Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “critical materials”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Upcycling Metal(loid) Contaminants to Produce Critical Raw Materials: The Nexus of Water Treatment and Material Criticality

The Critical Raw Materials Act adopted by the European Commission in 2024 signals a growing shift in the societal value of many elements, which has important implications for the water treatment sector. This legislation partly aims to increase production of Critical Raw Materials (CRMs) from waste streams, with many CRMs being elements with which the water sector has decades of experience, such as the notorious contaminant and newly classified CRM, arsenic. In this Perspective, we use arsenic as a case study to explore how water treatment waste can be repurposed to contribute to CRM supply chain requirements. Combining arsenic mass balances for indicative groundwater treatment plants and EU statistics of water use and arsenic compound consumption, we propose that arsenic upcycling integrated with water treatment can help offset imports of arsenic compounds. However, research is now needed to develop more holistic treatment systems that integrate CRM upcycling with contaminant removal and to better understand the political, institutional, and social drivers that can accelerate adoption of such systems at water utilities. With this work, we intend to stimulate a discussion of water treatment as a discipline that can both improve water quality by removing metal(loid) contaminants and generate local sources of CRMs.

Arsenic↗
DOE OSTI2023

2023 Critical Materials Strategy

The global effort to curb carbon emissions is accelerating demand for clean energy technologies and the materials they rely on. Demand for these materials will only continue to grow, especially as some nations aim to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. While some major materials like steel, copper, and aluminum are already powering the fossil fuel economy, others are more minor materials with potential supply risks. These risks could jeopardize the ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the desirable timeframe to avoid significant climate change. In some cases, it may be necessary to take action to improve the resilience of material supply chains and mitigate supply risks. Understanding the importance of individual materials to clean energy and the supply risks associated with them is necessary to identify which materials may serve as potential roadblocks to a clean energy future. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a series of 13 supply chain deep dive assessment reports on various energy technologies in 2022 in response to President Biden’s Executive Order on America’s Supply Chains (E.O. 14017). These reports emphasized that supply chain bottlenecks can occur at any stage of the value chain from mining and refining to component and even sub-system manufacturing. The bottlenecks are a combination of factors such as material availability, equipment availability, work force availability and quality, logistics, regulatory framework, and market conditions. These bottlenecks were worsened during the global Covid-19 pandemic. Its lingering impacts have hindered capacity expansion for material supply chains and prevented product lead-time recovery. One approach to reduce supply chain risks for the United States is to have a strong domestic manufacturing sector with a diverse set of producers. Boosting responsible domestic production would require leveraging the latest science not only in material extraction but also in developing substitutes, recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing. This report is an updated analysis of previous Critical Materials Strategy (CMS) reports published by the DOE in 2010, 2011, and 2019 based on national and global priorities, technology advancement, and technology adoption trends. Like the CMS reports, this analysis presents the results of a formal material criticality assessment to identify which materials are critical to the continued deployment of clean energy technologies globally. The analysis in this report leveraged the DOE supply chain deep dive assessments to develop the initial list of materials to evaluate. This DOE Critical Materials Assessment (CMA) is conducted independently of criticality assessments performed by other U.S. government agencies, such as that conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). This analysis complements the USGS critical minerals determination in three aspects. First, the DOE assessment is performed from a global perspective, while the USGS analysis focusses on the importance of minerals to the U.S. economy. Second, this report focuses on the importance of materials to clean energy technologies, rather than to the economy in general. Lastly, this study is forward looking to 2035 based on clean energy deployment scenarios, whereas the USGS assessment is retrospective. Materials evaluated in this report that do not appear in the USGS Critical Minerals List include copper, uranium, electrical steel, and SiC. A draft version of this report received ~80 public comments related to supporting data and methodological improvement. Those comments have been incorporated as much as possible where appropriate. Highlights of findings from this 2023 CMA include: Rare earth materials (neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, and terbium) used in magnets in electric vehicle (EV) motors and wind turbine generators continue to be critical. While dysprosium (Dy) and terbium (Tb) are both heavy rare earth elements that serve the same function in magnets, the criticality of Tb is slightly lower than that for Dy in the short term due to the widespread use of Dy in high-grade magnets and Tb’s present role as a substitute. Similarly, praseodymium (Pr) is critical in the medium term but only near critical in the short term because it is more substitutable in magnets than neodymium (Nd); Materials used in batteries for EVs and stationary storage are now considered to be critical. While cobalt (Co) was found to be critical in this and previous reports, lithium (Li) becomes critical in the medium term due to its broader use in various battery chemistries and the rampant growth of the EV industry. Natural graphite is a new addition in this assessment and is also found to be critical; Platinum group metals used in hydrogen electrolyzers, such as platinum (Pr) and iridium (Ir), are critical due to an increased focus on hydrogen technologies to achieve net zero carbon emissions, while those used in catalytic converters, such as rhodium (Rh) and palladium (Pd), were screened out due to the decreased importance of catalytic converters in the medium term; Gallium (Ga) continues to be critical due to its use in light-emitting diodes (LEDs). In addition, the use of Ga has increased in magnet manufacturing and in semiconductor in forms such as gallium arsenide (GaAs) or gallium nitride (GaN); Major materials like Aluminum (Al), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and silicon (Si) move from noncritical in the short term to near critical in the medium term due to their importance in electrification; Electrical steel is near critical due to its use in transformers for the grid and electric motors in EVs.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2024

