VTR Fuel Design
VTR fuel design presentation for the May 25, 2021 VTR quarterly integration meeting
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “VTR Fuel”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
VTR Fuel Design Analysis Plan
VTR Fuel Design Analysis Plan presentation for May 25, 2021, VTR quarterly integration meeting
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
VTR Fuel Design & Analysis Update Presentation
VTR Fuel Design & Analysis Update for the February 25, 2021, VTR Quarterly Meeting
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
VTR Fuel Design Considerations
This presentation contains a review of fast reactor metal fuel phenomena, fuel failure mechanisms, and associated design parameters followed by discussion of which design parameters were a consideration for VTR fuel. The technology is all found in previously released and published sources, though the perspective on what it means for design of metal fuel for advanced reactor designs is new. The content related to VTR fuel does not include design details that were previously determined to be export controlled, and any previous pre-decisional aspects that might be implied are not relevant today, given that the VTR project was not funded.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Modeling and Equipment Analysis for the VTR Fuel Fabrication Facility [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
ECAR-5067 Computational Evaluation on Effect of Edge-rounding in Circular to Annular Flow Transitions within a Hexagonal Duct
In this ECAR, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of the duct with a cross-section varying from circle to annulus was performed to evaluate the effect of edge-rounding of the internal edges. The edge of circular channel and the edge of inner annular channel were rounded with the radius of curvature ranged from 0 mm to 20 mm. The CFD results show that the pressure loss of the duct can be reduced by increasing the radius of the rounded edge. Case-A results showed that the pressure drop can be significantly reduced by the edge-rounding, e.g., the pressure drop was reduced approximately 56% by the radius of curvature of 5.0mm, and reduced 70% by the radius of curvature of 20.0 mm although its effectiveness would be attenuated as the radius of curvature of edge increases. Results from Case-B showed the impact of rounding the inlet edge was practically negligible compared to the outlet edge. This ECAR could provide a guideline to determine the optimum inlet module design of the VTR fuel rod bundle.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
BISON fuel performance modeling optimization for experiment X447 and X447A using axial swelling and cladding strain measurements
With the recent need to qualify new reactor designs such as the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR), fuel performance calculations need to be performed to determine safety criteria of the proposed designs. In order to validate the fuel performance results obtained by a fuel performance code, BISON, for new reactor designs, legacy fuel from EBR-II and FFTF MFF with Post -Irradiation Examination (PIE) data need to be used as validation cases to benchmark models. Here in this work, BISON has been paired with the Fuels Irradiation & Physics Database (FIPD) and IFR Materials Information System (IMIS) to supply PIE data for comparison with simulations of EBR-II experiments X447/X447A. X447/X447A were assessed by implementing models for Fuel Cladding Chemical Interaction (FCCI) within BISON and optimizing the friction coefficient between the fuel surface and the cladding, the anisotropic swelling factor, and the HT9 first thermal creep scalar (which scales the first term in the HT9 creep equation) to best match the PIE axial fuel swelling height and cladding profilometry for all pins in X447/X447A. The optimal values were found using a generic algorithm developed to select different values for the three parameters until end criteria was met and error couldn’t be reduced further. The BISON-simulated cladding profilometry was evaluated using Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) to account for the profile shape of the cladding profilometry. Optimal values for the friction coefficient, anisotropic fuel swelling factor, and HT9 first thermal creep scalar were found to best fit the BISON simulation results to the PIE measurements found in IMIS and FIPD. Improvements to current models are suggested to account for the underprediction of fuel swelling at low burnups and the overprediction of fuel swelling at higher burnups observed for the axial fuel swelling height. Although two pins in EBR-II X447/X447A (DP70 and DP75) were known to fail due to FCCI, none of the pins simulated in BISON reached a cumulative damage fraction (CDF) above 0.008 with FCCI correlations coupled in the BISON simulations. The error estimate generated for all pins in X447/X447A using optimal values was 209 µm, which is deemed acceptable.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Recommended Representative Isotopic Compositions for Potential VTR Pu Supplies
