Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “auroral electrodynamics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Distributed Observations of Auroral Electrodynamics From the Geospace Dynamics Constellation

The Geospace Dynamics Constellation (GDC), with an anticipated launch by the end of thedecade, can provide a unique dataset and modeling effort to support heterogeneousdistributed studies of auroral electrodynamics. On its own, GDC will fully characterize thelarger scale context for auroral electrodynamics, including the electric Meld/ion drift, plasmawaves and irregularities/small-scale structure, Meld-aligned and horizontal current, andenergetic electron and ion populations, with multipoint measurements that can assesslongitudinal gradients on scales of 300+ km, and in-track/latitudinal scales of approximately10 km, on timescales ranging from seconds to tens of minutes. In addition, GDC will fullycharacterize the thermosphere and ionosphere populations, including new capabilities likemeasurements of 3-d neutral wind, and detailed assessment of the neutral and ioncomposition and the plasma density proMles.When added to other space-based and ground-based assets, which may provide Mne-scaleelectrodynamics, time history of energy inputs and forcing, or altitude proMles of plasma driftsand density, the combined heterogeneous dataset will represent a groundbreaking opportunityto advance the science of auroral electrodynamics. GDC is particularly well suited as a'strategic hub' that can be leveraged by other observation campaigns with focus on GDC-adjacent science. For example, constellations of satellites able to measure Mne-scalestructure, or sounding rocket missions, or dedicated ground-based observing campaigns, inconjunction with advanced local-scale and regional-scale modeling show great promise incoordination with GDC.We will present the current status of GDC, its sampling scheme, measurement parameters,and a summary of instrumentation, in addition to several potential sampling scenarios thatmay be of particular interest for studies of auroral electrodynamics.

Douglas E Rowland↗
NASA NTRS1982

Modelling of auroral electrodynamical processes: Magnetosphere to mesosphere

Research conducted on auroral electrodynamic coupling between the magnetosphere and ionosphere-atmosphere in support of the development of a global scale kinetic plasma theory is reviewed. Topics covered include electric potential structure in the evening sector; morning and dayside auroras; auroral plasma formation; electrodynamic coupling with the thermosphere; and auroral electron interaction with the atmosphere.

Chiu, Y. T.↗
NASA NTRS2011

A Rocket-Base Study of Auroral Electrodynamics Within the Current Closure Ionosphere

The Auroral Current and Electrodynamics Structure (ACES) mission consisted of two sounding rockets launched nearly simultaneously from Poker Flat Research Range, AK on January 29, 2009 into a dynamic multiple-arc aurora. The ACES rocket mission, in conjunction with the PFISR Radar, was designed to observe the three-dimensional current system of a stable auroral arc system. ACES utilized two well instrumented payloads flown along very similar magnetic field footprints, at various altitudes with small temporal separation between both payloads. ACES High, the higher altitude payload (apogee 360 km), took in-situ measurements of the plasma parameters above the current closure region to provide the input signature into the lower ionosphere. ACES Low, the low-altitude payload (apogee 130 km), took similar observations within the current closure region, where cross-field currents can flow. We present results comparing observations of the electric fields, magnetic fields, electron flux, and the electron temperature at similar magnetic footpoints between both payloads. We further present data from all-sky imagers and PFISR detailing the evolution of the auroral event as the payloads traversed regions connected by similar magnetic footpoints. Current measurements derived from the magnetometers on both payloads are further compared. We examine data from both PFISR and observations on the high-altitude payload which we interpreted as a signature of electron acceleration by means of Alfv n waves. We further examine all measurements to understand ionospheric conductivity and how energy is being deposited into the ionosphere through Joule heating. Data from ACES is compared against models of Joule heating to make inferences regarding the effect of collisions at various altitudes.

