Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “convolution/deconvolution”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Earth radiation budget experiment scanner instrument

Orbital measurements of the earth's radiation budget are being made from several spacecraft launched in the latter part of 1984. Three sets of instruments have been designed to measure the incident solar flux, the earth's long-wave emitted radiation, and the earth's reflected radiation more accurately than have been measured before. These instruments consist of a three-channel narrow field of view scanning radiometer and a four-channel wide field of view staring nonscanner radiometer and a solar channel. The instruments are collecting data on spectral, spatial, and temporal scales specified by scientists and researchers in the weather and climate discipline. The scanning radiometer, the subject of this paper, is designed to yield small-scale definition for measurements taken by the nonscanner and thereby test convolution/deconvolution techniques used on wide field of view data. The scanning radiometer is also expected to yield bidirectional reflectance data as an aid in radiation transfer modeling calculations.

Kopia, L. P.↗

Convolution-based frequency domain multiplexing of SiPM readouts using the $\mathrm{DRS4}$ digitizer

Here we present 4:1 multiplexing of organic scintillators, each coupled to a silicon photomultiplier (SiPM), to reduce the need for a large number of digitizer input channels to readout highly pixelated radiation detection systems. Frequency domain multiplexing (FDM) encodes a detector pulse by assigning it a unique frequency via convolution before combining the encoded signal into a single channel. The combined signal is then read through a digitizer input channel. We have designed an FDM system to multiplex four SiPMs using DRS4 digitizer evaluation board from Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). We demonstrate 4:1 multiplexing of the SiPM fast output signals and pulse recovery from the digitized multiplexed signal using deconvolution. The noise in the recovered pulse introduces a bias and uncertainty in the estimate of energy and timing that changes with pulse height. The relative uncertainty in the estimated energy from the recovered pulse decreases with pulse height with a maximum uncertainty of 3.1% for the low energy pulses (corresponding to 100 keV); the uncertainty in the estimated time pick-off also decreases with pulse height with a maximum uncertainty of 110 ps for the low energy pulses.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Recovery of coincident frequency domain multiplexed detector pulses using sequential deconvolution

Multiplexing of radiation detector signals into a single channel significantly reduces the need for a large number of digitizer channels, which reduces the cost and the power consumption of a data acquisition system. We previously demonstrated frequency domain multiplexing by convolution using a prototype system that multiplexed two EJ-309 organic scintillators signals into a single channel. Each detector pulse was converted to a damped sinusoid which was then combined into a single channel. The combined signal was digitized and the original detector signal was recovered from the damped sinusoid by deconvolution. In this paper, we demonstrate the recovery of multiple detector signals that arrive during the same digitized record via a new sequential deconvolution method. Here, when two detectors produce signals in the same digitized record and their pulses do not overlap in time, we found that the charge, arrival time, and particle type can be estimated fairly precisely for the first pulse, but the second pulse exhibits substantial degradation in the precision of the estimated charge and arrival time. When the pulses overlap in time, we demonstrate both theoretically and experimentally that the part of the first pulse that does not overlap with the second can be recovered accurately, so the arrival time and amplitude of the first pulse can be estimated fairly precisely, but not the charge or particle type. None of these quantities can be estimated precisely for the second pulse when the two pulses overlap.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