Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Visible calibration methods”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of GSICS visible calibration methods.

Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System (GSICS) is an international collaborative effort initiated in 2005 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites (CGMS) to 1-monitor, 2-improve and 3-harmonize the quality of observations from operational weather and environmental satellites of the Global Observing System (GOS). GSICS aims at ensuring consistent accuracy among space-based observations worldwide for climate monitoring, weather forecasting, and environmental applications by 1-monitoring instrument performance, 2-operational inter-calibration of satellite instruments, 3-radiometrically scaling observations to absolute reference standards, 4-recalibration of archived datasets. Although many of the GSIC visible inter-calibration methods are based on medium pixel-level imagers such as MODIS, VIIRS, AVHRR, and geostationary sensors, the methods are applicable to high spatial resolution imagery such as Landsat. For sensor inter-calibration efforts, coincident ray-matched reflectance pairs are used to transfer the calibration from the reference to the target instrument. Spectral band adjustment factors (SBAF) are applied to account for any spectral band differences. For sensor stability monitoring, PICS, deep convective cloud (DCC) and polar ice Earth viewed targets are utilized. GSICS uses the moon for stability monitoring by using the GSICS Implementation of the USGS Robotic Lunar Observatory (ROLO) model (GIRO). GSICS is looking forward to the launch of CLARREO on the international space station (ISS) in 2023. The CLARREO hyperspectral reflective solar band (RSB) sensor will establish an absolute calibration reference in space, which will characterize invariant targets and will inter-calibrate concurrent sensors. Examples of these calibration methods will be presented at the workshop.

Visible calibration methods↗
NASA NTRS2018

Enhancements to the Open Access Spectral Band Adjustment Factor Online Calculation Tool for Visible Channels

With close to 40 years of satellite observations, from which, cloud, land-use, and aerosol parameters can be measured, inter-consistent calibrations are needed to normalize retrievals across satellite records. Various visible-sensor inter-calibration techniques have been developed that utilize radiometrically stable Earth targets, e.g., deep convective clouds and desert/polar ice pseudo-invariant calibration sites. Other equally effective, direct techniques for intercalibration between satellite imagers are simultaneous nadir overpass comparisons and ray-matched radiance pairs. Combining independent calibration results from such varied techniques yields robust calibration coefficients, and is a form of self-validation. One potential source of significant error when cross-calibrating satellite sensors, however, are the often small but substantial spectral discrepancies between comparable bands, which must be accounted for. As such, visible calibration methods rely on a Spectral Band Adjustment Factor (SBAF) to account for the spectral-response function- induced radiance differences between analogous imagers. The SBAF is unique to each calibration method as it is a function of the Earth-reflected spectra. In recent years, NASA Langley pioneered the use of SCIAMACHY-, GOME-2-, and Hyperion-retrieved Earth spectra to compute SBAFs. By carefully selecting hyperspectral footprints that best represent the conditions inherent to an inter-calibration technique, the uncertainty in the SBAF is greatly reduced. NASA Langley initially provided the Global Space-based Inter-calibration System processing and research centers with online SBAF tools, with which users select conditions to best match their calibration criteria. This article highlights expanded SBAF tool capabilities for visible wavelengths, with emphasis on the use of the spectral range filtering for the purpose of separating scene conditions for the channel that the SBAF is needed based on the reflectance values of other bands. In other words, spectral filtering will enable better scene-type selection for bands where scene determination is difficult without information from other channels, which should prove valuable to users in the calibration community.

Scarino, Benjamin↗
NASA NTRS2008

Comparison of CERES-MODIS Stratus Cloud Properties with Ground-Based Measurements at the DOE ARM Southern Great Plains Site

