Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “additively manufactured components”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Build plate conduction cooling for thermal management of wire arc additive manufactured components

Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) allows for quick, large component manufacturing with fast deposition rates while leveraging readily available wire feedstock that is significantly cheaper than metal powder. However, the increased deposition rate of this process requires enhanced thermal management as failures can occur due to overheating. A common strategy to mitigate overheating is to dwell, or pause, between individual layers; however, this can significantly increase build times and eliminate the advantage of additive manufacturing being able to manufacture components quickly. To help mitigate this issue, this study explores the use of active cooling to maintain process control and to decrease overall build time. In this work, conductive cooling applied to either the bottom or side of the print substrate was explored. Results from this study showed that bottom build plate active cooling can be used to decrease dwell times by up to 50% and decrease cool-down to room temperature after the building process by up to 75%. Results from this study demonstrate that the use of active cooling strategies for WAAM can be used for better thermal control over the process and should be further investigated.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Scientific Foundations and Approaches for Qualification of Additively Manufactured Structural Components

Additive manufacturing (AM) maintains a wide process window that enables complex designs otherwise unattainable via conventional production technologies. However, the lack of confidence in qualifying AM parts that leverage AM process–structure–property–performance (PSPP) relationships stymies design optimization and adoption of AM. While continuing efforts to map fundamental PSPP relationships that cover the potential design space, we first need pragmatic and then long-term solutions that overcome challenges associated with qualifying AM-designed parts. Two pragmatic solutions include: (1) AM material specifications to substantiate process reproducibility, and (2) component risk categorization to associate system risk relative to part performance and required part quality. A novel qualification paradigm under development involves efficient prediction of part performance over wide-ranging PSPP relationships through targeted testing and computational simulation. Here this paper describes projects at Sandia National Laboratories on PSPP relationship discovery, these pragmatic approaches, and the novel qualification approach.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
NASA NTRS2019

Nasa's Plans for Development of a Standard for Additively Manufactured Components

The current version of NASA standards for manned spaceflight hardware do not contain sufficient detail for the certification of additively manufactured components. The development of additively manufactured standards is currently in work by several standards organizations. However, NASA cannot wait on these organizations to develop such standards. NASA and its program partners in manned spaceflight (Commercial Crew, Space Launch System and the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle) are actively developing additively manufactured components for flight as early as 2019.

Russell, Richard W.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Ductile coatings on additive manufactured components

A method of forming a coated component using an additive manufacturing system including building a body portion of the component on a build plate. An outer surface of the body portion can include an indentation resulting from the additive manufacturing system. The method further includes performing at least one post-build process on the body portion. The method yet further includes forming a coating layer on an outer surface of the processed body portion. The coating layer may surround a portion of the body component and may impregnate the indentation. A thickness of the coating layer may be a function of at least one of surface roughness, size of the indentation, or a diameter of particles used to build the additive manufactured bracket.

Racca, Stephen D.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Material Characterization of Additively Manufactured Components for Rocket Propulsion

To advance Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies for production of rocket propulsion components the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) is applying state of the art characterization techniques to interrogate microstructure and mechanical properties of AM materials and components at various steps in their processing. The materials being investigated for upper stage rocket engines include titanium, copper, and nickel alloys. Additive manufacturing processes include laser powder bed, electron beam powder bed, and electron beam wire fed processes. Various post build thermal treatments, including Hot Isostatic Pressure (HIP), have been studied to understand their influence on microstructure, mechanical properties, and build density. Micro-computed tomography, electron microscopy, and mechanical testing in relevant temperature environments has been performed to develop relationships between build quality, microstructure, and mechanical performance at temperature. A summary of GRCs Additive Manufacturing roles and experimental findings will be presented.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS2015

Materials Characterization of Additively Manufactured Components for Rocket Propulsion

To advance Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies for production of rocket propulsion components the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) is applying state of the art characterization techniques to interrogate microstructure and mechanical properties of AM materials and components at various steps in their processing. The materials being investigated for upper stage rocket engines include titanium, copper, and nickel alloys. Additive manufacturing processes include laser powder bed, electron beam powder bed, and electron beam wire fed processes. Various post build thermal treatments, including Hot Isostatic Pressure (HIP), have been studied to understand their influence on microstructure, mechanical properties, and build density. Micro-computed tomography, electron microscopy, and mechanical testing in relevant temperature environments has been performed to develop relationships between build quality, microstructure, and mechanical performance at temperature. A summary of GRC's Additive Manufacturing roles and experimental findings will be presented.