An Evaluation of the Patent Portfolio Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Critical Materials Innovation Hub

This report describes the results of an analysis of critical materials research funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Critical Materials Innovation Hub (CMI Hub, formerly the Critical Materials Institute). The purpose of the report is to assess various characteristics of patents awarded for CMI Hub-funded innovations in critical materials technology and to determine the extent to which CMI Hub-funded research has influenced subsequent technological developments both within and beyond critical materials.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Bibliometric Analysis of Critical Materials Innovation Hub Publications 2013–2022

The Critical Materials Innovation Hub (the CMI Hub, formerly known as the Critical Materials Institute or CMI) is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Energy Innovation Hub led by Ames National Laboratory and supported by DOE. Established in 2013, the CMI Hub focuses on “technologies that make better use of materials and eliminate the need for materials that are subject to supply disruptions” (Ames National Laboratory 2024). The CMI Hub researchers regularly publish articles that describe their research and its results. Nexight Group conducted a bibliographic analysis of the CMI Hub’s publications to develop a profile of the CMI Hub’s research community, identify growing and emerging research fronts in critical materials, and describe the impact the CMI Hub’s publications have had on the research community. The analysis focused on 475 the CMI Hub publications from 2013 through 2022 that were covered by the Scopus database. Citation counts and other information on each publication (authors, author affiliation, keywords, references, etc.) were downloaded from Scopus in early December 2022.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Securing Critical Materials for the U.S. Electric Vehicle Industry: A Landscape Assessment of Domestic and International Supply Chains for Five Key Battery Materials

This study explores the prospective supply of upstream critical materials, providing insights into the U.S.'s capacity to meet its Electric Vehicle (EV) and Energy Storage System (ESS) deployment targets for 2035. It evaluates the proportion of critical materials demand that can be met by domestic upstream sources and the amount that will require non-U.S. sources. The analysis considers geological resources and current international development activities, contributing to the understanding of mineral supply security as the global community strives for net-zero emissions by 2050. The study focuses on five materials assessed in the 2023 DOE Critical Materials Assessment – Lithium, Nickel, Cobalt, Graphite, and Manganese.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Cooperative Lanthanide Solvation in an Ionic Liquid for Critical Materials Separations

Effectively separating critical materials, including intra-lanthanide separations, is crucial for meeting growing application demands. Liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) is the industry standard for lanthanide separations, where the selectivity can depend on small changes in metal coordination. In this work, we investigate representative lanthanide Eu coordination with a neutral malonamide extractant in an imidazolium bistriflimide ionic liquid (IL) solvent. Through systematic titrations of the water and extractant and under extraction conditions, we observe surprising cooperative Eu solvation with the IL anion and extractant. Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy measurements show strong extractant coordination in water-saturated IL. Lifetime measurements show no water coordination, and extended X-ray fine structure spectroscopy data provide a coordination number of 10. Molecular dynamics simulations confirm this coordination number and reveal IL anion coordination in the final Eu complex, even though it is ordinarily a significantly weaker ligand compared to water. The lack of water in the final extracted complex and IL anion coordination potentially explain the increased extraction in LLE systems using ILs, as evidenced by higher distribution ratios for cation exchange extraction, despite the energetic cost of cation transfer to the aqueous phase. These results highlight the opportunities for tuning metal coordination to drive extraction in unique solvent systems.

Carr, Amanda J.↗
DOE OSTI2025

NEWTS Economic Data Dashboard: Critical Materials for Energy

The NEWTS Economic Data Dashboard: Critical Materials for Energy is an economic screening tool for assessing the concentration and potential value of the 18 critical materials for energy in fossil energy-related wastewater across the United States. Datasets used to develop the dashboard and complete economic calculations are available as supplementary downloads. These resources were developed primarily using geochemical composition and volume data from the NEWTS Integrated dataset (version 1.0). Energy-related wastewater types presented in the dashboard include produced water (PW), brackish groundwater (BW), acid mine drainage (AMD), coal combustion residual leachate (CCRL), power plant flue gas desulfurization wastewater (FGD), and geothermal fluids. The concentrations of the following critical minerals were included in the analysis, when available: Al, Co, Cu, Dy, F, Ga, Ge, C, Ir, Li, Mg, Mn, Nd, Ni, Pt, Pr, Si, Tb. This economic screening tool was built to support identification of promising critical mineral feedstocks and economic research targets.

