Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Uranium-molybdenum”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Formation of uranium nitride nanoparticles via mechanical alloying of uranium-molybdenum alloy fuels in gaseous nitrogen

Uranium-molybdenum (U-Mo) alloys show promise as a nuclear fuel system due to their high thermal conductivity and fuel loading capability. However, U-Mo systems are susceptible to irradiation induced swelling ultimately affecting the cladding via mechanical and chemical interactions. To address these shortcomings, this research investigated the formation of uranium mononitride (UN) nanoparticles within a 90 wt% U/10 wt% Mo (U-10Mo) matrix to act as a prospective defect sink for fission products at nanometric hetero-interfaces. To promote the formation of UN, U-10Mo powders were mechanically alloyed under a high purity nitrogen atmosphere. Variations of the milling process investigated included media size, duration of milling, and number of times the milling jar was re-aerated with nitrogen gas. Characterization of the fuel microstructure was completed using light element analysis, X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission-electron microscopy, electron energy loss spectroscopy, and atom probe tomography. UN nanoparticles measuring 1–5 nm in radius were observed in the U-Mo matrix as early as 1 h into the mechanical alloying process. Milling time in excess of 10 h was found to lead to deleterious effects induced by the stainless-steel milling media.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Early self-organization of fission gas bubble superlattice formation in neutron-irradiated monolithic U-10Mo fuels

Self-organization of defect superlattices in far-from-equilibrium systems presents a promising way to mitigate swelling concerns in nuclear materials. The gas bubble superlattice (GBS) is a highly ordered, three-dimensional complex defect structure that can retain fission gasses in Uranium-Molybdenum (U-Mo) fuels. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigation of monolithic U-10Mo fuel irradiated to 1.15 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 and 1.30 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 revealed that early-stage ordering preferentially occurs at the grain boundaries (GB) and that the critical bubble size for complete ordering is ~3 nm. Once formed at the GB, the GBS extends towards the grain interior; however, the spread in distance from the GB varies likely depending on the type and strength of the GB sink. TEM results also showed a possible correlation between the growth and evolution of the intragranular disordered bubbles and large dislocation networks. The fission product distribution in and outside of the GBS was also investigated confirming the presence of xenon in the GBS, as well as other fission products including cesium, barium, lanthanum, and cerium.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

The role of UC inclusions in the development of fission gas bubble superlattice neutron-irradiated monolithic U-10Mo fuels

Uranium Carbide (UC) inclusions are the most prevalent impurities in Uranium-Molybdenum (U-Mo) fuel and are considered undesirable because they could potentially affect fuel performance. This work revealed that, like grain boundaries (gBs), UC inclusions could help facilitate the formation of the fission gas bubble superlattice (GBS). The GBS is a highly organized complex defect structure that can effectively store fission gases, thereby inhibiting fuel swelling. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that GBS self-organization can initiate at the UC/U-Mo interfaces in U-10Mo fuel irradiated to low fission density. Furthermore, this study also revealed that the UC boundary in U-10Mo irradiated to low fission density is wavy and periodic in morphology and that GBS formation is semi-coherent with the UC boundary. Because the initiation of GBS occurs at gBs and UC/U-Mo interfaces, the fission gas inventory is always highest at those regions compared to the U-Mo grain interior. Consequently, at higher fission densities, it is likely that high burnup structure (HBS) development via grain refinement will begin at gBs and UC/U-Mo interfaces.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Evidence of Xe-incorporation in the bubble superlattice in irradiated U-Mo fuel

