Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “bio oil”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Compatibility of Fuel System Elastomers and Plastics with a Fast-Pyrolysis Oil (Bio-oil) at Room Temperature

Herein the compatibility of a fast-pyrolysis bio-oil with 17 elastomer and 21 plastic materials common to fuel storage, dispensing, and delivery systems was assessed by measuring volume and hardness. Diesel was used as the baseline for comparison. The elastomer and plastic specimens were exposed to the test fuels at 23 °C. The exposure times were 4 and 16 weeks for the elastomers and plastics, respectively. The elastomers (except for silicone and styrene butadiene) exhibited pronounced swelling in the bio-oil. This was especially true for the fluorocarbons and acrylonitrile rubbers. For the elastomers, a strong correlation between polarity and volume swell was observed. Compositional and structural analysis on one of the fluorocarbon materials showed that the bio-oil was less effective at extracting phthalate additives than the diesel. However, the crystallinity of a fluorocarbon was altered by the bio-oil. Unlike the elastomers, the plastic materials were less impacted by exposure to the bio-oil. This finding is attributed to their denser and more rigid molecular structures (compared to the elastomers). Notable swelling did occur in the nylons, but this swelling was attributed to water absorption rather than polarity. Comparison with previous studies showed that the observed swelling was lower for both the elastomers and the plastics. Solubility (and hence swell) increases with temperature, and because this study was conducted at 23 °C rather than 50 °C, the reduced temperature is responsible for the lower swell levels.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Recent Progress in Electrochemical Upgrading of Bio-Oil Model Compounds and Bio-Oils to Renewable Fuels and Platform Chemicals

Sustainable production of renewable carbon-based fuels and chemicals remains a necessary but immense challenge in the fight against climate change. Bio-oil derived from lignocellulosic biomass requires energy-intense upgrading to produce usable fuels or chemicals. Traditional upgrading methods such as hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) require high temperatures (200–400 °C) and 200 bar of external hydrogen. Electrochemical hydrogenation (ECH), on the other hand, operates at low temperatures (<80 °C), ambient pressure, and does not require an external hydrogen source. These environmental and economically favorable conditions make ECH a promising alternative to conventional thermochemical upgrading processes. ECH combines renewable electricity with biomass conversion and harnesses intermediately generated electricity to produce drop-in biofuels. This review aims to summarize recent studies on bio-oil upgrading using ECH focusing on the development of novel catalytic materials and factors impacting ECH efficiency and products. Here, electrode design, reaction temperature, applied overpotential, and electrolytes are analyzed for their impacts on overall ECH performance. We find that through careful reaction optimization and electrode design, ECH reactions can be tailored to be efficient and selective for the production of renewable fuels and chemicals. Preliminary economic and environmental assessments have shown that ECH can be viable alternative to convention upgrading technologies with the potential to reduce CO2 emissions by 3 times compared to thermochemical upgrading. While the field of electrochemical upgrading of bio-oil has additional challenges before commercialization, this review finds ECH a promising avenue to produce renewable carbon-based drop-in biofuels. Finally, based on the analyses presented in this review, directions for future research areas and optimization are suggested.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium Prediction in Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil Systems: A Framework for Incorporating Bio-Oil Complexity

The study of mixtures of bio-oil, water and organic solvents in different proportions can serve as a cost-effective analysis of its content due to the formation of immiscible phases. This manuscript attempts to replicate experimentally determined partition coefficients (K OW ) of relevant species present in fast pyrolysis bio-oil (FPBO). A commercial flowsheeting simulator with surrogate bio-oil model representation is used. Concurrently, pyrolytic lignins in FPBO (‘pyrolignin’) do not have an agreed-upon structural representation, and the literature is ripe with wide variations of said representations. Thus, during the description of FPBO, this pyrolignin fraction was modeled using 20 possible structures (phenolic dimers to tetramers), with the goal of determining the structures for which the experimental data are best described. Two cases were considered: Case 1 normalized the reported experimental mass balance, while Case 2 included the unreported fraction in the mass balance to the total pyroligin. Please, add here a comment on the prediction of the Water oil equilibrium. The best KOW predictions for levoglucosan (LVG) were obtained when the system was modeled with no pyrolignin, presenting an MRE under 10% for both systems WO and BO. Among the possible structures, D2 (dimer), F1 (trimer) and I1, and I3 (tetramers) presented MRE ≤ 13% for both cases.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Selective adsorption removal of carbonyl molecular foulants from real fast pyrolysis bio-oils

