Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “VERA”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Determination of the spent fuel decay heat with the VERA core simulator

VERA core simulator capabilities to predict spent fuel decay heat have been explored. The comparison with the Serpent2 and NEWT/TRITON sequence from the SCALE package, performed on the NPP Krško fuel test cases, has enabled independent verification of the successful implementation of the VERA depletion/decay calculation sequence applied on the extended nuclide set. Since the VERA is a 3-D core simulator, the focus in the rest of the paper was on the investigation of the 3-D effects and non-linearity of the soluble boron concentration averaging process, which are difficult to assess with most of available computational tools. A difference in the decay heat prediction between the 3-D and 2-D model approaches was analyzed. In addition, the impact of the Inconel grids on the decay heat was determined. Averaging the concentration of soluble boron over the fuel irradiation period has been found to be a viable approach, since it results in slight decay heat overprediction, which is considered conservative for most applications. Finally, demonstration on the Watts Bar Unit 1 cycle 1 depletion has shown formidable VERA capabilities to accurately predict spent fuel decay heat.

Kromar, Marjan↗

VERA BWR progression problems

During the first phase of the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) program, the Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) was developed with a focus on capabilities for high-fidelity, multiphysics simulation of pressurized water reactors (PWRs). During this development effort, a set of progression problems was created ranging from smaller pin cell calculations to larger 3D full-core calculations. These progression problems helped to guide the development of the software and served as benchmarks against which to test VERA. Since 2019, efforts have been made to extend the capabilities of VERA to model boiling water reactors (BWRs). Because BWR simulations come with many unique challenges, a set of BWR progression problems was developed to aid in this new effort. The BWR progression problems range from 2D lattice calculations to 3D mini-core problems, and reference neutronic solutions were computed using continuous-energy Monte Carlo codes. MPACT, one of the neutronics code in VERA, was benchmarked using the BWR progression problems. The code is capable of computing solutions to all problems. The eigenvalues computed by MPACT agree well with the Monte Carlo reference solutions. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Integrating the PanDA Workload Management System with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory will produce an unprecedented astronomical data set for studies of the deep and dynamic universe. Its Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) will image the entire southern sky every three to four days and produce tens of petabytes of raw image data and associated calibration data over the course of the experiment’s run. More than 20 terabytes of data must be stored every night, and annual campaigns to reprocess the entire dataset since the beginning of the survey will be conducted over ten years. The Production and Distributed Analysis (PanDA) system was evaluated by the Rubin Observatory Data Management team and selected to serve the Observatory’s needs due to its demonstrated scalability and flexibility over the years, for its Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) support, its support for multi-site processing, and its highly scalable complex workflows via the intelligent Data Delivery Service (iDDS). PanDA is also being evaluated for prompt processing where data must be processed within 60 seconds after image capture. This paper will briefly describe the Rubin Data Management system and its Data Facilities (DFs). Finally, it will describe in depth the work performed in order to integrate the PanDA system with the Rubin Observatory to be able to run the Rubin Science Pipelines using PanDA.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

Dancoff-based Wigner-Seitz approximation for the subgroup resonance self-shielding in the VERA neutronic simulator MPACT

The MPACT neutronics module of the Virtual Environment for Reactor Analysis (VERA) has used the subgroup method for resonance self-shielding calculation, for which two-dimensional (2D) fixed-source transport calculations are performed using the method of characteristics for resonance energy groups. When considering thermal feedbacks, the subgroup calculation must be performed at each outer iteration. Therefore, the computing time for cross section processing is a significant burden for computational efficiency. The Dancoff-based Wigner-Seitz approximation (DWA) capability has been implemented into MPACT in conjunction with the subgroup method, which has been used in SCALE/XSProc since SCALE version 6.0 and has recently been called an equivalent Dancoff-factor cell (EDC) method. The issue of relatively large reactivity bias in DWA for the gadolinia rods was resolved by introducing multiple Dancoff factors. Benchmark results for the VERA pressurized and boiling water reactor benchmark suites show that the DWA capability would significantly enhance computational efficiency with comparable accuracy. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Ex-Core Radiation Transport Modeling with VERA User Manual

