Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “binary plant”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Binary Power Plant CO2 Life Cycle Emissions Including Isobutane Fugitive Emission

Geothermal energy production has one of the lowest life cycle CO2 emission factors (~ 15 g-CO2/kWh) for plants producing electricity (Hondo, 2005). This life cycle factor includes indirect emissions from plant construction as well as ongoing operations such as additional well drilling and equipment replacement. Not included in this calculation are direct emissions from geothermal power production. Geothermal flash plants emit CO2 at rates related to the reservoir concentration. Binary plants report “near zero” emissions of high global warming potential gases because of their closed loop system design. Binary plants use working fluids to drive the turbine generators and leakage of these working fluids have not yet been quantified. To assess the working fluid emissions from geothermal power production using an Organic Rankine Cycle, reported isobutane emissions were accessed for 3 California binary plants from the Great Basin Unified and Imperial County Air Pollution Control Districts as well as the California Air Resource Board. Each binary plant used in this study has been operating for more than 25 years. From the data, two types of isobutane emissions were accounted for over a 15 month period: ‘normal’ equipment leakage and equipment breakdown emissions. This preliminary analysis of working fluid emissions from these plants suggest that if a binary plant has equipment failures, the majority of the isobutane releases can be due to these events. The results indicate that a well maintained binary plant releases approximately 0.13 g-Isobutane/kWh where as a plant with equipment failures releases approximately 6 g-Isobutane/kWh. Assuming a greenhouse warming potential of 3 for isobutane, these emission values become 0.4 and 18 g-CO2e/kWh (where CO2e is the CO2 equivalent effect). The direct operation isobutane leakage for a well maintained binary plant does not significant increase the life cycle CO2 emission factor whereas a plant with significant equipment issues can effectively double the life cycle CO2 emissions. This limited data set suggests that when direct CO2e fugitive emission are add to the indirect CO2 emissions, the total CO2 emissions from binary power plants are equivalent or less than nuclear, as well as other renewables power production such as wind and solar.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2017

Analysis of Geothermal Reservoir and Well Operational Conditions using Monthly Production Reports from Nevada and California

When conducting techno-economic analysis of geothermal systems, assumptions are typically necessary for reservoir and wellbore parameters such as producer/injector well ratio, production temperature drawdown, and production/injection temperature, pressure and flow rate. To decrease uncertainty of several of these parameters, we analyzed field data reported by operators in monthly production reports. This paper presents results of a statistical analysis conducted on monthly production reports at 19 power plants in California and Nevada covering 196 production wells and 175 injection wells. The average production temperature was 304 degrees F (151 degrees C) for binary plants and 310 degrees F (154 degrees C) for flash plants. The average injection temperature was 169 degrees F (76 degrees C) for binary plants and 173 degrees F (78 degrees C) for flash plants. The average production temperature drawdown was 0.5% per year for binary plants and 0.8% per year for flash plants. The average production well flow rate was 112 L/s for binary plant wells and 62 L/s for flash plant wells. For all 19 plants combined, the median injectivity index value was 3.8 L/s/bar, and the average producer/injector well ratio was 1.6. As an additional example of analysis using data from monthly production reports, a coupled reservoir-wellbore model was developed to derive productivity curves at various pump horsepower settings. The workflow and model were applied to two example production wells.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2015

