LAUNCH DEFLECTOR DESIGN CRITERIA AND THEIR APPLICATION TO THE SATURN C-1 DEFLECTOR
Launch deflector design criteria and saturn c-1 deflector for exhaust jet energy distribution
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Launch deflector design criteria and saturn c-1 deflector for exhaust jet energy distribution
System for optical acquisition and tracking, and laser beam deflector devices - electro-optical techniques for controlling direction of laser beam flow
A 20-year life cycle cost analysis was performed to compare the operational life cycle cost, processing/turnaround timelines, and operations manpower inspection/repair/refurbishment requirements for corrosion protection of the Kennedy Space Center launch pad flame deflector associated with the existing cast-in-place materials and a newer advanced refractory ceramic material. The analysis compared the estimated costs of(1) continuing to use of the current refractory material without any changes; (2) completely reconstructing the flame trench using the current refractory material; and (3) completely reconstructing the flame trench with a new high-performance refractory material. Cost estimates were based on an analysis of the amount of damage that occurs after each launch and an estimate of the average repair cost. Alternative 3 was found to save $32M compared to alternative 1 and $17M compared to alternative 2 over a 20-year life cycle.
Piezoelectrically powered laser beam waveguide for electro-optical acquisition and tracking
An investigation was conducted in the model preparation area of the Langley 16-Foot Transonic Tunnel to determine the internal performance of a fixed-shroud nonaxisymmetric nozzle equipped with an aft-hood exhaust deflector. Model geometric parameters investigated included nozzle power setting, aft-hood deflector angle, throat area control with the aft-hood deflector deployed, and yaw vector angle. Results indicate that cruise configurations produced peak performance in the range consistent with previous investigations of nonaxisymmetric convergent-divergent nozzles. The aft-hood deflector produced resultant pitch vector angles that were always less than the geometric aft-hood deflector angle when the nozzle throat was positioned upstream of the deflector exit. Significant losses in resultant thrust ratio occurred when the aft-hood deflector was deployed with an upstream throat location. At each aft-hood deflector angle, repositioning the throat to the deflector exit improved pitch vectoring performance and, in some cases, substantially improved resultant thrust ratio performance. Transferring the throat to the deflector exit allowed the flow to be turned upstream of the throat at subsonic Mach numbers, thereby eliminating losses associated with turning supersonic flow. Internal throat panel deflections were largely unsuccessful in generating yaw vectoring.
Here, we derived first and second order analytic aberration formulas in the horizontal transverse plane for an electrostatic deflector specified by the reference orbit radius, the central angle spanning the deflector, and its inhomogeneity coefficients. The derivation was performed using an iterative order-by-order perturbation method in a Frenet–Serret beamline coordinate system. We produced a C program edabrt for calculation of the first and second order aberrations using the formulas that we derived. The electrostatic deflector aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) disagree with COSY INFINITY and the aberration formulas that we derived here, and they also deviate from the first and second order symplecticity conditions. The reason for this discrepancy is that the aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) consider only motion in the main field of the deflector and do not properly account for fringe field effects, in particular the necessarily occurring change of kinetic energy due to the change in potential. The code GIOS uses electrostatic aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) and exhibits the same discrepancy. We performed a comparison of first and second order electrostatic deflector aberrations for (1) the analytic formulas derived in this work, (2) differential-algebraic (DA) numerical integration of the equations of motion using the code COSY INFINITY, (3) the aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965), (4) aberrations computed using the code GIOS, and (5) the aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) adjusted to account for the occurring change in potential. An electrostatic spherical deflector and an electrostatic cylindrical deflector were used as test cases for this comparison. There is excellent agreement between methods (1), (2), and (5), and these three methods satisfy the first and second order symplecticity conditions.
This paper presents the updated ablative analysis methods used to determine Artemis 1 launch load environment on the flame deflector for the design based on Artemis I Assessments. The flame trench under Pad 39B at Kennedy Space Center contains a flame deflector to safely divert the exhaust plume from the SLS rocket during launch. During launch of Artemis I the refurbished flame trench and the new flame deflector experienced peak temperatures of over 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit (over 1,000 degrees Celsius) for several seconds. These extreme conditions caused ablation (material removal) from the steel plates. This paper contains flame deflector heat flux values for design based on Artemis I assessment. Post flight images of the flame deflector are shown along with “Pre vs Post” Flame Deflector scan image to measure the post flight deviations. Using COMSOL, a method to calculate a heat flux value due to measured deviations in the deflector plates caused by ablation is shown.
Numerical solutions are obtained for the cases of straight circular jets impinging on axisymmetric curved surfaces and plane jets impinging symmetrically on two-dimensional curved surfaces. These geometries are representative of some types of thrust reversers for transport aircraft. The solutions are based on the assumptions of incompressible and potential flow. The velocity field, pressure distribution at the deflector surface and reverser effectiveness are predicted for deflector turning angles of 15 to 75 deg, deflector width to jet diameter ratios of 1.5 to 2.0, and ratios of deflector clearance to jet diameter of 1.0 to 3.0. Reverser effectiveness is found to be a maximum for a ratio of deflector clearance to jet diameter of about 2.0. The effect of back pressuring due to the presence of the deflector is predicted. Experimental verification of the theoretical predictions is obtained. A compressible solution obtained for a limited number of cases indicates that the incompressible solution is satisfactory for jet exit Mach numbers less than 0.8.
