Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “TRAINING REACTORS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2012

Role of research reactors in training of NPP personnel with special focus on training reactor VR-1

Research reactors play an important role in providing key personnel of nuclear power plants a hands-on experience from operation and experiments at nuclear facilities. Training of NPP (Nuclear Power Plant) staff is usually deeply theoretical with an extensive utilisation of simulators and computer visualisation. But a direct sensing of the reactor response to various actions can only improve the personnel awareness of important aspects of reactor operation. Training Reactor VR-1 and its utilization for training of NPP operators and other professionals from Czech Republic and Slovakia is described. Typical experimental exercises and good practices in organization of a training program are demonstrated. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Need for research and training reactors for advanced reactor designs

Full text of publication follows. Research and training reactors have served a valuable role in helping train workforce for currently operating fleet of light water reactors. These research and training reactors have been used in reactor laboratory classes to familiarize the students with such vital concepts as approach to criticality, reactor period, neutron moderation, reactivity, flux distribution and leakage, etc. As the industry moves toward advanced non-light-water reactor designs, it is critical that research and training reactors be developed and deployed at university campuses to help train the new generation of nuclear and non-nuclear engineers who are likely to design, build, and operate these advanced reactors. Among the designs currently being pursued for nuclear power generation include molten salt, sodium cooled, and gas cooled designs, with options for various fuel forms. Thus, industry and DOE in collaboration with academic institutions should devise plans on how to familiarize the next generation of nuclear workforce with hands-on experience necessary for such designs. These research and training reactors will play a vital role in familiarizing the future workforce with hands-on experience with concepts associated with fast spectrum reactors, gas cooled reactors, and other features not associated with light water reactors. In addition to classical nuclear engineering concepts, these advanced research and training reactors can also be used for hands-on training as well as for research on features being considered in the design of GEN-IV reactors: cyber security for digital control room operations, hybrid energy system, hydrogen generation, district heating, autonomous control... (author)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Verification and validation of atmospheric transport models with the UF Training Reactor

The University of Florida Training Reactor (UFTR) is a 100-kW ARGONAUT type reactor with a unique design such that a large volume of air passes through the core, producing and releasing significant quantities of 41 Ar. Once released, the radioargon is dispersed throughout the atmosphere and decays by a 1294 keV gamma ray emission. This quantified, validated, and controlled 41 Ar plume can be utilized to verify and validate atmospheric transport models (ATMs). This is accomplished by coupling an ATM with MCNP and comparing the results to experimental measurements. For this study, an in-house developed Gaussian dispersion model and the EPA approved Gaussian model AERMOD were coupled with MCNP to simulate the results of a six hour measurement taken on May 8th, 2018. For the measurements and simulations, a grid of seven NaI detectors were placed in four different rooftop locations near the UFTR plume stack. With easterly winds dominating during the morning and early afternoon, both the measurement results and simulations displayed a higher 41 Ar photon count rate on the detectors west of the plume stack throughout the day. Overall, the AERMOD simulations produced better results when compared to the in-house model, particularly for the detectors placed east and west of the plume stack. While some of the AERMOD data showed a strong correlation with the measurements, the results remain inconsistent. Here, due to the varying accuracy of the simulation results, it is theorized that the relationship between measurement results and simulations will improve with the use of localized weather information or the utilization of non-Gaussian dispersion models.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2016

Atmospheric {sup 41}Ar Plume Tracking of the UF Training Reactor Using a Large-Volume NaI Detector