For years, researchers have reported competing ideas on the formation of fission gas bubble super lattices in metallic fuels, which was postulated to be comprised of elemental xenon (Xe) atoms. However, the chemical and physical arrangement of these elements within this gas bubble superlattice has not been verified. In this contribution, Xe was chemically profiled using atomic resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and atom probe tomography (APT) techniques in irradiated uranium-molybdenum (U-Mo) fuels. These complementary techniques provide conclusive evidence of Xe presence in bubble superlattice up to fission densities of 4.5×10 21 fissions/cm 3 and provide quantitative assessment of Xe content within the bubble superlattice. Based on the results of simultaneous imaging and spectroscopy using STEM, the chemical composition of the Xe bubble superlattice present in fission densities less than 4.5x10 21 fissions/cm 3 in U-Mo fuel was measured and found to be up to 8±1.3 atomic %. APT data complements STEM findings on Xe distribution in irradiated U-Mo fuel sample. APT showed a chemical composition of 0.7±0.1 atomic%. Finally, this study concludes by providing conclusive evidence that Xe is not only present within an atomically arranged bubble superlattice but provides fundamental insight the physical state of Xe in low enriched U-Mo monolithic fuel.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Porosity, swelling, and composition evolution in high-burnup monolithic U-Mo fuel

The microstructural progression of very high-burnup (>8 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 ) monolithic uranium-molybdenum (U-10wt.%Mo) was analyzed, providing crucial insights into the behavior of post-recrystallized nuclear fuel, where scant data exists. Three focused ion beam cuboids sourced from a fuel plate with varying local burnups of 8.86 × 10 21 , 9.05 × 10 21 , and 9.36 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 were characterized. The porosity and composition of the samples were evaluated to characterize the evolution of the microstructure as a function of fission density and different locations on the fuel plate, while simultaneously isolating plate-specific parameters such as Zr diffusion barrier thickness, hot-isostatic-pressing conditions, enrichment, and reactor conditions. The porosity was segmented, and the three-dimensional distribution of the porosity was extrapolated from the two-dimensional segmentation. The composition was assessed and quantified using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy areal mapping. The porosity fraction increased as a function of the burnup from 27.77±0.51, 35.12±1.54, and 37.71±0.44 % for 8.86 × 10 21 , 9.05 × 10 21 , and 9.36 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 , respectively. When compared to literature, the porosity volume fraction plateaus at burnups greater than 6 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 , while the pore size grows linearly as a function of fission density. The number of large pores increased in number density as a function of burnup, while the smallest pores (<0.3 µm) increased up to 9.05 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 , followed by a decrease at 9.36 × 10 21 fissions/cm 3 . The delamination and cracking in the fuel plate propagated through an interconnected porosity sublayer identified ∼5 µm from the diffusion barrier. The local swelling of the specimens was within or near the prediction bounds of the Robinson-Williams model for local swelling. The fission products, strontium, barium, cerium, and cesium, precipitated into the pores, while neodymium accumulated adjacent to the pores. Furthermore, these findings have direct implications for the development of fuel performance codes and the accurate documentation of the microstructure evolution in high burnup U-Mo, thus enhancing the safety and efficiency of nuclear fuel usage.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A critical review of the history of fabricating monolithic U-Mo fuel plates

The fabrication of monolithic uranium-molybdenum alloy fuels, specifically those developed for high-performance research and test reactors, began in the early 2000s. The primary fuel form consists of uranium alloyed with 10-wt% molybdenum in a thin foil coated with zirconium and encapsulated in aluminum-6061 cladding. Over the years, the process has evolved with different types of casting, heat treatments, rolling schedules, and cladding applications. This review examines the history of these fabrication processes and their impact on microstructure and fuel-swelling performance. Even though various fabrication methods were used, we found little correlation between fabrication variation and fuel swelling. This insensitive relationship between fabrication variation and fuel swelling is primarily due to inhomogeneous microstructures that formed during casting and grain refinement that occurred during rolling. We conclude that the fabrication processes we examined produced similar microstructures, indicating that the fuel microstructure is somewhat insensitive to the fabrication parameters evaluated. However, the relatively small amount of historic data, such as those for grain sizes, limited this analysis. More recently fabricated materials, such as those from ongoing irradiation experiment, Mini-Plate-1 and Mini-Plate-2, were also excluded from this analysis and are intended to be reviewed separately. The findings, that fuel microstructure is somewhat insensitive to the fabrication parameters, do not imply that any fabrication method is acceptable, given the uncertainties in data and fuel-swelling observations. For example, only arc melting and vacuum induction melting casting processes were previously explored in the historic fabrication efforts. In conclusion, the findings should not be extrapolated to other casting processes.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Micro X-ray computed tomography examination of mini plate fuel with hot isostatic pressed aluminum cladding

