Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “TPS instrumentation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Aerodynamic and Aerothermal TPS Instrumentation Reference Guide

The hypersonic regime of planetary entry combines the most severe environments that an entry vehicle will encounter with the greatest amount of uncertainty as to the events unfolding during that time period. This combination generally leads to conservatism in the design of an entry vehicle, specifically that of the thermal protection system (TPS). Each planetary entry provides a valuable aerodynamic and aerothermal testing opportunity; the utilization of this opportunity is paramount in better understanding how a specific entry vehicle responds to the demands of the hypersonic entry environment. Previous efforts have been made to instrument entry vehicles in order to collect data during the entry period and reconstruct the corresponding vehicle response. The purpose of this paper is to cumulatively document past TPS instrumentation designs for applicable planetary missions, as well as to list pertinent results and any explainable shortcomings.

Thermal Protection System↗
NASA NTRS2019

White Papers for the Next Decadal Survey: Thermal Protection Systems and Instrumentation

NASA is anticipated to commission the next Planetary Science Decadal Survey (PSDS) with preparation expected in early calendar year 2020. The new PSDS will outline the priorities of science missions for the decade spanning 2023-2032. For the previous PSDS, the science and technology communities have been invited to submit white papers to the PSDS sub-panels as background information to guide the PSDS recommendations. The National Research Council has previously stated that white papers that represent the opinion of many authors from different institutions carried more significant and weight, and the recommendations from the previous PSDS attempted to reflect more of a consensus opinion.In 2009, a total of 4 white papers were submitted to the PSDS panels regarding thermal protection system (TPS) readiness for missions, as well as one on TPS instrumentation. The TPS readiness papers were co-authored by 90 individuals from many institutions. These white papers surveyed the TPS materials for both forebody and afterbody of a probe and analyzed the suitability of materials for missions to each destination. In addition, each paper outlined the ground testing required and ongoing technology development. Recommendations were provided for further technology development and ground test capability in order to fulfill future missions. Planning for the next PSDS: Many improvements and changes have occurred in the past 10 years with regard to TPS materials and instrumentation. New materials have been developed and tested, such as the high density material Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET), and new capabilities for ground testing for high heating and high pressures have been added such as the 3” nozzle at the Ames arc jet. NASA has also flown several TPS instrumentation suites, such as MEDLI and EFT-1.In order to provide the PSDS sub-panels with the most current information about the state-of-the-art suit-ability for TPS materials for entry missions, we are be-ginning to update and draft new white papers. We will present the outline for material to be covered in the white papers, and we invite all IPPW attendees to parti-ciate in co-authoring these papers.

Hwang, H. H.↗
NASA NTRS2019

White Papers for the Next Decadal Survey: Thermal Protection Systems and Instrumentation

NASA is anticipated to commission the next Planetary Science Decadal Survey (PSDS) with preparation expected in early calendar year 2020. The new PSDS will outline the priorities of science missions for the decade spanning 2023-2032. For the previous PSDS, the science and technology communities have been invited to submit white papers to the PSDS sub-panels as background information to guide the PSDS recommendations. The National Research Council has previously stated that white papers that represent the opinion of many authors from different institutions carried more significance and weight, and the recommendations from the previous PSDS attempted to reflect more of a consensus opinion. In 2009, a total of 4 white papers were submitted to the PSDS panels regarding thermal protection system (TPS) readiness for missions, as well as one on TPS instrumentation. The TPS readiness papers were co-authored by 90 individuals from many institutions. These white papers surveyed the TPS materials for both forebody and afterbody of a probe and analyzed the suitability of materials for missions to each destination. In addition, each paper outlined the ground testing required and ongoing technology development. Recommendations were provided for further technology development and ground test capability in order to fulfill future missions. Many improvements and changes have occurred in the past 10 years with regard to TPS materials and instrumentation. New materials have been developed and tested, such as the high density material Heat-shield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET), and new capabilities for ground testing for high heating and high pressures have been added such as the 3-inch nozzle at the Ames arc jet. NASA has also flown several TPS instrumentation suites, such as MEDLI (Mars Science Laboratory Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrument) and EFT-1 (Exploration Flight Test-1). In order to provide the PSDS sub-panels with the most current information about the state-of-the-art suitability for TPS materials for entry missions, we are beginning to update and draft new white papers. We will present the outline for material to be covered in the white papers, and we invite all IPPW (International Planetary Probe Workshop) attendees to particiate in co-authoring these papers.

