SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “buffet, unsteady aerodynamics, launch vehicle, wind tunnel testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

18 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Buffet Forcing Functions Using Frequency-Dependent Coherence Factors

The current accepted approach to modeling launch vehicle transonic buffet environments is to acquire time-correlated unsteady pressure measurements at discrete locations on a model-scale wind-tunnel model and use these measurements to develop buffet forcing functions (BFFs).Part of the BFF development process is the application of coherence factors to account for the discrete nature of the pressure measurement used in the development of the BFFs. Presently, the Space Launch System (SLS) program divides the launch vehicle into distinct aerodynamic regions, within which, the coherence lengths are assumed to be constant. The coherence factors are computed by averaging the coherence function between sensors within the region over a specified frequency range. The present work validates and examines the impact of two proposed changes to the development of longitudinal coherence factors used in the development of launch vehicle BFFs. One change is to employ frequency-dependent coherence factors instead of coherence factors based on the mean of the coherence function. The second proposed change replaces the aerodynamic regions with a moving-segment approach that varies the calculated coherence lengths as a function of longitudinal location of the transducers. The impact of these approaches is examined using data from two rigid buffet model wind-tunnel tests: (1)a notional launch vehicle geometry through the comparison of discrete measurement-basedBFFs to loads developed by continuous integration of unsteady pressure sensitive paint data and (2) the SLS Block 1 Cargo vehicle configuration for which BFFs have been previously developed using less-mature methods. The trends from this examination of updated coherence factor approaches ultimately result in more intuitive results than currently-accepted coherence methods.

buffet, unsteady aerodynamics, launch vehicle, win↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Buffet Forcing Functions Using Frequency-Dependent Coherence Factors

The current accepted approach to modeling launch vehicle transonic buffet environments is to acquire time-correlated unsteady pressure measurements at discrete locations on a model-scale wind-tunnel model and use these measurements to develop buffet forcing functions (BFFs). Part of the BFF development process is the application of coherence factors to account for the discrete nature of the pressure measurement used in the development of the BFFs. Presently, the Space Launch System (SLS) program divides the launch vehicle into distinct aerodynamic regions, within which, the coherence lengths are assumed to be constant. The coherence factors are computed by averaging the coherence function between sensors within the region over a specified frequency range. The present work validates and examines the impact of two proposed changes to the development of longitudinal coherence factors used in the development of launch vehicle BFFs. One change is to employ frequency-dependent coherence factors instead of coherence factors based on the mean of the coherence function. The second proposed change replaces the aerodynamic regions with a moving-segment approach that varies the calculated coherence lengths as a function of longitudinal location of the transducers. The impact of these approaches is examined using data from two rigid buffet model wind-tunnel tests: (1) a notional launch vehicle geometry through the comparison of discrete measurement-based BFFs to loads developed by continuous integration of unsteady pressure sensitive paint data and (2) the SLS Block 1 Cargo vehicle configuration for which BFFs have been previously developed using less-mature methods. The trends from this examination of updated coherence factor approaches ultimately result in more intuitive results than currently-accepted coherence methods.

buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Buffet Functions using Frequency-Dependent Coherence Factors

Launch vehicle transonic buffet environments produce large fluctuating pressures on the surface of the vehicle. Transonic buffet occurs as a launch vehicle passes through the transonic regime, typically Mach 0.8 to 1.2, where phenomena such as flow separation and shock dynamics produce large fluctuating pressures. The unsteady aerodynamic forces produced by these phenomena can excite both global and local vehicle structural response. The consequences of incorporating poorly characterized buffet forces into the design process can range from inefficient structures that can reduce the vehicle capabilities to undersized structures that, in the worst case scenario, may result in structural failure (Refs. 1, 2, 3). It is thus imperative to appropriately characterize the transonic buffet environment.

buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Environments using Unsteady Pressure Sensitive Paint for the Space Launch System Block 1 Cargo Launch Vehicle