In order to minimize proliferation risks and improve security of nuclear material, the United States high performance research and test reactors (USHPRR) program is tasked with converting nuclear reactors that are fueled with highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels to operate with low-enriched uranium (LEU) nuclear fuels. One favorable LEU fuel configuration is plate fuel with a metallic uranium-molybdenum foil clad within an aluminum alloy (AA 6061). In this fuel, the aluminum cladding is bonded with a hot isostatic pressing (HIP) method to seal the cladding around the fuel meat. However, the HIP process parameters influence the cladding performance, as a defective or incomplete bond can cause a pathway for corrosion. Micro X-ray computed tomography (XCT), a nondestructive technique that provides volumetric imaging, can be applied to inspect fuel plate cladding at the engineering scale. In this work, XCT methodology was developed and successfully utilized to not only observe the bond line of unirradiated mini fuel plates, but to also identify subsurface abnormalities in the plates’ cladding. Importantly, in future work, this technique could be applied to fuel plates, pre- and post-irradiation, to quantify irradiation effects on cladding defects and bond line integrity.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

FAST Irradiations, Postirradiation Examinations, and Modeling of U-Mo for Light Water Reactor Applications

Many next generation light water reactor (LWR) concepts, such as mobile small modular reactors, are seeking to use smaller core dimensions than conventional reactor types. Smaller reactor cores require an increase in fissile material to maintain reactivity. For non-proliferation purposes, enrichment increases are limited to less than 20% (high assay low enriched uranium, [HALEU]) and so higher uranium density fuels than UO 2 must be considered. To this end, uranium-molybdenum alloys were tested using the Fission Accelerated Steady-state Test (FAST) approach. The experiment test matrix is focused on identifying the temperature transition between low swelling and high fission gas retention to break away swelling and low fission gas retention. This paper documents the results of irradiation tests and post-irradiation examinations (PIE) including neutron radiography, rodlet profilometry, fission gas collection analysis, and optical metallography. The results of these tests showed that unconstrained U-Mo fuels (solid, Na-bonded rodlets) have a swelling threshold between 400-450°C with minimal fission gas release below this point. Higher temperature solid fuel showed microstructural zoning with small pore networks while lower temperature solid fuels have a uniform microstructure with large pore networks. U-Annular Mo fuels where swelling had some self-constraint imposed upon it, were shown to have much reduced swelling compared to their solid counterparts as well as very low fission gas release for irradiation temperatures up to 500°C. These initial results show that the use of U-Mo in constrained fuel geometries could be used as a high uranium density HALEU fuel for LWRs.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Hot Hydrogen Testing of W-Coated UN Kernels in a Mo30W Matrix

Ceramic uranium mononitride (UN) is being considered as a reactor fuel for nuclear thermal propulsion. To avoid or reduce the dissociation of UN at the high temperatures needed, embedding it in a metallic matrix (cermet) has been proposed. To assess the viability of this concept, hot hydrogen testing of tungsten-coated UN kernels embedded in a Mo-30 wt% W (Mo30W) alloy matrix has been performed at temperatures from 1800°C to 2300°C. Both the isolated kernels and kernels consolidated by spark plasma sintering in the Mo30W matrix were tested. In addition to direct observations and mass loss measurements, the samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) after each run. The decomposition of UN started at 1800°C despite the coating and matrix, and increased at 2000°C. Uranium seeped through the tungsten grain boundaries of the coating at all temperatures. The consolidated sample expanded irregularly at 2000°C through the formation of voids, and SEM/EDS analysis showed uranium-containing veins in the matrix consisting of U 2 Mo according to the XRD data. The observed pore generation at 2000°C was explained by the formation of water vapor from residual oxides and diffused hydrogen. At 2200°C and above, both the kernels and the consolidated samples melted through the formation of uranium or low–melting point uranium-molybdenum alloys.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Scoping Study for Fast Flux Testing in the Advanced Test Reactor