Hwang, Helen H.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Orion EFT-1 Catalytic Tile Experiment Overview and Flight Measurements

This paper describes the design and results of a surface catalysis flight experiment flown on the Orion Multipurpose Crew Vehicle during Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT1). Similar to previous Space Shuttle catalytic tile experiments, the present test consisted of a highly catalytic coating applied to an instrumented TPS tile. However, the present catalytic tile experiment contained significantly more instrumentation in order to better resolve the heating overshoot caused by the change in surface catalytic efficiency at the interface between two distinct materials. In addition to collecting data with unprecedented spatial resolution of the "overshoot" phenomenon, the experiment was also designed to prove if such a catalytic overshoot would be seen in turbulent flow in high enthalpy regimes. A detailed discussion of the results obtained during EFT1 is presented, as well as the challenges associated with data interpretation of this experiment. Results of material testing carried out in support of this flight experiment are also shown. Finally, an inverse heat conduction technique is employed to reconstruct the flight environments at locations upstream and along the catalytic coating. The data and analysis presented in this work will greatly contribute to our understanding of the catalytic "overshoot" phenomenon, and have a significant impact on the design of future spacecraft.

Salazar, Giovanni↗
NASA NTRS1983

Space shuttle orbiter reusable surface insulation flight results

The first five flights of the orbiter Columbia provided the initial data required to certify the operational performance of the reusable surface insulation (RSI) thermal protection system (TPS). The flight performance characteristics of the RIS TPS are discussed. The discussion is based primarily on postflight inspections and postflight interpretation of the flight instrumentation. TPS modifications of the future orbiters (OV-099, 103, and subs) are also discussed.

Dotts, R. L.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Rotating Arc Jet Test Model: Time-Accurate Trajectory Heat Flux Replication in a Ground Test Environment

Though arc jet testing has been the proven method employed for development testing and certification of TPS and TPS instrumentation, the operational aspects of arc jets limit testing to selected, but constant, conditions. Flight, on the other hand, produces timevarying entry conditions in which the heat flux increases, peaks, and recedes as a vehicle descends through an atmosphere. As a result, we are unable to "test as we fly." Attempts to replicate the time-dependent aerothermal environment of atmospheric entry by varying the arc jet facility operating conditions during a test have proven to be difficult, expensive, and only partially successful. A promising alternative is to rotate the test model exposed to a constant-condition arc jet flow to yield a time-varying test condition at a point on a test article (Fig. 1). The model shape and rotation rate can be engineered so that the heat flux at a point on the model replicates the predicted profile for a particular point on a flight vehicle. This simple concept will enable, for example, calibration of the TPS sensors on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) aeroshell for anticipated flight environments.

Laub, Bernard↗
NASA NTRS2007

Testing Lunar Return Thermal Protection Systems using Sub-Scale Flight Test Vehicles

A key objective of NASA's Vision for Space Exploration is to revisit the lunar surface. Such an ambitious goal requires the development of a new human-rated spacecraft, the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), to ferry crews to low earth orbit and to the moon. The successful conclusion of both types of missions will require a thermal protection system (TPS) capable of protecting the vehicle and crew from the extreme heat of atmospheric reentry. As a part of the TPS development, various materials are being tested in arcjet tunnels; however, the combined lunar return aerothermal environment of high heat flux, shear stress, and surface pressure cannot be duplicated using only existing ground test facilities. To ensure full TPS qualification, a flight test program using sub-scale Orion capsules has been proposed to test TPS materials and heat shield construction techniques under the most stressing combination of lunar return aerothermal environments. Originally called Testing Of Reentry Capsule Heat Shield, or TORCH, but later renamed LEX, for Lunar Reentry Experiment, the proposed flight test program is presented along with the driving requirements and descriptions of the vehicle and the TPS instrumentation suite slated to conduct in-flight measurements.

heatshield↗
NASA NTRS1975

Development of TPS flight test and operational instrumentation

Thermal and flow sensor instrumentation was developed for use as an integral part of the space shuttle orbiter reusable thermal protection system. The effort was performed in three tasks: a study to determine the optimum instruments and instrument installations for the space shuttle orbiter RSI and RCC TPS; tests and/or analysis to determine the instrument installations to minimize measurement errors; and analysis using data from the test program for comparison to analytical methods. A detailed review of existing state of the art instrumentation in industry was performed to determine the baseline for the departure of the research effort. From this information, detailed criteria for thermal protection system instrumentation were developed.