The ability to track and monitor gaseous radioactive materials is important in the event of a radioactive release such as from a nuclear power plant accident, weapons testing, or other unintended release scenarios. The International Monitoring System (IMS) is currently in place to monitor for weapons testing and has been used to monitor nuclear power plant accidents. However, only 80 radionuclide stations for the IMS exist in the world and are stationary, limiting the resolution of any radioactive plumes detected. Furthermore, the IMS radionuclide stations are designed to be sensitive specifically to atmospheric radio-xenon and no other radionuclides. Historically, monitoring radioactive releases has been limited to the detection of radio-xenon and radio-krypton, both arising as fission products from nuclear fuel. After the accident at Three Mile Island Unit 2, scientists were interested in finding the dose the public received from released radioactive material. This was achieved by analyzing radiation monitors in the exhaust stack and filters within the reactor building. furthermore, a series of 20 thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's), 8 air sampling station positioned around Three Mile Island, and a helicopter survey which used a NaI(Tl) detector array provided data on radionuclides, specifically {sup 137}Cs, that escaped the confines of the reactor building. The TLD's and air sampling stations were stationary, and therefore limited the resolution of the radioactive release plume. The helicopter survey using the NaI detectors was limited by the technology available at the time. The NaI detector array output was compressed from 1024 channels to 256 channels, limiting the energy resolution of the spectral data. The helicopter used a microwave ranging system to establish position. Since this survey was taken in October of 1982, advancements in technology allow spectral data to be saved in its full 1024 channel format and the advent of GPS can give a more accurate account of the detector position. An updated mobile system for tracking a radioactive release would help to alleviate these issues as well as gain the ability to track a radioactive release in real-time. We investigate the feasibility of mobile tracking through study and measurement of the {sup 41}Ar plume released from the University of Florida Training Reactor (UFTR) research reactor. We use a large-volume NaI(Tl) detector placed on the roof near the reactor. This detector may also be placed and moved on a cart to survey the area surrounding the reactor. We compare the spectral data taken when the reactor is running at full power to the background to analyze the effectiveness of the detector at identifying atmospheric {sup 41}Ar. Finally we discuss the implications of these measurements with regards to validation of plume models and the capability to track releases over a localized area from the source. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Scalable Solar Fuels Production in A Reactor Train System by Thermochemical Redox Cycling of Novel Nonstoichiometric Perovskites

Hydrogen production via two-step thermochemical water splitting redox cycles using nonstoichiometric redox-active metal oxides has the potential to dramatically increase fuel production rates. At moderate-to-low water splitting temperatures, surface reaction kinetics co-limit the process. In such cases, stable and high surface area microstructures that allow exploitation of the full thermodynamic potential of the materials are essential as is tight thermal integration of the reactor module. This project’s goals were the development of novel nonstoichiometric perovskite oxides with high stability and favorable thermodynamic and kinetic properties, to optimize their microstructure for maximizing the fuel productivity, and to build a prototype reactor train system (RTS) comprising at least one reactor to meet specific performance targets: (1) capable of an in-house solar thermochemical hydrogen (STCH) productivity ≥ 12 mL g -1 for stable continuous operation ≥ 20 cycles; and (2) demonstration of scalable solar fuels production at practical solar reactor level in an industrial-scale concentrated solar tower (CST) using developed perovskites to achieve a hydrogen production rate ≥ 1 g h -1 .

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2012

Decommissioning Small Research and Training Reactors; Experience on Three Recent University Projects - 12455

Decommissioning small reactors within the confines of an active University environment presents unique challenges. These range from the radiological protection of the nearby University population and grounds, to the logistical challenges of working in limited space without benefit of the established controlled, protected, and vital areas common to commercial facilities. These challenges, and others, are discussed in brief project histories of three recent (calendar year 2011) decommissioning activities at three University training and research reactors. These facilities include three separate Universities in three states. The work at each of the facilities addresses multiple phases of the decommissioning process, from initial characterization and pre-decommissioning waste removal, to core component removal and safe storage, through to complete structural dismantlement and site release. The results of the efforts at each University are presented, along with the challenges that were either anticipated or discovered during the decommissioning efforts, and results and lessons learned from each of the projects. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Introduction on Recently Revised Regulatory Framework Related to Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities in Korea - 16488

