Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “copper catalyst, Cu/SSZ-13, In situ EPR, active site titration, SCR Catalyst”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Quantitative Cu Counting Methodologies for Cu/SSZ-13 Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalysts by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Here, two Cu/SSZ-13 selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts with distinct Si/Al ratios and isolated Z2Cu and ZCuOH distributions are prepared for in situ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic studies. These in situ studies include dehydration, titration of dehydrated samples with NO+O 2 and NH 3 , titration of NH 3 saturated samples with NO+O 2 , and finally steady-state standard NH 3 -SCR reaction. During dehydration, EPR active hydrated ZCuOH loses H 2 O ligands and becomes EPR silent due to a pseudo Jahn-Teller effect; a portion of ZCuOH also undergoes autoreduction to ZCu(I) species, a process that also induces EPR invisibility. During NO+O 2 treatment of dehydrated samples, ZCu(I) species are oxidized to Cu(II)-NO 3 - species, regaining EPR visibility. During NH3 titration, EPR silent dehydrated ZCuOH can also regain EPR visibility by coordinating with NH 3 ligands. During NO+O 2 titration of NH 3 -saturated samples, EPR active Cu contents first decrease due to Cu(II) reduction to Cu(I), and then increase due to Cu(II)-NO 3 - species formation. However, the Cu(II)-NO 3 - formation chemistry is substantially slower for the Si/Al = 36 catalyst. In steady-state SCR studies, the EPR active content decreases with increasing temperature in the kinetically controlled low-temperature regime and becomes largely invariant in mass-transfer limited regime. Importantly, Cu sites in the SCR more active Si/Al = 6 catalyst display substantially higher EPR visibility than the SCR less active Si/Al = 36 catalyst at any reaction temperatures tested. The higher Cu loading for the former catalyst is believed to be key for this difference.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