SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “US SUPERFUND”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2017

Sensemaking, stakeholder discord, and long-term risk communication at a US Superfund site

Abstract Introduction: Risk communication can help reduce exposures to environmental contaminants, mitigate negative health outcomes, and inform community-based decisions about hazardous waste sites. While communication best practices have long guided such efforts, little research has examined unintended consequences arising from such guidelines. As rhetoric informs stakeholder sensemaking, the language used in and reinforced by these guidelines can challenge relationships and exacerbate stakeholder tensions. Objectives: This study evaluates risk communication at a U.S. Superfund site to identify unintended consequences arising from current risk communication practices. Methods: This qualitative case study crystallizes data spanning 6 years from three sources: 1) local newspaper coverage of site-related topics; 2) focus-group transcripts from a multi-year project designed to support future visioning of site use; and 3) published blog entries authored by a local environmental activist. Constant comparative analysis provides the study’s analytic foundation, with qualitative data analysis software QSR NVivo 8 supporting a three-step process: 1) provisional coding to identify broad topic categories within datasets, 2) coding occurrences of sensemaking constructs and emergent intra-dataset patterns, and 3) grouping related codes across datasets to examine the relationships among them. Results: Existing risk communication practices at this Superfund site contribute to a dichotomous conceptualization of multiple and diverse stakeholders as members of one of only two categories: the government or the public. This conceptualization minimizes perceptions of capacity, encourages public commitment to stances aligned with a preferred group, and contributes to negative expectations that can become self-fulfilling prophecies. Conclusion: Findings indicate a need to re-examine and adapt risk communication guidelines to encourage more pluralistic understanding of the stakeholder landscape.

Environmental Sciences & Ecology↗

DOE OSTI2020

US EPA Superfund Remediation Program Update: Revisions to Risk and Dose Assessment Models - 20368

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

US EPA Superfund Radiation Risk Assessment Update: Superfund Update: Revisions to Risk and Dose Assessment Tools - 18232

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund remedial program is finishing up a significant number of revisions to its guidance for the risk assessment process at radioactively contaminated Superfund sites. The six Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) and Dose Compliance Concentration (DCC) internet based calculators for risk and dose assessment at Superfund sites are being revised to reflect better science, revisions to existing exposure scenarios and new scenarios, and changes to match up more closely with the EPA chemical regional screening level calculator. A comprehensive set of revisions to the PRG calculator was finished in November 2014. Additional revisions to the other 5 calculators were made in 2015. A set of further revisions are expected to be finalized prior to December 2016 and will be discussed in this abstract. There are several additional revisions that may be finished prior to WM 2017 and will be presented if finished or discussed in more general terms if still underway. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

US EPA Superfund Radiation Risk Assessment Update: Superfund Update: Revisions to Risk and Dose Assessment Tools - 19057

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund remedial program is finishing up a significant number of revisions to its guidance for the risk assessment process at radioactively contaminated Superfund sites. The six Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) and Dose Compliance Concentration (DCC) internet-based calculators for radiation risk and dose assessment at Superfund sites are being revised to reflect better science, revisions to existing exposure scenarios and new scenarios, and changes to match up more closely with the EPA chemical Regional Screening Level calculator. A comprehensive set of revisions to the PRG calculator was finished in November 2014. Additional revisions to the other 5 calculators were made in 2015. A set of further revisions are expected to be finalized prior to December 2018 and will be discussed in this abstract. A new Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (RVISL) calculator is expected to be finished in 2019, similar to the Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL) for chemical calculator that was finished in 2018. There are several additional revisions that may be finished prior to WM 2019 and will be presented if finished or discussed in more general terms if still underway. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

US EPA Superfund Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (RVISL) Electronic Calculator - 20340