Geothermal Risk Reduction via Geothermal/Solar Hybrid Power Plants. Final Report

There are numerous technical merits associated with a renewable geothermal-solar hybrid plant concept. The performance of air-cooled binary plants is lowest when ambient temperatures are high due to the decrease in air-cooled binary plant performance that occurs when the working fluid condensing temperature, and consequently the turbine exhaust pressure, increases. Electrical power demand is generally at peak levels during periods of elevated ambient temperature and it is therefore especially important to utilities to be able to provide electrical power during these periods. The time periods in which air-cooled binary geothermal power plant performance is lowest generally correspond to periods of high solar insolation. Use of solar heat to increase air-cooled geothermal power plant performance during these periods can improve the correlation between power plant output and utility load curves. While solar energy is a renewable energy source with long term performance that can be accurately characterized, on shorter time scales of hours or days it can be highly intermittent. Concentrating solar power (CSP), aka solar-thermal, plants often incorporate thermal energy storage to ensure continued operation during cloud events or after sunset. Hybridization with a geothermal power plant can eliminate the need for thermal storage due to the constant availability of geothermal heat. In addition to the elimination of the requirement for solar thermal storage, the ability of a geothermal/solar-thermal hybrid plant to share a common power block can reduce capital costs relative to separate, stand-alone geothermal and solar-thermal power plant installations. The common occurrence of long-term geothermal resource productivity decline provides additional motivation to consider the use of hybrid power plants in geothermal power production. Geothermal resource productivity decline is a source of significant risk in geothermal power generation. Many, if not all, geothermal resources are subject to decreasing productivity manifested in the form of decreasing production fluid temperature, flow rate, or both during the life span of the associated power generation project. The impacts of geothermal production fluid temperature decline on power plant performance can be significant; a reduction in heat input to a power plant not only decreases the thermal energy available for conversion to electrical power, but also adversely impacts the power plant efficiency. The impact of resource productivity decline on power generation project economics can be equally detrimental. The reduction in power generation is directly correlated to a reduction in revenues from power sales. Further, projects with Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) contracts in place may be subject to significant economic penalties if power generation falls below a specified default level. While the magnitude of PPA penalties varies on a case-by-case basis, it is not unrealistic for these penalties to be on the order of the value of the deficit power sales such that the utility may purchase the power elsewhere. This report evaluates the use of geothermal/solar-thermal hybrid plant technology for mitigation of resource productivity decline, which has not been a primary topic of investigation in previous analyses in the open literature.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Integration of a Concentrating Solar Steam Topping Turbine to an Existing Geothermal Binary Power Plant (CRADA CRD-17-700 Final Report)

U.S. Geothermal Inc. is a publicly traded leading renewable energy company focused on the development, production, and sale of electricity from geothermal energy with operating generation facilities at Raft River, Idaho; San Emidio, Nevada; and Neal Hot Springs, Oregon. (U.S. Geothermal was acquired by Ormat Technologies, Inc. since the execution of this project). This project will evaluate the integration of a concentrating solar steam topping cycle with a geothermal bottoming binary cycle. This hybrid plant configuration will enable high efficiency conversion of the solar heat to electrical power, while simultaneously increasing the power output of the bottoming cycle. Such a design has the potential to reduce the cost of electrical power from concentrating solar power (CSP) and geothermal plants, and a viable design could be deployed at existing geothermal plants that have experienced resource productivity decline as well as in greenfield projects. This analysis will examine US Geothermal’s Raft River power plant for implementation of this concept. INL and NREL have previously collaborated in the analysis of geo-solar hybrid power plants. These two labs will again work together to model the solar field, steam-topping, and geothermal bottoming cycles in order to investigate the performance of the proposed cycle. This analysis will provide US Geothermal with technical information including equipment specifications and estimated power generation necessary to advance the concept toward implementation. A successful project outcome has two parts: One would be for US Geothermal to have a process flow diagram (heat and mass balance), and performance parameters for the major pieces of equipment. US Geothermal could then use this information evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of the hybrid power cycle, and serve as the basis for subsequent detailed equipment design, purchase, and installation of the cycle. The second would be for the developed solution to be published by DOE for use by other geothermal developers both to retrofit underperforming plants and to lower the LCOE of new developments.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2014