A novel sorbent-based separation process has been developed to selectively remove target molecules from the real fast pyrolysis (FP) pine bio-oils. Specifically, zeolitic molecular sieves and functionalized polymeric resins were found to effectively reduce carbonyl content and carboxylic acid number of a real pine fast pyrolysis bio-oils, therefore enhance bio-oil stability and preserve down-stream catalyst. Our results provide the first-time evidence on the potential effectiveness of sorption technology strategy for dealing with real FP bio-oils, reducing the carbonyl-rich FP oils from 7.5 mmolg-1 down to 4 mmolg-1 at 40 ?, which has potential to enable bio-oil stabilization and enhance operation stability for down-stream upgrading/hydrotreating processes.

Church, Aimee L.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Ternary Phase Diagram of Water/Bio-Oil/Organic Solvent for Bio-Oil Fractionation

Separating bio-oil by fractionation with different chemical composition is a critical step to refine these oils and obtain high value products. Cold-water precipitation of pyrolytic lignin from bio-oil is the most common approach used. However, the obtained aqueous phase from this method still contain phenols, is diluted and difficult to use. In this study, the use of liquid-liquid extraction with different solvents (1-butanol, ethyl acetate, 1-octanol, dichloromethane, toluene, and hexane) for the separation of targeted molecules (lignin oligomers, sugars, acetic acid) is explored. Ternary phase diagrams for the organic solvent/water/bio-oil are reported. The partition coefficient of compounds of interest (both light and heavy fraction) is reported for the liquid-liquid equilibrium zone. When using butanol as solvent, the highest separation factor of total phenols over total sugars was observed. Furthermore, our results provide information to design L-L separation units with the capacity to selectively recover targeted molecules from pyrolysis oils.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Quantitative Determination of Biomass-derived Renewable Carbon in Fuels from Coprocessing of Bio-oils in Refinery Using a Stable Carbon Isotopic Approach

Increasing renewable carbon incorporation into conventional fuels through coprocessing with vacuum gas oil (VGO, a petroleum refining feedstock) is a critical step in biofuels development, scaling-up, adoption and associated GHG reduction. Optimization of the co-processing parameters maximizes incorporation of the renewable carbon in the fuel products. Quantitative determination of the renewable carbon content in the co-processed products provides direct evaluation of the parameters. The co-processing bio-oil with VGO through hydrocracking (HC) or fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) system resulted in carbon isotopic fractionation that prevented the direct use of the isotope mixing model for quantifying the renewable carbon. Here, we report an algorithm of using a stable carbon isotope approach to quantify the renewable carbon content in co-processing biofuel products through high-precision ?13C analysis. A controlled experiment carried out by blending a fossil diesel (-29.013‰) with a bio-diesel (-30.099‰) at various blending levels up to 98.0/2.0 wt% is presented and has demonstrated the applicability of this approach. The carbon isotope fractionation factors for the bio-oil co-processing were obtained by using a 14C-derived isotope-mixing model. The ?13C method was tested by co-processing 13C-labeled bio-crude and natural woody biomass-derived fast pyrolysis (FP) and catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) bio-oils with VGO. The results were verified by 14C accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) method (ASTM-D6866) and compared with the yield mass balance (YMB) method. Strong agreement between d13C and 14C AMS methods demonstrated the applicability of the ?13C method to quantify renewable carbon content in co-processing fuel products and guide the co-processing optimization

