Search NASASearch

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Vertical Solar Array Technology”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Investigation of Flux Spreading in a Light-Trapping, Planar-Cavity Receiver for Enclosed Solar Particle Heating

Concentrating solar thermal power (CSP) technology development has recently focused on increasing the operating temperatures to accommodate high efficiency power cycles and thermochemical processes. Inert solid particles as heat transfer media enable solar receivers to operate above 700 degrees Celsius resulting in increased system thermal efficiency compared to the conventional molten salt based CSP system. An open-cavity falling-particle solar receiver that can efficiently heat particles by direct heating from concentrated solar radiation faces challenges with large particle losses from wind and unable to support thermochemical reactions. A light-trapping, planar cavity reiver (LTPCR) where particles are indirectly heated can significantly minimize the particle losses during the operation, support thermochemical reactions, and offer scalability potential. The LTPCR features an array of vertical planar receiver/absorber panels arranged within a cavity configuration. Concentrated solar radiation from heliostats is focused onto the receiver walls, where heat is indirectly transferred to solid particles flowing inside the receiver channels. Heat transfer occurs through direct contact between the receiver panel walls and particles, and can be enhanced by fluidizing particles with air. This fluidization increases particle-wall contact and extends particle residence time, maximizing heat transfer efficiency. The unique vertical planar receiver structure originated from a near-blackbody tubular light absorber, effectively distributing the incoming solar beam spread across the panel walls and trapping light. This flux spreading effect, driven by cosine projection, converts high incident solar flux into a lower, more uniform heat flux on the panel walls. This redistribution enhances heat transfer efficiency between particle-wall or reaction gases-wall, while preventing localized overheating of the receiver panel. Indirect planar cavity solar receivers completely separate solid particles from the ambient environment that can greatly reduce the thermal losses in heated particles resulting in high efficiency at high temperatures above 700 degrees Celsius. This design ensures no particle losses to the environment during the operation while open-cavity designs can experience significant particle losses from wind. An experimental investigation was conducted to observe flux spreading on the receiver panel wall. A lab-scale prototype planar receiver, fabricated using Haynes 230 alloy, was tested under direct concentrated solar radiation using the high-flux solar furnace (HFSF) facility at NREL. The experiment was performed under normal peak radiative heat fluxes ranging from 800 to 1900 kW/m2. A temperature distribution on the panel wall was measured using a thermal imaging camera (FLIR A 6600). To prevent overheating at the receiver front tip, prism-shaped heat shields (Zircar UNIFROM C1) were placed in front of the receiver, and their influence on flux spreading was also studied. Absorbed flux distribution on the panel wall was modeled using SolTrace. The total solar power and flux distributions delivered from HFSF were determined based on the heliostat mirror optical properties, direct normal irradiance (DNI) on the on-sun testing days, peak flux measurement during the on-sun testing, and shutter/attenuator settings Due to the large incident angles of the solar beam on the panel wall, the angular optical properties of Haynes 230 alloy and Zircar heat shields were incorporated into the model. This flux distribution model was then integrated into a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation to predict the receiver panel wall temperature, which was compared with the experimental measurements. Both prediction and measurements identified a temperature hotspot at the backside of the panel, indicating that the incident solar beam can fully reach to the rear of the receiver. The heat shields positioned at the front of the receiver effectively reduced the excessive temperature rise at the receiver front tip. Overall, the temperature was well distributed over the panel wall, with a minor hotspot at the back of the receiver. The model slightly overpredicted the temperature, possibly due to discrepancies in optical properties of the panel and an underprediction of thermal loss in the receiver. The advancement of the particle LTPCR offers a viable alternative to open-cavity receivers by addressing particle loss issues. Additionally, it presents a pathway for enabling solar thermochemical processes, extending CSP technology beyond power generation to fuel and chemical production.

14 SOLAR ENERGY

Co-Design of Charge Transport Superhighways to Connect Catalytic Sites in Soft Photoelectrochemical Systems

Efficient photon-to-electron-to-molecule conversion requires multi-length scale control over charge transport pathways, where electronic charges are delivered to catalytic sites under high mass transport flux. A fundamental question is how can we co-design charge transport pathways to promote efficient charge transfer to/from catalytic sites in complex three-dimensional architectures? Soft conducting polymer systems offer exceptional promise to provide three-dimensional charge transport networks, where electrolyte (ion and solvent) can interdiffuse to promote long-lived charge carriers and the molecular nature allows for strategic synthetic design of catalytic sites. Herein we combine theoretical and experimental approaches to investigate the earliest stages of photoelectrochemical deposition of near-surface catalytic sites (Pt) on soft bulk heterojunction polymeric semiconductors composed of a prototype donor (PTB7-Th) and a prototype acceptor (N2200) as a model system towards better understanding molecular catalyst-polymer site interactions. We focus initially on photoelectrochemical deposition of low Pt loadings, nanoparticle sizes (formed by progressive nucleation) below 20 nm, for both density functional theory (DFT) modeling studies and for spectroscopic characterization using surface-sensitive X-ray and UV-photoemission (XPS/UPS). DFT modeling of “n-type” N2200 slabs reveal for the first time that sulfur atoms in the thiophene units serve as the lowest-energy adsorption sites for single Pt atoms, while larger Pt clusters engage more complexly with both thiophene and naphthalene diimide (NDI) core sites. Changes in chemical composition observed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) support the DFT predictions, and the angle-resolved measurements reveal that Pt nucleation initiates at subsurface sites which appear to be localized active domains that promote charge transport/transfer and enable vertical growth toward the surface. These results suggest that light-activated Pt nanoparticle deposition decorates energetically distinct sites, where photoactivity is dictated by the local energetics of those sites, and the fact that they represent the termini of charge transport “super-highways” – a small percentage of the total volume of the donor/acceptor polymeric active layer which carries most of the photocurrent generated during both Pt deposition and photoelectrochemical HER. We posit that these initial studies provide a foundational strategy for design of catalytic sites in the near surface regions of complex polymeric materials and advancing soft semiconductor-based photoelectrochemical systems. Achieving a nanometer-scale understanding of catalyst deposition and the impact of local composition and energetics on that placement, should ultimately provide the design guidelines (co-design) for a broad array of catalysts at sites that optimize that efficiency and maximize platform durability.

14 SOLAR ENERGY