Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “cetane”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

15 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1980

Autoignition characteristics of aircraft-type fuels

The ignition delay characteristics of Jet A, JP 4, no. 2 diesel, cetane and an experimental referee broad specification (ERBS) fuel in air at inlet temperatures up to 1000 K, pressures of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 atm, and fuel air equivalence ratios of 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0 were mapped. Ignition delay times in the range of 1 to 50 msec at freestream flow velocities ranging from 20 to 100 m/sec were obtained using a continuous flow test apparatus which permitted independent variation and evaluation of the effect of temperature, pressure, flow rate, and fuel/air ratio. The ignition delay times for all fuels tested appeared to correlate with the inverse of pressure and the inverse exponent of temperature. With the exception of pure cetane, which had the shortest ignition delay times, the differences between the fuels tested did not appear to be significant. The apparent global activation energies for the typical gas turbine fuels ranged from 38 to 40 kcal/mole, while the activation energy determined for cetane was 50 kcal/mole. In addition, the data indicate that for lean mixtures, ignition delay times decrease with increasing equivalence ratio. It was also noted that physical (apparatus dependent) phenomena, such as mixing (i.e., length and number of injection sites) and airstream cooling (due to fuel heating, vaporization and convective heat loss) can have an important effect on the ignition delay.

Spadaccini, L. J.↗
NASA NTRS2017

Fuel and Combustor Concerns for Future Commercial Combustors

Civil aircraft combustor designs will move from rich-burn to lean-burn due to the latter's advantage in low NOx and nvPM emissions. However, the operating range of lean-burn is narrower, requiring premium mixing performance from the fuel injectors. As the OPR increases, the corresponding combustor inlet temperature increase can benefit greatly with fuel composition improvements. Hydro-treatment can improve coking resistance, allowing finer fuel injection orifices to speed up mixing. Selective cetane number control across the fuel carbon-number distribution may allow delayed ignition at high power while maintaining low-power ignition characteristics.

Combustor↗
NASA NTRS1981

Autoignition characteristics of aircraft-type fuels

An investigation was conducted of the ignition delay characteristics of five liquid hydrocarbon fuels in air. The test apparatus developed permitted independent variation and control of temperature, pressure, air flow rate, and fuel/air ratio in order that the effects of each parameter could be investigated independently. All of the fuels tested behaved in a predictable manner, that is, ignition delay time decreased as temperature, pressure, and fuel/air ratio increased. The results for the different fuels tested (Jet-A, MP-4, No. 2 diesel, ERBS, and cetane) were directly comparable, since it can be shown that the fuel spray characteristics from the multiple conical tube injector are relatively insensitive to small changes in fuel properties (viscosity, surface tension, and density).

Spadaccini, L. J.↗
NASA NTRS1939

Theoretical and Experimental Study of Ignition Lag and Engine Knock

The author believes, on the basis of experimental ignition-lag data, that the character of a fuel cannot be stated in terms of a single constant (such as octane or cetane number) but that at least two and generally three constants are required. Thus no correlation between knock ratings can be expected if in one set of tests the charge temperature was varied while in the other the charge pressure was varied. For this reason, he favors knock rating being based on an equation characterizing the ignition lag of the fuel as a function of pressure and temperature of the charge.

Schmidt, Frtiz A F↗
NASA NTRS1936

The cetene scale and the induction period preceding the spontaneous ignition of diesel fuels in bombs

In the present report a comparison is made between the scale obtained with mixtures of cetane and l-methyl naphthalene in a bomb, and that obtained with the same fuels in a Waukesha engine. The tests were conducted in a metal bomb heated by a Nichrome spiral. The fuel was injected into the bomb from a Bosch jet by means of a specially constructed plunger pump. The instant injection and the pressure curve in the bomb were registered by a beam of light which was reflected from a mirror connected to the needle of the jet and to a membrane indicator.

