Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “depletion benchmark”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Depletion Benchmark of the AFIP-7 Experiment in the Advanced Test Reactor

Reactor physics depletion benchmarks for low-enriched uranium fuel are limited in number. In particular, there is very limited data for LEU benchmarks for U-10Mo (Uranium-10% Molybdenum) plate fuel developed for use in U.S. high-performance research reactors (USHPRR). USHPRR includes the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), Advanced Test Reactor Critical Facility (ATR-C), High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR), and National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR) at the National Institute of Science and Technology. These reactors are fueled with high-enriched uranium dispersed fuel in a silicon/aluminum matrix. In support of conversion to a HALEU fuel, qualification of U-10Mo formed into a monolithic foil is being performed. Fuel qualification involves irradiated fueled specimens in the ATR. The irradiation tests provide an opportunity to benchmark depletion capabilities of reactor physics codes in support of the ATR operation, as well as develop benchmarks that can be used by other institutions to benchmark other reactor physics codes. This report documents the development of a benchmark model of the irradiation of the ATR Full -size plate In center flux trap Position 7 (AFIP-7) experiment.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Depletion benchmark for a high-assay low-enriched uranium fuel experiment in the advanced test reactor

Reactor physics depletion benchmarks for high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) fuel are limited in number. In particular, there is limited data for HALEU benchmarks for U-10Mo (uranium-10% molybdenum) plate fuel that is being developed for use in the United States’ high performance research reactors including the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), Advanced Test Reactor Critical Facility (ATR-C), High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR), University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR), National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR). These six reactors currently operate with highly enriched uranium dispersed fuel in an aluminum matrix. In support of conversion to a HALEU fuel, qualification of U-10Mo formed into a monolithic foil is being performed. Fuel qualification involves irradiating fuel specimens in the ATR. The irradiation tests provide an opportunity to benchmark depletion capabilities of reactor physics codes in support of the ATR operation, as well as develop benchmarks that can be used by other institutions to benchmark other reactor physics codes. This paper documents the development of a benchmark model of the irradiation of the ATR Full-size plate In center flux trap Position 7 (AFIP-7) experiment using the depletion codes MC21 and Advanced Dimensional Depletion for Engineering of Reactors (ADDER).

Nielsen, Joseph W. [Idaho National Laboratory (INL↗
DOE OSTI2022

MCS solutions for the TVA Watts Bar Unit 1 multi-physics depletion benchmark

The high-fidelity solution for exercises 1-3 of the recently developed TVA Watts Bar Unit 1 multi-physics and multi-cycle depletion benchmark using MCS was coupled with two different thermal-hydraulics (TH) codes: TH1D and COBRA-TF (CTF), and their solutions were compared. The solutions from MCS/CTF and MCS/TH1D for typical Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) problems are quite close. And to evaluate MCS solutions for the benchmark, their results were also compared against measured data as well as publicly available high-fidelity solutions. The MCS criticality solutions at Hot Zero Power (HZP) deviate within 50 pcm against the reference solutions. While for the critical boron concentration (CBC) search calculations, the difference on the MCS calculated CBC is about 7 ppm, and the root-mean-squared (RMS) errors for the assembly power distribution and outlet coolant temperature are less than 0.5% and 1 Celsius degree respectively. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Depletion Benchmark Analysis on a Lead Fast Reactor Using PyARC/OpenMC

PyARC is a user-friendly fast reactor analysis tool that automates multiphysics workflows using the “extended suite” of Argonne Reactor Computation (ARC) codes by providing a single common input for model definition, code execution, and output post-processing. A lead fast reactor (LFR) benchmark model is used to perform depletion calculations using the newly integrated OpenMC depletion capability in PyARC, building on previous analysis using the ARC codes through PyARC and Serpent. Results for core lifetime k-effective, shutdown decay heat, and end-of-life heavy-metal inventory are compared to verify the PyARC/OpenMC integration against the PyARC/ARC workflow and Serpent for depletion analysis of LFR designs. The results show satisfactory agreement among all three methods, with remaining discrepancies largely attributable to differences in nuclear data libraries and decay-chain modeling detail rather than to fundamental modeling limitations.