It is important to be able to accurately predict the neutron flux outside the immediate reactor core for a variety of safety and material analyses. Monte Carlo radiation transport calculations are required to produce these high–fidelity ex-core responses. The Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) provides the automated capability to launch independent Shift fixed-source and eigenvalue Monte Carlo (MC) calculations for user-specified state points during a standard Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) calculation. VERA couples MPACT with COBRA-TF (CTF) to Shift to perform ex-core tallies for multiple state points concurrently, with each component capable of parallel execution on independent processor domains. In these ex-core calculations, MPACT is coupled to CTF and performs the in-core depletion and heat transfer calculation, followed by a fixed-source Shift transport calculation including ex-core regions to produce ex-core responses. The fission source, fuel pin temperatures, moderator temperature and density, boron concentration, and fuel pin depleted isotopic compositions can be transferred to Shift from the MPACT calculation. Specifically, VERA performs fluence calculations in the core barrel outward to the end of the pressure vessel and detector response calculations in ex-core detectors. It also performs the requested tallies in any user-defined ex-core regions. VERA takes advantage of the General Geometry (GG) package in Shift. This gives VERA the flexibility to explicitly model features outside the core barrel, including detailed vessel models, detectors, and power plant details. A very limited set of experimental and numerical benchmarks is available for ex-core simulation comparison. The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors has developed a set of ex-core benchmark problems to include as part of the VERA verification and validation set of problems. The ex-core capability in VERA has been tested on small representative assembly problems, multi-assembly problems, as well as quarter-core and full-core problems. VERA View has also been extended to visualize these vessel fluence results from VERA. This manual serves to present a guide to VERA users about the methodology behind ex-core calculations and the details of input, output, and analysis of results from these calculations. Details in this version of the manual are based on features in VERA 4.0.1.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

VERA Installation Guide

This guide describes the structure and setup of the standard VERA development environment (VERA Dev Env) and standard VERA Third Party Libraries (TPLs) that need to be in place before installing many of the VERA simulation components. It describes everything from the initial setup on a new machine to the final build, testing, and installation of VERA components. The goal of this document is to describe how to create the directories and contents outlined in 'Standard VERA Dev Env Directory Structure' and then obtain the remaining VERA source and build, test, and install any of the necessary VERA components on a given system. This document describes the process both for a development version of VERA and for a released tarball of the VERA sources.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Coupled Neutronic and Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a Natural Circulation Based Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Using VERA-CS

As part of the work supported by a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear FY 2020 Voucher, Holtec International subsidiary SMR LLC (hereinafter referred to as Holtec) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory entered into a cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) to develop coupled multiphysics core models of the Holtec developed small modular reactor (SMR), SMR-160. The scope of the 1 year project was to use the DOE–developed tool set, VERA, to analyze several aspects of a representative SMR-160 core design. The goals of the project were to perform the code-to-code benchmarking and to provide Holtec with a confirmatory calculations to compare against the results with the codes used in the SMR-160 design, identify and resolve areas of discrepancy between the two models to give Holtec a basis for selecting certain tool and model options, and develop a workflow so that the VERA model could be adapted easily to any future changes in the design of the SMR-160 core. The work proceeded in four phases: 1. Developing the initial VERA model based on Holtec-provided core design information; 2. Comparing VERA results with Holtec-provided calculations for the first five cycles; 3. Developing a VERA transient model based on the prior model; and 4. Training Holtec personnel on VERA and hand-off the developed models. This report summarizes at a high level the completed tasks. Details of the tasks and results are reserved for the full report, which will not be publicly released for 5 years per the terms of the CRADA. The report is titled “Coupled Neutronic and Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a Natural Circulation Based Small Modular Reactor (SMR) using VERA-CS” and has the ORNL technical report number ORNL/TM 2021/2303 (NFE-20-08305)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Multiphysics Coupling Methods for Molten Salt Reactor Modeling and Simulation in VERA