Li, Zhenghua↗
DOE OSTI2020

Stability, Combustion, and Compatibility of High-Viscosity Heavy Fuel Oil Blends with a Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil

Properties related to the combustion, stability, and compatibility of blends composed of high-viscosity heavy fuel oil (HFO) and highly acidic pyrolysis bio-oil were determined to assess the utility of bio-oil as a marine fuel. The addition of bio-oil was shown to be fully stable with HFO at blend levels up to 50 mass % for up to 2 weeks. Bio-oil concentrations as low as 5 mass % significantly reduced the viscosity of HFO at 25 and 50 °C. Aging studies at 50 and 90 °C showed that the HFO inhibited the polymerization of bio-oil. The heating value and lubricity showed a linear dependency with bio-oil content, and combustion quality was acceptable for blends containing up to 15% bio-oil. The highly acidic bio-oil was found to be corrosive to carbon steel, 2.25Cr-1Mo steel, and 409 stainless steels, but not 304L and 316L. When blended into HFO at levels less than 19 mass %, no measurable corrosion was observed on any of the steel materials, but a 50 mass % concentration produced low-to-moderate corrosion in the carbon steel, 2.25Cr-1Mo steel, and 409 stainless steel grades. The combination of good blend stability, polymerization inhibition, reduced viscosity, and acceptable compatibility for low blend levels suggests that bio-oils may be suitable for use as a marine fuel.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Electrochemical Corrosion Analysis of Stainless Steels in LALM Pyrolysis Bio-Oil with Organic Corrodents

Pyrolysis bio-oils are corrosive to low alloy steels, e.g., 2.25Cr-1Mo, 5Cr-1Mo, and 9Cr-1Mo grades. To identify the alloys with sufficient bio-oil compatibility, several commercial stainless steels were examined in bio-oil using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to semi quantitatively assess their corrosion resistance. Low-Ash Low-Moisture (LALM) bio-oil, produced from a forest residue feedstock by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO, was used as a test liquid for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements. Three organic corrodents, formic acid, catechol, and lactobionic acid, were added into LALM bio-oil to produce test liquids with intentionally increased corrosivity. Corrosion reaction resistance, determined from the impedance data, was used to evaluate the corrosion compatibility of each stainless steel in LALM bio-oil and LALM bio-oil + organic corrodent(s). The results from corrosion reaction resistance indicated that the critical Cr content of stainless steels for corrosion resistance would be greater than 14 wt % if Ni and Mo contents are low but can be as low as 12–13 wt % with appreciable amounts of Ni and Mo.

Jun, Jiheon↗
DOE OSTI2020

Air Pollutant Emissions and Regulatory Implications of Co-Processing Raw Bio-Oil in U.S. Petroleum Refineries

Pyrolysis oil, often referred as bio-oil or biocrude, has attracted considerable attention because it has higher energy density and carbon content compared to the raw biomass. Using pyrolysis oil derived from low cost and underutilized biomass to produce renewable hydrocarbon fuels provides a viable link between the agriculture/forestry and (petro-) chemical industry. Co-processing bio-oil with vacuum gas oil (VGO) in petroleum refinery is appealing due to the relatively low capital requirement to retrofit refinery and the compatibility of fuel products with existing infrastructure. In order to implement co-processing, a petroleum refinery would need to consider several process modifications and therefore could be subject to varying levels of air permitting requirements based on bio-oil co-processing ratio, co-processing capacity in existing units, the amount of regulated pollutants expected to be emitted, among other factors. This analysis considers co-processing 5% (by weight) of raw bio-oil with VGO in the fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) unit(s) in a petroleum refinery. We estimate the potential increase in emissions of regulated air pollutants resulting from the modifications required to implement bio-oil co-processing and evaluate the regulatory and permitting implications for three FCC size categories in the U.S. refineries, which could co-processes raw bio-oil to produce partially renewable transportation fuels. We also assess technically feasible emission control options petroleum refineries could adopt to avoid being subject to major source permitting requirements if the estimated increase in regulated air pollutant emission exceeds the applicable threshold for major modifications. Insights from our analysis can help overcome challenges and risks associated with timely obtaining air permits required to implement bio-oil co-processing in existing refineries. Our analysis also provides needed information for decision makers (e.g., local air quality agencies) to understand the potential air quality implications for retrofitting refineries to co-process bio-oil, particularly in areas with high concentration of petroleum refineries.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Accelerated Aging of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil Using Carbonyl Titration: Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP)