Predicting launch vehicle unsteady aerodynamic loads due to buffet remains a significant challenge. Current practices for modeling buffet environments involve the development of buffet forcing functions using unsteady pressure measurements acquired during wind-tunnel tests. These practices often result in significant uncertainty in buffet environments for coupled loads analyses due to the complex spatio-temporal nature of the unsteady pressure field and challenge of its estimation using discrete sensors. Unsteady pressure sensitive paint, on the other hand, can provide unsteady pressure data at a comparatively high-spatial-density and may overcome the challenge of unsteady pressure field estimation with discrete sensors and lead to improvements in the development of buffet forcing functions. In this paper, comparisons of the fluctuating pressure field are made for the Space Launch System Block 1 cargo launch vehicle measured using unsteady pressure sensitive paint and pressure transducers.

buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Environments using Unsteady Pressure Sensitive Paint for the Space Launch System Block 1 Cargo Launch Vehicle

Predicting launch vehicle unsteady aerodynamic loads due to buffet remains a significant challenge. Current practices for modeling buffet environments involve the development of buffet forcing functions using discrete unsteady pressure measurements acquired during wind-tunnel tests. These practices often result in significant uncertainty in buffet environments for coupled loads analyses due to the complex spatio-temporal nature of the unsteady pressure field and the challenge of its estimation using discrete sensors. Unsteady pressure sensitive paint, on the other hand, can provide unsteady pressure data at a comparatively high spatial density and may overcome the challenge of unsteady pressure field estimation with discrete sensors and lead to improvements in the development of buffet forcing functions. In this paper, comparisons of the fluctuating pressure field are made for the Space Launch System Block 1 cargo launch vehicle measured using unsteady pressure sensitive paint and pressure transducers.

buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Environments using Unsteady Pressure Sensitive Paint for the Space Launch System Block 1 Cargo Launch Vehicle

Predicting launch vehicle unsteady aerodynamic loads due to buffet remains a significant challenge. Current practices for modeling buffet environments involve the development of buffet forcing functions using discrete unsteady pressure measurements acquired during wind-tunnel tests. These practices often result in significant uncertainty in buffet environments for coupled loads analyses due to the complex spatio-temporal nature of the unsteady pressure field and the challenge of its estimation using discrete sensors. Unsteady pressure sensitive paint, on the other hand, can provide unsteady pressure data at a comparatively high spatial density and may overcome the challenge of unsteady pressure field estimation with discrete sensors and lead to improvements in the development of buffet forcing functions. In this paper, comparisons of the fluctuating pressure field are made for the Space Launch System Block 1 cargo launch vehicle measured using unsteady pressure sensitive paint and pressure transducers.

buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Wind-Tunnel and Flight Unsteady Pressure Environments for the Ares I-X Flight Test Vehicle

Wind-tunnel testing of highly-instrumented rigid models is the current standard for the estimation of unsteady environments acting on a launch vehicle during ascent. However, uncertainties are present in how well these constant condition wind-tunnel data model the unsteady environments for a full-scale launch vehicle during accelerating flight. The Ares I-X wind-tunnel and flight tests provided rich data sets for comparative analysis that have been used to develop answers to the question of tunnel-to-flight validity and uncertainty. In this paper, additional comparisons are presented for the unsteady pressure data acquired during wind-tunnel and flight testing to describe current methods that are used to evaluate preflight predictions. Utilizing these methods to generate ensembles of flight-comparable realizations from wind-tunnel data is shown to yield fluctuating magnitudes and spectra that compare well with flight data for the Ares I-X flight test vehicle throughout the transonic flight regime.

buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Wind-Tunnel and Flight Unsteady Pressure Environments for the Ares I-X Flight Test Vehicle

buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Wind-Tunnel and Flight Unsteady Pressure Stochastic Characteristics for the Space Launch System Artemis I Flight

Over the course of more than ten years, numerous wind-tunnel tests have been conducted to acquire data for characterizing the unsteady pressure environments expected to act on the Space Launch System Block 1 crew launch vehicle during ascent. These wind-tunnel tests of highly-instrumented rigid models are the current standard for the estimation of unsteady environments. Following the successful launch of the Artemis I mission, the extensive flight data acquired can be analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of unsteady pressure environments predicted in subscale wind-tunnel testing in comparison to the flight test data. In this paper, analyses focusing on data from several Space Launch System wind-tunnel tests and the Artemis I flight test are presented, including assessments of test-to-test, tunnel-to-tunnel, and tunnel-to-flight stochastic characteristics and preflight modeling validity based on wind-tunnel testing. In general, the fluctuating pressure environments measured during the several preflight subscale wind-tunnel tests compare favorably and provide relatively accurate estimates of the environments measured during flight. Discrepancies in fluctuating magnitudes, spatial extent of regions of unsteadiness, and narrowband frequency peaks are noted in the multibody region aft of the solid rocket booster forward attachment to the core stage.