New multiphysics coupling capabilities for molten salt reactor (MSR) analysis have been developed in the Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA). This development consisted of two main efforts. First, a generic species transport module was added in the CTF code, which is the thermal-hydraulics (TH) code for VERA. This module uses the velocity fields for which CTF solves during the TH calculation to transport species through the core and around the primary loop. Additionally, a gas sparging model has been added to CTF to model the movement of certain species, namely, fission products such as xenon gas, to transport between the molten salt and gas bubbles present in the salt. The second effort in this development was coupling this capability to VERA’s neutron transport code MPACT. This effort focused on coupling the detailed TH transport models in CTF to MPACT to account for feedback effects in the neutron transport calculations. Finally, the thermochemistry code Thermochimica has also been coupled to VERA. Thermochimica performs pointwise calculations for chemical potential and Gibbs free energy and determines what phases are produced by the temperature, pressure, and elemental concentrations at different locations in the primary loop. These capabilities are demonstrated using a model of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE). Furthermore, this reactor operated at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the 1960s, providing sources of experimental data that were used to develop the model. Various combinations of species were modeled using VERA’s new multiphysics coupling capabilities. Species distributions and reactivity effects behaved as expected for the MSRE model, demonstrating that the coupling is behaving correctly and causing appropriate feedback. The results of these calculations show the potential for VERA to be used for a wide variety of MSR analyses.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Assessment of CASL VERA for BWR analysis and application to accident tolerant SiC/SiC channel box

Application of the Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) to BWR analysis is assessed in this paper by comparing results to those calculated using other widely-used modeling tools, namely the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s PARCS/PATHS and the Serpent Monte Carlo particle transport code. Additionally, VERA is used to calculate 3-D temperature and fast neutron flux distributions in silicon carbide (SiC) fiber-reinforced, SiC matrix composite (SiC/SiC) BWR channel boxes, which are being studied as an Accident Tolerant Fuel core structural material concept. We found that the code-to-code comparisons were favorable, and the SiC/SiC channel box evaluation demonstrates the many advanced modeling features VERA provides while also highlighting the non-uniformity in fast neutron flux distributions that can play a role in potential SiC/SiC channel box deformation. Traditional BWR analysis tools do not have the calculation fidelity necessary for coupled assessment of flux and temperature gradients in a SiC/SiC channel box. VERA is a state-of-the-art modeling environment that was developed to increase the safety and economic competitiveness of nuclear power through improved modeling accuracy. While VERA has already been deployed in the nuclear industry for PWR applications, the current study is a vital initial step in the extensive development, validation, and verification that VERA must go through to be useful for BWR applications.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Development of Preliminary VERA-CS Crud Induced Localized Corrosion Modeling Capability

The objective of this milestone was to develop a crud-induced localized corrosion (CILC) screening capability in VERA-CS using existing codes and capabilities that had been developed in the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) as part of the efforts to resolve the crud challenge problem. The milestone work focused on improving existing CASL software and implementing clad corrosion modeling into VERA-CS. Clad corrosion modeling was implemented by creating an application interface (API) in the Cicada software so that its clad heat transfer and corrosion models could be used in VERA-CS. Cicada was coupled to the subchannel code CTF for solving crud and corrosion growth. Additionally, a clad corrosion model was added directly to CTF to serve as an alternate approach. The rod thermal hydraulic reconstruction (ROTHCON) process, which is used for capturing computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-predicted rod-surface heat and turbulence behavior that can impact crud-induced power shift (CIPS) and CILC prediction, was also implemented into VERA-CS. Usability improvements were made to this feature, which was developed over several previous milestones, so that the VERA-CS user can link spacer grids in a VERA-CS model to an applicable pregenerated spacer grid data file if available. Several assessments were performed to demonstrate the proper functioning of the new capability. Sensitivity studies were performed to demonstrate the effect of crud lithium content, oxide thermal conductivity, Cicada mesh refinement, and ROTHCON coupling mesh refinement on predicted amounts of crud and oxide growth. A full-scale demonstration was performed by running Seabrook Cycle 5 with the CILC capability. Some general observations were made from the assessments. It was observed that predicted corrosion thickness is less than anticipated for CILC cases, so further work is needed to better understand and improve the corrosion modeling. Refining the coupling mesh in the ROTHCON process leads to increased corrosion and crud thickness, which can affect where crud and corrosion grow, how thick it gets, and how many rods experience crud and corrosion growth. Results indicate that applying the ROTHCON process and refining the coupling mesh leads to only a slight increase in total core maximum crud and corrosion thickness, but it leads to a significant increase in the number of rods with a maximum thickness that surpasses a set threshold value (i.e., more rods grow thicker corrosion and crud). Computational performance of the simulation is degraded by a factor of 5{6 with high coupling mesh refinement. The impact of the ROTHCON coupling mesh refinement on total core crud mass is less significant; however, using the ROTHCON process with CFD-generated data over the Yao{Hochreiter{Leech (YHL) model in CTF leads to significantly different amounts of total core crud mass. Future work on the CILC screening capability will include model improvement and validation, development and testing of a CILC-risk screening criteria, and performance improvements.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