Carnahan, K. R.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Parametric Analysis of Entry Vehicles for Giant Planet Missions

Summarize concept designs for entry vehicles for giant planet destinations identified as high priority in the latest decadal survey. Identify viable entry states, aerothermal environments, and heatshield thermal protection systems (TPS) for various vehicle dimensions. Viable TPS options and sizing focus on low-g (< 50g) entry conditions to avoid costly instrumentation requalification. TPS manufacturing capabilities are also taken into consideration while adhering to the manufacturing capabilities of the TPS options. Margined mass estimates for heatshield TPS options are provided for Uranus and Saturn test cases.

Giant Planet↗
NASA NTRS2020

Entry, Descent, and Landing Instrumentation

The first purpose of this white paper is to summarize the state-of-the-art of engineering instrumentation available for atmospheric Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) vehicles. Capabilities of the various types of measurements, along with recent examples from human and robotic EDL missions and technology development programs, significance to planetary science, and current challenges are discussed. Second, this paper provides recommendations for continuing to collect data on future missions with an EDL phase. Although the focus of this paper will be primarily on entry, instrumentation for descent and landing are also recognized to be important areas of future investment.

EDL↗
NASA NTRS2018

Shock Layer Radiation Measurements for Planetary Probes

Shock layer radiation to a planetary probe's heat shield has been investigated since the 1960's, using ground tests, flight tests, and theoretical modelling. Radiometers and a spectrometer were embedded in the TPS of NASA's earlier Project FIRE II, Apollo 4 and 6, as well as PAET. PAET is particularly relevant to planetary probes since it successfully demonstrated detecting the atmospheric composition using shock-layer radiometry. The NASA Orion program and Mars 2020 include and propose for future use embedded small scale, low-mass radiometers and mini-spectrometers. Recent work used a specific COTS fiber-optic mini-spectrometer, selected for wide wavelength range for testing flexibility. In proof of concept tests, these mini-spectrometers detected the strongest Na and K spectral lines in both Arcjet test and Laser tests, with thermal radiation. Characterization and tests of the radiometer and spectrometer devices components is described.

radiation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Modeling instrumented test articles for Plasmatron X aerothermal environment

This work discusses the ablative response of thermal protection system materials when exposed to aerothermal environments. It focuses on modeling instrumented test article assemblies tested in the Plasmatron X inductively coupled plasma wind tunnel. For this purpose, as the samples are mounted to a water-cooled arm using numerous assembly components and are embedded with thermocouples for in-depth temperature measurements, the variation in ablative response of the samples as a result of these components is studied. The aerothermal boundary conditions for Plasmatron X are obtained for hypersonic flight-relevant conditions using the multi-physics aerothermal framework built at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. For simulating the material response, a material response code, Porous Material Analysis Toolbox based on OpenFOAM (PATO) is used. In PATO, numerous configurations and materials of thermocouples were studied. The optimal configuration for obtaining temperature measurements with minimal error using embedded thermocouples was found to be the U-shaped Type S, 30 American wire gauge thermocouple configuration.

Thermal Protection Systems↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Modeling instrumented test articles for Plasmatron X aerothermal environment

This work discusses the ablative response of thermal protection system materials when exposed to aerothermal environments. It focuses on modeling instrumented test article assemblies tested in the Plasmatron X inductively coupled plasma wind tunnel. For this purpose, as the samples are mounted to a water-cooled arm using numerous assembly components and are embedded with thermocouples for in-depth temperature measurements, the variation in ablative response of the samples as a result of these components is studied. The aerothermal boundary conditions for Plasmatron X are obtained for hypersonic flight-relevant conditions using the multi-physics aerothermal framework built at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. For simulating the material response, a material response code, Porous Material Analysis Toolbox based on OpenFOAM (PATO) is used. In PATO, numerous configurations and materials of thermocouples were studied. The optimal configuration for obtaining temperature measurements with minimal error using embedded thermocouples was found to be the U-shaped Type S, 30 American wire gauge thermocouple configuration.

Thermal Protection Systems↗
NASA NTRS1986

ET TPS Development Criteria and Flight Instrumentation Program

The objective was to verify the design thermal environments for the Space Shuttle External Tank. These environments encompassed a myraid of potential flight cases which included nominal and dispersed trajectories launched from Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and Vandenberg and abort cases. Many iterations of environments have been produced during the evolution of the Space Shuttle system which required an analysis and assessment of each environment. A significant effort was expended in the analysis and application of wind tunnel and heat transfer data to develop math/computer models. Various versions of the aeroheating computer code MINIVER were tailored to calculate ascent aeroheating environments for the External Tank. The significant environment assessment results are summarized.