Additive Manufacturing↗
DOE OSTI2025

DETERMINATION OF THE SOLID-STATE RESISTANCE-WELDABILITY OF ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED 304L STAINLESS STEEL

Additive manufacturing of pressure-containing boundaries is of interest to numerous industries, so a project was initiated to develop several different methods to join and weld additively manufactured materials. The approach investigated in this study was a low energy, solid state spot weld. This general approach has been routinely used for conventionally prepared tubing and is now being expanded to additively manufactured components. Additively manufactured 304L stainless steel sheets, semi-tubes, and tubes were resistance spot welded and compared to comparable welds in conventionally manufactured tubing. Radiographic computed tomography and metallography were used to evaluate the suitability of the welds using three criteria: weld closure length, thickness, and width. All additively manufactured test welds closely matched the conventional tubing for these criteria

additive manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s Plans for the Release of Standards for Additive Manufactured Components

NASA has a critical need for the development of Agency standards for the certification of additively manufactured (AM) components. This is necessary since the current version of NASA standards for manned and noncrewed spaceflight hardware do not contain sufficient detail and the development of documents by the international standards organizations are not mature enough for implementation. AM parts are currently flying or in development for nearly all NASA flight programs. To bridge the gap prior to the release of Agency standards MSFC released two documents, MSFC-STD-3716 and MSFC-SPEC-3717. These documents were written specifically for laser power fusion of metallic powder, but the principles defined were used for tailoring requirements for current NASA manned missions. In 2018 a team of Agency AM experts was assembled and development of standards for the certification of additively manufactured components. These standards are design for use by all NASA programs and a broader spectrum of mature materials and processes. Four documents are being planned; NASA-STD-6030 (add title), NASA-STD-6032 (add title), NASA-STD-6033 (add title) and NASA-HNBK-6034 (add title). Two of these documents, NASA-STD-6030 and NASA-STD-6033, are being finalized for release in late 2020. These standards contain requirements that address part classification, metallurgical process control, material property development, part process control, part inspection and acceptance, equipment process control and vendor process control. This paper will present a summary of the status of each document and provide an overview of the content of NASA-STD-6030.

Richard Russell↗
NASA NTRS2015

Application of Additively Manufactured Components in Rocket Engine Turbopumps

The use of additive manufacturing technology has the potential to revolutionize the development of turbopump components in liquid rocket engines. When designing turbomachinery with the additive process there are several benefits and risks that are leveraged relative to a traditional development cycle. This topic explores the details and development of a 90,000 RPM Liquid Hydrogen Turbopump from which 90% of the parts were derived from the additive process. This turbopump was designed, developed and will be tested later this year at Marshall Space Flight Center.

Calvert, Marty, Jr.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of Segmentation-Induced Deviations of Porosity Metrics in Powder Bed Fusion Additively Manufactured Components

Post processing X-ray computational tomography (CT) inspection data for additively manufactured (AM) components can induce deviations in defect quantification, affecting subsequent fatigue and failure predictions. To assess the influence and potential impact of segmentation-induced measurement deviations, this paper applies several segmentation techniques to X-ray CT data for powder bed fusion Ti-6Al-4V specimens exhibiting porosity conditions. X-ray CT reconstructions were segmented with varying techniques including Otsu’s thresholding, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, and the multilayer perceptron. Metrics such as pore size and global porosity were compared for internal validity. Then, top-down X-ray CT measurements of surface-breaking porosity were compared to optical profilometry for cross-validation.

Data fusion↗
DOE OSTI2024

Ultrasonic Characterization of Material Properties in Metal Components Additively Manufactured by Powder Bed Fusion

We present the methodology for using pulsed-echo ultrasound to characterize the properties of additively manufactured (AM) metal components and their response to changes in the fabrication settings. We show how to accurately characterize anisotropy in these properties and when such characterization can be performed noninvasively. Our approach, when applied to 3D-printed stainless steel samples, reveals a significant heterogeneity between the surface and internal properties of the AM part and the anisotropy in material properties in the build and transverse directions.

Walton, Kenneth↗
NASA NTRS2017

Computed Tomography Inspection and Analysis for Additive Manufacturing Components

Computed tomography (CT) inspection was performed on test articles additively manufactured from metallic materials. Metallic AM and machined wrought alloy test articles with programmed flaws and geometric features were inspected using a 2-megavolt linear accelerator based CT system. Performance of CT inspection on identically configured wrought and AM components and programmed flaws was assessed to determine the impact of additive manufacturing on inspectability of objects with complex geometries.

Beshears, Ronald D.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Computed Tomography Inspection and Analysis for Additive Manufacturing Components

Computed tomography (CT) inspection was performed on test articles additively manufactured from metallic materials. Metallic AM and machined wrought alloy test articles with programmed flaws were inspected using a 2MeV linear accelerator based CT system. Performance of CT inspection on identically configured wrought and AM components and programmed flaws was assessed using standard image analysis techniques to determine the impact of additive manufacturing on inspectability of objects with complex geometries.