wind-tunnel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Wind-Tunnel and Flight Unsteady Pressure Stochastic Characteristics for the Space Launch System Artemis I Flight

wind-tunnel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluation of Preliminary Buffet Forcing Function Development based on Wind-Tunnel Tests of Geometrically-similar Models

The current state-of-the-art for launch vehicle buffet load estimation involves wind tunnel testing of highly instrumented rigid models and data processing of experimental unsteady pressure measurements to estimate the fluctuating aerodynamic loads. The model and instrumentation requirements to accomplish this type of testing are significant. The rigid model, in particular, must be built with relatively high geometric fidelity to approximate similar aerodynamic phenomena that will occur during the full-scale vehicle flight. Due to this requirement, several iterative wind tunnel tests are often required during the design maturation of the vehicle. For preliminary buffet load estimation, however, data from previous launch vehicle wind tunnel tests of geometrically similar models can be used to provide initial buffet environment estimates before a high geometric fidelity wind tunnel test has been conducted. In this paper, two components of this preliminary buffet estimation process are described: (1) assembly of buffet forcing functions from multiple data sources and (2) scaling of these buffet forcing functions to geometrically-similar components of a target vehicle configuration. The impacts of these estimation methods on the full-vehicle buffet forcing functions, including their longitudinal distribution along the vehicle, frequency-content at individual stations, and station-to-station coherence, are investigated. Considerations for using these methods to extrapolate wind tunnel data to geometrically similar models are also discussed.

Patrick S Heaney↗

NASA NTRS2017

Inverse Force Determination on a Small Scale Launch Vehicle Model Using a Dynamic Balance

A launch vehicle can experience large unsteady aerodynamic forces in the transonic regime that, while usually only lasting for tens of seconds during launch, could be devastating if structural components and electronic hardware are not designed to account for them. These aerodynamic loads are difficult to experimentally measure and even harder to computationally estimate. The current method for estimating buffet loads is through the use of a few hundred unsteady pressure transducers and wind tunnel test. Even with a large number of point measurements, the computed integrated load is not an accurate enough representation of the total load caused by buffeting. This paper discusses an attempt at using a dynamic balance to experimentally determine buffet loads on a generic scale hammer head launch vehicle model tested at NASA Ames Research Center's 11' x 11' transonic wind tunnel. To use a dynamic balance, the structural characteristics of the model needed to be identified so that the natural modal response could be and removed from the aerodynamic forces. A finite element model was created on a simplified version of the model to evaluate the natural modes of the balance flexures, assist in model design, and to compare to experimental data. Several modal tests were conducted on the model in two different configurations to check for non-linearity, and to estimate the dynamic characteristics of the model. The experimental results were used in an inverse force determination technique with a psuedo inverse frequency response function. Due to the non linearity, the model not being axisymmetric, and inconsistent data between the two shake tests from different mounting configuration, it was difficult to create a frequency response matrix that satisfied all input and output conditions for wind tunnel configuration to accurately predict unsteady aerodynamic loads.

testing↗

NASA NTRS2015

Overview of the Space Launch System Transonic Buffet Environment Test Program

Fluctuating aerodynamic loads are a significant concern for the structural design of a launch vehicle, particularly while traversing the transonic flight environment. At these trajectory conditions, unsteady aerodynamic pressures can excite the vehicle dynamic modes of vibration and result in high structural bending moments and vibratory environments. To ensure that vehicle structural components and subsystems possess adequate strength, stress, and fatigue margins in the presence of buffet and other environments, buffet forcing functions are required to conduct the coupled load analysis of the launch vehicle. The accepted method to obtain these buffet forcing functions is to perform wind-tunnel testing of a rigid model that is heavily instrumented with unsteady pressure transducers designed to measure the buffet environment within the desired frequency range. Two wind-tunnel tests of a 3 percent scale rigid buffet model have been conducted at the Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) as part of the Space Launch System (SLS) buffet test program. The SLS buffet models have been instrumented with as many as 472 unsteady pressure transducers to resolve the buffet forcing functions of this multi-body configuration through integration of the individual pressure time histories. This paper will discuss test program development, instrumentation, data acquisition, test implementation, data analysis techniques, and several methods explored to mitigate high buffet environment encountered during the test program. Preliminary buffet environments will be presented and compared using normalized sectional buffet forcing function root-meansquared levels along the vehicle centerline.

