Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “biogas upgrading”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Data driven investigation to understand the influence of total solids on biological biogas upgrading

In situ biogas upgrading achieves CO 2 conversion to CH 4 via hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis; however, gas-liquid mass transfer constraints limit the upgrading performance. Recognizing that optimization studies often underrepresent the effects of total solids (TS) and organic loading rate (OLR), this study undertook a holistic, statistics driven assessment of operating conditions for in situ H 2 assisted biogas upgrading, centering the analysis on TS and OLR. A dataset of 31 studies was compiled and comprised 99 observations. A rigorous analytical framework was employed, combining data standardization, fixed- and random-effects (REML) weighted regressions with cluster-robust errors, stratified analyses, and machine learning. Mixed-effects meta regression indicated that TS was the main factor explaining differences of methane fraction (CH 4 %) when considering the between studies heterogeneity. Focusing on a near-stoichiometric subset (H 2 /CO 2 ≈ 4:1), TS remained significant. Stratified results showed a stronger negative relationship between TS and CH 4 % in UASB reactors than in CSTRs, with a negative effect under mesophilic conditions and no significant effect under thermophilic conditions. A Random Forest model corroborated the statistical findings, consistently ranking H 2 /CO 2 ratio, OLR, TS, and hydrogen injection rate (HIR) as the most influential predictors. These findings delineate trends across increasing TS levels, particularly between 1% and 10%, and provide preliminary insights for TS above 15% in in situ biogas upgrading. They further provide insights for the influence of TS by reactor type and temperature, thereby advancing the evidence base for implementing biological CO 2 conversion to CH 4 in practice.

In situ biogas upgrading↗
DOE OSTI2023

Meta-analysis of biogas upgrading to renewable natural gas through biological CO 2 conversion

Biogas upgrading through CO 2 conversion by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis is receiving an increasing attention worldwide because of the demand for renewable natural gas. Herein, a holistic and statistical study of the operation conditions, driving forces, performances, and potential implementation of biogas upgrading via biological CO 2 conversion was conducted. Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 existing publications that were selected from 1475 papers, we have compiled a global dataset of CO 2 bioconversion biogas upgrading, encompassing 308 study cases. Subsequently, we employed a rigorous analytical framework incorporating data processing and mixed effects linear regression analysis to examine the dataset. This analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between the H 2 :CO 2 ratio and the methane percentage in the upgraded biogas when using the study as a random effect. Furthermore, we performed meta-analysis on observations taken when the ratio was close to 4:1 and found that ex situ reactors (91.93% [88.11%, 95.75%]) can perform better than in situ reactors (84.74% [80.69%, 88.80%]). No evidence of differential performance was found based on the present dataset between different temperature regimes or operation modes. Furthermore, those findings establish a database that will contribute to a deeper understanding of the biogas upgrading via biological CO 2 conversion.

Biogas upgrading↗
DOE OSTI2024

Machine learning-aided inverse design for biogas upgrading through biological CO 2 conversion

The biogas upgrading process through bioconversion of CO 2 to CH 4 by hydrogenotrophic methanogens is an attractive strategy for energy decarbonation. Many studies have optimized operational parameters to improve key performance indicators such as CH 4 % and H 2 utilization efficiency. However, inconsistent laboratory conditions make it challenging to compare results. Existing models for analyzing operating conditions can only assess the impact of individual conditions and lack the ability to simultaneously optimize multiple conditions. To address this, two XGBoost models were built with R 2 of 0.779 and 0.903 with data collected from literatures and were embedded into multi-objective partitive swarm optimization algorithm to optimal operating conditions. Predictions were compared with experimental validations under optimized conditions, revealing an 8.50% and 2.95% relative error in CH 4 % and H 2 conversion rate, respectively. This approach streamlines biogas upgrading processes, offering a data-driven solution to enhance efficiency and consistency in the pursuit of sustainable methane production.

