Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “calibration-free quantitative analysis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Calibration-Free Quantitative Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery (LiB) Electrode Materials Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)

Recent years have seen a surge in the demand for high-performance battery electrode materials for automotive and various electronic device applications. Improving battery performance requires precise knowledge of the structure–composition properties of active electrode materials. To this effect, quantitative and precise estimation of the composition of advanced electrode materials, containing trace amounts of dopants, provide immense value toward developing next-generation high-capacity battery materials. Herein, we demonstrate the application of calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) as a powerful analytical tool for rapid and reliable quantitative spectrochemical characterizations of layered Li metal oxide cathodes containing Mo and Cr dopants (<5 atom %). Specifically, we employ the LIBS using an internal calibration methodology to establish the quantitative elemental ratios of major (Ni, Mn, Co) and trace dopant (Cr, Mo) transition metals to bulk Li contents in diverse cathode material samples such as LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 (NM-50/50), LiNi 0.33 Mn 0.33 Co 0.33 O 2 (NMC), LiNi 0.317 Mn 0.317 Co 0.317 Cr 0.05 O 2 (Cr-doped NMC), and LiNi 0.5– x /2 Mn 0.5– x /2 Mo x O 2 ( x = 0.03, 0.04, 0.05) (Mo-doped NM-50/50) that were synthesized via sol–gel routes. The LIBS-estimated elemental compositions are in good agreement with the nominal stoichiometric values. Furthermore, ex situ LIBS characterizations presented here pave the path for future high-efficacy application of calibration-free quantitative LIBS for rapid in situ analyses of elemental composition changes in battery electrode materials under operation that need not resort to off-site analytical techniques requiring cumbersome sample preparations and/or external standards.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

MnEdgeNet for accurate decomposition of mixed oxidation states for Mn XAS and EELS L2,3 edges without reference and calibration

Accurate decomposition of the mixed Mn oxidation states is highly important for characterizing the electronic structures, charge transfer and redox centers for electronic, and electrocatalytic and energy storage materials that contain Mn. Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) and soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements of the Mn L2,3 edges are widely used for this purpose. To date, although the measurements of the Mn L2,3 edges are straightforward given the sample is prepared properly, an accurate decomposition of the mix valence states of Mn remains non-trivial. For both EELS and XAS, 2+, 3+, and 4+ reference spectra need to be taken on the same instrument/beamline and preferably in the same experimental session because the instrumental resolution and the energy axis offset could vary from one session to another. To circumvent this hurdle, in this study, we adopted a deep learning approach and developed a calibration-free and reference-free method to decompose the oxidation state of Mn L2,3 edges for both EELS and XAS. A deep learning regression model is trained to accurately predict the composition of the mix valence state of Mn. To synthesize physics-informed and ground-truth labeled training datasets, we created a forward model that takes into account plural scattering, instrumentation broadening, noise, and energy axis offset. With that, we created a 1.2 million-spectrum database with 1-by-3 oxidation state composition ground truth vectors. The library includes a sufficient variety of data including both EELS and XAS spectra. By training on this large database, our convolutional neural network achieves 85% accuracy on the validation dataset. We tested the model and found it is robust against noise (down to PSNR of 10) and plural scattering (up to t/λ = 1). We further validated the model against spectral data that were not used in training. In particular, the model shows high accuracy and high sensitivity for the decomposition of Mn 3 O 4 , MnO, Mn 2 O 3 , and MnO 2 . The accurate decomposition of Mn 3 O 4 experimental data shows the model is quantitatively correct and can be deployed for real experimental data. Our model will not only be a valuable tool to researchers and material scientists but also can assist experienced electron microscopists and synchrotron scientists in the automated analysis of Mn L edge data.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