Kaeppler, Stephen R.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Prediction of High-Latitude Ionospheric Electrodynamics Using the Machine Learning Based Auroral Ionospheric Electrodynamics Model

We introduce a new framework for Machine-Learning (ML) based Auroral Ionosphere Model (ML-AIM). ML-AIM solves a current continuity equation by utilizing the ML model of Field Aligned Currents (FACs) of Kunduri et al., 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027908), the FAC-derived aurora conductance model of Robinson et al., 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028008), and the solar irradiance conductance model of Moen & Brekke (1993). The ML-AIM inputs are 60min time histories of solar wind plasma, interplanetary magnetic fields (IMF), and geomagnetic indices, and its outputs are ionospheric electric potential, electric fields, Pederson/Hall currents, and Joule Heating. We conduct two ML-AIM simulations for a weak geomagnetic activity on 14 May 2013 and a geomagnetic storm on 7-8 September 2017. ML-AIM produces reasonable ionospheric potential patterns such as two cell convection patterns and the enhancement of electric potentials during active times. The cross polar cap potential drop from ML-AIM is also comparable to the ones from the Weimer 2005 model, Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN), and Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) F17 observations. ML-AIM is unique in a sense that it predicts ionospheric responses to the time-varying solar wind and geomagnetic conditions, while other traditional empirical model like Weimer 2005 is designed to provide static ionospheric conditions under steady solar wind/IMF conditions. In future, ML-AIM will include ML-based models of aurora precipitation and ionospheric conductance, improving its performance during active times.

H. K. Connor↗
NASA NTRS1985

A numerical simulation of auroral ionospheric electrodynamics

A computer simulation of auroral ionospheric electrodynamics in the altitude range 80 to 250 km has been developed. The routine will either simulate typical electron precipitation profiles or accept observed data. Using a model background ionosphere, ion production rates are calculated from which equilibrium electron densities and the Hall and Pedersen conductivities may be determined. With the specification of suitable boundary conditions, the entire three-dimensional current system and electric field may be calculated within the simulation region. The results of the application of the routine to a typical inverted-V precipitation profile are demonstrated. The routine is used to explore the observed anticorrelation between electric field magnitude and peak energy in the precipitating electron spectrum of an auroral arc.

Mallinckrodt, A. J.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Auroral arc electrodynamic parameters measured by AE-C and the Chatanika radar

Auroral arc electrodynamic parameters are studied using coordinated measurements between the AE-C satellite and the Chatanika radar. On January 4, 1978, the spacecraft twice crossed an east-west aligned auroral arc at widely spaced longitudes, spanning more than 3 hours in local time. The Chatanika radar was scanning in elevation at a magnetic longitude equidistant from the two AE-C crossings. The electric field pattern around this arc was remarkably similar at the three longitudes. Equatorward of the arc the north-south field was very intense (greater than approximately 60 mV/m), whereas poleward of the arc it was small (approximately 10 mV/m). The east-west field was small and almost constant across the arc. The same arc was observed by the radar for about 1 hour, and this electric field pattern did not change, even though the arc location, intensity, and width changed substantially. For a given electric field the AE-C measured ion temperature was substantially different during each of the arc crossings. This dissimilarity is attributed to differences in the F region neutral wind at the two longitudes. It is shown that the electric field variations are consistent with the existence of polarization charges within the arc, even though the electric field remained small poleward of the arc.

Beaujardiere, O. D. L.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Feedback between neutral winds and auroral arc electrodynamics

The feedback between neutral atmospheric winds and the electrodynamics of a stable, discrete auroral arc is analyzed. The ionospheric current continuity equation and the equation for neutral gas acceleration by ion drag are solved simultaneously, as a function of time. The results show that, in general, the electric field in the ionosphere adjusts to neutral wind acceleration so as to keep auroral field-aligned currents and electron acceleration approximately independent of time. It is thus concluded that the neutral winds that develop as a result of the electrodynamical forcing associated with an arc do not significantly affect the intensity of the arc.