Kiesling, Kalin R.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Status of the OECD/NEA Watts Bar unit 1 benchmark and calculations of local reactor core power data of the Zero Power physics tests

The paper aims to provide an update on the status of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) / the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Watts Bar 1 (WB1) Multi-Physics Multi-Cycle depletion benchmark and the results associated with Exercise 1. The benchmark relies on the set of benchmark progression problems developed by the Department of Energy (DOE) Consortium for the Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) for the Virtual Environment for Reactor (VERA), which are based on real plant design and operational data. The OECD/NEA TVA WB1 benchmark is designed for validation of both traditional and novel high-fidelity multi-physics codes to analyze Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR) depletion cycles. The activities are conducted under the Expert Group on Reactor Systems Multi-Physics (EGMUP) at NEA/OECD. In this work, we analyze Exercise 1 of the benchmark: stand-alone Three-Dimensional (3D) neutronics at Start-up Zero Power Physics Test (ZPPT) at Hot Zero Power Conditions (HZP) and the resulting power maps. The code used to model the exercise is the continuous energy Monte Carlo code Serpent 2.1.31 along with the nuclear data library ENDF/B-VII.1. Serpent results are compared with the high-fidelity deterministic code MPACT, which is part of VERA. The paper presents three selected results from power calculations required output. The results compared are the normalized axially integrated radial core power maps, the normalized axial averaged core power shapes, and the normalized core hottest and coldest assemblies radial power maps. The Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) between Serpent and MPACT is 0.51 % for the axially integrated radial core power map, 1.41 % for the axial averaged core power shape, 2.42 % for the hottest assembly axial power shape, 0.88 % for the coldest assembly axial integrated hottest assembly radial pin power map, and 0.17 % for the axially integrated coldest assembly radial pin power map. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Monte Carlo neutronics benchmarks on nuclear fuel depletion: A review

Monte Carlo (MC) neutronics codes are used widely for academic and industrial needs. Several schemes of coupling MC neutronics code with isotope generation and depletion code exist, which are used for performing nuclear fuel depletion simulations. These simulations can estimate the inventory of isotopes in neutron irradiated nuclear reactor fuel. However, the accuracy of these simulations shall be validated through experiments. MC codes are seldom validated by isotopic benchmarks compared to criticality benchmarks. This work compiles and analyzes the fuel depletion benchmarks and validations used to analyze the performance of MC-based fuel depletion neutronics codes. Analyses of these benchmarks and validations showed that the computed concentrations of 133 Cs, 135 Cs, 137 Cs, 148 Nd, 239 Pu, 240 Pu, and 241 Pu in the irradiated fuel by the depletion codes agreed with the measured values within 10% error. However, the computed concentrations of 125 Sb, 242 Cm, 243 Cm, 244 Cm, 245 Cm, and 246 Cm had errors more than 15% compared to the measured values. As a result, Ventina depletion code showed the most accurate predictions for the greatest number of isotope concentrations compared to ORIGEN2 and CINDER90.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Benchmark for Fuel Shuffling and Depletion for Pebble-Bed Reactors

Pebble bed reactors have specific operational characteristics when their fuel-cycle and fueling operations are considered. They are specifically distinguished by other type of nuclear reactor designs by their online fuel recycling scheme, where the fuel elements that have not yet reached discharge burnup can be reloaded and recycled continuously during normal operation. The fuel in a pebble bed reactor is not stationary and stochastically moves through the core once or several times during its lifetime, which allows them to operate without requiring a large excess reactivity hold for the burnup. However, this characteristic of pebble bed reactors introduces challenges in simulation, as each pebble can take many different trajectories through the core, its composition depends on the details of the irradiation history that is unique to its aggregated path through the core. For predicting the safety performance characteristics, such as source term, maximum fuel temperatures and fuel failure rates, etc., it is important to accurately incorporate the movement of pebbles through the core during their lifetime in a multi-physics simulation together with other phenomena. The equilibrium core analysis for pebble bed reactors are performed with multi-physics tools including fuel depletion in a multi pass reload coupled to the fuel movement. Currently, there are only a few legacy multi-physics simulation tools that can implement the pebble flow characteristics and perform equilibrium core analysis for pebble bed reactors. However, there are development efforts on-going under Department of Energy's Nuclear Energy Advanced Modelling and Simulation program and also in private industry for including these capabilities into their modelling and simulation tools. Any new development in the modelling and simulation tools needs to be validated by using tools such as experiments, analytical solutions or code-to-code benchmarks. In this work, a code-to-code benchmark for the equilibrium core analysis capability of pebble bed reactors was developed. Multiple cases were identified to capture different fuel cycle strategies that can be used in PBRs. The results of each case are presented in terms of overall equilibrium core characteristics: the discharge burnup; spatial burnup distribution; spatial isotopic distributions; axial and radial neutron flux distributions and power history of fuel elements per pass through the core for both a prototypical pebble bed High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor and a prototypical pebble bed Fluoride-salt cooled High temperature Reactor.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Studsvik R2 materials test reactor Ad Hoc depletion strategy for the derivation of the fuel isotopic composition of the MPCMIV benchmark

