Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “auroral substorm activity”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Evidence of Alfvenic Poynting Flux as the Primary Driver of Auroral Motion During a Geomagnetic Substorm

Geomagnetic substorms are major energy transfer events where energy stored in the Earth's magnetotail is released into the ionosphere. Substorm phenomena, including auroral activities, earthward Poynting flux, magnetic field dipolarization, etc, have been extensively studied. However, the complex interplay among them is not fully understood. In a fortuitous event on June 7, 2013, the twin Van Allen Probes (separated by 0.4 h in local time) observed bursts of earthward Alfvenic Poynting flux in the vicinity of the plasma sheet boundary layer (PSBL). The Poynting flux bursts correlate with enhancements of auroral brightness around the footpoints of both spacecraft. This indicates a temporal and spatial correlation between the auroral brightening and Poynting flux bursts, and that the auroral motion is directly linked to the perpendicular expansion of the Alfven wave. These observations suggest that the Alfvenic Poynting flux is a primary driver for the auroral electron acceleration. Furthermore, around the time of auroral brightening, a dipolarization was seen to propagate more than 4 h in local time during a 20 min period. The azimuthal phase speed of this dipolarization (2 deg/min) is too small to explain the azimuthal motion of the aurora (13.6 deg/min), but the dipolarization could be related to the generation of the Alfvenic Poynting flux through phase mixing at strong density gradients like those in the PSBL.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Association of Mesoscale Auroral Structures and Breakups With Energetic Particle Injections at Geosynchronous Orbit

Geomagnetic substorms are associated with characteristic energetic particle injection signatures at geosynchronous orbit that are often dispersionless in both electrons and ions near the magnetic local time sector of auroral onset locations and are dispersed farther away from this region. Although the precise mechanism responsible for the coherent injection signatures at geosynchronous orbit have been the topic on considerable ongoing debate for decades, recent work on bursty bulk flows (BBFs) in the tail have led to the hypothesis that they may be the result of multiple, overlapping flow bursts penetrating into the inner magnetosphere from more distant downtail reconnection sites. Since auroral streamers are thought to be ionospheric signatures of BBFs in the tail, they can be used as proxies for testing this hypothesis. Using high resolution auroral imagery from the POLAR/VIS instrument combined with multi-spacecraft observations of energetic particle injections at geosynchronous orbit, we examine the association of mesoscale auroral structures with particle injection signatures over many hours during the 9 November 1998 storm. We find that the explosive types of auroral activations, such as pseudo-breakups and substorm onset breakups, are associated with the more intense and well-defined dispersed injection signatures, while intervals of isolated streamer activity appear to be associated with smaller dispersed “injectionlet” signatures. Furthermore, intervals of sustained, intense, and late expansion phase/recovery phase streamer activity appear to be associated with sustained elevated dispersed particle fluxes. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that it is the overlapping effects of sustained, intense multiple flow bursts penetrating toward the Earth that result in classical substorm particle injection signatures at geosynchronous orbit. However, it is also suggested that torches/omega-band tongues are the prime fate of braking isolated flow bursts (streamers) rather than the development of breakups, bulges, and substorm current wedge formation. A statistical analysis is presented showing that 93% of the observed torches evolved from streamers, 93% of streamers arriving in the equatorward regions of the bulge led to torches, 10.5% of such streamers led to breakups (either pseudo-breakups or substorm onsets), and only 3.5% of such streamers led to substorm onsets.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Key Elements of Auroral Substorm Development and their Relationship to Recent Observations of Detached Sub-Auroral Phenomena Including STEVE-like Emissions

Since Akasofu introduced the concept of the substorm in 1964, numerous refinements have been added to the phenomenological model of how auroral substorms develop. Here, we review several of the most important of these including; polar cap patches, intensifications of the Polar Activated Band (PAB) at the poleward edge of the bulge, the development of new arcs poleward, the generation of auroral streamers, the evolution of streamers into auroral torches and omega bands, the association of streamers with particle injection and BBF activity in the tail, and wedgelet-like magnetic perturbations on the ground. We also review the concept of “contact breakups” which are breakups that appear to be triggered by the arrival of streamer-like forms in the equatorward regions of the oval. Finally, we remind the community that the addition of detached sub-auroral emissions was made to the phenomenological picture of substorm develop in the late 1960s along with the concept of auroral streamers. Newer observations of detached sub-auroral (STEVE-like emissions) from the Viking/UVI and POLAR/VIS imagers are presented which confirm that they are east-west aligned bands of emission that separate away from the equatorward edge of the auroral oval in response to intensifications of the poleward edge of the bulge and subsequent streamer production. We propose a new model for the formation of detached sub-auroral (STEVE-like) emissions in which a non-linear growth of a SAPS-driven instability (e.g. like the shear-flow/ballooning instability) at the plasmapause results in the disruption of the boundary separating hot plasma sheet particle from the cold plasmaspheric plasma. It is proposed that the resulting intermixing of plasma populations leads to both the observed STEVE-like emissions and also provides a source of cold plasma on open drift paths that can feed the long-lived drainage plumes that have recently been discovered.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