The value of fast spectrum reactors remains prominent in the nuclear technology portfolio. The performance of these reactors can be maximized with advancements in nuclear fuel technologies, but development of these technologies is currently held back by lack of fast spectrum test reactors available to the United States. Spectral modification of experiment positions in the thermal spectrum Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) has long been used to support fast reactor fuel development, but these methods have not been progressed to their full potential. This study investigated the use of concentric rings of aluminum-clad fuel plates in ATR flux traps and thermal neutron absorbing filters to increase fast neutron flux on test specimens. This concept was termed the Boosted Energy Advanced Spectrum Test (BEAST). This approach will enable irradiation of advanced fuel designs in prototypic-length fuel pins and representative flux environment to support post irradiation exams, enable transient testing, and produce the type of data that will permit lead test assembly irradiations in true Sodium Fast Reactors (SFRs) when they become available. Neutronic predictions were performed to investigate BEAST design options and thermal hydraulic models were produced to ensure feasibility of BEAST. Two versions were considered based on the geometric limitations of ATR’s small and large flux traps. The small version was found to be preferable due to slightly higher fast flux and fast-to-thermal neutron ratio. Perhaps more influentially, the small flux trap option was also preferred to avoid conflict with ongoing very high temperature reactor fuel irradiation programs in ATR’s large northeast flux trap. The small flux trap option provided less than half the test volume of the large version, but still had adequate volume for seven SFR pins in cross section which could be stacked two-high in ATR’s 1.2m long core to accommodate up to 14 EBR-II size pins. The preference for the small flux trap configuration should be revisited if additional collaborative test programs emerge with the need to irradiate a significant volume of additional specimens. Calculations were performed regarding a lithium deuteride ring to convert thermal neutrons into 14 MeV fusion neutrons. At the time this report was written these calculations were partially complete and it remains to be seen whether the concept would be worth including in BEAST. Given the preference for the small flux trap option, which does not afford enough room for the 14 MeV ring, it was concluded to defer future work on the lithium deuteride ring. This decision could be revisited if fusion material research programs emerge for collaborative testing in BEAST. A cadmium-lined specimen holder design was found to be adequate in filtering thermal neutrons and preferred over other neutron absorbers based on past experience with cadmium baskets. It was acknowledged that cadmium-bearing hardware would become depleted and need to be replaced occasionally, which appeared feasible from a mechanical design perspective. Neutronic studies investigated different enrichment levels in the booster fuel using uranium-molybdenum alloy dispersion fuel which has performed well in past ATR irradiations. Both options were able to drive fuel pins to SFR-like fission heating rates. The high enriched booster fuel option outperformed the low enriched option by ~20% on key metrics including fast flux and fast-to-thermal ratio, but the low enriched option was favored in order to broaden options for potential fuel suppliers. The preferred BEAST design options including cadmium filter with low enriched booster fuel in the small flux trap configuration was predicted to achieve 6.2E14 n/cm2sec fast flux (>0.1 MeV) with a fast-to-thermal ratio of 44.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Critical Review on the History of Fabricating Monolithic U-Mo Fuel Plates

Fabrication of uranium-molybdenum alloy fuels has been occurring since the early 2000s in support of the development of a high-uranium-density low-enrichment fuel for use in high-performance research and test reactors which operate at relatively low temperatures. The primary fuel form—a thin foil of uranium, alloyed with 10wt% molybdenum, which is coated in a layer of zirconium and then encapsulated with aluminum 6061 as a cladding material—was developed over a number of years.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Plan to Qualify New Fuel for the High Flux Isotope Reactor for Material Minimization