Geothermal Power Production: Alternative Scenarios and Critical Issues

This is the last in a series of reports that completes the life cycle analyses (LCAs) of geothermal power production technologies conducted by Argonne National Laboratory. It addresses the remaining critical issues pertaining to the LCAs of geothermal electricity production: the relative contributions from plant operations and maintenance (O&M), from decommissioning (dcm), from well field exploration, and from plant operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to the total life cycle performance of geothermal power plants. Contributions from O&M and dcm to the performance of other power generating technologies are also discussed. Also included in this study are LCA results for a new series of scenarios for geothermal power production. Our analysis uses fossil fuel energy consumption and GHG emissions per unit of lifetime electricity output (referred to as the fossil energy and GHG ratios, respectively) as the life cycle metrics for quantifying life cycle stage contributions to their corresponding totals, which were subsequently used for comparing the environmental performance of geothermal and other electric power production plants. Based on literature results, we concluded that the contribution from dcm to both ratios is negligible for power plants in general. Further, we found that the contribution from O&M to both ratios is generally significant for facilities with no fuel cycle (fuel production and use) burdens. In the case of geothermal power production, O&M contributes about 20% to the total for enhanced geothermal power plants, 10% for geothermal binary plants, and about 25% of the energy ratio for geothermal flash and dry steam plants. However, due to operational GHG emissions that are unique among geothermal power plants, O&M contributes only about 1% of total GHG ratios for flash and dry steam plants. These GHG emissions arise when the geofluids of these plants become exposed to the atmosphere, thus releasing dissolved GHGs. The amount of GHG emissions from these plants had a wide range. However, we found that 85% of California’s running capacity in flash and dry steam plants released 160 grams or less per kilowatt-hour of electricity produced. We developed an exploration model to account for core hole, slim hole, and confirmation well drilling that includes a probability of success for confirmation well drilling. The model shows that well field exploration represents about 20% of the total life cycle burden for large geothermal plants with numerous wells and 32% of the burden for small plants with few wells. We also analyzed a set of geothermal scenario pairs. The objective was to identify geothermal scenarios with a lower levelized cost of electricity and lower life cycle burdens. A comparison of reference with improved cases within each pair revealed that the improved cases demonstrated a lower levelized cost of electricity and lower fossil energy consumption and GHG metrics. The scenario pairs covered a range of plant capacities, well numbers and depths, resource temperatures, and plant lifetimes. Finally, we found that compared to fossil-fuel generation of electricity, both flash and dry steam geothermal electricity generation result in fewer GHG emissions: on average, only one-fifth of the GHG emissions per kilowatt-hour from a natural gas combined-cycle plant, and one-tenth of those from a coal-fired plant. Moreover, these fractions were much smaller when the fossil plants were compared with plants that use geothermal binary technology.

Sullivan, J. L.↗
DOE OSTI2014

February 2014 Dixie Valley Binary Cycle Production Data

Dixie Valley Binary Plant data points for January - March 6 2014. Used to demonstrate the techno-economic feasibility of utilizing the available unused heat to generate additional electric power from a binary power plant. Data includes Brine Flow, Brine Return Temperature, Brine Supply Temperature, Generation Output, Net Generation, Parasitic Loss, and Dry Bulb Temperature.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2018

Hybridizing Solar Heat with a Geothermal Binary Power Plant Using a Solar Steam Topping Turbine

Solar-thermal hybridization is a way to boost power generation of geothermal power plants, especially when the geothermal resource cannot supply the design flow or temperature. A new process using a high-pressure steam topping turbine can almost double the conversion rate of solar energy to power compared to the common practice of solar brine heating, and thus improve economic viability. This study looked at one such plant. Output from a geo-solar hybrid is typically increased both from the additional solar energy and from restoring turbine design-point efficiency. In this new process, a third effect occurs: the addition of a solar topping cycle increases the geothermal energy extracted from the brine. Process flow diagrams, off-design results, and economic results are presented. Three representative geothermal locations in the U.S. are evaluated, as are the effects of thermal storage, solar field sizing, and tax incentives.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Multi-scale evaporator architectures for geothermal binary power plants

In this paper, novel geometries of heat exchanger architectures are proposed for evaporators that are used in Organic Rankine Cycles. A multi-scale heat exchanger concept was developed by employing successive plenums at several length-scale levels. Flow passages contain features at both macro-scale and micro-scale, which are designed from Constructal Theory principles. Aside from pumping power and overall thermal resistance, several factors were considered in order to fully assess the performance of the new heat exchangers, such as weight of metal structures, surface area per unit volume, and total footprint. Component simulations based on laminar flow correlations for supercritical R134a were used to obtain performance indicators.

