Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Y(SnO2)2”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Materials Data on Y(SnO2)2 by Materials Project

Y(SnO2)2 is Spinel structured and crystallizes in the trigonal R-3m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Y3+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form YO4 tetrahedra that share corners with twelve SnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 52–61°. There are one shorter (2.09 Å) and three longer (2.23 Å) Y–O bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Sn+2.50+ sites. In the first Sn+2.50+ site, Sn+2.50+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form SnO6 octahedra that share corners with six equivalent YO4 tetrahedra and edges with six SnO6 octahedra. There are two shorter (2.45 Å) and four longer (2.55 Å) Sn–O bond lengths. In the second Sn+2.50+ site, Sn+2.50+ is bonded to six equivalent O2- atoms to form SnO6 octahedra that share corners with six equivalent YO4 tetrahedra and edges with six equivalent SnO6 octahedra. All Sn–O bond lengths are 2.15 Å. There are two inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Y3+ and three Sn+2.50+ atoms. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Y3+ and three equivalent Sn+2.50+ atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

High Performing Inverted Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells via Solution Phase Deposition of Yttrium-Doped SnO 2 Directly on Perovskite

Solution processing of flexible perovskite solar cells (f-PSCs) provides an avenue for scalable, high-throughput printing of lightweight, scalable, and cost-effective flexible solar cells. However, the deposition of fully solution-processed metal oxide charge transport layers on perovskites has been limited by solvent incompatibilities and high processing temperatures for metal oxide nanoparticles. In this study, we present high-performance, inverted f-PSCs from the direct deposition of yttrium doped SnO 2 nanoparticles functionalized with acetate on top of perovskite as an ink in anhydrous ethanol via blade coating. Yttrium doping improved device performance by improving the charge extraction leading with a decreased series resistance leading to improvements in the open-circuit voltage and fill factor. Furthermore, the champion power conversion efficiency for 0.1 cm 2 devices increased from 14.3% for undoped SnO 2 to 18.2% with 2% Y:SnO 2 doping, which is unprecedented for f-PSCs on ITO-PET substrate employing SnO 2 as an ETL.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Effect of Sn oxides on the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline SnSe

SnSe is a promising thermoelectric material, with intrinsically low lattice thermal conductivity, κL. Surprisingly, in several reports, polycrystalline samples are found to have a higher thermal conductivity than single crystals. This disparity has been attributed to trace amounts of thermally conductive Sn oxides at the grain boundaries of polycrystalline samples. The same culprit was recently proposed to explain the reduction of κL in purified, oxide-free, SnSe polycrystals. Here, we test this hypothesis by: (i) tuning the type of oxide in SnSe by exploiting thermodynamic stability regions, since Sn-rich or Sn-poor compositions favour the formation of SnO or SnO 2 , respectively; and (ii) varying the quantity of SnO 2 by intentionally oxidizing SnSe powder before consolidation, to obtain samples with quantifiable amounts - up to 15% - of SnO 2 . We find that the κL of SnSe is impervious to changes in the type or the amount of Sn oxide present in the samples. Our results show that a simple “rule of mixtures” cannot be used to estimate the effect of grain boundary oxides on the thermal conductivity of SnSe. These results call for an improved understanding of the intriguing thermal transport mechanisms in SnSe and numerous other systems where a two-phase transport is presumed.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A compendium and meta-analysis of flatband potentials for TiO2, ZnO, and SnO2 semiconductors in aqueous media

Semiconductor/electrolyte interfaces are of great interest to numerous scientific fields including renewable energy, (photo)electrochemistry, and energy storage. The semiconductor flatband potential is a key parameter in locating the conduction band minimum or valence band maximum of the semiconductor material in electrolyte. Despite its importance for quantifying the energetic location of the semiconductor bands, literature reports for the same material demonstrate significant variability in the flatband potential. In this compendium and meta-analysis, reported flatband potentials of the common semiconductor materials TiO2, SnO2, and ZnO in aqueous electrolyte were compiled and assessed to quantify the spread in literature flatband potentials as well as determine the factors that lead to the significant spread. For TiO2, SnO2, and ZnO, literature flatband potentials referenced to the reversible hydrogen electrode span a range of nearly 2 V each. Flatband potential tabulations were separated by variables such as the solution pH, the crystalline polymorph, the crystal facet, the morphology, and the dimensions or combinations of these variables to assess the factors that contribute to the observed spread. Important and surprising findings from these categorizations are summarized: (1) Even for the narrowest categorizations, the spread in flatband potential is still large. (2) Flatband potentials of TiO2 and SnO2 follow the expected Nernstian dependence with solution pH. ZnO materials deviate from this Nernstian dependence. (3) In the aggregate, there is no statistically significant difference in the reported flatband potentials of anatase and rutile TiO2. Single crystal tabulations were the only distributions to have statistically significant differences in the flatband potential between anatase and rutile TiO2. (4) Anatase TiO2 materials with a nanotube morphology appear to have a +400 mV difference in mean flatband potential compared to all other morphologies, but we argue that this is likely due to widespread misuse of the Mott–Schottky analysis. Other interesting findings are revealed within the spread of literature flatband potentials, and possible explanations are provided to generate discussion. We also briefly review and discuss common techniques that were used to determine the flatband potential and the pitfalls/criticisms of these techniques. Last, we discuss some ways in which future research on the determination of the flatband potential can be performed to improve the reliability of reported values and the quality of the work. In total, the results from this meta-analysis suggest multiple factors can affect the measured flatband potential and that an abundance of caution should be applied when attempting to quantify the flatband potential of complex or nanostructured systems.

Patel, Milan Y. (ORCID:0000000291948141)↗