Piatak, David J.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fluid for Thought: SLS Rocket Aerodynamics featuring Pressure Sensitive Paint

Combining computer vision algorithms, state-of-the-art high-speed cameras, pressure sensitive paint (PSP) and transonic wind tunnel facilities, teams at NASA and Boeing study unsteady pressure over the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket model with unprecedented temporal and spatial data resolution. Post-processing visualizes pressure fluctuations over a 3D model by converting intensity data from videos of the wind tunnel test. Additionally, data analysis creates predictions of buffet forcing and aeroacoustic activity over the rocket body with the accuracy of a CFD model! The development of the technique will revolutionize aerodynamics research and reveal uncharted insights into fluid behavior and vehicle performance, enhancing aerospace technology and design as they advance. The talk will focus on the impact of the PSP technique on the SLS design and other potential aerospace applications, as well as lay out the experimental process, from wind tunnel test to insights from the data analysis.

Lucy Zhonghui Tang↗

NASA NTRS2019

Measurement and Analysis of Terminal Shock Oscillation and Buffet Forcing Functions on a Launch Vehicle Payload Fairing

The buffet loads on a launch vehicle payload shroud can be impacted by the unsteadiness associated with a terminal shock at high subsonic speeds. At these conditions, flow accelerates to supersonic speeds on the nose of the payload fairing and is terminated by a normal shock on the cylindrical section downstream of the nose cone/cylinder shoulder. The location of the terminal shock and associated separated boundary layer is affected by the freestream Mach number, Reynolds number, and the pitch/yaw of the launch vehicle. Furthermore, even when the freestream conditions and vehicle attitude are constant, this terminal shock oscillates on the surface of the vehicle. The time-varying surface pressure associated with the terminal shock results in unsteady aerodynamic loads that may interact with vehicle structural dynamic modes and the guidance and control of the vehicle. Buffet testing of a 3-percent scale rigid buffet model of a launch vehicle cargo configuration with a tangent-ogive payload shroud was conducted in 2012 and in 2016. Initial buffet forcing functions (BFFs) utilized a coarse pressure sensor distribution on the vehicle surface in which a single longitudinal station with eight sensors observed the terminal shock environment at Mach 0.90. An examination of these circumferential pressures reveal large impulse-like pressure fluctuations and an asymmetry in pressure when the vehicle is at a nonzeroangle of attack that result in high BFFs. Revisions to the shock integration region were made based on computational fluid dynamics and shadowgraph video of shock motion to better represent the BFFs and reduce the high loads resulting from this environment. To more clearly understand this terminal shock environment, a second wind tunnel test was conducted with a dense distribution of 256 sensors at the terminal shock location. These sensor arrays presents a unique opportunity to observe the unsteady terminal shock environment and to characterize the impact of various integration schemes on the BFFs. This paper presents a summary of the development of BFFs for this terminal shock and a detailed analyses of shock region pressure coefficients, coherence, BFFs, shock location time histories, and power spectral density to help guide development of BFFs for other launch vehicle test and analysis programs.

Piatak, David J.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Sensitivity of Space Launch System Buffet Forcing Functions to Buffet Mitigation Options

Time-varying buffet forcing functions arise from unsteady aerodynamic pressures and are one of many load environments, which contribute to the overall loading condition of a launch vehicle during ascent through the atmosphere. The buffet environment is typically highest at transonic conditions and can excite the vehicle dynamic modes of vibration. The vehicle response to these buffet forcing functions may cause high structural bending moments and vibratory environments, which can exceed the capabilities of the structure, or of vehicle components such as payloads and avionics. Vehicle configurations, protuberances, payload fairings, and large changes in stage diameter can trigger undesirable buffet environments. The Space Launch System (SLS) multi-body configuration and its structural dynamic characteristics presented challenges to the load cycle design process with respect to buffet-induced loads and responses. An initial wind-tunnel test of a 3-percent scale SLS rigid buffet model was conducted in 2012 and revealed high buffet environments behind the booster forward attachment protuberance, which contributed to reduced vehicle structural margins. Six buffet mitigation options were explored to alleviate the high buffet environments including modified booster nose cones and fences/strakes on the booster and core. These studies led to a second buffet test program that was conducted in 2014 to assess the ability of the buffet mitigation options to reduce buffet environments on the vehicle. This paper will present comparisons of buffet forcing functions from each of the buffet mitigation options tested, with a focus on sectional forcing function rms levels within regions of the vehicle prone to high buffet environments.