Overcast stratus cloud properties derived for the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy system (CERES) Project using Terra and Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data are compared with observations taken at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains site from March 2000 through December 2004. Retrievals from ARM surface-based data were averaged over a 1-hour interval centered at the time of each satellite overpass, and the CERES-MODIS cloud properties were averaged within a 30-km x 30 km box centered on the ARM SGP site. Two datasets were analyzed: all of the data (ALL) which include multilayered, single-layered, and slightly broken stratus decks and a subset, single-layered unbroken decks (SL). The CERES-MODIS effective cloud heights were determined from effective cloud temperature using a lapse rate method with the surface temperature specified as the 24-h mean surface air temperature. For SL stratus, they are, on average, within the ARM radar-lidar estimated cloud boundaries and are 0.534 +/- 0.542 km and 0.108 +/- 0.480 km lower than the cloud physical tops and centers, respectively, and are comparable for day and night observations. The mean differences and standard deviations are slightly larger for ALL data, but not statistically different to those of SL data. The MODIS-derived effective cloud temperatures are 2.7 +/- 2.4 K less than the surface-observed SL cloud center temperatures with very high correlations (0.86-0.97). Variations in the height differences are mainly caused by uncertainties in the surface air temperatures, lapse rates, and cloud-top height variability. The biases are mainly the result of the differences between effective and physical cloud top, which are governed by cloud liquid water content and viewing zenith angle, and the selected lapse rate, -7.1 K km(exp -1). Based on a total of 43 samples, the means and standard deviations of the differences between the daytime Terra and surface retrievals of effective radius r(sub e), optical depth, and liquid water path for SL stratu are 0.1 +/- 1.9 micrometers (1.2 +/- 23.5%), -1.3 +/- 9.5 (-3.6 +/-26.2%), and 0.6 +/- 49.9 gm (exp -2) (0.3 +/- 27%), respectively, while the corresponding correlation coefficients are 0.44, 0.87, and 0.89. For Aqua, they are 0.2 +/- 1.9 micrometers (2.5 +/- 23.4%), 2.5 +/- 7.8 (7.8 +/- 24.3%), and 28.1 +/- 52.7 gm (exp -2) (17.2 +/- 32.2%), as well as 0.35, 0.96, and 0.93 from a total of 21 cases. The results for ALL cases are comparable. Although a bias in R(sub e) was expected because the satellite retrieval of effective radius only represents the top of the cloud, the surface-based radar retrievals revealed that the vertical profile of r(sub e) is highly variable with smaller droplets occurring at cloud top in some cases. The larger bias in optical depth and liquid water path for Aqua is due, at least partially, to differences in the Terra and Aqua MODIS visible channel calibrations. methods for improving the cloud-top height and microphysical property retrievals are suggested.

Dong, Xiquan↗
NASA NTRS2016

A Consistent AVHRR Visible Calibration Record Based on Multiple Methods Applicable for the NOAA Degrading Orbits: Validation - Part 2

Consistent cross-sensor Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) calibration coefficients are determined using desert, polar ice, and deep convective cloud (DCC) invariant Earth targets. The greatest AVHRR calibration challenge is the slow orbit degradation of the host satellite, which precesses toward a terminator orbit. This issue is solved by characterizing the invariant targets with NOAA-16 AVHRR observed radiances that have been referenced to the Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) calibration using simultaneous nadir overpass (SNO) observations. Another benefit of the NOAA-16 invariant target-modeled reflectance method is that, because of the similarities among the AVHRR spectral response functions, a smaller spectral band adjustment factor is required than when establishing calibrations relative to a non-AVHRR reference instrument. The sensor- and band-specific calibration uncertainties, with respect to the calibration reference, are, on average, 2 percent and 3 percent for channels 1 and 2, respectively. The uncertainties are smaller for sensors that are in afternoon orbits, have longer records, and spend less time in terminator conditions. The multiple invariant targets referenced to Aqua MODIS (MITRAM) AVHRR calibration coefficients are evaluated for individual target consistency, compared against Aqua MODIS/AVHRR SNOs, and selected published calibration gains. The MITRAM and SNO relative calibration biases mostly agree to within 1 percent for channels 1 and 2, respectively. The individual invariant target and MITRAM sensor relative calibration biases are mostly consistent to within 1 percent and 2 percent for channels 1 and 2, respectively. The differences between the MITRAM and other published calibrations are mostly attributed to the reference instrument calibration differences.

Doelling, David R.↗
NASA NTRS1990

NOAA-11 AVHRR visible and near-IR inflight calibration

An inflight calibration method for NOAA-11 AVHRR visible and near-infrared bands using desert reflectance is discussed. The results show a decrease in sensor systems response of 22 percent and 32 percent for the visible and near-infrared bands, respectively, relative to the published preflight calibration. The relative accuracy of the present calibration to the calibration of NOAA-9, published elsewhere, is + or - 3 percent. The absolute accuracy is around + or - 6 percent. An approximate correction to the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ratio suggests that an increase of 0.06 is required.