Currently, there is no U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance on correlating soil or groundwater levels of radon with indoor radon concentrations at Superfund sites. EPA is developing the Radon Vapor Intrusion Level Calculator (RVISL) Calculator which is an online tool. The RVISL calculator: (1) lists three radon isotopes (Rn-219, Rn-220 and Rn-222) known to pose a potential cancer risk through the inhalation pathway; (2) provides generally recommended risk and Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARAR) based preliminary remediation goals (PRG) for groundwater, soil gas (exterior to buildings and sub-slab) and indoor air for default target risk and ARAR based levels and exposure scenarios; and (3) allows calculation of site-specific PRGs based on user-defined target risk and ARAR based levels and exposure scenarios. EPA developed the RVISL calculator to help risk assessors, remedial project managers, and others involved with risk assessment and decision making at radioactively contaminated sites. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Determining Coal Ash Impacts on Radium and Thorium Background Levels in Soil Using Rare Earth Element Analyses - 18604

One challenge at large remediation sites contaminated with radiological materials is differentiating between low-level site-related contamination and NORM. This is because sites contaminated with radiological materials, such as thorium processing and mining and milling facilities, often generate wastes that contain contaminants that are similar to NORM deposits. For sites in urban areas, this issue is further compounded due to the presence of historic industrial fill (historic fill) containing materials such as fly ash, coal ash, and red brick, that exhibit elevated radioactivity levels. These materials often have activity levels near, or even well above, a site's cleanup goal. At a large Superfund Site in the eastern US (Site), many of the suspected Site-related fill areas are commingled with coal and fly ash. As the cleanup criteria for the radionuclides of concern (ROC), radium (Ra) and thorium (Th), is 5 pico-Curies per gram above background, a four-pronged approach was developed to determine if the coal and fly ash are impacting the background levels of the ROCs. This evaluation included a review of boring logs to visually confirm the presence of historic fill, as well as coal fragments and coal ash; a literature review to establish the typical concentrations of Ra and Th found in coal and fly ash from US sources; the use of rare earth analyses to establish chemical signatures for non-Site related historic fill containing coal ash versus Site-related fill; and a quantitative analysis of Site-related data to determine if the radioactivity levels in historic fill containing coal were elevated. Soil samples were collected from two locations at the Site; fill areas containing coal ash that were not suspected to be impacted by Site activities, as well as fill areas containing coal ash that were associated with the former processing facility. These samples were analyzed for rare earth elements (REE), as well as Ra-228 and Th-232 and the ratios of lanthanum, cerium, and neodymium to Ra-228 and Th-232 were established for each sample. Based on a comparison of these data, a strong correlation was established between the rare earth/thorium decay chain ratios and the classification of material as either Site or non-Site related. These data were used to develop a higher background activity for fill areas containing non-Site related NORM. While the cleanup level defined in the Record of Decision remained unchanged, the higher background derived from the fly ash/coal ash material, as identified by REE analyses, resulted in higher project screening levels, which ensured that excavation activities did not 'chase' material that was not Site-related. To date, use of the coal ash background level has saved millions of dollars in cleanup costs since non-Site related contamination is not being remediated. Use of this approach to determine the appropriate background level for a site is relatively straightforward since it relies on visual observation of the soil for coal and fly ash, along with REE analyses, which is an inexpensive, quick, and established analytical method for soil samples. As long as a good rare earth profile of both contaminated and natural (in this case fly ash and coal ash) material can be established, the results can be quite definitive, which could result in significant volume reduction by minimizing the amount of material excavated and disposed of. This will lead to cost and time savings for what could be an otherwise costly and potentially complex excavation. Anyone performing environmental remediation of NORM contaminated sites may benefit from this paper and presentation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2016

Biota Modeling in EPA’s Preliminary Remediation Goal and Dose Compliance Concentration Calculators for Use in EPA Superfund Risk Assessment: Explanation of Intake Rate Derivation, Transfer Factor Compilation, and Mass Loading Factor Sources

The Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) and Dose Compliance Concentration (DCC) calculators are screening level tools that set forth Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recommended approaches, based upon currently available information with respect to risk assessment, for response actions at Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites, commonly known as Superfund. The screening levels derived by the PRG and DCC calculators are used to identify isotopes contributing the highest risk and dose as well as establish preliminary remediation goals. Each calculator has a residential gardening scenario and subsistence farmer exposure scenarios that require modeling of the transfer of contaminants from soil and water into various types of biota (crops and animal products). New publications of human intake rates of biota; farm animal intakes of water, soil, and fodder; and soil to plant interactions require updates be implemented into the PRG and DCC exposure scenarios. Recent improvements have been made in the biota modeling for these calculators, including newly derived biota intake rates, more comprehensive soil mass loading factors (MLFs), and more comprehensive soil to tissue transfer factors (TFs) for animals and soil to plant transfer factors (BV’s). New biota have been added in both the produce and animal products categories that greatly improve the accuracy and utility of the PRG and DCC calculators and encompass greater geographic diversity on a national and international scale.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2019

96 Park Way Vicinity Property Remediation Challenges at the FUSRAP Maywood Superfund Site, Maywood, New Jersey - 19216

The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Maywood Superfund Site (FMSS), 'the Project,' was transferred to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in 1997. Shortly thereafter, USACE initiated FUSRAP remediation efforts on 24 commercial and residential properties and, in addition, the Project team evaluated properties previously addressed at the FMSS. One of those properties was located at 96 Park Way in Rochelle Park, New Jersey. The property history included removal of contaminated soil in 1985 by the US Department of Energy (US DOE). Soil sampling performed after removal of contaminated soil indicated the cleanup met applicable guidelines in place at the time. A Five-Year Review of the FMSS conducted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in 2009 found that 96 Park Way did not meet the current residential cleanup levels for the site and recommended additional study and remediation, if warranted. The current levels are established in the approved cleanup plan for the FMSS (known as the Record of Decision [ROD]) issued in 2003. Based on USEPA's recommendation, USACE carefully reviewed all available records for the property. The review considered the differences between the soil cleanup standards used in the 1980's and the 2003 ROD standards, which are slightly more restrictive for deeper soils. The USACE conducted detailed field studies at 96 Park Way in 2014-15 to address the USEPA findings. This work included gamma walkover surveys and soil sampling to depths of approximately 3.5 meters. The results identified three discrete areas at depth that did not meet the ROD residential soil cleanup standard: two areas bordering an adjacent highway (New Jersey Route 17) and one along railroad property adjacent to the site. To address these areas, soil removal actions were conducted in 2016-17. The principal challenge with construction, engineering, and community relations was the property housed two sensitive facilities: a long-term assisted care living facility and a short-term post-surgery rehabilitation center. The operations at these facilities could not be interrupted in any way during FUSRAP activities. The three FUSRAP-impacted areas were addressed and restored in coordination with the USEPA, property management, and local officials. Site restoration presented a particular challenge well after the remedial action was completed, as the property owner and the government disagreed on the level of restoration. Those negotiations are ongoing as of this writing. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 6: Interagency Community of Practice in Risk and Performance Assessments

This panel focused on the status of the Inter-agency Performance and Risk Assessment Community of Practice (P and RA COP). Representatives from the P and RA COP and subject matter experts discussed lessons learned and provide feedback on building the P and RA COP to support risk-informed environmental decision making. Each panelist provided a brief presentation followed by open discussion. Presentations proposed include: 1 - Applying Lessons Learned on Engineered Barrier Service Life to Performance Assessment (Craig Benson, University of Virginia - CRESP (USA)); 2 - Decision Analysis in Integrated Risk and Performance Assessment: Challenges (Paul Black, Neptune and Company, Inc. (USA)); 3 - Managing Uncertainty (Roger Seitz, IEI (USA)); 4 - U.S. EPA Superfund Program's Need for Model Comparison for Radioactive Contamination (Stuart Walker, Office of Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI), US EPA (USA)); 5 - CRESP Activities Supporting Performance and Risk Assessments (Kevin Brown, Vanderbilt University - CRESP (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

