Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “cloud computing, data parallel computing, mapreduce, scientific”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Magellan: experiences from a Science Cloud

Cloud resources promise to be an avenue to address new categories of scientific applications including data-intensive science applications, on-demand/surge computing, and applications that require customized software environments. However, there is a limited understanding on how to operate and use clouds for scientific applications. Magellan, a project funded through the Department of Energy?s (DOE) Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program, is investigating the use of cloud computing for science at the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility (ALCF) and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Facility (NERSC). In this paper, we detail the experiences to date at both sites and identify the gaps and open challenges from both a resource provider as well as application perspective.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Locality-aware and load-balanced static task scheduling for MapReduce

Task scheduling for MapReduce jobs has been an active area of research with the objective of decreasing the amount of data transferred during the shuffle phase via exploiting data locality. In the literature, generally only the scheduling of reduce tasks is considered with the assumption that scheduling of map tasks is already determined by the input data placement. However, in cloud or HPC deployments of MapReduce, the input data is located in a remote storage and scheduling map tasks gains importance. Here, we propose models for simultaneous scheduling of map and reduce tasks in order to improve data locality and balance the processors’ loads in both map and reduce phases. Our approach is based on graph and hypergraph models which correctly encode the interactions between map and reduce tasks. Partitions produced by these models are decoded to schedule map and reduce tasks. A two-constraint formulation utilized in these models enables balancing processors’ loads in both map and reduce phases. The partitioning objective in the hypergraph models correctly encapsulates the minimization of data transfer when a local combine step is performed prior to shuffle, whereas the partitioning objective in the graph models achieve the same feat when a local combine is not performed. Here, we show the validity of our scheduling on the MapReduce parallelizations of two important kernel operations – sparse matrix–vector multiplication (SpMV) and generalized sparse matrix–matrix multiplication (SpGEMM) – that are widely encountered in big data analytics and scientific computations. Compared to random scheduling, our models lead to tremendous savings in data transfer by reducing data traffic from several hundreds of megabytes to just a few megabytes in the shuffle phase and consequently leading up to 2.6x and 4.2x speedup for SpMV and SpGEMM, respectively.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