Holben, B. N.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Calibration of the AVHRR visible and near-IR bands by atmospheric scattering, ocean glint and desert reflection

A method for calibrating satellite sensors (such as the AVHRR visible and NIR bands) is proposed by which the sensors are calibrated using well-known physical characteristics of the atmosphere, ocean, and deserts, as well as the digital satellite imagery. The approach, independent of ground support, used the following three phenomena: molecular scattering over the ocean for absolute visible band calibration; ocean glint, to transfer the calibration from the visible band to the NIR band; and desert reflectance to monitor, independently, the stability of the visible and NIR bands. The method was applied to NOAA-7, -9, and -11 sensors. The results of the ocean and the desert calibration methods were found to differ in the brightness range and the spectral response of the radiance source (molecular scattering over the ocean versus the desert reflectance).

Kaufman, Y. J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPSAS-NF1676L-16988-DND

There has been renewed interest to uniformly recalibrate historical geostationary (GEO) data records to aid in climate monitoring. GEO sensors have annual repeatable angular sampling over a given location. The view angle is fixed and the imaging schedule is usually constant through its lifetime. Given the fact that colocated GEOs are always share the same sub-satellite point and maintain their imaging schedules provides repeatable angular sampling over decades. One of the biggest challenges in transferring a reference sensor calibration using invariant desert targets to another sensor is the accuracy of the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BDRF). A well-calibrated GEO can be used to predict the daily exoatmospheric radiance model (DERM) over a desert target for a given GMT that is valid for any GEO sensor at the same location. The advantage of this method is that a BRDF is not needed. Another challenge of invariant target calibration is the unique spectra signature of the desert. However, since most GEOs are built in batches, the spectral response functions (SRF) are very similar for most historical GEOs, the spectral band adjustment factor (SBAF) between GEO sensors is much smaller than for MODIS and GEO sensors. Since the water vapor burden over the desert is seasonal, both the TOA and desert surface can be considered invariant for a given day of the year. The reference GEO can be inter-calibrated with MODIS or VIIRS, which have onboard visible calibration using solar diffusers, using other methods, such as ray-matching or deep convective clouds. Also the next generation GEOs will have onboard visible calibration, which will increase the accuracy of this method. Three Meteosats over the Libyan desert will be used to illustrate the DERM method. The reference Meteosat will be inter-calibrated against Aqua-MODIS. The reference GEO DERM will be constructed and used to calibrate the remaining Meteosats. The DERM calibration will be validated by comparing the calibration using Aqua-MODIS ray-matching. Similarly, two GOES sensors using the Sonoran desert will also be highlighted. An uncertainty analysis will also be performed with emphasis on the SBAF, derived over the desert targets using both SCIAMACHY and Hyperion hyper-spectral radiances.

David Doelling↗
NASA NTRS1988

The absolute radiometric calibration of the advanced very high resolution radiometer

An increasing number of remote sensing investigations require radiometrically calibrated imagery from NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiation (AVHRR) sensors. Although a prelaunch calibration is done for these sensors, there is no capability for monitoring any changes in the in-flight absolute calibration for the visible and near infrared spectral channels. Hence, the possibility of using the reflectance-based method developed at White Sands for in-orbit calibration of LANDSAT Thematic Mapper (TM) and SPOT Haute Resolution Visible (HVR) data to calibrate the AVHRR sensor was investigated. Three diffrent approaches were considered: Method 1 - ground and atmospheric measurements and reference to another calibrated satellite sensor; Method 2 - ground and atmospheric measurements with no reference to another sensor; and Method 3 - no ground and atmospheric measurements but reference to another satellite sensor. The purpose is to describe an investigation on the use of Method 2 to calibrate NOAA-9 AVHRR channels 1 and 2 with the help of ground and atmospheric measurements at Rogers (dry) Lake, Edwards Air Force Base (EAFB) in the Mojave desert of California.