There are 24 units of nuclear power reactors in operation and 4 units of nuclear power reactors under construction in Korea as of November 2015. However, there is no permanently shutdown nuclear power reactor and decommissioned or under decommissioning nuclear power reactor. There are only 2 research reactors being decommissioned since 1997. It is realized that improvement of the regulatory framework for decommissioning of nuclear facilities has been emphasized constantly from the point of view of IAEA's safety standards. IAEA published the safety requirement on decommissioning of facilities on July 2014; its title is the Safe Decommissioning of Facilities, General Safety Requirement Part 6. According to follow up action on the result of IAEA's Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) mission to Korea in 2011, regulatory framework for decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Korea was revised through comparing to IAEA safety standards. It was identified that items should be revised to improve the regulatory framework for decommissioning. Those are as follows: absence of legal definition of decommissioning, incomplete procedure for safety regulation after permanent shutdown, un-detailed acceptance criteria for decommissioning plan, incomplete requirements for early preparing and periodic update of decommissioning plan, un-detailed requirements on standard format and contents for decommissioning plan, and incomplete radiological criteria on site and building reuse after completion of decommissioning. Nuclear Safety Act related to decommissioning of nuclear facilities was revised and promulgated on 21 July 2015. As the lower statute of Nuclear Safety Act, Enforcement Decree of the Nuclear Safety Act and Enforcement Regulation of the Nuclear Safety Act were also revised and promulgated on 21 July 2015. In this paper, related to decommissioning of nuclear facilities such as nuclear power reactor, research or training reactor, and nuclear fuel cycle facility, it was introduced the main changes of the amended and promulgated Nuclear Safety Act on July 2015. It was also mentioned about the current issue in accordance with its implementation. Main contents of revised Nuclear Safety Act are that decommissioning plan should be submitted for nuclear installations to be constructed and operated, and this plan should be updated periodically. In addition, 3 years of grace period was set to submit preliminary decommissioning plan for the facility which has already been approved prior to July 2018. Preliminary decommissioning plan should be updated every 10 years, and regulatory body should review this document. According to the revised Nuclear Safety Act, in the case of a nuclear power reactor after the approval of the change on operating license for permanent shutdown, should submit final decommissioning plan within 5 years, and be approved by the regulatory body. On July 2015, Kori Unit 1 was determined not to apply its 2nd continued operation, and will expire in 2017. Kori Unit 1 will be the first case for the submission of final decommissioning plan. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

The Use of Ljubljana TRIGA Reactor in Training of NPP Operators and Public Information

The TRIGA Mark II reactor at Jozef Stefan Institute in Ljubljana, Slovenia, marked 50. anniversary of its operation this year. The acronym TRIGA comes from Training, Research, Isotopes and General Atomics (manufacturer). In addition to research and production of isotopes, the Ljubljana TRIGA reactor was extensively used also for training and education. This paper reviews the contribution of this research reactor to training and public information in the last five decades. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Diamond as a solid state micro-fission chamber for thermal neutron detection at the VR-1 research reactor

Diamond exhibits a combination of properties which makes it attractive for neutron detection in hostile conditions. In the particular case of detection in a nuclear reactor, it is resilient to radiation, exhibits a natural low sensitivity to gamma rays, and its small size (as compared with that of gas ionisation chambers) enables fluency monitoring with a high position resolution. We report here on the use of synthetic CVD diamond as a solid state micro-fission chamber with U-235 converting material for in-core thermal neutron monitoring. Two types of thin diamond detectors were developed for this application. The first type of detector is fabricated using thin diamond membrane obtained by etching low-cost commercially available single crystal CVD intrinsic diamond, so called 'optical grade' material. Starting from a few hundred of micrometre thick samples, the sample is sliced with a laser and then plasma etched down to a few tenths of micrometre. Here we report the result obtained with a 17 μm thick device. The detection surface of this detector is equal to 1 mm{sup 2}. Detectors with surfaces up to 1 cm{sup 2} can be fabricated with this technique. The second type of detector is fabricated by growing successively two thin films of diamond, by the microwave enhanced chemical vapour deposition technique, on HPHT single crystal diamond. A first, a film of boron doped (p+) single crystal diamond, a few microns thick, is deposited. Then a second film of intrinsic diamond with a thickness of a few tens of microns is deposited. This results in a P doped, Intrinsic, Metal structure (PIM) structure in which the intrinsic volume id the active part of the detector. Here we report the results obtained with a 20 μm thick intrinsic whose detection surface is equal to 0.5 mm{sup 2}, with the possibility to enlarge the surface of the detector up to 1 cm{sup 2}. These two types of detector were tested at the VR-1 research reactor at the Czech Technical University in Prague. The Training Reactor VR-1 is a pool type (light water) reactor based on UO{sub 2} low enriched uranium. It has a nominal power of 1 kW, and can be operated for a short period up to 5 kW. The arrangement of the reactor pool reactor facilitates access to the core, setting and removal of various experimental samples and detectors, and safe and easy handling of fuel assemblies. The reactor is equipped with two horizontal channels (radial and tangential) and 10 vertical channels, of varying diameters, which can be loaded into various core positions, and one pneumatic transfer system. It is also equipped with several specifically designed educational instrumentation systems that can be used to supply complementary measurements and characterization around the reactor. The reactor is operated by the Department of Nuclear Reactors of the Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering of the Czech Technical University in Prague. The two detectors were placed in-core through one of the vertical insertion channel. They were coupled to remote placed (5 m BNC cable) classical nuclear charge sensitive electronics. Detection properties of both sensors, including: pulse height spectra of U-235 fission fragments (response linearity with neutron flux, count rate, gamma background, were evaluated varying the power of the reactor from 0.005 W to 500 W. The evolution of the counting rate of the thinned optical grade detector as a function of counting rate of a gas ionization chamber used currently for reactor monitoring shows the very good linearity of the detector over the 5 decades. Similar results were obtained with the PIM detector. Additionally fast transient current signals of the detectors were recorded on a digital storage oscilloscope (DSO) using broad-band amplifier and with a simple bias-T, showing potential use of such sensors for neutron counting with no need of an amplification stage, since non-amplified signals from fission fragments exceeded 4 mV in amplitude. Therefore, one can think of simple neutron counting system by feeding diamond detectors signals directly to the low threshold discriminators. The results obtained on the VR1 will be described and discussed in detail in the paper and associated presentation. The results demonstrate that diamond micro-fission chambers can be used for in-core neutron monitoring, where robust, simple and compact devices are required.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Challenge of Fielding Experiments at the Annular Core Research Reactor