Critical Minerals; Critical Minerals and Materials↗
DOE OSTI2026

Recycling of Printed Circuit Boards to Recover Critical Materials

The printed circuit board (PCB), a central component of most electronic devices, represents a significant fraction of the electronic product waste stream. The complex composition of PCBs, consisting of metals, polymers, and fiberglass, requires specialized recovery steps to reclaim valuable and critical materials and the safe disposal of brominated compounds. In this review paper, we describe the current state of critical material recovery and traditional recycling technologies and identify key obstacles to large-scale implementation. Metals present at high concentrations, such as copper, lead, and iron, are conventionally recovered from PCBs using hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, or electrometallurgical processes. Hydrometallurgical methods achieve high selectivity through chemical leaching but pose significant challenges for effluent and reagent recovery. Pyrometallurgical methods facilitate rapid metal separation through smelting but require substantial energy and may release harmful gases. Electrometallurgical techniques produce high-purity metals but are constrained by pretreatment requirements and the consumption of energy. The non-metallic fraction of PCB waste is recycled using thermochemical conversion, microwave-aided heating, and direct recycling of epoxy–fiberglass composites, enabling material or energy recovery. The recovered polymer from direct recycling may have reduced mechanical strength and poor compatibility with new polymer matrices, and the resulting products from the thermal conversion suffer from incomplete conversion, degradation of quality, and residual contamination, as compared to synthetic polymers. Recent process developments have focused on extracting rare earth and supply-critical materials present at lower concentrations in the waste stream. The literature on existing and emerging approaches for recycling PCB wastes is reviewed to identify sustainable, economically viable, and environmentally responsible strategies for the recovery and reuse of critical materials from waste streams.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Living Filter Designs for In-Line Recovery and Sorting of Critical materials

This project explored “bio-mining” of critical materials from electronic waste (E-waste) streams by developing living filters arrays capable of recovering these materials, focusing on the platinum group metals (PGMs) and rare earth elements (REEs). While highly toxic, E-waste is considered a valuable “urban mine” as it contains critical materials such as PGMs and REEs with orders of magnitude higher purity than the richest ores. The aim of the project was to: (1) develop mechanically robust, silk-based biomaterial filtration membranes that can capture REEs from dilute aqueous waste; (2) design and build 3D bioprinted living filters containing encapsulated electrochemically active bacteria (EAB) capable of bio-reducing PGMs and recovering them from waste streams; and (3) constructing combined living filter arrays using both components to efficiently capture REE and PGM from the same waste stream. The developed silk-based filtration membranes were self-assembled using silk-nanofibrils (SNFs) derived from silkworm (Bombyx mori) cocoons in conjunction with recombinant silk-elastin-like proteins (SELPs), which contained lanthanide-binding peptide tags (LBTs) with a high affinity and specificity towards REEs. These 100% biodegradable protein-based membranes were capable of recovering up to 85% of model REE ions (Tb 3+ ) filtered through the membrane, with ~50% recovery achieved in the presence of high concentrations (100X) of common interfering metals (Ca 2+ , Cu 2+ , Fe 3+ , Zn 2+ ). REE captured by the membranes were easily recovered by applying a low pH desorption buffer. The membranes also demonstrated substantial reusability, with only a 30% loss in binding capacity after 4 cycles of REE binding and recovery. To recover the PGMs, we created a bottom-up assembling strategy to construct a living hydrogel composed of a seamlessly integrated living catalyst, Shewanella loihica PV-4 (PV-4), for metal reduction, and their structural and functional linkers, bio-reduced graphene oxide (B-rGO). This hydrogel demonstrated a close to 90% recovery of model metal ions, Pd, from a simulated e-waste leaching stream with minimum-to-no biomass production. It’s also worth noting that the Pd recovery is initiated immediately after the introduction of living hydrogel, compared to conventional biocarriers that required start-up times within hours to days. Overall, these living hydrogels demonstrated superior bioactivity, structural integrity, and agility over existing biocarriers, which offers extensive opportunities to advance the biological metal recovery with unparallel efficiency, reduced energy/material consumption, and minimal environmental impact.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Critical Materials Institute (CMI) Year 10 Cumulative Report

This 40-page technical report summarizes the achievements and success of the first 10 years of the Critical Materials Institute (CMI). CMI is an Energy Innovation Hub created by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that focuses on developing the technical innovations needed to address the supply chain of critical materials important to clean energy technologies. The report describe the CMI’s unique implementation of the Energy Innovation Hub model including sections on situational analysis and approach; critical materials challenges and technical achievements; and diverse impacts of the first 10 years of operations.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Agentic workflow enables the recovery of critical materials from complex feedstocks via selective precipitation

We present a multi-agentic workflow for critical materials recovery that deploys a series of AI agents and automated instruments to recover critical materials from produced water and magnet leachates. This approach achieves selective precipitation from real-world feedstocks using simple chemicals, accelerating the development of efficient, adaptable, and scalable separations to a timeline of days, rather than months and years.