Sabau, Adrian S↗
NASA NTRS1974

Investment and operating costs of binary cycle geothermal power plants

Typical investment and operating costs for geothermal power plants employing binary cycle technology and utilizing the heat energy in liquid-dominated reservoirs are discussed. These costs are developed as a function of reservoir temperature. The factors involved in optimizing plant design are discussed. A relationship between the value of electrical energy and the value of the heat energy in the reservoir is suggested.

Holt, B.↗
DOE OSTI2021

Thermal and Mechanical Energy Performance Analysis of Closed-loop Systems in Hot-Dry-Rock and Hot-Wet-Rock Reservoirs

To understand the potential and limitations for recovering thermal and mechanical energy from closed-loop geothermal systems a collaborative study is underway that will investigate an array of system configurations, working fluids, geothermal reservoir characteristics, operational periods, and heat transfer enhancements. Closed-loop geothermal systems are distinguished from hydrothermal or enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in that the working fluid only circulates through drilled boreholes. Principal objectives of this study are to determine upper limits for thermal and mechanical energy recovery and optimal operational and configuration parameters for each scenario. Teams of scientists and engineers are applying a suite of numerical simulation and analytical tools to model the heat recovery from closed-loop geothermal systems, and then optimizing operational and configuration parameters to maximize the thermal and mechanical energy recovery. Results from the suite of numerical simulators and analytical tools, such as outlet and inlet states and temperature profiles in the geothermal reservoir over time are intercompared to increase confidence in the analysis. This paper documents the study findings for closed-loop systems in hot-dry-rock and hot-wet-rock reservoirs, where water is the working fluid. The characteristics of the hot-dry-rock reservoir were based on the U.S. Department of Energy's Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) site, near Milford Utah. Two objective functions are defined to optimize the operational and configuration parameters of the system, one each for the recovery of mechanical and thermal energy over the period of operation. For both objective functions, a surface plant thermal to mechanical energy conversion factor and an energy drilling cost is required. In keeping with the study objectives the surface plant conversion factor is determined from a second-law of thermodynamics analysis of a generic binary plant, and drilling costs are based on those from the Utah FORGE site and current national electrical costs.

closed-loop geothermal systems↗
DOE OSTI2021

Thermal and Mechanical Energy Performance Analysis of Closed-loop Systems in Hot-Dry-Rock and Hot-Wet-Rock Reservoirs

To understand the potential and limitations for recovering thermal and mechanical energy from closed-loop geothermal systems a collaborative study is underway that will investigate an array of system configurations, working fluids, geothermal reservoir characteristics, operational periods, and heat transfer enhancements. Closed-loop geothermal systems are distinguished from hydrothermal or enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in that the working fluid only circulates through drilled boreholes. Principal objectives of this study are to determine upper limits for thermal and mechanical energy recovery and optimal operational and configuration parameters for each scenario. Teams of scientists and engineers are applying a suite of numerical simulation and analytical tools to model the heat recovery from closed-loop geothermal systems, and then optimizing operational and configuration parameters to maximize the thermal and mechanical energy recovery. Results from the suite of numerical simulators and analytical tools, such as outlet and inlet states and temperature profiles in the geothermal reservoir over time are intercompared to increase confidence in the analysis. This paper documents the study findings for closed-loop systems in hot-dry-rock and hot-wet-rock reservoirs, where water is the working fluid. The characteristics of the hot-dry-rock reservoir were based on the U.S. Department of Energy’s Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) site, near Milford Utah. Two objective functions are defined to optimize the operational and configuration parameters of the system, one each for the recovery of mechanical and thermal energy over the period of operation. For both objective functions, a surface plant thermal to mechanical energy conversion factor and an energy drilling cost is required. In keeping with the study objectives the surface plant conversion factor is determined from a second-law of thermodynamics analysis of a generic binary plant, and drilling costs are based on those from the Utah FORGE site and current national electrical costs.