This laboratory analytical procedure covers the accelerated aging of fast pyrolysis bio-oils. Bio-oils undergo reactions that result in physical and chemical changes over time. These changes typically result in an increase in molecular weight, decrease in some functional groups such as carbonyls, and an increase in viscosity; additionally, the aging process often leads to phase separation. Studies have shown that accelerated aging of bio-oils using this method closely mimics room temperature aging for long periods of time (over 3 years). This procedure has been developed for the accelerated aging of fast pyrolysis bio-oils only. Fast pyrolysis bio-oils are more reactive than other bio-oils (e.g., catalytic fast pyrolysis) and undergo aging much more rapidly. Therefore, this procedure should only be used for fast pyrolysis bio-oil samples.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Low-Temperature Processing of Pyrolysis Bio-Oil for Sustainable Biographite Production

Catalytic graphitization of pyrolysis bio-oil with iron (Fe) can produce an anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) at a moderate temperature. The key challenge to scaling up the process is foaming, which occurs due to the oxidation of Fe by the organic acids present in bio-oil. This study explored five different pathways to control foaming in bio-oil upon Fe addition, including (i) defoamers use, (ii) use of iron oxide (Fe2O3) as graphitization catalyst, (iii) pH adjustment of bio-oil, (iv) bio-oil coking (300-500 degrees C), and (v) low-temperature pretreatment of bio-oil (150-200 degrees C). The low-temperature pretreatment successfully avoided foaming by removing the volatile acids in bio-oil. The bio-oil was solidified and powdered for even mixing with the Fe catalyst. The biographite catalytically prepared at 1500 degrees C following this pathway demonstrated nearly theoretical specific gravimetric capacity (~370 mAh/g), high initial Coulombic efficiency (90.03%), and minimal capacity fading after 50 cycles in LIB half-cells. The low-temperature pretreatment pathway also addressed the viscosity, swelling, and aging issues associated with bio-oil processing and will make scale-up endeavors more attainable.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Advanced spectrometric methods for characterizing bio-oils to enable refineries to reduce fuel carbon intensity during co-processing

A promising approach for supplementing petroleum-derived fuels to support reductions in green-house gas emissions is to convert abundant biomass feedstocks into renewable carbon-rich oils using pyrolysis. However, the resultant bio-oils contain various oxygenated compounds that can impart acidity, chemical and thermal instability, and immiscibility with petroleum derived fuels, necessitating further upgrading to derive fuel blendstocks. Co-processing bio-oils and petroleum-derived liquids in existing refineries is a potentially near-term, cost-effective approach for upgrading bio-oils while reducing refinery carbon intensities. However, one cause for hesitation in co-processing bio-oils is limited comprehensive characterization and speciation of the bio-oil components. Advanced analytical techniques are currently under investigation to enable identification of elusive species in bio-oils, enabling researchers to develop strategies to mitigate catalyst deactivation agents and contaminants. This review provides a brief overview of several analytical methods commonly used to analyze bio-oils and their limitations. In addition, advanced techniques currently under development are discussed to further elucidate bio-oil components that may limit its end use. This will help inform the technical and economic feasibility of co-processing bio-oils with petroleum-derived liquids, therefore, improving the overall downstream processes for biofuels blendstock production.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Corrosivity Screening of Pyrolysis Bio-Oils by Short-Term Alloy Exposures. Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP), Issue Date: May 12, 2022