Michailova, M N↗
NASA NTRS2011

Fischer-Tropsch Catalyst for Aviation Fuel Production

As the oil supply declines, there is a greater need for cleaner alternative fuels. There will undoubtedly be a shift from crude oil to non-petroleum sources as a feedstock for aviation (and other transportation) fuels. The Fischer-Tropsch process uses a gas mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen which is converted into various liquid hydrocarbons; this versatile gas-to-liquid technology produces a complex product stream of paraffins, olefins, and oxygenated compounds such as alcohols and aldehydes. The Fischer-Tropsch process can produce a cleaner diesel oil fraction with a high cetane number (typically above 70) without any sulfur and aromatic compounds. It is most commonly catalyzed by cobalt supported on alumina, silica, or titania or unsupported alloyed iron powders. Cobalt is typically used more often than iron, in that cobalt is a longer-active catalyst, has lower water-gas shift activity, and lower yield of modified products. Promoters are valuable in improving Fischer-Tropsch catalyst as they can increase cobalt oxide dispersion, enhance the reduction of cobalt oxide to the active metal phase, stabilize a high metal surface area, and improve mechanical properties. Our goal is to build up the specificity of the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst while adding less-costly transition metals as promoters; the more common promoters used in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis are rhenium, platinum, and ruthenium. In this report we will describe our preliminary efforts to design and produce catalyst materials to achieve our goal of preferentially producing C8 to C18 paraffin compounds in the NASA Glenn Research Center Gas-To-Liquid processing plant. Efforts at NASA Glenn Research Center for producing green fuels using non-petroleum feedstocks support both the Sub-sonic Fixed Wing program of Fundamental Aeronautics and the In Situ Resource Utilization program of the Exploration Technology Development and Demonstration program.

deLaRee, Ana B.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Characterization of Catalyst Materials for Production of Aerospace Fuels

Due to environmental, economic, and security issues, there is a greater need for cleaner alternative fuels. There will undoubtedly be a shift from crude oil to non-petroleum sources as a feedstock for aviation (and other transportation) fuels. Additionally, efforts are concentrated on reducing costs coupled with fuel production from non-conventional sources. One solution to this issue is Fischer-Tropsch gas-to-liquid technology. Fischer-Tropsch processing of synthesis gas (CO/H2) produces a complex product stream of paraffins, olefins, and oxygenated compounds such as alcohols and aldehydes. The Fisher-Tropsch process can produce a cleaner diesel oil fraction with a high cetane number (typically above 70) without any sulfur or aromatic compounds. This process is most commonly catalyzed by heterogeneous (in this case, silver and platinum) catalysts composed of cobalt supported on alumina or unsupported alloyed iron powders. Physisorption, chemisorptions, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) are described to better understand the potential performance of Fischer-Tropsch cobalt on alumina catalysts promoted with silver and platinum. The overall goal is to preferentially produce C8 to C18 paraffin compounds for use as aerospace fuels. Progress towards this goal will eventually be updated and achieved by a more thorough understanding of the characterization of catalyst materials. This work was supported by NASA s Subsonic Fixed Wing and In-situ Resource Utilization projects.