Piatak, David J.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coherence Analysis of the Space Launch System using Unsteady Pressure Sensitive Paint

Transonic buffet forces are a major source of unsteady loading on launch vehicles, thus requiring accurate estimation for efficient vehicle design. The state of the art in modeling these unsteady loads utilizes wind-tunnel tests where the fluctuating pressures are measured by pressure transducers (PTs) at discrete locations on a rigid buffet model. These pressures are then integrated over the surface of the vehicle to yield a series of orthogonal centerline loads called buffet forcing functions (BFFs). Typically, the PT layout aims at resolving the pressure correlation along the longitudinal axis of the vehicle. As a result, the distribution of azimuthal correlation and its impact on the estimated BFFs are not well known. To fill these gaps, extremely high-spatial-resolution uPSP data were collected for three different configurations of the Space Launch System in the NASA Ames Research Center 11-Foot Transonic Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel. The spatio-temporal behavior of the pressure correlation on these vehicles is analyzed and flow features of interest are investigated. It is shown that terminal shocks interacting with turbulence are a source of increased azimuthal coherence, especially when the shock develops at a junction. Vortex shedding off the forward attachment hardware that connects the core stage to the solid rocket boosters (SRBs) is the most severe buffet environment on the vehicle. The associated fluctuating pressures are shown to be highly coherent as far as the vehicle tail and up to 40 degrees away from the boosters. For selected areas of the vehicle, factoring the azimuthal coherence into the attenuation of discrete-measurements-based BFFs results in under prediction relative to the BFFs obtained from full integration of the uPSP data.

buffet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coherence Analysis of the Space Launch System using Unsteady Pressure Sensitive Paint

Transonic buffet during atmospheric ascent is a major source of unsteady loading on launch vehicles that, in the past, has led to structural failures. Thus, determining accurate buffet forcing functions (BFFs) to properly predict the vehicle response to buffet is of vital importance in launch vehicle design. The state of the art for obtaining the BFFs relies on wind-tunnel tests where the fluctuating pressures are measured by pressure transducers (PTs) at sparse locations on a rigid, geometrically-scaled buffet model. To compute the BFFs, the outer mold line (OML) of the vehicle is mapped onto contiguous panels centered at the location of the PTs and the measured fluctuating pressures are integrated over the panels’ areas. To mitigate conservatism due to the assumption that the measured buffet pressures act in phase across each panel, coherence factors are applied, effectively reducing the integration areas and, therefore, the buffet forces. For coherence factors to provide the proper level of BFF attenuation, accurate knowledge of the spatial and temporal correlation of the buffet pressures is paramount. Unfortunately, even with hundreds of unsteady pressure transducers instrumenting the models, compromises must be made on the spatial resolution of the PTs. Typically, the PT layout aims at resolving the pressure correlation along the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, assuming that coherent structures propagate mostly in the longitudinal direction. As a result, the distribution of azimuthal/cross-stream correlation is not well known and its impact on the estimated BFFs is often neglected. To fill this and other knowledge gaps, extremely high spatial-resolution uPSP data were collected for three different production-design configurations of the Space Launch System in the NASA Ames Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel. Specifically, two cargo configurations, the Block 1 and Block 1B, and one crew configuration, the Block 1B crew, were surveyed at resolutions ranging from 600,000 to over 1 million uPSP measurement locations. To shed light on the temporal and spectral behavior of are presented. Several OML regions and flow features of interest are investigated, from theexpansion/shock on the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, to the terminal shock environment on the core stage, and the Strouhal shedding behind the boosters forward attach. The sensitivity of these environments to the vehicle attitude is examined. Furthermore, for selected panels,coherence factors that accurately capture the azimuthal coherence distribution of the buffetpressures are derived and their impact on the estimated BFFs is discussed. Finally, distributions of the local convection velocity and cross spectrum phase are presented.

buffet↗