Ritchhart, Andrew J.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Electrochemical leaching of critical materials from lithium-ion batteries: A comparative life cycle assessment

The manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries (LIB) requires critical materials such as cobalt (Co) and lithium (Li) that are essential for clean-energy products including electric vehicles. Because of their rapidly increasing demand and limited supply, the recycle and reuse of these materials from end-of-life LIB have garnered a lot of interest. Electrochemical leaching has emerged as a sustainable method to extract critical materials out of LIBs, so life cycle assessment was conducted to compare the environmental impacts with traditional peroxide-based leaching and another emerging technology – SO 2 -based leaching. The results showed that electrochemical leaching reduces the global warming potential (GWP) by 80%-87% compared to peroxide-based leaching due to a lower acid consumption, avoidance of hydrogen peroxide, and regeneration of reducing agent iron (II) sulfate and compares well with SO 2 -based leaching in most impact categories. Furthermore, the analysis suggested renewable energy can further reduce the environment footprint of electrochemical leaching.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

US critical materials strategy: The importance of innovation in obtaining supply chain security

Critical raw materials (CRMs) and/or critical minerals and materials (CMMs) are metals, metal groups, and non-metallic minerals essential for the many modern technologies, including wind turbine, electric vehicles and energy storage systems. Different countries have slightly different metrics for determining criticality. However, broadly speaking, the European Union (EU) and United States (US)both define them as materials that reach or exceed thresholds for both economic importance and supply risk. Furthermore, both organizations have implemented instruments, such as the EU's 2024 Critical Raw Materials Act and the US Department of Energy's (DOE) Critical Minerals and Materials Strategy, to facilitate research and development of CRM/CMM ranging from mineral deposit development to geometallurgy to separations to advanced manufacturing. This talk is aimed at an EU audience to explain the DOE CMM strategy and how it compares to the steps taken by the EU to facilitate progress. Furthermore, this talk takes a geology-centric approach on the challenges geoscientists face and how their roles may change in the future.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Carbon Ores-Derived Critical Materials for Clean Energy Technology Applications

Presented at the 48th International Technical Conference on Clean Energy (Clearwater Clean Energy Conference), Clearwater, Florida, June 16-19, 2024. This presentation describes the Energy & Environmental Research Center’s development of the Upgraded Carbon Ores-to-Products (UCOP) technology to produce high‑quality graphite and other critical materials from coal and coal wastes for clean energy applications such as batteries and electrodes. It outlines the technical approach, including feedstock cleaning, controlled heat treatment, and graphitization, and presents results demonstrating high graphite purity, novel microstructures, and competitive performance relative to commercial graphite. The work highlights the potential for lower environmental impact and domestic supply chains for critical materials amid increasing global demand and supply‑chain constraints.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2023

Mechanistic understanding of aging behaviors of critical-material-free Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 //LiNi 0.9 Mn 0.1 O 2 cells with fluorinated carbonate-based electrolytes for safe energy storage with ultra-long life span

Behind-the-meter storage (BTMS) systems - a viable method to minimize potential risk of blackout events and stabilize the grid - require a different type of cost-effective energy storage with excellent safety, ultra-long (>20 years) cycle life and reasonable energy density compared that of electric vehicles. To increase the energy density and reduce the cost of a long-term cyclable lithium-titanate-based cell, it is required to employ a critical-material-free high voltage cathode and an electrolyte with good electrochemical and transport properties. In this report the long-term electrochemical performance and behaviors of selected critical-material-free Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 (LTO)//LiNi 0.9 Mn 0.1 O 2 (LNMO) full cells for BTMS applications are evaluated and analyzed in the optimized voltage range of 1.4-2.7 V at 45 degrees C with different fluorinated carbonate-based electrolytes. The fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC)-based electrolyte cell shows the highest capacity retention of 57.9% and Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 99.96% after 1000 cycles, potentially attributed to a dense, homogenous and less resistive LiF-rich solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer formed on the surface of LTO that may mitigate electrolyte decomposition and maintain relatively low cell impedance during cycling. The 3,3,3-fluoroethylmethyl carbonate (F-EMC)-based electrolyte cell, however, presents the worst performance with lower capacity and a sharp decrease of CE, due to unstable and non-uniform SEI formation and continuous oxidative electrolyte decomposition. This mechanistic understanding of cell aging behaviors and failure mechanisms with detailed analysis of surface chemistry and electrode morphology can guide design of new electrode chemistries and electrolyte formulations for the development of BTMS batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