probe. As a result, additional drop trajectory simulations as airflow moving towards the probe head were run for a Langmuir-D 7-bin drop size distribution of a spray cloud with a nominally large value of medium volumetric diameter. The simulation results helped identify a critical drop-size threshold of 300 µm above which the velocities of larger drops are not affected by the adverse pressure gradient generated by the probe head due to their large drop inertia. From the dimensional analysis of the drop velocity measurement data obtained, it showed that at the tunnel test section reference location a generalized empirical correlation was developed for the non-dimensional drop velocity as a function of the non-dimensional corrected drop diameter independent of the actual spraybar pressure settings and the tunnel air speeds. The generalized curve-fit correlation showed that the drop velocity was universally asymptotic to about 86 percent of the corresponding tunnel air speed at the test section reference location for the largest drop diameter captured by the probe. Further evaluation of this correlation is recommended to assess its applicability for Supercooled Large Drop icing scaling applications in the Icing Research Tunnel.

SLD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Characterization of Large Drop Velocity in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

This paper presents experimental work conducted in the Icing Research Tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center to characterize the velocity of large drops in the test section. Some icing spray clouds with large drops were generated with Mod1 nozzles at low nozzle air pressure of 2 to 4 psig for various tunnel air speeds. Drop diameters and drop velocities were measured via high-resolution imaging with a Particle Imaging Particle Tracking Velocimetry probe developed by Artium Technologies. The probe was mounted at four different locations aligned with the centerline of the test section from near the end of the contraction to the constant height test section part of the tunnel. CFD analyses were performed. It showed that the probe head geometry affects the local air flow in the measurement area of the probe between the prongs and in front of the probe. Initial analysis of the air velocity data during the test also indicated that the probe mounting stand has blockage effect on the local tunnel air velocity measurement by a pitot-static probe affixed on the mounting plate next to the stand. Those findings were later verified in the Icing Research Tunnel using a new pitot-static probe design with a linear motion system to measure the local tunnel air velocity with and without the probe. As a result, additional drop trajectory simulations were performed with the airflow moving towards the probe head with a Langmuir-D 7-bin distribution cloud containing large drops. The simulation results helped identify a critical drop-size threshold of 300 μm above which the velocities of larger drops are negligibly affected by the adverse pressure gradient generated by the probe head due to their large drop inertia. From the dimensional analysis of the drop velocity measurement data obtained, it showed that at the tunnel test section reference location a generalized empirical correlation was developed for the non-dimensional drop velocity as a function of the non-dimensional corrected drop diameter independent of the actual spraybar pressure settings and the tunnel air speeds. The generalized curve-fit correlation showed that the drop velocity was universally asymptotic to about 86 percent of the corresponding tunnel air speed at the test section reference location for the largest drop diameter captured by the probe. Further evaluation of this correlation is recommended to assess its applicability for Supercooled Large Drop icing scaling applications in the Icing Research Tunnel.

SLD↗