Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “THIN AIRFOIL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Impact of Aerodynamic Modeling Assumptions on Flutter Speeds of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines

Theodorsen’s unsteady aerodynamic theory has been used extensively in flutter speed prediction of wind turbine blades. In this study, three key assumptions of Theodorsen theory (thin airfoil, flat wake, and small angle of attack) have been revisited, and all three assumptions have been addressed in combination to obtain new lift and moment equations that are subsequently applied in flutter calculations for full-scale vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) rotors, not just of an individual airfoil or blade. Furthermore, edgewise aerodynamics terms are added to the lift and moment equations to include their effects on flutter speeds. The newly obtained equations were implemented in the OWENS (Offshore Wind ENergy Simulation) toolkit, which is an FEM (Finite Element Method)-based toolkit for aeroelastic analysis of VAWTs. The effect of modifying each of these assumptions has been studied for the flutter RPM prediction of three primary modes of flutter of VAWTs: propeller, butterfly, and tower modes. For the land-based case, the most change was observed for the flutter RPM of the propeller mode, with a maximum increase of 2.62% for the two-bladed UTD 5 MW VAWT case. For the floating offshore case, the primary flutter modes (tower and platform pitch) were not significantly affected.

Engineering↗
DOE OSTI2020

Lift Equivalence and Cancellation for Airfoil Surge–Pitch–Plunge Oscillations

A NACA 0018 airfoil in freestream velocity is oscillated in longitudinal, transverse, and angle-of-attack directions with respect to the freestream velocity, known as surge, plunge, and pitch. The lift-based equivalence method introduces phase shifts between these three motions to construct in-phase sinusoidal components for maximum lift, waveform construction. Lift cancellation is also determined with the exact negative pitch and plunge motion amplitudes found from the equivalence method to achieve out-of-phase wave destruction. Lift cancellation occurs when a combination of these motions is sought to obtain a constant lift magnitude throughout the oscillation cycle. To achieve both equivalence and cancellation of lift, a prescribed pure pitch amplitude through the Theodorsen theory equates the corresponding equivalent plunge amplitude and pitch–plunge phase shift. These Theodorsen, linear superposition findings of pitch–plunge are leveraged toward the Greenberg theory to determine a closed-form, surge–pitch–plunge solution through the addition of a surge–plunge phase shift and optimal surge amplitude for lift cancellation. The lift cancellation surge–pitch–plunge amplitudes define the equivalence amplitude investigated here and theoretically limit the experiment to combinations of the first lift harmonic of the Greenberg theory. The analytical results are then compared with experimental lift force measurements and dye visualization. Finally, the normalized lift differences due to unsteady wake and boundary-layer behavior are examined to explore the extents of the Greenberg theory for these cases of lift-based equivalence and cancellation.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

G2Aero Database of Airfoils - Curated Airfoils

This dataset contains a curated set of 19,164 airfoil shapes from various applications and the data-driven design space of separable shape tensors (PGA space), which can be used as a parameter space for machine-learning applications focused on airfoil shapes. We constructed the airfoil dataset in two main stages. First, we identified 13 baseline airfoils from the NREL 5MW and IEA 15MW reference wind turbines. We reparameterized these shapes using least-squares fits of 8-order CST parametrizations, which involve 18 coefficients. By uniformly perturbing all 18 CST coefficients by +/-20% around each baseline airfoil, we generated 1,000 unique airfoils. Each airfoil was sampled with 1,001 shape landmarks whose x-coordinates followed a cosine distribution along the chord. This process resulted in a total of 13,000 airfoil shapes, each with 1,001 landmarks. In the second phase, we gathered additional airfoils from the extensive BigFoil database, which consolidates data from sources such as the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) airfoil database, the JavaFoil database, the NACA-TR-824 database, and others. We undertook a thorough pre-processing step to filter out shapes with sparse, noisy, or incomplete data. We also removed airfoils with sharp leading edge and those exceeding our threshold for trailing edge thickness. Additionally, we thinned out the collection of NACA airfoils-- parametric sweeps of NACA airfoils with increasing thickness and camber present in BigFoil database-- by selecting every fourth step in the parameter sweeps. Finally, we regularized the airfoils by reparametrizing them with an 8-order CST parametrization (with 1,001 shape landmarks with x coordinated following cosine distribution along the chord) and removing airfoils with high reconstruction errors. This data pre-processing resulted in a set of 6,164 airfoils. In total, our curated airfoil dataset comprises 19,164 airfoils, each with 1,001 landmarks, and is stored in the curated_airfoils.npz file. Using this curated airfoil dataset, we utilized the separable shape tensors framework to develop a data-driven parameterization of airfoils based on principal geodesic analysis (PGA) of separable shape tensors. This PGA space is provided in PGAspace.npz file.