Numerical solutions are obtained for the cases of straight circular jets impinging on axisymmetric curved surfaces, and plane jets impinging symmetrically on two-dimensional curved surfaces. These geometries are representative of some types of thrust reversers for transport aircraft. The solutions are based on the assumptions of incompressible and potential flow. The velocity field, pressure distribution at the deflector surface, and reverser effectiveness are predicted for deflector turning angles of 15 to 75 deg, deflector width to jet diameter ratios of 1.5-2.0, and ratios of deflector clearance to jet diameter of 1.0-3.0. Reverser effectiveness is found to be a maximum for a ratio of deflector clearance to jet diameter of about 2.0. The effect of back pressuring resulting from the presence of the deflector is predicted.
Acoustic spectral data obtained from a model-scale study of several over the wing (OTW) configurations with a 5:1 slot nozzle using various external deflectors are correlated in terms of deflector geometry and flow parameters. Variations in the deflector geometry include deflector size and deflector angle. In addition, geometry variations in flap setting and nozzle chordwise location are included. Three dominant noise sources are correlated: fluctuating lift noise, flap trailing edge noise, and jet mixing noise. Aerodynamic characteristics including lift and thrust measurements, obtained for the various configurations are summarized.
Acoustic spectral data obtained from a model-scale study of several OTW configurations with a 5:1 slot nozzle using various external deflectors are correlated in terms of deflector geometry and flow parameters. Variations in the deflector geometry include deflector size and deflector angle. In addition, geometry variations in flap setting and nozzle chordwise location are included. Three dominant noise sources are correlated: fluctuating lift noise, flap trailing edge noise, and jet mixing noise. Aerodynamic characteristics, including lift and thrust measurements, obtained for the various configurations are summarized.
In this work we performed an analysis of the derivation of first and second order analytic aberration formulas by Wollnik (1965) for the case of electrostatic deflectors in the horizontal plane. We found that these aberration formulas are valid for the main field of the deflector; however, they do not account for any fringe field effects. To address this issue, we modified the aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) for a hard edge fringe field by scaling the particle inclinations at the entrance and exit edges of the deflector. These modified aberration formulas fully agree with electrostatic aberration formulas derived by Valetov and Berz (2020), as well as with differential-algebraic (DA) calculations of electrostatic deflector aberrations using the code COSY INFINITY.
The effect of geometry variations in the design of external deflectors for use with over-the-wing (OTW) configurations was studied at model scale and subsonic jet velocities. Included in the variations were deflector size and angle as well as wing size and flap setting. A conical nozzle (5.2-cm diameter) mounted at 0.1 chord above and downstream of the wing leading edges was used. The data indicate that external deflectors provide satisfactory takeoff and approach aerodynamic performance and acoustic characteristics for OTW configurations. These characteristics together with expected good cruise aerodynamics, since external deflectors are storable, may provide optimum OTW design configurations.
The effect of geometry variations in the design of external deflectors for use with OTW configurations was studied at model scale and subsonic jet velocities. Included in the variations were deflector size and angle as well as wing size and flap setting. A conical nozzle (5.2-cm diameter) mounted at 0.1 chord above and downstream of the wing leading edges was used. The data indicate that external deflectors provide satisfactory take-off and approach aerodynamic performance and acoustic characteristics for OTW configurations. These characteristics together with expected good cruise aerodynamics, since external deflectors are storable, may provide optimum OTW design configurations.
Future STOL aircraft may utilize engine-over-the-wing installations in which the exhaust nozzles are located above and separated from the upper surface of the wing. An external jet flow deflector can be used with such installations to provide flow attachment to the wing/flap surfaces for lift augmentation. Deflector noise in the flyover plane measured with several model-scale nozzle/deflector/wing configurations is examined. The deflector-associated noise is correlated in terms of velocity and geometry parameters. The data also indicate that the effective overall sound pressure level of the deflector-associated noise peaks in the forward quadrant near 40 deg from the inlet axis.
Future STOL aircraft may utilize engine-over-the-wing (OTW) installations in which the exhaust nozzles are located above and separated from the upper surface of the wing. An external jet-flow deflector can be used with such installations to provide flow attachment to the wing/flap surfaces for lift augmentation. In the present work, the deflector noise in the flyover plane measured with several model-scale nozzle/deflector/wing configurations is examined. The deflector-associated noise is correlated in terms of velocity and geometry parameters. The data also indicate that the effective overall sound pressure level of the deflector-associated noise peaks in the forward quadrant near 40 deg from the inlet axis.
Noise data were obtained with a small scale model stationary STOL configuration that used an eight lobe mixer nozzle with deflector mounted above a 32-cm-chord wing section. The factors varied to determine their effect upon the noise were wing flap angle, nozzle shape, nozzle location, deflector configuration, and jet velocity. The noise from the mixer nozzle model was compared to the noise from a model using a circular nozzle of the same area. The mixer nozzle model was quieter at the low to middle frequencies, while the circular nozzle was quieter at high frequencies. The perceived noise level (PNL) was calculated for an aircraft 10 times larger than the model. The PNL at 500 feet for the mixer nozzle turned out to be within 1 db of the PNL for the circular nozzle. For some configurations at highly directional broadband noise, which could be eliminated by changes in nozzle and/or deflector location, occurred below the wing.
This paper presents analytical conclusions resulting from subscale solid rocket motor tests and flowfield modeling for a plume deflector. Loads, flow characteristics, and corresponding material behavior were predicted or observed and will be used in final design of the deflector. The efforts resulted in quantifiable size reductions and lower cost material selections, which will significantly reduce the deflector cost while meeting performance requirements.