Lyons, L. R.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Current Closure in the Auroral Ionosphere: Results from the Auroral Current and Electrodynamics Structure Rocket Mission

The Auroral Current and Electrodynamics Structure (ACES) mission consisted of two sounding rockets launched nearly simultaneously from Poker Flat Research Range, AK on January 29, 2009 into a dynamic multiple-arc aurora. The ACES rocket mission was designed to observe electrodynamic and plasma parameters above and within the current closure region of the auroral ionosphere. Two well instrumented payloads were flown along very similar magnetic field footprints, at different altitudes, with small temporal separation between both payloads. The higher altitude payload (apogee 360 km), obtained in-situ measurements of electrodynamic and plasma parameters above the current closure region to determine the input signature. The low altitude payload (apogee 130 km), made similar observations within the current closure region. Results are presented comparing observations of the electric fields, magnetic components, and the differential electron energy flux at magnetic footpoints common to both payloads. In situ data is compared to the ground based all-sky imager data, which presents the evolution of the auroral event as the payloads traversed through magnetically similar regions. Current measurements derived from the magnetometers on the high altitude payload observed upward and downward field-aligned currents. The effect of collisions with the neutral atmosphere is investigated to determine it is a significant mechanism to explain discrepancies in the low energy electron flux. The high altitude payload also observed time-dispersed arrivals in the electron flux and perturbations in the electric and magnetic field components, which are indicative of Alfven waves.

Kaeppler, S. R.↗
NASA NTRS2012

Current Closure in the Auroral Ionosphere: Results from the Auroral Current and Electrodynamics Structure Rocket Mission

The Auroral Current and Electrodynamics Structure (ACES) mission consisted of two sounding rockets launched nearly simultaneously from Poker Flat Research Range, AK on January 29, 2009 into a dynamic multiple-arc aurora. The ACES rocket mission was designed to observe electrodynamic and plasma parameters above and within the current closure region of the auroral ionosphere. Two well instrumented payloads were flown along very similar magnetic field footprints, at different altitudes, with small temporal separation between both payloads. The higher altitude payload (apogee 360 km), obtained in-situ measurements of electrodynamic and plasma parameters above the current closure region to determine the input signature. The low altitude payload (apogee 130 km), made similar observations within the current closure region. Results are presented comparing observations of the electric fields, magnetic components, and the differential electron energy flux at magnetic footpoints common to both payloads. In situ data is compared to the ground based all-sky imager data, which presents the evolution of the auroral event as the payloads traversed through magnetically similar regions. Current measurements derived from the magnetometers on the high altitude payload observed upward and downward field-aligned currents. The effect of collisions with the neutral atmosphere is investigated to determine if it is a significant mechanism to explain discrepancies in the low energy electron flux. The high altitude payload also observed time-dispersed arrivals in the electron flux and perturbations in the electric and magnetic field components, which are indicative of Alfven waves.

Kaeppler, S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Initial results from the operation of two argon ion generators in the auroral ionosphere

Two argon ion generators have been lofted by sounding rockets in order to investigate ion beam dynamics and beam effects on the ionosphere, and auroral electrodynamics during rocket passage over auroral arcs. The ion generators were on a subpayload that was separated from the main payload early in the flight. The main payload conducted the diagnostic measurements during ion beam operations. Evidence of heating of the ionosphere around the subpayload during each ion beam emission is noted.

Erlandson, R. E.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Electrodynamic studies of upper and lower atmospheric coupling

Theoretical interprotations and data interpretations of electrodynamical studies in upper and lower atmosphere coupling are reported. The following topics are discussed: (1) magnetosphere/ionosphere/atmosphere coupling in auroral electrodynamics; (2) middle atmosphere electrodynamics; (3) thermosphere troposphere coupling; and (4) tropospheric electrodynamics. Understanding of the near Earth space environment shows the interrelationships between various components of the Earth's atmosphere.

