Summary of Ling-Temco-Vought feasibility studies
Turboprop, fan-in-wing, and propulsive wing concepts for V/STOL commercical transport aircraft
COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “TEMCO”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Conference on V/STOL and STOL aircraft
This compilation contains results of recent NASA research on problems associated with V/STOL and STOL aircraft. The first three sections include papers presented at the NASA Conference on V/STOL and STOL Aircraft held at the Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, on April 4 and 5, 1966. The fourth section presents three additional papers on research testing techniques that are particularly pertinent to the subject matter, but were not presented orally at the conference. Contributors include staff members from the Ames and Langley Research Centers of NASA and industrial representatives from Lockheed Aircraft Corporation; Ling-Temco-Vought, Incorporated; and The Boeing Company.
STOL AIRCRAFT↗
Comparison of wind-tunnel and flight results on a four-propeller tilt-wing configuration
Over the years aerodynamicists have learned to rely heavily on wind-tunnel-model results in predicting the aerodynamic characteristics of conventional aircraft configurations. With the development of V/STOL configurations which have high slipstream deflection angles. such as the four-propeller tilt-wing XC-142A V/STOL aircraft, the reliability of small-scale wind-tunnel-model results in predicting full-scale airplane characteristics needs to be reexamined. Extensive tests have been made by NASA on several sizes of wind-tunnel models of the XC-142A V/STOL configuration and by Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., on the airplane. These results show that models predict the slow-speed level-flight characteristics very well but that small models underpredict the descent capability of the airplane. Larger scale wind-tunnel models of approximately half size show better agreement with the airplane descent characteristics. It was found from smoke flow studies that small models can also predict the region in which self-generated disturbances will be encountered by tilt-wing configurations in ground proximity.
WIND TUNNEL MODEL↗
Trust Control of VTOL Aircraft Part Deux
Thrust control of Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) aircraft has always been a debatable issue. In most cases, it comes down to the fundamental question of throttle versus collective. Some aircraft used throttle(s), with a fore and aft longitudinal motion, some had collectives, some have used Thrust Levers where the protocol is still "Up is Up and Down is Down," and some have incorporated both throttles and collectives when designers did not want to deal with the Human Factors issues. There have even been combinations of throttles that incorporated an arc that have been met with varying degrees of success. A previous review was made of nineteen designs without attempting to judge the merits of the controller. Included in this paper are twelve designs entered in competition for the 1961 Tri-Service VTOL transport. Entries were from a Bell/Lockheed tiltduct, a North American tiltwing, a Vanguard liftfan, and even a Sikorsky tiltwing. Additional designs were submitted from Boeing Wichita (direct lift), Ling-Temco-Vought with its XC-142 tiltwing, Boeing Vertol's tiltwing, Mcdonnell's compound and tiltwing, and the Douglas turboduct and turboprop designs. A private party submitted a re-design of the Breguet 941 as a VTOL transport. It is important to document these 53 year-old designs to preserve a part of this country's aviation heritage.
Thrust control↗