DeLaRee, Ana B.↗
NASA NTRS2012

Fischer-Tropsch Catalyst for Aviation Fuel Production

As the oil supply declines, there is a greater need for cleaner alternative fuels. There will undoubtedly be a shift from crude oil to nonpetroleum sources as a feedstock for aviation (and other transportation) fuels. The Fischer-Tropsch process uses a gas mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen which is converted into various liquid hydrocarbons; this versatile gas-to-liquid technology produces a complex product stream of paraffins, olefins, and oxygenated compounds such as alcohols and aldehydes. The Fischer-Tropsch process can produce a cleaner diesel oil fraction with a high cetane number (typically above 70) without any sulfur and aromatic compounds. It is most commonly catalyzed by cobalt supported on alumina, silica, or titania or unsupported alloyed iron powders. Cobalt is typically used more often than iron, in that cobalt is a longer-active catalyst, has lower water-gas shift activity, and lower yield of modified products. Promoters are valuable in improving Fischer-Tropsch catalyst as they can increase cobalt oxide dispersion, enhance the reduction of cobalt oxide to the active metal phase, stabilize a high metal surface area, and improve mechanical properties. Our goal is to build up the specificity of the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst while adding less-costly transition metals as promoters; the more common promoters used in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis are rhenium, platinum, and ruthenium. In this report we will describe our preliminary efforts to design and produce catalyst materials to achieve our goal of preferentially producing C8 to C18 paraffin compounds in the NASA Glenn Research Center Gas-To-Liquid processing plant. Efforts at NASA Glenn Research Center for producing green fuels using non-petroleum feedstocks support both the Sub-sonic Fixed Wing program of Fundamental Aeronautics and the In Situ Resource Utilization program of the Exploration Technology Development and Demonstration program.

DeLaRee, Ana B.↗
NASA NTRS2012

Characterization of Catalyst Materials for Production of Aerospace Fuels

Due to environmental, economic, and security issues, there is a greater need for cleaner alternative fuels. There will undoubtedly be a shift from crude oil to non-petroleum sources as a feedstock for aviation (and other transportation) fuels. Additionally, efforts are concentrated on reducing costs coupled with fuel production from non-conventional sources. One solution to this issue is Fischer-Tropsch gas-to-liquid technology. Fischer-Tropsch processing of synthesis gas (CO/H2) produces a complex product stream of paraffins, olefins, and oxygenated compounds such as alcohols and aldehydes. The Fisher-Tropsch process can produce a cleaner diesel oil fraction with a high cetane number (typically above 70) without any sulfur or aromatic compounds. This process is most commonly catalyzed by heterogeneous (in this case, silver and platinum) catalysts composed of cobalt supported on alumina or unsupported alloyed iron powders. Physisorption, chemisorptions, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) are described to better understand the potential performance of Fischer-Tropsch cobalt on alumina catalysts promoted with silver and platinum. The overall goal is to preferentially produce C8 to C18 paraffin compounds for use as aerospace fuels. Progress towards this goal will eventually be updated and achieved by a more thorough understanding of the characterization of catalyst materials. This work was supported by NASA s Subsonic Fixed Wing and In-situ Resource Utilization projects.

Best, Lauren M.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Fuel Sensitivity of Gas Emissions, Lean Blowout and Combustion Dynamics for a 9-Point LDI Combustor

Fuel sensitivity of gaseous emissions, approach to lean blowout and combustion dynamics are evaluated in this study. Experiments were conducted at the NASA Glenn Research Center's CE-5 flame tube test facility with a 9-point Swirl-Venturi Lean Direct Injection (SV-LDI) combustor. A reference jet fuel (A2) and two test fuels (C1 and C3) from were provided by the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program (NJFCP). C1 is essentially a 2-component iso-paraffin test fuel with a low cetane number of 17, and C3 is a high viscosity test fuel. Approach to lean blowout was monitored in terms of the rapid increase in CO emissions index as equivalence ratio decreased, but testing did not proceed all the way to lean blowout (LBO). Burning C1 was found to produce lower NOx emissions, but C1 flame temperatures were about 25 K higher relative to A2 at near LBO points (where CO emissions increased very rapidly). The NOx emissions of C3 were similar to A2. At low power conditions where fuel injector performance is not optimized for this 9-point LDI combustor, C3 had higher CO emissions than A2 and C1, likely due to C3's higher viscosity relative to A2 and C1. No discernable difference in combustion dynamics was observed between the three fuels tested in the 9-point LDI combustor. While a systematic ignition test campaign was not conducted, it was observed that C1 required a higher equivalence ratio and inlet air temperature for test rig ignition compared to A2 and C3.