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of five high power research reactors the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) Program, Office of Conversion is working to convert from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to using low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This effort stems from the primary objective within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to achieve permanent threat reduction by minimizing, and when possible, eliminating weapon-usable nuclear material around the world. Under M3’s Office of Conversion, the U.S. High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Project is pursuing fuel qualification and licensing of LEU fuels to support the high-performance reactors. All high-performance reactors except HFIR will be converted to LEU monolithic uranium-molybdenum alloy fuel. HFIR will be evaluated for conversion to LEU using a uranium silicide fuel, namely, U3Si2-Al dispersion fuel. The mission of the USHPRR Project is to develop the technology needed to reduce, and eventually eliminate, worldwide use of HEU in civilian applications. The goal is to develop the technical means needed to use low enriched uranium (LEU) instead of HEU fuel in research and test reactors without significant penalties in performance, economics, or safety of the reactors. The USHPRR Project has four major elements, called Pillars: Fuel Qualification (FQ) managed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Fuel Fabrication (FF) managed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Reactor Conversion (RC) managed at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne), and Cross-Cutting (CC) managed at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). FQ is responsible for the qualification of the fuel type. RC is responsible for supporting reactor conversion analysis and overseeing licensing submittals leading to conversions of domestic reactors to LEU fuel. For the FQ effort, FQ (INL) worked in collaboration with RC (Argonne) and ORNL to develop the plan for the uranium silicide fuel qualification for HFIR. The resulting HFIR Fuel Qualification Plan provides the general approach for the USHPRR team to move the selected uranium silicide fuel design for HFIR conversion through qualification. Authorization and use in HFIR will be approved through the DOE’s Office of Science. Uranium silicide fuel was previously qualified in NUREG-1313 at an approximate maximum heat flux of 1.4 MW/m2 and a maximum fuel section temperature of about 130°C. In addition to the different regulator process utilized by DOE, these upper limits will be exceeded in HFIR; therefore, further testing will be necessary to ensure the fuel can meet HFIR qualification requirements. The HFIR fuel loading may exceed 4.8 gU/cm3 which was determined in the NUREG-1313 safety evaluation to be acceptable for use in non-power NRC-licensed reactors provided there exist no other safety considerations. In addition, the uranium silicide fuel will need to be qualified in a HFIR-specific design. This plan includes the currently available information from the USHPRR Project Functions and Requirements document and expands these requirements to ensure that planned tests have traceable results providing evidence that the requirements have been met. Data collection methods are discussed as well as the process to show that the requirements have been met. This document is designed to provide a pathway for researchers to obtain data necessary and at the appropriate quality level for HFIR fuel qualification

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Formation and Consolidation of UN Nanostructures in U-Mo Fuel via Mechanical Alloying and Spark Plasma Sintering

Uranium-molybdenum (U-Mo) alloys show promise as a nuclear fuel system due to their high thermal conductivity and high fuel loading capability. However, U-Mo systems suffer from irradiation induced swelling ultimately affecting the cladding via mechanical and chemical interaction. To address these shortcomings, this thesis investigated the formation of uranium mononitride (UN) nanoparticles within a U-10Mo matrix. To promote the formation of UN, U-10Mo powders were mechanically alloyed under a high purity nitrogen cover gas (99.9995%) atmosphere. Variations were made in stainless steel milling media size, duration of milling, and number of times the milling jar was re-aerated with nitrogen gas. UN nanoparticulates were successfully formed within the U-Mo matrix and was characterized utilizing light element analysis, X-ray diffractometry, scanning and transmission-electron microscopy, electron energy loss spectroscopy, and atom probe tomography. Presence of the UN nanoparticles was found as early as 1-hour into the mechanical alloying process, and significant iron contamination found after 10-hours of milling. The U-Mo/UN powders were compacted using spark plasma sintering techniques in order to stabilize the nanostructure. U-Mo/UN compacts containing small amounts of neodymium and helium were analyzed to observe the defect migration tendencies of fission products within the fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Plan to Qualify New Fuel for the High Flux Isotope Reactor for Material Minimization