Slater, P. N.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Status of the GSICS VIS/NIR DCC Calibration Efforts

This year's goals for the GSICS VIS/NIR group is to finalize the VIS/NIR demonstration product requirements and to process the product for public dissemination provided on the GSICS web page. The GSICS VIS/NIR group members have been working on a unified calibration approach among various agencies. Two calibration methods have been chosen for the visible bands, deep convective clouds (DCC) and lunar invariant targets. To come to consensus across the agencies, each step of the DCC process will be outlined. Brief discussions are to follow to determine any outstanding issues. The presentation will review the DCC calibration process implemented by the CERES calibration team. CERES has already implemented the DCC method across 18 geostationary satellites. The various agencies have taken the framework and optimized the method for their particular geostationary satellite. Several new improvements will be discussed, such as deseasonalization of the DCC reflectances, impact of the bidirectional model, and update frequency.

David Doelling↗
NASA NTRS2010

TPSAS-NF1676L-10863-DND

One important aspect of successful climate monitoring is satellite calibration. There is at least a 25-year of operational geostationary (GEO) record available for climate studies, if properly calibrated. The Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System (GSICS) project is another effort to provide the climate community consistent calibration across multiple platforms. Also, the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) project, provides consistent GEO retrieved cloud properties and derived broadband fluxes across multiple platforms. This year GSICS is focusing on geostationary visible channel calibration. The GSICS strategy is to use multiple approaches, such as cross-calibrating the GEO radiances against MODIS as a reference, deep convective clouds as bright stable targets, deserts, sun-glint, stars, moon and other model based calibration methods. Each of these methods is independent of each other and can assess the stability of the GEO visible instrument with differing uncertainties. This study focuses on the inter-calibration of the GEO radiances against MODIS as a reference by using collocated, and coincident ray-matched radiances. The advantage of the ray-matching technique is that it provides a full dynamic range of radiances to check the linearity of the GEO visible instrument. This presentation will focus on the technique, some error analysis, comparisons with other methods, and an approach to inter-calibrate historical GEOs before MODIS.

D R Doelling↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPSAS-NF1676L-19788-DND

The calibration of the historical AVHRR visible channels has always been hindered by the degrading NOAA satellite orbits. The complete AVHRR record spans over three decades making it useful for cloud, aerosol, and land use climate studies. Studies that monitor long-term changes in these properties require climate quality calibration. The AVHRR sensors do not have any onboard visible calibration, unlike the IR channels. Many AVHRR post-launch calibration methods have been published. Some of these are based on the pseudo invariant targets such as desert and polar ice and others employ direct calibration transfer from a well-calibrated sensor such as MODIS. Most historical studies only employed only one method and reconciling calibration differences from multiple studies was difficult. This study employs multiple calibration approaches, which are then merged according to their individual uncertainty. Since the visible spectral response functions are similar across AVHRR sensor and that the morning and afternoon orbits usually degrade in the same manner, an afternoon and morning orbiter during the MODIS era is chosen as the reference AVHRR sensor. The reference AVHRR sensor is inter-calibrated with the Aqua-MODIS Collection 6 standard using simultaneous nadir overpass (SNO) radiance pairs. Three pseudo invariant target approaches are utilized, deserts, polar ice and deep convective clouds. These sites are characterized using reference AVHRR reflectances as a function of solar zenith angle. The multiple calibration approach is then validated with non-reference AVHRR sensor during the MODIS era, using AVHRR and MODIS SNO measurements. For historical AVHRR satellite having consistent calibration across invariant targets then validates the approach. This calibration effort is in sponsored by the NOAA CDR program to provide climate quality visible calibration coefficients to the remote sensing community. Each of the calibration approaches are unique and when utilized in tandem can accurately calibrate the AVHRR record. AVHRR calibration methods cannot rely on repeatable annual orbits for calibration model development. Inconsistent results prompt code and invariant target examinations that cannot be determined using only single method approaches. Results from this study will be presented at the meeting.