U.S. EPA Superfund Counts Per Minute (CPM) Electronic Calculator - 17305

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund program is developing a new Counts Per Minute (CPM) calculator to correlate real-time survey results, which are often expressed as counts per minute, to contaminant concentrations that are more typically provided in risk assessments or for cleanup levels, usually expressed in pCi/g or pCi/m{sup 2}. Currently there is no EPA guidance for Superfund sites on correlating count per minute field survey readings back to risk, dose, or other Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARAR) based concentrations. The CPM calculator is a web-based model that estimates a gamma detector response for a given level of contamination. The intent of the CPM calculator is to facilitate more real-time measurements within a Superfund response framework. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Using Superfund Guidance and Tools for the Remediation of Uranium Mine sites - 19056

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI) has primary responsibility for implementing the long-term (non-emergency) portion of a key U.S. law regulating cleanup of contaminated sites: the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, CERCLA, nicknamed 'Superfund.' The purpose of the Superfund program is to protect human health and the environment over the long term from releases or potential releases of hazardous substances from abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The focus of this paper is on the guidance and tools for addressing radioactively contaminated sites by the Superfund program that are most important when remediating uranium mine sites. This presentation will also discuss some of the key features of these tools that may have more utility at a uranium mine site. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Operations and Recent Upgrades to a Tritium Recycling Facility - 20375

Nuclear Sources and Services Inc. (NSSI) is a waste handling treatment company that has been operating since 1971. In 2000, NSSI began building a 1,000 m{sup 2} (∼10,000 sqft) tritium recycling facility on the Houston, Texas premises to address a growing need in the waste disposal market. Over the years, the capability of the facility grew to address many different waste streams with the goal of recycling > 99.9% of all tritium activity back into the fusion community. This is achieved by maintaining an effluent stack release well below the 150 GBq/year (C Ci/year) operating limit and maintaining all liquid and solid waste disposal below the low-level radioactive release limit of 0.C MBq/kg (10 μCi/kg). The unique processing systems in the facility attracts many challenging contracts. Within the past two years, NSSI has engaged with customers to treat; organic mixed wastes that simultaneously contain tritium and carbon-14, safely extract tritium from large quantities of exit sign lights, and remove tritium from uncharacterised legacy depleted uranium beds from a superfund site. This paper will outline the initial testing, the system upgrades to treat these varied streams, and the progress in processing the feedstocks provided by these projects. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 80: Interagency Community of Practice in Risk and Performance Assessment

This panel focused on the status of the Inter-agency Performance and Risk Assessment Community of Practice (P and RA COP). Representatives from the P and RA COP and subject matter experts discussed lessons learned and provided feedback on building the P and RA COP to support risk-informed environmental decision making. Panelists with presentations: Understanding Mechanisms to Manage Uncertainty and Risk in Waste Containment Systems (Craig Benson, University of Virginia - CRESP (USA) Scaling for Performance Assessments (Paul Black, Katie Catlett, Doug Anderson, Paul Duffy, Tom Stockton, Sam Van Sickle, John Carson); Interagency Community of Practice in Rick and Performance Assessment (Horst Monken Fernandes); Institutional Controls as a Risk Management Tool (David Esh); Superfund: Explanation of Screening and PRG's for Risk and Dose Assessment (Stuart Walker)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

This letter corrects factual errors and omissions in Ellen K. Silbergeld's commentary on ''Managing hazards in place: The risks of residual risk''

Highlights: • The Bunker Hill Superfund Site has a long history of managing lead wastes on site. • We rely on comprehensive Institutional Controls Program to:• educate and train the community to limit their exposure. • monitor and maintain infrastructure and physical barriers to exposure. • monitor pediatric blood lead levels. • monitor interior house dust lead levels. • We share information widely via the:• internet • scientific journals • books • newsletters • reports • facebook • youtube.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2019