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of five high power research reactors the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) Program, Office of Conversion is working to convert from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to using low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This effort stems from the primary objective within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to achieve permanent threat reduction by minimizing, and when possible, eliminating weapon-usable nuclear material around the world. Under M3’s Office of Conversion, the U.S. High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Project is pursuing fuel qualification and licensing of the high-performance reactors to operate with LEU fuels. All high-performance reactors except HFIR will be converted to LEU monolithic uranium-molybdenum alloy fuel. HFIR will be evaluated for conversion to LEU using a uranium silicide fuel, namely, U3Si2-Al dispersion fuel.The mission of the USHPRR Project is to develop the technology needed to reduce, and eventually eliminate, worldwide use of HEU in civilian applications. The goal is to develop the technical means needed to use low enriched uranium (LEU) instead of HEU fuel in research and test reactors without significant penalties in performance, economics, or safety of the reactors. The USHPRR Project has four major elements, called Pillars: Fuel Qualification (FQ) managed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Fuel Fabrication (FF) managed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Reactor Conversion (RC) managed at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne), and Cross-Cutting (CC) managed at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). FQ is responsible for the qualification of the fuel type. RC is responsible for supporting reactor conversion analysis and overseeing licensing submittals leading to conversions of domestic reactors to LEU fuel. For the FQ effort, FQ (INL) worked in collaboration with RC (Argonne) and ORNL to develop the plan for the uranium silicide fuel qualification for HFIR.The resulting HFIR Fuel Qualification Plan provides the general approach for the USHPRR team to move the selected uranium silicide fuel design for HFIR conversion through qualification. Authorization and use in HFIR will be approved through the DOE’s Office of Science. Uranium silicide fuel was previously qualified in NUREG-1313 at an approximate maximum heat flux of 1.4 MW/m2 and a maximum fuel section temperature of about 130°C. In addition to the different regulator process utilized by DOE, these upper limits will be exceeded in HFIR; therefore, further testing will be necessary to ensure the fuel can meet HFIR qualification requirements. The HFIR fuel loading may exceed 4.8 gU/cm3 which was determined in the NUREG-1313 safety evaluation to be acceptable for use in non-power NRC-regulated reactors provided there exist no other safety considerations. In addition, the uranium silicide fuel will need to be qualified in a HFIR-specific design. This plan includes the currently available information from the USHPRR Project Functions and Requirements document and expands these requirements to ensure that planned tests have traceable results providing evidence that the requirements have been met. Data collection methods are discussed as well as the process to show that the requirements have been met. This document is designed to provide a pathway for researchers to obtain data necessary and at the appropriate quality level for HFIR fuel qualification.

Shokes, Tamara↗

Nuclear Fuel and Pu Redox Studies from The Glenn T. Seaborg Institute at Idaho National Laboratory

The Glenn T. Seaborg Institute at Idaho National Laboratory (INL-GTSI) focuses on advancing fundamental research in the actinide sciences by providing unique opportunities to early career scientists and engineers to gain experience studying the actinide elements and their associated systems. The INL-GTSI is built from three focus areas that are based on the expertise and supporting infrastructure at INL and include solid state chemistry and physics, solution phase chemistry and physics, and forensic and isotope science. INL is the lead Laboratory for nuclear energy research and development in the U. S. and the research on nuclear fuels performed under the INL-GTSI gives good examples of solid state studies. Uranium-Molybdenum (U-Mo) alloys are leading fuel candidates for conversion of high performance research and test reactors to low-enriched fuels. During irradiation, generated fission gas accumulates into bubbles and self-organizes into a gas bubble superlattice (GBS) that effectively stores fission gases and inhibits fuel swelling. A study on the early self- organizing behavior of the GBS shows that not only grain boundaries but the interfaces between the U-Mo matrix and uranium carbide (UC) impurities are important to GBS formation.[1] In solution, understanding the complex redox behavior of plutonium in aqueous environments is critical for establishing optimized nuclear waste reprocessing solvent systems and storage tank environments. INL-GTSI researchers have produced an experimentally validated multi-scale model of the gamma radiation induced behavior of plutonium ions in concentrated aqueous HNO3 solutions.[2] Here, gamma radiation effected only minimal steady state changes in the redox distribution of the plutonium oxidation states. The redox cycling between Pu(IV) and Pu(III) is demonstrated to be mediated by the •OH/NO3• radical oxidation of Pu(III) and the H2O2/HNO3 driven reduction of Pu(IV). The INL-GTSI offers young researchers the unique chance to work directly with actinide bearing materials in a U. S. National Laboratory environment. Further topical areas of interest to the INL-GTSI include, but are not limited to, fundamental actinide properties, structure/property (electronic, magnetic, thermal) relations, actinide quantum criticality, f- electron interactions, electron correlations, computational studies, new phases, defect effects, interface interactions, isotope production and separation, forensic analytical chemistry, structure and dynamic properties of actinides in non-aqueous media, separations chemistry and kinetics for advanced nuclear fuel cycles, radiation effects, and innovative and advanced ligand design for complexation of the actinides.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Assessment of effective elastic constants of U-10Mo fuel: A multiscale modeling and homogenization study