David Doelling↗
NASA NTRS2001

Intercalibration of Meteorological Satellite Imagers Using VIRS, ATSR-2 and MODIS

Global retrievals of surface, cloud and radiative properties from geostationary (GEO) and low-Earth-orbit (LEO) meteorological satellites require accurate calibration of their imagers. An accurate and consistent calibration increases the reliability and effectiveness of long-term monitoring of climate changes. More emphasis has been placed on calibrating the thermal infrared (IR) channel. The lack of on-board calibration in the visible (VIS) channel has prompted efforts to characterize the degradation of the VIS sensor using vicarious post-launch calibration techniques that measure bright stable desert targets from space and aircraft or using satellite-to-satellite normalizations. While such inter-calibrations are valuable and widely used, the lack of a well-characterized calibration reference source and the lengthy time delay between updates have minimized their effectiveness in climate monitoring. To address these shortcomings, this paper examines the use of research satellite imagers to provide stable calibration references for the visible (VIS, approximately 0.65 micrometers) channels and develops a method for rapid intercalibration of existing satellites. Calibration coefficients are determined for the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES-8 to GOES-10), Geostationary Meteorological Satellite (GMS-5), Meteosat-7, and the NOAA-14 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR). As a reference calibration source, this technique uses the self-calibrating sensors on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Visible Infrared Radiometers (VIRS) or the ERS-2 Along Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR-2). GOES-8 is calibrated with VIRS and then its calibration is transferred to other GEO or LEO satellites. The absolute accuracy of this technique relies on the assumption that the on-board calibration is stable and well maintained. Minnis et al. assessed the VIRS calibration using comparisons with other self-calibrated satellite sensors including the broadband Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) scanners, the ERS-2 Along Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR-2), and the Terra Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). Thus, the VIRS data can be confidently used as the initial reference source.

Nguyen, Louis↗
NASA NTRS1986

Calibration of satellite sensors after launch

A simple and accurate method for the postflight calibration of satellite Visible Infrared Spin-Scan Radiometers (VISSR) is presented, and the results of inflight testing are reported. The calibration source for the VISSR with its effective wavelength of 610 nm is the radiance of sunlight, measured in calibrated reflectance units, scattered by the atmospheric gas above ocean which is far from land. Only the lowest 20 percent of the full-scale VISSR response is calibrated. VISSR testing aboard two geostationary operational evironmental satellites between 1980 and 1983 showed significant calibration coefficient variations of only + or - 12 percent and + or - 2 percent. Good agreement was found between values of aerosol optical thickness measured by VISSR and those measured from the ground.

Fraser, R. S.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Laboratory calibration of field reflectance panels

A method used for calibrating field reflectance panels in the visible and shortwave infrared wavelength range is described. The directional reflectance factor of painted barium sulfate (BaSO4) panels is determined. The reference for this method is the hemispherical reflectance of pressed polytetrafluoroethylene (halon) powder prepared according to National Bureau of Standards (NBS) directions. The panels and a radiometer are mounted on rotation stages to measure the reflectance factor at different incidence and view angles. The sensor can be any laboratory or field filter radiometer small enough to mount on the apparatus. The method is used to measure the reflectance factors of halon and BaSO4 panels between 0.45 and 0.85 micrometers. These reflectance factors are compared to those measured by a field apparatus. The results agree to within 0.013 in reflectance at incidence angles between 15 and 75 degrees.

Biggar, S. F.↗
NASA NTRS1984

The importance and attainment of accurate absolute radiometric calibration

The importance of accurate absolute radiometric calibration is discussed by reference to the needs of those wishing to validate or use models describing the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with the atmosphere and earth surface features. The in-flight calibration methods used for the Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and the Systeme Probatoire d'Observation de la Terre, Haute Resolution visible (SPOT/HRV) systems are described and their limitations discussed. The questionable stability of in-flight absolute calibration methods suggests the use of a radiative transfer program to predict the apparent radiance, at the entrance pupil of the sensor, of a ground site of measured reflectance imaged through a well characterized atmosphere. The uncertainties of such a method are discussed.

Slater, P. N.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Radiometric Calibration of A Non-Imaging Airborne Spectrometer To Measure the Greenland Ice Sheet Surface

