Completeness and coverage of open-access freshwater fish distribution data in the United States
Aim: Primary biodiversity data constitute observations of particular species at given points in space and time. Open-access databases provide unprecedented access to these data, but their utility depends on how complete species inventories are at a given surveying resolution and how uniformly distributed surveys are in space and time. Our aim was to characterize the completeness of freshwater fish data across spatial scales and among habitat types (lotic stream reaches and lentic waterbodies), and assess coverage bias in space and time. Location: Freshwater habitats of the contiguous United States. Methods: We compiled fish occurrence records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), the Multi-state Aquatic Resources Information Server (MARIS), and three federally-administered surveys (EMAP, NAQWA, NRS). Next, we evaluated survey completeness across seven spatial resolutions representing nested stream catchments, and separately for lotic and lentic habitats. Lastly, we tested for bias in survey coverage along environmental and temporal gradients for each habitat type. Results: A total of 39,855,157 records representing 1925 species were available from 1800 to 2014. The percent of catchments surveyed increased as spatial resolution decreased while the density of occurrence records within surveyed catchments decreased. Species richness also increased with catchment size consistent with putative species–area relationships. Occurrence records were distributed among 72,114 lotic reaches and 3,325 lentic waterbodies throughout the contiguous US. Seven percent (N=5,055) of surveyed lotic reaches and 23% (N=771) of surveyed lentic waterbodies were well-surveyed based on the most conservative thresholds for two completeness indices. Most well-surveyed lotic reaches (95%) and undammed lentic waterbodies (97%) were completed since 1980, and most were surveyed during only one 20-year time interval (83% and 56% for lotic and lentic waterbodies, respectively). Coverage analyses indicated that contemporary and future climates corresponding to regions along the west coast and gulf coast are the most under-represented for both lotic and lentic habitats. Small lentic waterbodies (surface area < 0.1 km2) are also under-represented. Main Conclusions: Contemporary surveys of lotic reaches and, to a lesser extent, lentic waterbodies are plentiful and generally representative of climatic and landscape characteristics. Data compilation efforts should focus on adding historical data to public repositories. Clustering of well-surveyed waterbodies in MARIS-participating states highlights the value of state-agency data and demonstrates the need for dissemination of these data by more state agencies.