Biogas upgrading↗
DOE OSTI2021

Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review

Anaerobic digestion produces biogas, a mixture of CH 4 and CO 2 , where CH 4 is a low cost, environmentally friendly, and renewable energy source. The application of biogas production is increasing rapidly as a means of reducing the pollution impact of organic biomasses. However, biogas contains unwanted elements such as hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, siloxanes, and carbon dioxide. To remove these elements, several biogas upgrading technologies like water scrubbing, amine scrubbing, pressure swing adsorption, and membrane separation have been developed and are being used at various commercial scales. Problems with these methods are high energy consumption, the use of expensive chemicals, and high operating cost. Therefore, a major effort is currently underway to improve the design of existing methods as well as developing innovative new upgrading technologies such as cryogenic separation and biological upgrading. Here, this review intends to provide a comprehensive overview of the limitations with the existing upgrading technologies along with recent advances in physical, chemical, and biological biogas upgrading technologies (e.g., pressure swing adsorption, membrane separation, biochar adsorption and CO 2 conversion by biological organisms) and further into possible future solutions, such as hybrid systems. Comparative studies of process complexities and associated economic concerns are also provided, and future perspectives that may facilitate research into sustainable biogas upgrading technologies are discussed, focusing in particular on cryogenic separation, novel biological techniques, biochar based upgrading and hybrid technologies incorporating two or more different methods seamlessly integrated.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Biogas Upgrading for Fuel Production

Waste-to-Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) offers a promising solution to alleviating waste management challenges by converting waste into renewable fuels. Here, this process can significantly reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as demonstrated through a comprehensive life cycle analysis. Biogas upgrading is essential to enhance the methane concentration, though it could be energy-intensive and susceptible to methane slippage. Four commonly adopted biogas upgrading technologies, including pressure swing adsorption, membrane separation, chemical absorption, and water scrubbing, are considered. Our study evaluates the life cycle GHG emissions of RNG production from major sources of waste in the U.S. including wastewater sludge, food waste, landfill gas, dairy cow manure, and swine manure. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess methane slippage and energy consumption of biogas upgrading and associated GHG emissions, while accounting for potential avoided emissions from conventional waste management, which vary widely (ranging from −481.0 to 101.8 g CO 2 -eq/MJ). Under default upstream assumptions, representative carbon intensity of RNG varies from about −125 g of CO 2 -eq/MJ (dairy cow manure) to about 41 g of CO 2 -eq/MJ (wastewater sludge). We also explored RNG applications in producing hydrogen, ammonia, and compressed/liquefied forms. These findings highlight the potential of RNG and RNG-derived fuels to reduce GHG emissions and bolster the U.S. energy supply.

Biogas upgrades↗
DOE OSTI2020

Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries

We discuss gaseous streams in biorefineries that have been undervalued and underutilized. In cellulosic biorefineries, coproduced biogas is assumed to be combusted alongside lignin to generate process heat and electricity. Biogas can instead be upgraded to compressed biomethane and used as a transportation fuel. Capturing CO 2 -rich streams generated in biorefineries can also contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation goals. We explore the economic and life-cycle GHG impacts of biogas upgrading and CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) at ionic liquid-based cellulosic ethanol biorefineries using biomass sorghum. Without policy incentives, biorefineries with biogas upgrading systems can achieve a comparable minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) and reduced GHG footprint ($1.38/liter gasoline equivalent (LGE) and 12.9 gCO 2e /MJ) relative to facilities that combust biogas onsite ($1.34/LGE and 24.3 gCO 2e /MJ). Incorporating renewable identification number (RIN) values advantages facilities that upgrade biogas relative to other options (MESP of $0.72/LGE). Incorporating CCS increases the MESP but dramatically decreases the GHG footprint (-21.3 gCO 2e /MJ for partial, -110.7 gCO 2e /MJ for full CCS). The addition of CCS also decreases the cost of carbon mitigation to as low as $52-$78/t CO 2 , depending on the assumed fuel selling price, and is the lowest-cost option if both RIN and California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits are incorporated.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Upgrading Biogas through in situ Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Biomethane in Anaerobic Digesters