Conference is the annual Test, Research &Training Reactors (TRTR) meeting. Typically attended by dozens of research reactor operators, educators, trainers, maintenance & service contractors Also, members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) attend. Presentation highlights ACRRs capability and the process used to submit and approve experimental activities. This presentation is adapted from my previous presentation to the Material Test and Research conference, SAND2025-1775526.

Martin, Lonnie E. [Sandia National Laboratories (S↗
DOE OSTI2012

2012 Annual Report Research Reactor Infrastructure Program

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) manages and provides project management, technical support, quality engineering, quality inspection and nuclear material support for the Department of Energy (DOE) Research Reactor Infrastructure Program (RRI). This program provides fresh, unirradiated nuclear reactor fuel for United States domestic University Test, Research and Training Reactor Programs. The two fuel types fabricated for the program, plate fuel and Training, Research, Isotope Production, General Atomics (TRIGA) fuel are obtained through subcontracts with two fuel fabricators, Babcock and Wilcox Nuclear Operations Group (B&W) and TRIGA International (TI). Respectively, these subcontractors fabricate high and low enriched uranium aluminide, silicide and TRIGA fuel on a recurring basis. The program is also responsible for funding the return of the DOE-owned, irradiated nuclear fuel over the life of the program.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2011

Final Technical Report

The Consortium of Big-10 University Research and Training Reactors was by design a strategic partnership of seven leading institutions. We received the support of both our industry and DOE laboratory partners. Investiments in reactor, laboratory and program infrastructure, allowed us to lead the national effort to expand and improve the education of engineers in nuclear science and engineering, to provide outreach and education to pre-college educators and students and to become a key resource of ideas and trained personnel for our U.S. industrial and DOE laboratory collaborators.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

An Autonomous Critical Data Extrapolator for the AGN-201m

Nuclear nonproliferation serves as a key goal, being undertaken by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). To recognize proliferation there are two pathways that states, who intend to use nuclear material for malicious purposes can take, diversion can misuse. Diversion is when fissile nuclear material is declared to the IAEA for non-weapon purposes, but then covertly removed. If the source of nuclear material, that is not declared and not fissionable, is placed inside the reactor core to create fissile material used to create weapons then the state is using the second pathway of proliferation, misuse. With the emerging development in areas of simulation and machine learning the creation of virtual models of reactor systems, digital twins, serve as a potential method to identify proliferation through detecting anomalous behavior in the reactor. A digital twin for a physical nuclear reactor has never been developed, as digital twins serve as an emerging technology. To investigate the process for development and use of a digital twin for a nuclear reactor Idaho State University’s AGN-201m serves as the nuclear reactor used for development of this digital twin. A data acquisition system has been installed to the reactor system allowing for the transfer of collected data from a reactor operation to Idaho National Laboratory’s Deeplynx data warehouse. When utilizing data to train reactor physics and machine learning models, a significant challenge encountered is the initial state of the data. Nuclear proliferation will have the capacity to be detected when the reactor immediately starts up, nor will it occur after the reactor shuts down. Generally, it will be detected when the reactor is operating at some desired power over a sufficient period for that specific reactor design. For the AGN-201m this will be when the reactor is critical (generally 1 mW or above) for a timespan that is within or less than the range of a regular business day. Datasets sent to Deeplynx have had to be manually cut to when the reactor is critical based on plots of power levels. This method is inefficient and laborious, especially when using multiple datasets at once to train a model. To provide a more streamlined approach an automated critical data extrapolator is developed, with capabilities of recognizing when the reactor operation first reaches criticality, and when the reactor undergoes a SCRAM and is shutdown.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Methodology Development for Cybersecurity Robustness and Vulnerability Assessment of University Research Reactors