Chiu, Y. T.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Auroral Current and Electrodynamics Structure Measured by Two SOunding Rockets in Flight Simultaneously

On January 29, 2009, two identically instrumented sounding rockets were launched into a sub-storm auroral arc from Poker Flat Alaska. Labeled the Auroral Currents and Electrodynamics Structure (ACES) mission, the payloads were launched to different apogees (approx.350km and approx.120km) and staggered in time so as to optimize their magnetic conjunctions. The different altitudes provided simultaneous in-situ measurements of magnetospheric input and output to the ionosphere and the ionospheric response in the lower F and E region. Measurements included 3-axis magnetic field, 2-axis electric field nominally perpendicular to the magnetic field, energetic particles, electron and ion, up to 15keV, cold plasma temperature and density. In addition, PFISR was also operating in a special designed mode to measure electric field and density profiles in the plane defined by the rocket trajectories and laterally to either side of the trajectories. Observation of the measured currents and electrodynamics structure of the auroral form encountered are presented in the context of standard auroral models and the temporal/spatial limitations of mission designs.

Bounds, Scott R.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Auroral Current and Electrodynamics Structure (ACES) Observations of Ionospheric Feedback in the Alfven Resonator

In 2009, the Auroral Current and Electrodynamics Structure (ACES) High and Low sounding rockets were launched from the Poker Flat Rocket Range (PFRR) in Alaska, with the science objective of gathering in-situ data to quantify current closure in a discrete auroral arc. As ACES High crossed through the return current of an arc (that was monitored using an all sky camera from the ground at Fort Yukon), its instruments recorded clear Alfv nic signatures both poleward and equatorward of the return current region, but not within the main region of the return current itself. These data provide an excellent opportunity to study ionospheric feedback and how it interacts with the Alfv n resonator. We compare the observations with predictions and new results from a model of ionospheric feedback in the ionospheric Alfv n resonator (IAR) and report the significance and impact of these new data for the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling in the Alfv n Resonator (MICA) rocket mission to launch from PFRR this winter. MICA s primary science objectives specifically focus on better understanding the small-scale structure that the model predicts should exist within the return current region.

Cohen, Ian J.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Resonant Alfven waves on auroral field lines

It is shown that resonant Alfven waves on dipole magnetic field geometry and plasma distributions suitable for auroral field lines can be conventiently treated in the theory of Mathieu functions. Resurgent interest in invoking large-scale Alfven waves to structure some elements of auroral electrodynamics calls for interpretation of measured perpendicular electric and magnetic disturbance fields in terms of Alfven waves. The ability to express the resonant eigenmodes in closed form in terms of Mathieu functions allows for convenient tests of the Alfven wave structuring hypothesis. Implications for current vector electric and magnetic disturbance measurements are discussed.

Chiu, Y. T.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Waterhole auroral arc modification experiments Electrodynamic response

The Waterhole series of experiments, which tested current theories of the electrodynamic structure of auroral arcs, is discussed. In these experiments, the current-carrying capability of the ionospheric plasma was modified by the explosive release of a large number of reactive molecules in the ionospheric F region, with the net effect of reducing the local plasma density over spatial scales comparable to the auroral forms. The response of the aurora to this perturbation was monitored directly by plasma diagnostic instruments on the rocket carrying the explosive release and indirectly from the ground by various photometric and imaging devices. Model predictions of the perturbation induced by the two releases are summarized, and the rocket-borne and ground-based instrumentation is described. Results from both flights are summarized, and a theoretical model is presented which relates the differences in observed response to the topological relationship between the releases and the auroral form.

Whalen, B. A.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Electrodynamic properties of auroral surges

Data from measurements made during five auroral surges in 1980 and 1981 by the Chatanika radar, ground-based magnetometers, and all-sky cameras and instruments aboard the DE satellites are presented. The combined data sets yielded information about the auroral forms, electric fields, and currents that were associated with these surges. A model was developed that simulates the observed changes in electric field and precipitation that accompany auroral surges.

Robinson, R. M.↗