Bio-oils contain organic acids and oxygenated compounds that can lead to corrosion issues during bio-oil processing and storage. This Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) allows for rapid screening of a bio-oil's corrosivity without the need for complex equipment and long-term exposures. A robust and repeatable method for assessing the corrosivity of bio-oils is necessary in order to remove materials degradation as an obstacle to research, upgrading, use and storage of bio-oils. This LAP involves the incubation of a representative alloy, 410 stainless steel (410 SS), specimen in bio-oil over a period of 48 hours at 50 degrees C in a sealed container. The corrosive species in the bio-oil react with and deplete alloy elements such as iron (Fe) and/or chromium (Cr) from the specimen into the bio-oil solution. The depletion of Fe and Cr from the specimen results in a significant mass loss that can be recorded. The mass loss is directly correlated to the corrosivity of a bio-oil. Examples of bio-oils in scope include the ones produced by fast pyrolysis and catalytic fast pyrolysis, as well as liquids produced from hydrothermal liquefaction.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Bio-Oil Impact on Water Diffusion and Durability of Bitumen: Influence of Aging and Salinity

Bio-oils derived from inexpensive biomass offer environmentally friendly options for modifying bitumen for improved durability or rejuvenating aged material, although their impact on bitumen moisture resistance can be mixed. A better understanding of water diffusion into bitumen and its interactions with bio-oil compounds would aid the development of effective bio-oils. In this study, the effect of water exposure on bio-oil-modified bitumen blends was examined by de-wetting contact angle measurements and differential FTIR spectroscopy. The bio-oils improved the anti-stripping behavior of the bitumen but also increased water absorption which could weaken cohesive strength. Short-term thermal aging increased water diffusion for all bitumen blends including the control, probably due to the presence of more oxidized compounds. Negative peaks of alkanes and polar groups in the differential FTIR data suggest the co-diffusion of surfactant molecules towards the bitumen-water interface. Basic pH increased de-wetting of some bitumen blends from silica, possibly by attacking the silica surface itself. The presence of salt in solution altered the bitumen surface composition through the formation of salt complexes with bitumen or bio-oil compounds. In particular, the formation of calcium-carboxylate complexes appeared to greatly improve anti-stripping effects of bio-oils. Water diffusion into most of the bitumen blends was insensitive to pH or salt concentration except for a few notable outliers. Identifying the compounds responsible for increasing or decreasing water diffusion in these outlier cases would be valuable developing future bio-oil formations that avoid or promote those compounds.

Hung, Albert M.↗
DOE OSTI2024

Co-hydrotreatment of Bio-oil and Waste Cooking Oil to Produce Transportation Fuels

This paper reports the co-hydrotreatment of the heavy bio-oil fraction with waste cooking oil (WCO) using NiMo/γ-Al 2 O 3 catalyst, followed by the distillation of resulting deoxygenated oil and the characterization of resulting fuel cuts. The heavy BTG bio-oil fraction was obtained by removing the very reactive light-oxygenated compounds via rotary evaporation, subsequently mixed with 1-butanol. The resulting oil was blended with WCO and subjected to a two-step co-hydrotreatment process. The first step, called “stabilization,” is aimed at saturating highly reactive hydrogen-deficient compounds. The second step, called “deoxygenation,” aimed to remove bio-oil oxygen, primarily as H 2 O. This study examined the impact of varying bio-oil concentrations (0, 10, 20, 30, 40 wt.% of WCO) on the upgraded oil's yield, composition, and fuel properties. The resulting hydrotreated oil was distilled into gasoline-range, kerosene-range, and diesel-range hydrocarbons at <150 °C, 150 to 250 °C, and 250 to 350 °C, respectively. The yield of the hydrotreated oil indicates that as the bio-oil concentration increases, the amounts of coke (0.7 to 2.4 %) and water (2 to 10 wt. %) increase while the organic layer yields decrease (80 to 63 %). The coke yield was comparable to the coke yield obtained when co-processing the pyrolytic lignin fraction. This suggests that coke is formed from both the sugar oligomers and the lignin-derived oligomers. The UV-fluorescence analysis on the hydrotreated oil shows that more polycondensed and conjugated ring compounds formed as the bio-oil concentration is increased. These compounds are precursors of coke. FTIR results showed that most raw materials were converted to biofuels after the hydrotreatment. To achieve less than 1 wt. % of coke yield, blends with up to 20 wt. % pyrolysis oil should be used. An increase in bio-oil concentration leads to a slight increase in gasoline yield and a decrease in kerosene and diesel yields. The identified carbon species found in the fuel cuts include n-paraffin, iso-paraffin, cycloparaffin, and aromatics. Further, the jet fuel cut (kerosene) was characterized by density, surface tension, and viscosity. Our product conforms to the standard specifications for sustainable aviation fuels (Jet A-1). Further research is suggested to fine-tune the operating parameters for achieving reduced coke yield and enhanced kerosene yield.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Standard Analytical Methods for Pyrolysis Bio-Oils