In 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) formed a working group in collaboration with the Test, Research and Training Reactors (TRTR) group to review cyber security programs at US nuclear nonpower reactor (NPR) facilities. Following their review of cyber security at four different university NPR (i.e. university research reactor (URR)) facilities, the NRC staff made recommendations for improvements at URR including 1) augmenting the URR licensees’ understanding of the protective features provided with their physical security systems, 2) educating URR facility staff on cyber security issues, and 3) developing guidance to help the URR facilities maintain adequate cyber security going forward. This three-year project to develop and implement a cyber-security risk assessment methodology and defense-in-depth mitigation strategy for application at URR facilities provides solutions effectively addressing each of the recommendations given in the NRC review referenced above. In support of this project, cyber security documentation and guidance from the NRC, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Cyber Emergency Response Team (CERT), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), were reviewed. Most of this documentation did not take the unique resources, configuration, and infrastructure associated with URR facilities into account. The NRC-TRTR effective practices document provides useful guidance for implementing cyber security protections at URR, but lacks a structured framework for systematically auditing facility digital control assets (DCA) and evaluating associated cyber threats, vulnerabilities, and risk. The outcomes from this project, therefore, seek to build on the general resources above by providing a straightforward DCA auditing and risk assessment methodology, as well as mitigation strategies, that may be implemented to address the risk of cyber-attack at URR facilities.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2019

NSUF Research Reactor Fitness Workshop Results

The Nuclear Science User Facilities has been working with the National Organization of Test, Research, and Training Reactors to collect input from the US university reactor community on their current and future needs. The effort started with a web survey in March to collect initial data. NSUF held a follow-up workshop in July at the Center for Advanced Energy Studies in Idaho Falls. We identified four areas of interest in the university research reactor community that can affect future operations and sustainability of the reactors: capital infrastructure, regulatory burden, staffing and knowledge transfer, and utilization and relevancy. Members of the community presented challenges and best practices from their facilities. Discussions were held to create and distill the list of challenges for each area. A working group was formed for each area to continue the discussion and prioritize the challenges. NSUF and the working groups intend to create a final recommendations report by the end of the year. This panel session will discuss the workshop and summarize the discussion in the four topic areas. The audience is encouraged to add to the discussion.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Radiation characterization summary of the NETL beam port 1/5 free-field environment at the 128-inch core centerline adjacent location

The characterization of the neutron, prompt gamma-ray, and delayed gamma-ray radiation fields in the University of Texas at Austin Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) TRIGA reactor for the beam port (BP) 1/5 free-field environment at the 128-inch location adjacent to the core centerline has been accomplished. NETL is being explored as an auxiliary neutron test facility for the Sandia National Laboratories radiation effects sciences research and development campaigns. The NETL reactor is a TRIGA Mark-II pulse and steady-state, above-ground pool-type reactor. NETL is intended as a university research reactor typically used to perform irradiation experiments for students and customers, radioisotope production, as well as a training reactor. Initial criticality of the NETL TRIGA reactor was achieved on March 12, 1992, making it one of the newest test reactor facilities in the US. The neutron energy spectra, uncertainties, and covariance matrices are presented as well as a neutron fluence map of the experiment area of the cavity. For an unmoderated condition, the neutron fluence at the center of BP 1/5, at the adjacent core axial centerline, is about 8.2×10 12 n/cm 2 per MJ of reactor energy. About 67% of the neutron fluence is below 1 keV and 22% above 100 keV. The 1-MeV Damage-Equivalent Silicon (DES) fluence is roughly 1.6×10 12 n/cm 2 per MJ of reactor energy.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