Radon Considerations at Environmental Remediation Sites - 19469

Radon and how it is regulated poses many challenges to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in executing the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). These challenges include:, terminology; radon measurement methods and limitations; state certification and testing requirements; limited and potentially conflicting federal guidance; background considerations; and limited experience regarding application of guidance; among others. These challenges and others are discussed in detail. The FUSRAP Maywood Superfund Site (FMSS) is presented as a case study demonstrating these challenges and considerations to mitigate or address the challenges. The USACE, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) (NJDEP) have spent several years working on and continue to work through the radon issues at FMSS. The FMSS experience, information, and solutions presented in this paper will be helpful to other environmental sites with radium and thorium contamination. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Superfund Update: Revisions to Risk and Dose Assessment Tools - 17302

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund remedial program is finishing up a significant number of revisions to its guidance for the risk assessment process at radioactively contaminated Superfund sites. The six Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) and Dose Compliance Concentration (DCC) internet based calculators for risk and dose assessment at Superfund sites are being revised to reflect better science, revisions to existing exposure scenarios and new scenarios, and changes to match up more closely with the EPA chemical regional screening level calculator. A comprehensive set of revisions to the PRG calculator was finished in November 2014. Additional revisions to the other 5 calculators were made in. A set of further revisions are expected to be finalized prior to December 2016 and will be discussed in this abstract. There are several additional revisions that may be finished prior to WM 2017 and will be presented if finished or discussed in more general terms if still underway. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

FUSRAP Maywood Site - Remediation of a Residential Property at 61 Trudy Drive, Lodi, NJ - 17533

The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) is the U.S. government program started in 1974 to identify, investigate and clean up or control sites that became contaminated as a result of the nation's early atomic programs. The FUSRAP Maywood (New Jersey) Superfund Site (FMSS) consists of 92 designated property parcels known as vicinity properties. 61 Trudy Drive in Lodi, New Jersey is one such vicinity property. Construction planning for a recently-completed remedial excavation at 61 Trudy Drive was predicated on a fundamental question: to remediate the property with the existing home remaining in place or to demolish the exiting home. Answering this question involved detailed engineering and cost analyses, programmatic considerations, and stakeholder input. 61 Trudy Drive was originally addressed under FUSRAP in 1985 by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). However, subsequent remediation on an adjacent property by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in 1998 suggested that residual contamination remained at depth at 61 Trudy. The property owner at that time declined to allow FUSRAP access to the property. However, a property transfer in 2012 presented USACE with an opportunity to address this property. Characterization of the property began in 2013; remedial activities were completed in 2015. The 61 Trudy Drive remediation required an intensive stakeholder communications program tailored for several audiences, including the affected property owner, local government officials and the neighboring community This paper will present the FUSRAP history at 61 Trudy Drive, to provide context for recent FUSRAP actions there. It will then focus on the challenges and complexities of performing environmental remediation in a suburban residential setting, focusing on both construction and communications. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Using EPA's Risk Assessment Tools for Superfund When Addressing Removal Actions and Late-Phase Response to Terrorist Attacks - 18228

EPA's Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI) has three internet based calculators, or risk assessment models, for developing risk based Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) for radioactively contaminated CERCLA sites. These PRG calculators are EPA's recommended methodology for developing risk-based concentrations for remedial actions for soil and water (PRG), inside buildings (BPRG), and outside hard surfaces (SPRG). EPA has three equivalent calculators for dose assessment, which are the Dose Compliance Concentration (DCC) calculator for soil and water, inside buildings (BDCC), and outside hard surfaces (SDCC). The three PRG calculators also include default PRG tables provided for each of the calculators showing concentrations corresponding to 1 x 10-6 when the calculators are run using all of their default parameters. This presentation will provide information on how users may employ these tools beyond their original intended uses in the remedial program, to develop risk based cleanup levels during the late-phase portion of an actual response after a Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) or Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) terrorist attack or a major accident at a Nuclear Power Plant (NPP), or a simulation during an exercise of an RDD/IND/NPP event, they may want to run the calculator using more site-specific data. This presentation will provide information on how users may employ these tools beyond their original intended uses in the remedial program, and focus on some of the more conservative default parameters that are likely candidates for replacement by site-specific information. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