Warmbrod, John D.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Conformal Ablative Thermal Protection System for Small and Large Scale Missions: Approaching TRL 6 for Planetary and Human Exploration Missions and TRL 9 for Small Probe Missions

In 2011, NASAs Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) funded an effort to develop an ablative thermal protection system (TPS) material that would have improved properties when compared to Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) and AVCOAT. Their goal was a conformal material, processed with a flexible reinforcement that would result in similar or better thermal characteristics and higher strain-to-failure characteristics that would allow for easier integration on flight aeroshells than then-current rigid ablative TPS materials. In 2012, NASAs Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) began funding the maturation of the best formulation of the game changing conformal ablator, C-PICA. Progress has been reported at IPPW over the past three years, describing C-PICA with a density and recession rates similar to PICA, but with a higher strain-to-failure which allows for direct bonding and no gap fillers, and even more important, with thermal characteristics resulting in half the temperature rise of PICA. Overall, C-PICA should be able to replace PICA with a thinner, lighter weight, less complicated design. These characteristics should be particularly attractive for use as backshell TPS on high energy planetary entry vehicles. At the end of this year, the material should be ready for missions to consider including in their design, in fact, NASAs Science Mission Directorate (SMD) is considering incentivizing the use of C-PICA in the next Discovery Proposal call. This year both scale up of the material to large (1-m) sized pieces and the design and build of small probe heatshields for flight tests will be completed. NASA, with an industry partner, will build a 1-m long manufacturing demonstration unit (MDU) with a shape based on a mid LD lifting body. In addition, in an effort to fly as you test and test as you fly, NASA, with a second industry partner, will build a small probe to test in the Interactive Heating Facility (IHF) arc jet and, using nearly the same design, build the aeroshell and TPS, with instrumentation, for a small probe flight test article, due to fly in 2017. At the end of the year, the C-PICA will be at TRL 5+, and with the flight data in 2017, it will be at TRL 9 for missions needs with C-PICA at a small scale (12 diameter). The scale-up and small probe efforts will be de-scribed in this presentation.

Conformal Ablative↗
NASA NTRS2018

Time-Varying Entry Heating Profile Replication with a Rotating Arc Jet Test Article

A new approach to arc jet testing that replicates the time-varying conditions of atmospheric entry heating was demonstrated. The concept relies on the spatial variation of heat flux and pressure around a cylindrical test article. The spatial variation is transformed to a temporal variation at one location by rotating the test article during exposure to the arc jet stream. The test article rotation mechanism is based on a programmable stepper motor. An entry heat flux profile was mapped to the cylinders heat flux distribution to determine the rotation angle vs. time executed by the mechanism. A series of arc jet tests with instrumented cylindrical TPS test articles was conducted to prove the concept.

Aerothermodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons Learned from Aerothermal Flight Data on NASA Mars Entry Vehicles

The NASA Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) and Mars 2020 entry vehicles included temperature measurements inside and direct heat flux on the surface of the thermal protection system (TPS) material. The instrumentation was included to begin addressing predictive capabilities for aerodynamic heating and ablative TPS material response. The MSL aeroshell included temperature measurements at seven heatshield locations, from which total aerodynamic heating was reconstructed. The Mars 2020 instrumentation suite included eleven heatshield measurement locations and new backshell measurements at nine locations: six with temperature sensors, two with sensors to directly measure total heat flux, and one to measure radiative heat flux. Both instrumentation suites returned full sets of data, with all temperature sensors nearest to the surface surviving entry, indicating minimal material recession. Heatshield boundary layer transition (BLT) was observed for both vehicles prior to the time of peak heating, with transition starting near the shoulder and progressing towards the stagnation area. MSL’s higher speed on approach to Mars resulted in higher total heating compared to Mars 2020, with the maximum occurring near the heatshield’s leeside shoulder. The Mars 2020 backshell heating data indicate significant contributions from shock layer radiation. Heating from Navier-Stokes flowfield calculations are in family with reconstructed heating. The paper covers the instrumentation, BLT and reconstructed heating on both heatshields, backshell heating for Mars 2020, TPS performance, and predicted versus reconstructed heat fluxes. Opportunities for improved design approaches for future Mars missions are discussed, especially for the upcoming Mars Sample Return mission.

Mars Science Laboratory↗