Beshears, Ronald D.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Alternating chempolishing and electropolishing for interior and exterior surface finishing of additively manufactured (AM) metal components

Additively manufactured (AM) components’ surface finishing is crucial in adopting them for intended applications in challenging environments involving fatigue, corrosion, high temperature, and nuclear radiation. In our prior research, chempolishing (C) was utilized as an electroless etching process that uniformly smoothens complex AM components’ accessible interior and exterior surfaces (Tyagi et al. Additive Manufacturing, 25:32–38, 22). A wide range of electropolishing (E) has been demonstrated for AM surface finishing. However, electropolishing can impact a surface that can be juxtaposed to counter electrode and can yield a very smooth surface to sub-micrometer level roughness. However, a knowledge gap exists about the impact of applying both approaches on the same surface one after another and what new advantages may arise because of combining two methods. This paper uses dual-stage liquid-based surface finishing strategies produced by alternating the chempolishing (C) and electropolishing (E) steps. Two dual-stage surface finishing approaches, i.e., chempolishing followed by electropolishing (CE) and electropolishing followed by chempolishing (EC), were performed on the 316 stainless AM steel component. Impacts of EC and CE approaches were compared with single-stage C and E surface finishing approaches. An optical microscope and mechanical profilometer were utilized to investigate the wide range of surface roughness parameters. CE and EC produced Ra ~ 1.4 µm and ~ 1.6 µm, respectively. Surface roughness on CE- and EC-treated AM samples was lower than those individually treated by C and E approaches. Scanning electron microscopy provided further insights into the microstructural difference between CE- and EC-treated AM samples. This paper reports a liquid contact angle study on CE- and EC-treated AM samples to provide insights into the relative difference in surface energy that is crucial for making coatings on AM parts. A spectroscopic reflectance study was also employed to register the difference in physical properties of AM components treated with CE and EC approaches. Further, this study reveals industrially practicable interior and exterior surface finishing approaches for complex AM metal components that require minimum tooling and real-time process monitoring.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

In-process, layer-by-layer non-destructive testing of additive manufactured components using linear and nonlinear vibrational resonance

Provided is an additive manufacturing system capable of performing in-process, layer-by-layer non-destructive testing, the additive manufacturing system including: a plate for producing a part thereon; a transducer attached to the plate and configured to induce vibrations in the part; and a laser vibrometer configured to detect a vibrational response of the part to determine whether defect and/or anisotropy exists within the part.

Remillieux, Marcel↗
DOE OSTI2025

Multiscale Characterization of Additive Manufacturing Components with Computed Tomography, 3D X-ray Microscopy, and Deep Learning

Additive manufacturing (AM) facilitates the creation of complex-geometry parts, driving advancements in lightweight aerospace components, high-efficiency engine cooling channels, and customized medical implants. However, ensuring the quality and reliability of AM parts remains challenging due to internal defects, surface irregularities, porosity, and residual trapped powder, which are often inaccessible to traditional inspection methods. Recent developments in X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and 3D X-ray microscopy (XRM), particularly systems equipped with resolution-at-a-distance (RaaD™) capabilities, enable high-resolution, non-destructive evaluation of AM components across multiple scales, from sub-micrometer to macroscopic levels. This paper explores modern XCT and XRM techniques for multiscale characterization of AM parts, focusing on their ability to detect and analyze defects such as porosity, cracks, inclusions, and surface roughness, while offering insights into defect formation mechanisms, material properties, and process-induced variations. The integration of deep learning (DL) frameworks, including Simurgh, DeepRecon, and DeepScout, enhances XCT/XRM workflows by reducing scan times, improving resolution recovery, and enabling accurate defect detection even with limited projection data. These DL-based methods overcome limitations of traditional reconstruction techniques, enabling faster, more reliable characterization of dense materials like Inconel 718 and novel alloys such as AlCe. Applications include process parameter optimization, high-throughput quality control, and multistage AM process evaluation, with DL-enhanced workflows accelerating analysis times from weeks to days. Correlative imaging approaches further validate XCT and XRM data against scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of physically sectioned samples, confirming the accuracy of DL-based reconstructions and enabling comprehensive defect analysis. While challenges remain in generalizing DL models to diverse materials and imaging conditions, improvements in resolution, noise reduction, and defect detection highlight the transformative potential of these methods. This multiscale and correlative approach enables precise identification and correlation of microstructural features with the overall performance of AM components. By integrating advanced XCT, XRM, and DL techniques, this paper demonstrates a significant leap forward in AM characterization, offering valuable insights into the relationships between processing parameters, microstructure, and part performance, and driving innovations that enhance the quality and reliability of AM products for demanding industrial applications.

Additive manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS2021

Additive Component Manufacturing

State-of-the-art technology like additive manufacturing has not yet been thoroughly applied to fluid control valves. Many valve manufacturing issues such as flow passage machining, deep hole boring, and bi-metallic joining could successfully be addressed with this new technology. The goal of this project was to apply additive manufacturing technology specifically to the problems that fluid control valves present. In order to properly apply additive manufacturing processes to the design of control valves, the plan was to manufacture samples using metals compatible with low temperature, high pressure oxygen service and then tested. While vetting this project with manufacturers, it was determined that the materials chosen were not ideal for additive manufacturing due to their high reflectivity. Therefore, materials for this project were currently undergoing reevaluation and materials that are better suited for additive manufacturing may be substituted. During FY20, additional alloys were selected that would be both appropriate for high pressure oxygen environments as well appropriate for additive manufacturing processes. However, final bid for manufacturing was six times larger than the available funding for this project. Based on previous additive manufacturing projects, the scope and funding for this project were appropriate, but a suitable manufacturer willing to provide a reasonable proposal, was not found. Therefore, funds were de-obligated for this project, and then re-obligated to augment another FY20 CIF project.

Jonathan Dickey↗