There has been significant recent interest in the production of renewable fuels and chemicals from biomass and waste feedstocks. Pyrolysis pathways produce a liquid bio-oil product, which must be processed further, or upgraded, to yield fuel or chemical products. Bio-oils are very complex and often unstable samples, and research and development on upgrading processes needs reliable analytical information. In particular, chemical characterization techniques are needed to quantify both functional groups and individual compounds present in bio-oils. Reliable analytics are also needed to enable the bioenergy industry, as industrial facilities often have different analytical needs and capabilities than research facilities. In this presentation, we will discuss the development of a suite of standard analytical methods for pyrolysis bio-oils. Analytical methods to be discussed include: Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, and Oxygen in bio-oils; Accelerated Aging of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-oil using Carbonyl Titration; Determination of Water Content in Bio-oils by Volumetric Karl Fischer Titration; Determination of Carbon Functional Groups; Elemental Analysis of Bio-oils by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) - Na, K, Mg, Ca, S, P, and Fe; Determination of Phenolic Groups in Bio-oils using Revised Folin-Ciocalteu Methods: Single Cuvette and Plate Reader; Corrosivity of Bio-oils: Screening Test using Metal Leaching; Determination of Biogenic Content by 14C Measurement using Liquid Scintillation Counter. These new analytical methods are publicly available as Laboratory Analytical Procedures (https://www.nrel.gov/bioenergy/bio-oil-analysis.html), along with previously developed standard methods: GC-MS, Acid Titration, Carbonyl Titration, and 31P NMR. Additionally, the development of diffusion ordered NMR for characterization of bio-oil molecular weight will be discussed. Collectively, this suite of analytical methods represents the most comprehensive set of standard methods available for pyrolysis bio-oils. These standard methods are commonly used by the bioenergy community, and provide reliable information that enables research, scaleup, and industrial processing of biomass to produce renewable fuels and chemicals.

analytical↗
DOE OSTI2021

Determination of Water Content in Bio-Oils by Volumetric Karl Fischer Titration: Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP)

The water content of bio-oils is a key metric for several reasons. Water is typically the most concentrated single component of fast pyrolysis oils, though this will be much lower in catalytic fast pyrolysis and upgraded products. Reduced water content is preferable in bio-oil as water can contribute to phase separation, corrosivity, and instability. Additionally, lower water is beneficial for physical properties such as energy density. The percentage of water can also be used to correct the calculation for organic oxygen when determining total oxygen content of bio-oils via combustion-based ultimate analysis. The procedure described here is specifically written for the analysis of bio-oils, and is based on ASTM E203, Standard Test Method for Water Using Volumetric Karl Fischer Titration. This standard test method is specified for measuring the mass % water in pyrolysis liquid biofuels in ASTM D7544, Standard Specification for Pyrolysis Liquid Biofuel. Although the standard method is prescribed for the analysis of pyrolysis liquids for use in industrial and commercial burners, the method is not specifically written for this product. The method described with this Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) provides specific guidance for the analysis of bio-oils. Both organic and aqueous phases can be measured with this technique.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