DOE OSTI2018
One challenge at large remediation sites contaminated with radiological materials is differentiating between low-level site-related contamination and NORM. This is because sites contaminated with radiological materials, such as thorium processing and mining and milling facilities, often generate wastes that contain contaminants that are similar to NORM deposits. For sites in urban areas, this issue is further compounded due to the presence of historic industrial fill (historic fill) containing materials such as fly ash, coal ash, and red brick, that exhibit elevated radioactivity levels. These materials often have activity levels near, or even well above, a site's cleanup goal. At a large Superfund Site in the eastern US (Site), many of the suspected Site-related fill areas are commingled with coal and fly ash. As the cleanup criteria for the radionuclides of concern (ROC), radium (Ra) and thorium (Th), is 5 pico-Curies per gram above background, a four-pronged approach was developed to determine if the coal and fly ash are impacting the background levels of the ROCs. This evaluation included a review of boring logs to visually confirm the presence of historic fill, as well as coal fragments and coal ash; a literature review to establish the typical concentrations of Ra and Th found in coal and fly ash from US sources; the use of rare earth analyses to establish chemical signatures for non-Site related historic fill containing coal ash versus Site-related fill; and a quantitative analysis of Site-related data to determine if the radioactivity levels in historic fill containing coal were elevated. Soil samples were collected from two locations at the Site; fill areas containing coal ash that were not suspected to be impacted by Site activities, as well as fill areas containing coal ash that were associated with the former processing facility. These samples were analyzed for rare earth elements (REE), as well as Ra-228 and Th-232 and the ratios of lanthanum, cerium, and neodymium to Ra-228 and Th-232 were established for each sample. Based on a comparison of these data, a strong correlation was established between the rare earth/thorium decay chain ratios and the classification of material as either Site or non-Site related. These data were used to develop a higher background activity for fill areas containing non-Site related NORM. While the cleanup level defined in the Record of Decision remained unchanged, the higher background derived from the fly ash/coal ash material, as identified by REE analyses, resulted in higher project screening levels, which ensured that excavation activities did not 'chase' material that was not Site-related. To date, use of the coal ash background level has saved millions of dollars in cleanup costs since non-Site related contamination is not being remediated. Use of this approach to determine the appropriate background level for a site is relatively straightforward since it relies on visual observation of the soil for coal and fly ash, along with REE analyses, which is an inexpensive, quick, and established analytical method for soil samples. As long as a good rare earth profile of both contaminated and natural (in this case fly ash and coal ash) material can be established, the results can be quite definitive, which could result in significant volume reduction by minimizing the amount of material excavated and disposed of. This will lead to cost and time savings for what could be an otherwise costly and potentially complex excavation. Anyone performing environmental remediation of NORM contaminated sites may benefit from this paper and presentation. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