airfoils↗
DOE OSTI2025

Experimental Analysis of Advanced Turbine for Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle

An advanced first stage high pressure turbine blade for a supercritical CO2 power cycle is tested in the Big Rig for Aerothermal Stationary Turbine Analysis (BRASTA) annular cascade at the Purdue Experimental Turbine Aerothermal Laboratory (PETAL) high pressure blow down facility alongside a baseline blade for comparison of aerodynamic performance. Both geometries are tested simultaneously using a novel off-axis rig design to allow for the blade geometries to be scaled up to achieve higher Reynolds numbers. The off-axis design necessitates the use of discrete sectors of airfoils, which are designed and additively manufactured in house using an mSLA printer. Printing the blades allows for unique routing of passage for blade surface static pressure taps that contour to the blade shape instead of requiring a straight line view from surface tap to egress, allowing all instrumentation for 15%, 50%, and 85% span to exist in the same passage. A flow conditioning gauze [1] is placed upstream of the blade passages to impart pressure, Mach, and swirl profiles to mimic the rotor relative frame inlet conditions to the blade. Downstream, a sonic valve is used to alter the backpressure to achieve different pressure ratios for different blowdown setpoints. The design of the rig, sonic wheel, and instrumentation are discussed along with the manufacturing and GD&T of the blades with respect to the build-up of this novel experimental apparatus. Initial commissioning data is obtained from inlet total pressure and temperature rakes, blade static pressure taps, and exit total pressure rakes. Oil visualization is performed using a silicone oil mixture containing titanium dioxide and pigmented for contrast of the blade suction side surface with the hub and shroud endwalls. The viscosity of the oil is tuned so that the oil does not fully thin and blow away during the time of the test, and endoscopic cameras are placed in the rig for live monitoring and recording. The preliminary oil visualization and rake profiles are presented, showcasing the operability of this additively manufactured off-axis flow path design.

Tuite, Logan [Purdue University]↗
DOE OSTI2024

Active Aerodynamic Load Control for Wind Turbines

The goal of this project was to develop and demonstrate an advanced dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuator technology. We set out to demonstrate the efficacy and impact of the new actuator technology as a key component of an active load control system for wind turbines. A DBD plasma actuator consists of a thin layer of dielectric material separating a pair of offset electrodes. One of those electrodes is embedded between the dielectric layer and a non-conductive substrate, while the other is exposed to air. When driven by an appropriate high voltage waveform, the device ionizes the air near the surface of the dielectric and adjacent to the exposed electrode. Collisions between the ions in the plasma and neutral air molecules result in a wall-jet – a region of induced air velocity that can be used to modify the flow around a lifting body. Use of the device near the trailing edge of a wind turbine blade, designed in such a way as to amplify the effects of the flow-modifying device, can result in large changes to the global forces experienced by the blade. Because of the fast response time of the device, it can allow the turbine to react in real time to changes in the wind associated with turbulence, wind shear, gusts, and the like, when paired with appropriate sensors and control algorithms. The goal of this project was to increase the capacity of the device to induce velocity on its surface at the levels required by large, utility-scale wind turbines. The first technical goal was to increase the induced velocity from the current industry-best of about 4 m/s to 10 m/s by modifying the electrical waveform used to drive the device and by introducing a semi-conductive surface coating to control electrostatic charge build-up on the surface. The second goal was to use the device to modify the lift on a representative airfoil in a wind tunnel, demonstrating a reduction in lift coefficient of 0.2 or better. The third goal was to produce an actuator-induced velocity of 20 m/s. Alongside our partners at the University of Texas at Dallas, we also applied modern, advanced design methods to optimize the impact of the technology on the design of wind turbines. We also had planned to install a segmented, active load control system on a test turbine to demonstrate the ability to reduce unsteady aerodynamic forces on the turbine associated with changes in the wind. The highest induced velocity achieved during this research was 11 m/s. However, practical design constraints limited the change in lift coefficient to about 0.12 for a representative airfoil in the wind tunnel at a Reynolds number of 400,000. The primary conclusion is that the plasma actuator control authority remains insufficient for practical purposes when extrapolated to Reynolds numbers over 1 million. The potential impact of the active lift control concept was evaluated through detailed simulations for three wind turbine sizes: a 3.4MW onshore turbine, a 10MW offshore turbine, and a 15MW offshore turbine. A feedback control system was designed for each turbine within two scenarios: one where the active lift control is used as a retrofit capability on the baseline design, and the other where the designers were permitted to “upscale” the turbines in order increase annual energy production. The levelized cost of energy was then evaluated for the range of turbine sizes and design configuration. It was found that the LCOE reduction associated with active lift control fell in the range of 0.7% to 7.2%, with the highest reduction associated with upscaling the 3.4MW turbine.

17 WIND ENERGY↗