Lean Direct Injection↗
NASA NTRS2018

Fuel Sensitivity of Gas Emissions, Lean Blowout and Combustion Dynamics for a 9-Point LDI Combustor

Fuel sensitivity of gaseous emissions, approach to lean blowout and combustion dynamics are evaluated in this study. Experiments were conducted at the NASA Glenn Research Center's CE-5 flame tube test facility with a 9-point Swirl-Venturi Lean Direct Injection (SV-LDI) combustor. A reference jet fuel (A2) and two test fuels (C1 and C3) from were provided by the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program (NJFCP). C1 is essentially a 2-component iso-paraffin test fuel with a low cetane number of 17, and C3 is a high viscosity test fuel. Approach to lean blowout was monitored in terms of the rapid increase in CO emissions index as equivalence ratio decreased, but testing did not proceed all the way to lean blowout (LBO). Burning C1 was found to produce lower NOx emissions, but C1 flame temperatures were about 25 K higher relative to A2 at near LBO points (where CO emissions increased very rapidly). The NOx emissions of C3 were similar to A2. At low power conditions where fuel injector performance is not optimized for this 9-point LDI combustor, C3 had higher CO emissions than A2 and C1, likely due to C3's higher viscosity relative to A2 and C1. No discernable difference in combustion dynamics was observed between the three fuels tested in the 9-point LDI combustor. While a systematic ignition test campaign was not conducted, it was observed that C1 required a higher equivalence ratio and inlet air temperature for test rig ignition compared to A2 and C3.

Combustion dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flame Structure Comparison using Jet-A and an isoparaffinic fuel in a lean direct injection flame tube combustor

This paper offers a first look at some recently acquired optical data. The effect of reference velocity on flame thickness, fuel atomization, and relative speciation of OH, CH, C2, and soot for two National Jet Fuel Combustion Program (NJFCP) fuels are explored in this paper. The NJFCP fuels are an average Jet-A, designated A-2 with a derived cetane number (DCN) of 49, and an isoparaffinic kerosene, C-4. C-4 fuel is made up primarily of C9 - C13, and C16 isoparaffins and is a combination of 60% Sasol IPK and 40% GEVO alcohol-to-jet (ATJ). C-4 has a DCN of 28. Both fuels begin distillation at about the same temperature, but C-4 completes about 30 degrees Celsius lower than A-2. Chemiluminescence images were acquired in a 5-atm gas turbine flame tube combustor using the NASA 7-point lean direct injector (LDI). The flame characteristics were determined through imaging with three scientific cameras. OH*, CH*, and C2* chemiluminescence were collected through narrow bandpass filters centered at 313nm, 430nm and 515nm onto an intensified high-speed camera framed at 8-kHz. A second high-speed camera collected color flame images at rates between 40 and 50 kHz. An ICCD camera framed at 20 Hz was used to record planar laser scatter from liquid fuel. Differences in speciation for the chemiluminescent species was observed between the two fuels. Some reasons for the differences are explored in this paper.

gas turbine combustion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of High-Speed Images of Lean Blowout for Four National Jet Fuel Combustion Program Fuels

Using the NASA 7-point lean direct injection (LDI) aero gas turbine combustor concept, the effect of fuel composition on lean blowout (LBO) was compared for three National Jet Fuel Combustion Program (NJFCP) fuels and one single-component fuel. The fuels were A-2, an "average" Jet-A with a derived cetane number (DCN) of 49; C-1, which consists primarily of C12 and C16 isoparaffins (Gevo ATJ), with a DCN of 16; C-4, which consists primarily of C9-C16 and C13 isoparaffins (Sasol IPK blended with Gevo), with a DCN of 28; and n-dodecane, with a DCN of 73.5;. Lean blowout was reached by increasing the air flow. Previously-reported results showed the air flow rate at LBO increased with increasing DCN. This presentation examines high speed flame images taken as the flame blew out.

lean blow-out↗