This document recommends isotopic compositions to represent selected Pu supplies that might be made available for use in VTR driver fuel. These compositions are intended to be conservative representations suitable for determination of environmental impacts associated with use of the selected Pu supplies, but not upper bounds of all possible compositions. The selected Pu supplies under consideration are themselves representations of a more complicated set of possibilities, defined in a manner to allow efficient but conservative analysis of impacts. The source definitions to be considered are as follows: 1) Foreign sources of reactor-grade plutonium. This material would be provided as polished material in an oxide form and is assumed to be transported from Europe (France or England); 2) Domestic, non-weapon sources of plutonium such as unused FFTF fuel, Hanford metal (stored at SRS), and various oxides; 3) Domestic sources of weapons-grade plutonium, including metal from dismantled pits and otherwise excess to stockpile needs.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Approach to Analyzing VTR Core Performance Sensitivities to Fuel Manufacturing Uncertainties and Application to Fuel Slug Diameter
This report documents the initial effort to characterize sensitivity of VTR core performance to fuel manufacturing uncertainties. The effects of variation in the as-fabricated fuel slug diameter on VTR neutronics performance are evaluated, using both high-fidelity Monte Carlo (OpenMC) and the main core design solver (DIF3D) for all cases. This work and follow-on work will inform the VTR Project’s fuel manufacturing processes and associated acceptable criteria, as well as detailed uncertainty analysis in later stages of VTR development and deployment. In addition, this work demonstrates the approach to performing such evaluations and provides a basis for reducing the scope of calculations in future sensitivity analysis.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Concept Descriptions for the VTR Rabbit System and Driver Fuel Test Assemblies
Two of the experiment vehicles being developed for the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) are presented here. The first is a rabbit system that will enable rapid insertion of small test capsules into the high fast flux of the VTR core for relatively short durations. The rabbit concept development includes the construction/demonstration of a near-full-scale system in a deep-water pool to demonstrate functionality, development of a concept of operations and initial procedures, and validation of thermal-hydraulic modeling. In addition, modeling efforts are underway to simulate the thermal and neutronic environment of a rabbit capsule. The second type of experiment vehicle presented here is a driver fuel test assembly for inserting fuel and materials tests into the core by replacing a driver fuel assembly. Here, a novel design for dismountable test assemblies is proposed for the VTR.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Assessment of the BISON Metallic Fuel Performance Models
The US Department of Energy is leading a project to design and construct a fast spectrum test reactor called the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR). The BISON nuclear fuel performance code will be used to model VTR driver fuel, including looking at the effects of differences between the VTR driver fuel element design and the legacy fuel designs and experiments on which it is based. Simulations will be conducted to help determine whether the design’s behavior and performance are properly understood and to assess the margins to cladding failure and fuel melting relative to those predicted for past metallic fuel experiments. These predictions are expected to streamline VTR design and operation by helping inform the VTR driver fuel element design and by providing supplemental information for the fuel design safety basis.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Fuel Performance Design Basis for the Versatile Test Reactor
Not Available
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Integrating Advanced Modeling and Accelerated Testing for a Modernized Fuel Qualification Paradigm
With the increasing interest in sodium fast reactor technology, as seen by applications to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the OKLO Aurora plant, fuel testing for the TerraPower Traveling Wave Reactor, and the impending construction and startup of the versatile test reactor (VTR), a modernized, accelerated approach to fuel qualification is needed. To guide this effort, a Phenomena Identification Ranking Table–styled analysis was performed for a U-Pu-Zr sodium-free annular fuel system. This analysis evaluated a series of fuel design properties and parameters against their contributions to key fuel performance phenomena. The resulting priority parameters were then reviewed against existing modeling and experimental capabilities to support investigation of the highest-priority parameters. A pathway for qualification was then established using highthroughput, high-volume experiments from MiniFuel and FAST in parallel with advanced physics-based model development. This effort outlines how the first stages of qualification can be reduced from the typical 20+-year development cycle to 5 to 7 years by deploying accelerated irradiation testing platforms. As with any accelerated test, these methods are prototypic in some aspects and less so in others; however, by coupling with advanced fuel performance modeling and simulation capabilities, the larger space of irradiation parameters and material response provided offers advantages for the validation of physics-based models supporting the deployment of novel fuel designs. As a test case, this paper utilizes a proposed Mark II fuel system for the upcoming VTR. Thus, an accelerated qualification method can be tested for the development of MARK II driver fuel so that by the time of VTR startup, lead test assemblies for a Mark II fuel can be initiated.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