The significant microstructural changes that U-Mo fuel undergoes during operation degrades its mechanical properties and structural integrity. Microstructural evolution entails the formation, evolution, and redistribution of porosity in conjunction with grain refinement. In the present paper, we employ numerical approaches to assess the impact of the various microstructural features—grains, nanoscale intragranular fission gas bubbles, and mesoscale intergranular voids—on the degradation of elastic constants. Phase-field microstructure models are combined with the asymptotic expansion homogenization technique in order to derive the effective elastic constants as a function of porosity and fission density. Here the results are verified and compared against theoretical bounds. Using this approach, elastic degradation in operating nuclear fuels can be quantified when the distributions of microstructural features are known.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Impact of chemical ordering on thermodynamic properties of point defects and Xe substitutional in U-10Mo

The accurate knowledge of defect energetics is critical to understanding the aging and irradiation behavior of U-10Mo nuclear fuel, which is selected as the fuel type for conversion of the United States High-Performance Research Reactors (HPRRs). Furthermore, using hybrid molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo (MDMC) simulation, we studied the impact of chemical ordering on the formation energies of vacancies, interstitials, and the solution energy of the Xe substitutionals. Instead of forming a random solid solution (RSS), substantial short-range-order (SRO) develops in U-10Mo, particularly at low temperatures. Mo atoms are found to repel each other and prefer U-rich local atomic environments within the 1st nearest neighbor (1NN) cutoff. Compared to the case of a RSS, the state with equilibrated Mo ordering shifts the distributions of vacancy and interstitial formation energies due to the dependence of defect energies on the local atomic environment, without a clear effect on Xe solution energy. In the operation temperature range (100–250 °C) of U-Mo fuels, neglecting SRO can lead to an inaccurate estimate of thermal equilibrium point defect concentrations by over an order of magnitude and incorrectly predict the preference among different types of dumbbells, highlighting the critical importance of accounting for the impact of chemical ordering for accurate atomistic calculations of defect properties.

Molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo (MDMC)↗

Mapping the Microhardness of Al Matrix in U-7Mo/Al Dispersion Fuels at Medium and High Burn-up by in situ Nanoindentation

The mechanical degradation of the Al matrix in U-7Mo dispersion fuels was detected after irradiation in previous studies, but more details of the degradation mechanism are not clear yet to clarify the root cause. In this study, microhardness mapping in fresh and irradiated U-7Mo dispersion fuels coated with ZrN, with burn-up of 3.35 × 10 21 and 6.28 × 10 21 f/cm 3 , are measured to reveal the hardening of the Al matrix as a function of distance to fuel particles. Micro cubes were pulled by plasma focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy and tested by in situ nanoindenter with Berkovitch tip. Size effects are measured in medium and high burn-up samples. The higher burn-up specimen exhibits a more pronounced size effect when indent load is lower than 20 mN. Size effect correction models are also calculated by plots fitting, which predicts the true microhardness without size effect. Results shows that the hardness of the Al matrix near the ZrN coating has the highest value, then decreases moving away from the coating and become stable when the distance reaches ∼10 µm. The hardness starts increasing again getting closer to the next fuel particle, which makes the hardness distribution between two fuel particles to be “U” shape.

36 - MATERIALS SCIENCE↗