Closed-loop geothermal systems, hot-dry-rock, hot-↗
NASA NTRS1974

The Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory geothermal program in northern Nevada

The Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory's geothermal program began with consideration of regions where fluids in the temperature range of 150 to 230 C may be economically accessible. Three valleys, located in an area of high regional heat flow in north central Nevada, were selected for geological, geophysical, and geochemical field studies. The objective of these ongoing field activities is to select a site for a 10-MW demonstration plant. Field activities (which started in September 1973) are described. A parallel effort has been directed toward the conceptual design of a 10-MW isobutane binary plant which is planned for construction at the selected site. Design details of the plant are described. Project schedule with milestones is shown together with a cost summary of the project.

Mirk, K. F.↗
DOE OSTI2014

Dixie Valley Bottoming Binary Unit

This binary plant is the first air cooled, high-output refrigeration based waste heat recovery cycle in the industry. Its working fluid is environmentally friendly and as such, the permits that would be required with a hydrocarbon based cycle are not necessary. The unit is largely modularized, meaning that the unit’s individual skids were assembled in another location and were shipped via truck to the plant site. The Air Cooled Condensers (ACC), equipment piping, and Balance of Plant (BOP) piping were constructed at site. This project further demonstrates the technical feasibility of using low temperature brine for geothermal power utilization. The development of the unit led to the realization of low temperature, high output, and environmentally friendly heat recovery systems through domestic research and engineering. The project generates additional renewable energy, resulting in cleaner air and reduced carbon dioxide emissions. Royalty and tax payments to governmental agencies will increase, resulting in reduced financial pressure on local entities. The major components of the unit were sourced from American companies, resulting in increased economic activity throughout the country.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2018

Solar-Driven Steam Topping Cycle for a Binary Geothermal Power Plant

Solar-thermal hybridization is a way to boost power generation of geothermal power plants, especially when the geothermal resource cannot supply the design flow or temperature. A new process using a high-pressure steam topping turbine can almost double the conversion rate of solar energy to power compared to the common practice of solar brine heating, and thus improve economic viability.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2014

Scale Resistant Heat Exchanger for Low Temperature Geothermal Binary Cycle Power Plant

Phase 1 of the investigation of improvements to low temperature geothermal power systems was completed. The improvements considered were reduction of scaling in heat exchangers and a hermetic turbine generator (eliminating seals, seal system, gearbox, and lube oil system). A scaling test system with several experiments was designed and operated at Coso geothermal resource with brine having a high scaling potential. Several methods were investigated at the brine temperature of 235 ºF. One method, circulation of abradable balls through the brine passages, was found to substantially reduce scale deposits. The test heat exchanger was operated with brine outlet temperatures as low as 125 ºF, which enables increased heat input available to power conversion systems. For advanced low temperature cycles, such as the Variable Phase Cycle (VPC) or Kalina Cycle, the lower brine temperature will result in a 20-30% increase in power production from low temperature resources. A preliminary design of an abradable ball system (ABS) was done for the heat exchanger of the 1 megawatt VPC system at Coso resource. The ABS will be installed and demonstrated in Phase 2 of this project, increasing the power production above that possible with the present 175 ºF brine outlet limit. A hermetic turbine generator (TGH) was designed and manufacturing drawings produced. This unit will use the working fluid (R134a) to lubricate the bearings and cool the generator. The 200 kW turbine directly drives the generator, eliminating a gearbox and lube oil system. Elimination of external seals eliminates the potential of leakage of the refrigerant or hydrocarbon working fluids, resulting in environmental improvement. A similar design has been demonstrated by Energent in an ORC waste heat recovery system. The existing VPC power plant at Coso was modified to enable the “piggyback” demonstration of the TGH. The existing heat exchanger, pumps, and condenser will be operated to provide the required process conditions for the TGH demonstration. Operation of the TGH with and without the ABS system will demonstrate an increase in geothermal resource productivity for the VPC from 1 MW/(million lb) of brine to 1.75 MW/(million lb) of brine, a 75% increase.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2014

August 2014 Dixie Valley DOE Production Data

Binary Engineering production data for August 2014. Used to demonstrate the techno-economic feasibility of utilizing the available unused heat to generate additional electric power from a binary power plant.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