VeraShift I/O Optimization for Ex-core Calculations with VERA

The initial release of Shift in the Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) provided users with the ability to perform ex-core calculations. After this release, a task was undertaken to optimize input parameters and output of desired quantities for ex-core calculations. As requested by analysts, this report presents the detailed input and output changes made to VERA to enhance usability. Specifically, some of the major optimizations added were detector and bioshield setup using the VERA common input, updated Shift input defaults, consolidated output, and output of pin importance's. Close interaction between developers, analysts, and users enabled these useful optimization updates, which will be included in the release of VERA 4.1, and some are included in VERA 4.0.1. Under these auspices, this work will continue under the VERA Users Group (VUG).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

VERA Integration in the NEAMS Workbench

The Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) is a cutting edge simulation code suite used to solve complex multiphysics problems for nuclear reactors. VERA makes use of high performance computing (HPC) systems to solve large problems that were not historically tractable. While extensive work has been put into the usability of VERA, it still takes significant effort to build reactor models, ensure their correctness, properly execute the calculations, and conduct the necessary analysis of the results. This difficulty is common for many complex codes such as VERA. As part of the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program, the NEAMS Workbench has been developed and maintained. The goal of the NEAMS Workbench is to provide a single interface with which to execute a wide variety of physics codes, from building the input models to analyzing the results. This document serves as a manual detailing the current integration of VERA with the NEAMS Workbench and a guide for configuring Workbench to allow remote execution of VERA.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

VERA Geodetic Activities

This report briefly describes the geodetic activities of VERA in the year 2012. The regular geodetic observations are carried out both in K- and S/X-bands. The frequency of regular observations is three times a month-twice for the VERA internal observations in K-band. The networks of the S/X sessions are JADE of GSI and IVS-T2. The raw data of the T2 and JADE sessions are electronically transferred to the Bonn, Haystack, and GSI correlators via Internet. Gravimetric observations are carried out at the VERA stations. An SG was installed at Mizusawa and placed in the vicinity of the VERA antenna in order to monitor vertical displacement at the end of 2008, and the observations continued throughout the year. Also at the VERA-Ishigakijima station, continuous operation of the SG started in 2012. The crustal movements generated by the 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tohoku continued during 2012, and displacement of the VERA-Mizusawa position by post-seismic creeping continued.

Jike, Takaaki↗

VERA Infrastructure

The Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) Infrastructure provides the infrastructure to build, configure, test, install, and package for release the VERAS suite of codes that is being developed by the Consortium for the Advanced Simulation of Light-water reactors (CASL). It includes the list of codes that can be built within VERA, the location on the configuration-controlled CASL development computer, the version number used in any particular software installation, the location of the third-party libraries used for testing VERA on a suite of the CASL testing and development computers, and the scripts to configure, build, test, install, and package for release a particular version of VERA. The VERA Infrastructure contains a list of scripts, configuration options, and utilities that are specific to CASL, but contain no physics or numeric, nuclear technology, or encryption technology.

Baird, Mark↗

Updated Verification and Validation Assessment for VERA

The Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) code suite is assessed in terms of capability and credibility against the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) Verification and Validation Plan (presented herein) in the context of three selected challenge problems: CRUD-Induced Power Shift (CIPS), Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB), and Pellet-Clad Interaction (PCI). Capability refers to evidence of required functionality for capturing phenomena of interest while credibility refers to the evidence that provides confidence in the calculated results. For this assessment, each challenge problem defines a set of phenomenological requirements against which the VERA software is assessed. This approach, in turn, enables the focused assessment of only those capabilities relevant to the challenge problem. The evaluation of VERA against the challenge problem requirements represents a capability assessment. The mechanism for assessment is the Sandia-developed Predictive Capability Maturity Model (PCMM) that, for this assessment, evaluates VERA on 8 major criteria: (1) Representation and Geometric Fidelity, (2) Physics and Material Model Fidelity, (3) Software Quality Assurance and Engineering, (4) Code Verification, (5) Solution Verification, (6) Separate Effects Model Validation, (7) Integral Effects Model Validation, and (8) Uncertainty Quantification. For each attribute, a maturity score from zero to three is assigned in the context of each challenge problem. The evaluation of these eight elements constitutes the credibility assessment for VERA.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Updated Verification and Validation Assessment for VERA

The Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) code suite is assessed in terms of capability and credibility against the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) Verification and Validation Plan (presented herein) in the context of three selected challenge problems: CRUD-Induced Power Shift (CIPS), Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB), and Pellet-Clad Interaction (PCI). Capability refers to evidence of required functionality for capturing phenomena of interest while credibility refers to the evidence that provides confidence in the calculated results. For this assessment, each challenge problem defines a set of phenomenological requirements against which the VERA software is assessed. This approach, in turn, enables the focused assessment of only those capabilities relevant to the challenge problem. The evaluation of VERA against the challenge problem requirements represents a capability assessment. The mechanism for assessment is the Sandia-developed Predictive Capability Maturity Model (PCMM) that, for this assessment, evaluates VERA on 8 major criteria: (1) Representation and Geometric Fidelity, (2) Physics and Material Model Fidelity, (3) Software Quality Assurance and Engineering, (4) Code Verification, (5) Solution Verification, (6) Separate Effects Model Validation, (7) Integral Effects Model Validation, and (8) Uncertainty Quantification. For each attribute, a maturity score from zero to three is assigned in the context of each challenge problem. The evaluation of these eight elements constitutes the credibility assessment for VERA.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory Data Preview 1

We present Rubin Data Preview 1 (DP1), the first data from the National Science Foundation–Department of Energy Vera C. Rubin Observatory, comprising raw and calibrated single-epoch images, coadds, difference images, detection catalogs, and ancillary data products. DP1 is based on 1792 optical–near-infrared exposures acquired over 48 distinct nights by the Rubin Commissioning Camera (LSSTComCam) on the Simonyi Survey Telescope at the Summit Facility on Cerro Pachón, Chile in late 2024. DP1 covers ∼15 deg 2 distributed across seven roughly equal-sized noncontiguous fields, each independently observed in six broad photometric bands, ugrizy. The median FWHM of the point-spread function across all bands is approximately 1"14, with the sharpest images reaching about 0." 58. The 5σ point-source depths for coadded images in the deepest field, the Extended Chandra Deep Field South, are u = 24.55, g = 26.18, r = 25.96, i = 25.71, z = 25.07, and y = 23.1. Other fields are no more than 2.2 mag shallower in any band, where they have nonzero coverage. DP1 contains approximately 2.3 million distinct astrophysical objects, of which 1.6 million are extended in at least one band in coadds, and 431 solar system objects, of which 93 are new discoveries. DP1 is approximately 3.5 TB in size and is available to Vera C. Rubin Observatory data rights holders via the Rubin Science Platform, a cloud-based environment for the analysis of petascale astronomical data. While small compared to future LSST releases, its high quality and diversity of data support a broad range of early science investigations ahead of full operations in 2026.

Ground-based astronomy↗

Validation of Light Water Reactor Ex-Core Calculations with VERA

The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) is a reactor simulation software. It offers unique capabilities by combining high-fidelity in-core radiation transport with temperature feedback by using MPACT (a deterministic neutron transport code) and COBRA-TF (a thermal-hydraulic code) with follow-on, fixed-source transport calculations using the Shift Monte Carlo code to calculate ex-core quantities of interest. In these coupled calculations, MPACT provides Shift with the fission source for follow-on ex-core calculations. These ex-core simulations can be set up to calculate detector responses, as well as the flux and fluence in ex-core regions of interest, such as the reactor pressure vessel, nozzle, and irradiated capsules. A Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 1 (WBN1) ex-core model was developed, as described in this paper, and this model was used to perform coupon calculations. The results for the coupon flux calculations show close agreement with the reference values for cycle 1 produced by the two-dimensional Discrete Ordinates Transport (DORT) code and presented in a BWXT Services Inc. report. However, differences in the results (10%) seen in cycles 2 and 3 and the reasons for these differences are discussed in this paper. The VERA WBN1 model was also used to perform a vessel fluence calculation for cycle 1. Additionally, a collaboration between CASL and Duke Energy led to the first code-to-code validation of VERA for reactor ex-core applications that used a model for the Shearon Harris reactor. Results from this collaboration show excellent agreement between VERA and the Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code for the detector response calculations. The work performed under this collaboration is also detailed in this paper.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