VTR Casting Furnace Conceptual Design
This TEV describes the development of a conceptual design for a fuel casting system to be used in the development and demonstration of fuel designs for the new Versatile Test Reactor (VTR). This system will be installed in the Fuel Manufacturing Facility (FMF). The system will be in a shielded glovebox and will be used to melt fuel materials and injection cast these materials into fuel slugs, which will further be used to fabricate fuel elements for the VTR. This TEV covers only the injection casting system itself. Operations such as removing the castings from the injection molds, trimming of the castings, and installation of the castings into fuel element cladding are beyond the scope of the TEV. The conceptual design herein is principally concerned with the mechanical portion of the casting system and does not include details of the control or power supply systems.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Metallic Fuel Performance Code Requirements for the Versatile Test Reactor Project
Metallic nuclear fuels have been proposed for use in several emerging nuclear reactor designs, and a number of codes have been developed to model these fuels and assess their performance. Qualification of these metallic nuclear fuels will ultimately require monitored irradiation of lead test assemblies, but the use of fuel performance codes can reduce the uncertainty associated with these efforts by quantifying uncertainties and estimating margins to failure ahead of time. In this work, metallic fuel performance code requirements are defined for the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) project using input from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II functional requirements, operational requirements, and design criteria. This work focuses on the thermomechanical responses and irradiation behaviors of metallic fuel elements that are representative of the proposed VTR driver fuel design concepts. As such, many of the code requirements and physics/modeling discussions in this work are expected to be broadly applicable to metallic fuel applications outside of the VTR project.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Versatile Test Reactor Conceptual Core Design
The VTR is a 300-MW(thermal) sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) designed for the specific purpose of delivering unique testing capabilities to enable the advancement of all reactor technologies. With its flux level, irradiation volume, and operational flexibility, the VTR will enable accelerated testing of materials, fuels, and various components needing irradiation testing. Proven SFR technologies and design approaches have been leveraged in designing the VTR core, ensuring the highest possible readiness level. This resulted in the VTR using ternary metallic fuel and delivering fast flux levels in excess of 4 x 10 15 n/cm 2 ∙ s over large useful volumes, corresponding to about 60 dpa/year in steel. As part of the design efforts, the VTR core performance has been determined for a representative configuration, ensuring that the reactivity control systems offer sufficient shutdown margins, that the core can be safely cooled in all situations, and that reactivity feedback coefficients are conducive to a favorable safety behavior. Furthermore, the incorporation of features such as fuel assembly storage in the shield region supports the flexible and reliable operation of the VTR. Additional design work has been ongoing as well. This includes thorough shielding performance evaluations to ensure safe operation of the VTR, verification and validation of the design tools used to achieve compliance with Nuclear Quality Assurance (NQA-1) requirements, early assessment of the impact of irradiation experiments on the core performance envelope and associated margins, and in-depth uncertainty quantification efforts to quantify the anticipated range of performance characteristics. An experimental program supporting the VTR core design has been set up, with the current focus being on thermal-hydraulic experiments. The purpose of this experimental program is to obtain confirmatory measurements to serve directly as part of the core design basis or as part of the validation cases supporting the simulation tools used.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Oak Ridge Response to Versatile Test Reactor Environmental Impact Statement Data Request
The Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) is a fast-spectrum test reactor being developed in the United States under the direction of the US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE). The VTR mission is to enable accelerated testing of advanced reactor fuels and materials required for advanced reactor technologies. The conceptual design of the 300 MWth sodium-cooled metallic-fueled pool-type fast reactor has been led by the US National Laboratories in collaboration with General Electric–Hitachi and Bechtel National, Inc. In support of the VTR project, DOE issued a Notice of Intent (NOI) in the Federal Register on August 5, 2019, announcing the intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its implementing regulations. The EIS will evaluate alternatives for a versatile reactor–based fast-neutron source facility and associated facilities for the preparation, irradiation, and post-irradiation examination (PIE) of test/experimental fuels and materials. Specifically, the NOI identified two siting alternatives for the VTR reactor facility: Idaho National Laboratory (INL) or Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). In addition, the NOI also specified two siting alternatives for VTR fuel fabrication: INL and the Savannah River Site (SRS). This report provides information in response to data requests made to ORNL to fill in site-specific knowledge gaps to develop a high-quality EIS. The responses provided are not required to provide full details in every aspect; instead, they adequately bound possible environmental impacts or provide sufficient information to adequately assess likely environmental impacts. This work is being performed under a subcontract from INL to ORNL using DOE-NE funds and is directed by DOE-NE and DOE-ID. Leidos has been contracted by DOE-NE to write the VTR EIS, so most data requests have come from Leidos but were often routed through INL or DOE-ID. DOE-ID is overseeing the NEPA and EIS processes for the VTR project. Leidos will use the information provided in this report to inform the VTR EIS and will also cite this document to establish a clear, publicly available source of the information. Section 2 of this report briefly describes the proposed ORNL VTR Alternative and illustrates the location of the proposed site for the ORNL VTR Alternative. Sections 3 through 7 provide direct responses to data requests received by ORNL. These sections use a tabular format in which data requests are divided into separate items to be addressed; the items are numbered, the data requests are restated with more topical information included, and then the responses are provided. Initial data requests and follow-on requests for additional information (RAIs) are combined under the original data request fields. Finally, Section 8 presents summarized conclusions and describes future work.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Full Length Assembly Testing in PELICAN (Final Report)
In support of the development of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Versatile Test Reactor (VTR), a thermal hydraulics test facility was constructed to generate experimental measurement of the pressure drop across a single full-scale assembly containing prototypic axial reflectors, fuel, and plena components. Constructed and operated at Argonne National Laboratory, the Pressure drop Experimental Loop for Investigations of Core Assemblies in Nuclear reactors (PELICAN) facility was designed to achieve hydraulic conditions identical to those anticipated for a full-scale fuel assembly located in the VTR core in the region with the highest flow rate. Using water as surrogate for liquid sodium, the flow loop was operated at elevated temperatures and pressures to match the thermophysical properties of liquid sodium and ensure matching Reynolds and Euler numbers. The measurement objectives for data generated from this test facility was driven primarily by the validation needs for code calculations and simulations of the reference VTR core. These objectives focused on the need to validate pressure drop results across the various segments of the fuel assembly as they relate directly to the pumping power and safety of the reactor. Presented in this report are experimental results and analytical comparisons based on testing of a full-length assembly in PELICAN. Housed within a hexagonal test section extending 3.4 m in length, the tested assembly features a prototypic lower reflector, grid plates, wire-wrapped rod bundle, upper reflector, and exit region. The rod bundle extends over 1.5 m in length and contains 217 individual wire-wrapped rods with dimensions that best reflect the reference VTR design. The as-tested bundle assembly was fabricated using 316 stainless steel 0.25-inch (6.35-mm) diameter rods wrapped with 0.04-inch (1.016-mm) diameter wire at a helical pitch of 10.51 inch (26.6 cm). Details of the method for in-house wire-wrapping, assembly, and installation are provided later in this report. Experimental measurements of pressure drop at 19 positions along the test assembly were recorded for a range of flow conditions, with special attention paid to key locations within the assembly, including component inlet and outlet, transition, and wire-wrapped rod bundle regions. Testing conditions were based on 110°C water with flow rates ranging from 50 to 450 GPM (3 to 27 kg/s) at the inlet of the test assembly generating Reynolds numbers and velocities up to ~8.0×10 4 and ~7.8 m/s, respectively, within the rod bundle region. Non-dimensional values for the friction factor were then calculated based on these experimental measurements and compared against those predicted by various analytical correlations available from open literature. Predictions by the upgraded Cheng and Todreas, Rehme, and Novendstern correlations fell within 4% to those values measured experimentally.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