Organic waste streams generated by wastewater treatment plants, agricultural operations, and food processing industries represent an important yet underutilized opportunity for renewable energy production in the United States. Through anaerobic digestion, these waste streams can produce biogas, a mixture primarily composed of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2), that can be upgraded to pipeline-quality natural gas. However, most existing upgrading technologies remove CO2 from biogas rather than utilizing it, leaving a significant portion of the potential energy unused. This project investigates a novel biological upgrading approach that converts CO2 into additional CH4 by supplying hydrogen (H2) to specialized microorganisms capable of performing hydrogenotrophic methanation. The main challenges associated with biological biogas upgrading are related to hydrogen supply, gas-liquid mass transfer, and process stability. First, due to the high cost of hydrogen gas, it is preferable that H2 be produced on-site using renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power. Second, hydrogen has low solubility in liquids, which limits its availability to microorganisms and requires strategies to improve gas dissolution and transfer within the reactor. Third, process inhibition may occur as a result of increased pH caused by CO2 consumption or elevated H2 partial pressure, both of which can negatively affect methanogenic activity. Although research in these areas has advanced during the course of this project, these challenges have not yet been fully resolved. To date, the biological systems that have achieved the highest methane concentrations are typically ex-situ reactors, where operational conditions can be more easily controlled. For this reason, the findings of the present project remain highly relevant. The project goal was to develop an innovative system that can accomplish biogas upgrading via biological conversion of CO2 to CH4, in a novel hybrid approach that combines the advantages of both in-situ and ex-situ systems. The proposed system employs a three-phase upflow anaerobic bioreactor with H2 delivery through a gas-permeable membrane, enabling efficient hydrogen transfer and microbial conversion. Under optimized operating conditions, the system achieved 99% H2 consumption and 90% CO2 conversion. A subsequent gas cleaning stage was implemented to further improve gas quality and meet target purity standards. The upgraded gas composition reached 97.7% CH4, 2.2% CO2, and 0.97% O2, while H2S concentrations remained below detection limits. In addition, a flue gas-driven inorganic thermoelectric generator (TEG) system was designed and experimentally validated as a potential source of electricity for H2 production. The system consisted of six TEG modules connected in series and achieved an open-circuit voltage of 4.5 V and a maximum power output of 224 mW at a temperature difference of approximately 53.5 °C, demonstrating effective conversion of waste heat into electrical power under simulated flue gas conditions. Finally, a comprehensive techno-economic analysis was completed to evaluate the capital and operating costs associated with the proposed system. The results provide important insights to guide future scale-up, optimization, and potential deployment of integrated biological biogas upgrading technologies.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Beta-Amino Carboxylate (BAC) non-aqueous physical solvents for enhanced CO2 separations in pre-combustion carbon capture, industrial CO 2 capture, and biogas upgrading processes

Novel beta-amino carboxylate (BAC) solvents have been synthesized and tested to efficiently capture carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from process gas streams with CO 2 partial pressure intermediate between pre-combustion and post-combustion capture. The BAC solvents have molecular structures characterized by alkyl-substituted amides or esters containing a secondary amine functional group on the second carbon from the carbonyl carbon (referred to as the beta “β” carbon). The ester or amide functional group combined with optimal steric crowding around the amine nitrogen by proximate alkyl groups are tailored to modify the strength of CO 2 binding in the solvent. The solvents possess high CO 2 solubilities and high gas selectivity including good CO 2 /H 2 O selectivity and can be utilized for CO 2 absorption over a range of partial pressures. Due to low volatility, many of the solvents can be operated at or above ambient temperature which eliminates solvent chilling and allows regeneration using low grade waste heat. These novel solvents offer an opportunity for efficient carbon capture for a range of applications including biogas upgrading, hydrogen production, and pre-combustion carbon capture.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2021

BETO 2021 Peer Review - Biomethanation to Upgrade Biogas to Pipeline Grade Methane WBS 5.1.3.102

We are developing, innovating and de-risking a biomethanation process capable of megawatt-scale deployment that upgrades biogas waste streams to produce pipeline quality renewable natural gas (RNG). Biomethanation is a two-step process using a methanogenic microorganism to convert renewable hydrogen (H2) and waste carbon dioxide (CO2) to renewable methane (CH4) - the primary component in natural gas. Using biogenic CO2 from biogas sources like dairies, wastewater treatment plants, and landfills allows production of this drop-in direct replacement fuel to participate in the growing number of carbon markets; like California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard and the Federal Renewable Fuel Standard. The end-of-project goal is to demonstrate pipeline quality RNG production (> 95% CH4, < 4% H2, <1% CO2, < 0.2% O2 and < 4 parts per million hydrogen sulfide) using real biogas feedstocks. We will accomplish this goal by designing and building a pressurized (18 bar) mobile lab-scale (20L) bioreactor research platform, including integrated electrolyzer system, based on lessons learned from operating the 700L pilot system from Southern California Gas Company. In collaboration with Electrochaea, natural gas utilities and Argonne National lab, will provide the data to establish a preliminary range of carbon intensity to help accelerate the deployment of utility-scale H2 production and qualify the biomethanation pathway process for RNG production.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Carbonate Composite Sorbents: A Novel Technology for Biogas Upgrading