Methods to radiometrically calibrate a non-imaging airborne visible-to-shortwave infrared (VSWIR) spectrometer to measure the Greenland ice sheet surface are presented. Airborne VSWIR measurement performance for bright Greenland ice and dark bare rock/soil targets is compared against the MODerate resolution atmospheric TRANsmission (MODTRAN ® ) radiative transfer code (version 6.0), and a coincident Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) acquisition on 29 July 2015 during an in-flight radiometric calibration experiment. Airborne remote sensing flights were carried out in northwestern Greenland in preparation for the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite 2 (ICESat-2) laser altimeter mission. A total of nine science flights were conducted over the Greenland ice sheet, sea ice, and open-ocean water. The campaign's primary purpose was to correlate green laser pulse penetration into snow and ice with spectroscopic-derived surface properties. An experimental airborne instrument configuration that included a nadir-viewing (looking downward at the surface) non-imaging Analytical Spectral Devices (ASD) Inc. spectrometer that measured upwelling VSWIR (0.35 to 2.5 µm) spectral radiance (Wm −2 sr −1 µm −1 ) in the two-color Slope Imaging Multi-polarization Photon-Counting Lidar's (SIMPL) ground instantaneous field of view, and a zenith-viewing (looking upward at the sky) ASD spectrometer that measured VSWIR spectral irradiance (W m −2 nm −1 ) was flown. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable radiometric calibration procedures for laboratory, in-flight, and field environments are described in detail to achieve a targeted VSWIR measurement requirement of within 5 % to support calibration/validation efforts and remote sensing algorithm development. Our MODTRAN predictions for the 29 July flight line over dark and bright targets indicate that the airborne nadir-viewing spectrometer spectral radiance measurement uncertainty was between 0.6 % and 4.7 % for VSWIR wavelengths (0.4 to 2.0 µm) with atmospheric transmittance greater than 80 %. MODTRAN predictions for Landsat 8 OLI relative spectral response functions suggest that OLI is measuring 6 % to 16 % more top-of-atmosphere (TOA) spectral radiance from the Greenland ice sheet surface than was predicted using apparent reflectance spectra from the nadir-viewing spectrometer. While more investigation is required to convert airborne VSWIR spectral radiance into atmospherically corrected airborne surface reflectance, it is expected that airborne science flight data products will contribute to spectroscopic determination of Greenland ice sheet surface optical properties to improve understanding of their potential influence on ICESat-2 measurements.

Christopher J. Crawford↗
DOE OSTI2024

Archetype-based Redshift Estimation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Survey

We present a computationally efficient galaxy archetype-based redshift estimation and spectral classification method for the Dark Energy Survey Instrument (DESI) survey. The DESI survey currently relies on a redshift fitter and spectral classifier using a linear combination of principal component analysis–derived templates, which is very efficient in processing large volumes of DESI spectra within a short time frame. However, this method occasionally yields unphysical model fits for galaxies and fails to adequately absorb calibration errors that may still be occasionally visible in the reduced spectra. Our proposed approach improves upon this existing method by refitting the spectra with carefully generated physical galaxy archetypes combined with additional terms designed to absorb data reduction defects and provide more physical models to the DESI spectra. We test our method on an extensive data set derived from the survey validation (SV) and Year 1 (Y1) data of DESI. Our findings indicate that the new method delivers marginally better redshift success for SV tiles while reducing catastrophic redshift failure by 10%–30%. At the same time, results from millions of targets from the main survey show that our model has relatively higher redshift success and purity rates (0.5%–0.8% higher) for galaxy targets while having similar success for QSOs. These improvements also demonstrate that the main DESI redshift pipeline is generally robust. Additionally, it reduces the false-positive redshift estimation by 5%–40% for sky fibers. We also discuss the generic nature of our method and how it can be extended to other large spectroscopic surveys, along with possible future improvements.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
NASA NTRS1982

Optogalvanic wavelength calibration for laser monitoring of reactive atmospheric species

Laser-based techniques have been successfully employed for monitoring atmospheric species of importance to stratospheric ozone chemistry or tropospheric air quality control. When spectroscopic methods using tunable lasers are used, a simultaneously recorded reference spectrum is required for wavelength calibration. For stable species this is readily achieved by incorporating into the sensing instrument a reference cell containing the species to be monitored. However, when the species of interest is short-lived, this approach is unsuitable. It is proposed that wavelength calibration for short-lived species may be achieved by generating the species of interest in an electrical or RF discharge and using optogalvanic detection as a simple, sensitive, and reliable means of recording calibration spectra. The wide applicability of this method is emphasized. Ultraviolet, visible, or infrared lasers, either CW or pulsed, may be used in aircraft, balloon, or shuttle experiments for sensing atoms, molecules, radicals, or ions.

Webster, C. R.↗