Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “decaBDE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Thermal aging effects on crosslinked polyethylene cable insulation with decabromodiphenyl ether flame retardant alternative

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) has been extensively used as a flame retardant in several applications, including nuclear electrical cable insulation. However, decaBDE has been identified as a persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) substance, leading to regulatory scrutiny. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a regulation on January 6, 2021, aimed at phasing out the manufacturing, processing, and distribution of decaBDE. This rule set a compliance deadline of March 8, 2021, for the manufacture and processing of decaBDE, and an extended deadline of January 6, 2023, for specific applications including wire and cable insulation in nuclear power generation facilities. In response to such regulations, RSCC, a major supplier of safety-related electrical cables and associated products to the U.S. nuclear industry updated the formula of their crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation to replace the historically used decaBDE flame retardant with an acceptable alternative. This change from the previous decaBDE-containing XLPE prompted interest in comparative performance of the two material formulations, especially with respect to characteristics relevant to safety-related function such as thermal and radiation resistance. RSCC graciously provided samples of wire insulated with the decaBDE-containing XLPE formulation and corresponding wire insulated with XLPE of the new formulation, containing a decaBDE alternative. In this work we compare characteristics of the two formulations and a previously produced commercial version of the RSCC decaBDE-containing XLPE insulation subjected to thermal aging at 150 °C and 165 °C. The comparison was focused on mechanical durability, thermal stability in the oxidative environment, and chemical structures. Briefly, • Tensile elongation at break (EAB) results showed loss of mechanical elasticity with longer aging time, as expected. Aging time dependence of EAB did not differ between the decaBDE-containing and decaBDE-alternative samples. • Subtle differences between the two materials can be detected from Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) absorbance spectra in the range below 1700 cm -1 , are assumed to be related to decomposition of flame retardant additives during thermal aging. • The oxidation induction time (OIT) data seemed to show that the unaged decaBDE-containing XLPE material is more thermally stable than the unaged decaBDE-alternative material, but the discrepancy in OIT decreased with aging time and the OIT values of the two materials became similar starting with the 4 th day of aging at 165 °C. This thermal aging investigation confirmed that the mechanical durability, a key property monitored for cable qualification, was not significantly affected by the modification of the formulation with a decaBDE alternative flame-retardant system in the investigated thermal aging conditions. Further studies on the same sets of materials exposed to thermal and gamma radiation aging would further inform comparison of the materials safety-related function.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Consideration of Decabromodiphenyl Ether Flame Retardant in Thermal and Radiation Aging of Crosslinked Polyethylene Cable Insulation

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) has been used as a flame-retardant additive in nuclear-grade electrical cable insulation. However, decaBDE has been identified as a persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) substance, leading to regulatory scrutiny. On January 6, 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule to phase out decaBDE. The 2021 rule set a two-year compliance deadline for “processing and distribution in commerce of decaBDE for use in wire and cable insulation in nuclear power generation facilities.” In recognition of industry concerns following a sudden discontinuation of decaBDE-containing Class 1E wire and cable essential for nuclear power operations and the time needed for qualifying the individual components using the alternative insulation technology, an extended compliance deadline was set in the finalized amendments to the 2021 rule as published by the Environmental Appeals Board on November 12, 2024. The 2024 rule set the compliance deadline for processing and distributing decaBDE-containing wire and cable insulation until the end of the service life of these materials. Since decaBDE has long been relied upon as the flame retardant in one of the most common cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) nuclear cable insulation formulations, RSCC Firewall III insulation, questions have naturally arisen regarding whether changes in cable performance might be expected for XLPE containing a decaBDE alternative, especially for safety-related cables that must perform their safety function in a design basis event such as a loss of coolant accident.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Value of Nuclear Energy to the Reliability of the North American Power System: Results for Western and Eastern Interconnections

This report documents the fulfillment of a milestone for the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program: completing a baseline study of regional impact of nuclear power plants and hydrogen production in maintaining grid services and power quality. Models have been comprehensively demonstrated for the Western Interconnection, or Western Electric Coordinating Council area, and in the Eastern Interconnection for scenarios representative of past extreme events (e.g., drought and heat waves). Understanding the impact on the reliability of the bulk electric system of any reduction in generation capacity from nuclear power, for any reason, is the motivation of this work. Factors that might lead to the premature or unplanned closure of nuclear plants, extended outages, or repurposing of nuclear power include: • Aging infrastructure: Many nuclear power plants in the U.S. are nearing the end of their designed operating lives. Upgrading aging infrastructure can be expensive, and some utilities may choose to retire plants rather than invest in costly upgrades. • Low wholesale electricity prices: The deregulation of the electricity market in many states has led to increased competition and driven down wholesale electricity prices, causing nuclear power operators to seek other revenue sources for their heat and power such as clean hydrogen production. • Renewables growth: The rapid growth of renewable energy sources like solar and wind power is posing a challenge to traditional generation sources like nuclear. While many see renewables as a key part of the clean energy transition, their intermittent nature requires additional grid solutions for reliable power supply. • The potential for regulatory decisions to be in conflict: In its 2021 rulemaking, EPA rule (86 FR 880), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set a compliance date for the ban on processing and distribution in commerce of Decabromodiphenyl Ether (DecaBDE). Since DecaBDE is in many components, particularly wiring, of nuclear power plants which are deemed safety-related or important to safety, three plants would not have been able to restart after their 2023 spring outages, and numerous others would have faced issues in the near future. Fortunately, in this case, the EPA provided relief to the nuclear energy industry. The report provides a summary of the significant role nuclear energy plays in the United States’ power generation mix, supplying around 20% of the nation’s electricity generation, spread across 28 U.S. states. Nuclear power is reliable, mostly unaffected by weather and seasonal changes, and provides a consistent source of baseload power. In terms of capacity, nuclear power plants account for as much as 26% of balancing area power generation capacity. Nuclear power also provides a substantial contribution (e.g., 10% of the inertia in the Eastern Interconnection) of the synchronous spinning mass/inertia that buffers the rate at which frequency changes when a load and generation imbalance occurs (e.g., a large plant trips or a load is suddenly shed due to a transmission outage). This contribution is critical for maintaining grid stability during sudden changes in load or generation.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