With no signs of slowing, global warming and resource consumption continue to rise. Biogas has been shown to be a reliable renewable energy source in tandem to natural gas. Biogas is naturally sourced as a byproduct from dairy and food waste plants and can be upgraded to biomethane as an alternative to natural gas. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has developed carbonate composite sorbents which yield pipeline quality biomethane and cost less than traditional biogas upgrading technologies (e.g., water/chemical scrubbing, pressure swing adsorption). Laboratory-scale experiments using biogas and the composite sorbents resulted in absorption of 0.62 mol of CO 2 per kilogram of material, methane purity of >99% and an energy demand of <0.1 MJ/Nm 3 . The team is currently working on scaling up the production of the composite sorbent to kilogram quantities and to operate a small-scale pilot at a partnered test facility. To ensure market competitiveness, the team is currently working on improving the CO 2 loading capacity of the composite sorbent by optimizing the powder to polymer ratio and developing a confined coaxial powder extrusion method.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Biomethanation to Upgrade Biogas to Pipeline Grade Methane

NREL is working closely with DOE, Electrochaea GmbH, and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) to reduce costs of a biomethanation process capable of megawatt-scale deployment that upgrades organic biogas waste streams to produce pipeline quality renewable natural gas (RNG). Biomethanation is a two-step process using a single-celled methanogenic archaea that converts low-carbon low-cost hydrogen (H2) and waste carbon dioxide (CO2) to produce renewable methane (CH4). The process upgrades the biogenic CO2 - while allowing the CH4 to pass through - from biogas sources like dairies, wastewater treatment plants, and landfills. The CH4 produced is a drop-in direct replacement fuel and producers can participate in the growing number of carbon markets; like California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard and the Federal Renewable Fuel Standard. NREL and Argonne National Laboratory have completed a life cycle analysis using the GREET model to show that the biomethanation process produces RNG that is carbon negative even when H2 production via low-temperature water electrolysis is driven by the existing carbon intensity of California's electricity grid. And of course, even further carbon negative (-233 kg CO2e/kWh) when the electricity is produced from low-carbon sources like wind and solar. Leveraging lessons learned from operating SoCalGas' 700L 18-bar bioreactor system, NREL is designing and building a flexible RD&D platform that will enable field trials at biogas and other CO2 sources. A custom 16' long trailer will house a 20L 18-bar bioreactor, 3 - 25 kW proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, and dosing, thermal, and controls systems to support operations with only power, biogas, and water feedstocks required by the field locations. The end-of-project goal is to demonstrate pipeline quality RNG production (> 95% CH4, < 4% H2, <1% CO2, < 0.2% O2 and < 4 parts per million H2 sulfide) using real biogas feedstocks - thereby recycling both greenhouse gases for injection into the natural gas network or to be used onsite.

biogas upgrading↗
DOE OSTI2023

Biological upgrading of biogas assisted with membrane supplied hydrogen gas in a three-phase upflow reactor

Biogas upgrading via CO 2 conversion to CH 4 is an emerging technology for renewable natural gas production and carbon management, but its development is limited by the low H 2 gas to liquid phase transfer. Herein, an innovative biogas upgrading system employing a three-phase design was studied for CO 2 conversion with H 2 supply via gas-permeable membrane. The system produced biogas consisted of 74.1 ± 7.1 % CH 4 and 25.9 ± 7.1 % CO 2 with intermittent injection of H 2 . When H 2 supply was continuous, the CH 4 content increased to 91.6 ± 2.2 % at a H 2 :CO 2 ratio of 4.4. Although a higher ratio of 5.5 could result in a higher CH 4 percentage of 95.2 ± 2.5 %, biogas production rate started to decrease. The removal efficiency of organic contents remained above 90 % throughout the experiment. Microbial community analysis corroborated the findings, showing that hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriaceae was more prevalent in the biofilm (71.9 %) compared to that in anaerobic digestion (15.8 %) and effluent (14.1 %).

Agriculture↗
DOE OSTI2026

Energy utilization strategies in lignocellulosic biorefineries

Lignocellulosic biorefineries can generate various energy-rich side streams, including biogas from anaerobic digestion, a lignin stream from biomass pretreatment, and conversion residues. This study evaluates different chemical energy utilization strategies in lignocellulosic biorefineries based on energy and carbon efficiencies, cost, and greenhouse gas mitigation potential. Specifically, using modeling and optimization, we examine strategies that include electricity generation, biogas upgrade to biomethane, lignin valorization, and carbon capture and storage. We find that upgrading biogas to biomethane demonstrates the highest energy efficiency and leads to the lowest minimum fuel selling price for the main product, ethanol. The biorefinery with carbon capture and storage achieves the lowest net carbon footprint. Lignin valorization has the highest carbon footprint due to the additional materials required for lignin depolymerization, despite its potential to produce high value bioproducts.

Aboagye, Emmanuel A. [Princeton Univ., NJ (United ↗
DOE OSTI2026

Improving anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge to renewable natural gas by the Advanced Pretreatment & Anaerobic Digestion technology (APAD): Pilot testing

Conventional anaerobic digestion (AD) of sewage sludge in wastewater treatment facilities suffers from low carbon conversion efficiency (CCE = 40%) and requires costly CO2 removal for injection of the produced CH4 into the natural gas grid. To address these limitations, we developed the Advanced Pretreatment and Anaerobic Digestion (APAD) process. This integrates Advanced Wet Oxidation & Steam Explosion (AWOEx) pretreatment of residual sludge after conventional AD, followed by biogas upgradation using a novel methanogenic strain, Methanothermobacter wolfeii BSEL, converting CO2 with H2 into CH4 or RNG (renewable natural gas). Pilot-scale results demonstrated that AWOEx pretreatment achieved a CCE of 62% for the residual sludge, 68% higher than the conventional AD process. The CH4 production was further increased by 79%. Subsequent biogas upgrading in a trickling bed reactor with H2 further enhanced total methane output by 100% and resulted in a final CO2 concentration of =3%. The integrated APAD process achieved a remarkable overall CCE of 83%, resulting in a 200% increase in RNG output when compared to conventional AD. Techno-economic analysis revealed that AWOEx pretreatment alone reduced sludge treatment costs from $494 to $253 per ton of dry solids. The complete APAD process incurred a higher cost of treatment of $530 per ton, driven by prices for bottled H2. The process did, however, show gains in energy recovery and decarbonization. Renewable H2, which may reduce in price in the near future, can positively improve the economics of biogas upgrading for the APAD process.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)↗
DOE OSTI2024

An Advanced Pretreatment/Anaerobic Digestion (APAD) Technology for Increased Conversion of Sewage Sludge to Bio-natural Gas in Small-scale Wastewater Plants of less than Five tons Sewage Sludge a Day

The problem today of energy production from sewage sludge at small-scale is that conventional Anaerobic Digestion (AD) as used today at Wastewater Treatment Facilities (WWTF) produces too little energy for warrant use of the biogas. It further leaves 50% or more of the waste behind after the treatment. To overcome this problem, we proposed a novel concept based on Advanced Wet Oxidation & Steam Explosion (AWOEx) of the recalcitrant parts of sewage sludge left behind after AD. We further suggest upgrading biogas to renewable natural gas (RNG) using gaseous fermentation of biogas with hydrogen added by a new methanogen. Overall, the DOE funded Advanced Pretreatment & Anaerobic digestion (APAD) project showed significant improvements over current practice. The project demonstrated that AWOEx followed by AD significantly enhanced the carbon conversion efficiency from 37% to 62%, an increase of 68%. This is far higher than the metric for the specific FOA of an increase of 50%. Besides, the project showed high efficiency of our biological conversion of biogas into RNG when using a new isolate of Methanothermobacter wolfeii resulting in a 100% increased production of a refined biogas with maximum 5% CO2. With both AWOEx pretreatment and biogas upgrading, the project showed a CCE of ca. 83%, far higher than any previous work on sewage sludge. Besides over 200% higher amount of energy in the form of RNG, the APAD concept will reduce disposal cost due to significant reduction in the concentration of final sludge product after APAD. The APAD technology can operate as a bolt-on to a conventional AD plant for improving conversion of the residual organics after AD as done in this DOE project. It can further be implemented as a stand-alone process with AWOEx followed by AD for WWTF’s currently operating without AD.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Hythane production from brewery wastewater‐generated biogas using a membrane electrochemical cell

Converting organic wastes into hythane, a blend of hydrogen (5% to 25%) and methane (75% to 95%), will not only reduce waste discharge but also maximize energy recovery. Herein, a membrane electrochemical cell was investigated to produce hythane from biogas generated in anaerobic digestion of brewery wastewater (BW). The key parameters including current densities, electrolyte concentrations, and biogas flow rates were examined in batch tests. Under an optimal condition (210 mA, 100 mM electrolyte, 1 mL min −1 of biogas flow), the system achieved the production of hythane containing 70.6% ± 1.1% CH 4 , 27.3% ± 0.5% H 2 , and 2.1% ± 1.6% CO 2 (corresponding to 91.1% ± 6.4% CO 2 removal). Meanwhile, the H 2 S concentration was decreased from 513 to 2 ppm, 99.9% ± 0.2% removal. Energy efficiency of this system was estimated 61.8% ± 10.7%, and energy output increased by 54.4% ± 10.6% with biogas upgrading to hythane. Furthermore, these results encourage further exploration of electrochemical approach for simultaneous biogas upgrading and hythane production.

Rao, Yue [Washington University in St. Louis, MO (↗