The Ad Hoc Depletion Strategy elaborated by the NINE company, developed in support of the organization of the MPCMIV (Multi-physics Pellet Cladding Mechanical Interaction Validation) benchmark input and output specifications, is presented. This work aims at illustrating the strategy itself and then showing the results obtained with its application over the Studsvik R2 Testing Reactor, which is analyzed in the benchmark. The objective of the application of the strategy is to compute the fuel elements isotopic compositions at the beginning of some core loadings of interest for the benchmark. To this objective, it is necessary to implement first the simulation model of the three single assembly types and perform the infinite lattice depletions, then, to build the full core model and to perform the simulation of the core cycle. All the models and simulations were carried out with the use of the Monte Carlo particle transport code Serpent 2. Finally, the simulations results are assessed against Studsvik isotopic compositions of the fuel elements discharged from the R2 Reactor at the end of the core loading. Several assumptions were necessary during all the steps of the strategy, to overcome the lack of information regarding the core management. For this reason, the solution found at the end of the current analysis may not be completely optimized and further improvements regarding the model assumptions will be tested in a future work. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Relevant Advanced Reactor Benchmarks for Nuclear Data Assessment

Advanced reactor concepts currently being developed throughout the industry are significantly different from light water reactor (LWR) designs with respect to geometry, materials, and operating conditions, and consequently, with respect to their reactor physics behavior. Given the limited operating experience with non-LWRs, the accurate simulation of reactor physics and the quantification of associated uncertainties are critical for ensuring that advanced reactor concepts operate within the appropriate safety margins. Nuclear data are a major source of input uncertainties in reactor physics analysis. As part of an ongoing project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the effects of nuclear data uncertainties on key figures of merit associated with advanced reactor safety are being assessed for selected advanced reactor technologies. Key nuclear data relevant for reactor safety analysis for each selected advanced reactor technology were identified in Phase 1, and their impact on important key figures of merit was assessed in Phase 2. This report describes the outcome of Phase 3. Available benchmarks and fuel irradiation data for use in evaluating the impact of uncertainties and gaps in nuclear data that impact reactivity control for advanced reactor designs through the fuel cycle were identified and assessed. Benchmarks were identified by searching (1) the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) handbook, (2) the OCED/NEA International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) handbook, (3) ongoing OECD/NEA benchmark activities, and (4) documentation in public literature. Relevant benchmarks were identified by selecting reactors with geometry, materials, and neutron energy spectra similar to those of selected advanced reactor technologies. This assessment identified six benchmarks, of which three are experimental and three are purely computational. One experimental and one computation benchmark contain depleted fuel; all others are limited to fresh fuel. This report provides short descriptions of the selected benchmarks along with the availability of measured data for comparison.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Validation of Fast Reactor Depletion Tools Using EBR-II Measured Data

The validation of simulation tools for calculating fuel depletion and evolution in fast reactors is vital for design, licensing, deployment, operations, and material accountancy. The Physics Analysis Database (PADB) and Analytical Laboratory (AL) database contain measured data collected from Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) and were used to validate the most recent versions of the Argonne Reactor Computation (ARC) tool suite and ORIGEN-S for calculating isotopic compositions in irradiated fast reactor fuel. The PADB contains important modeling and operational information about the EBR-II core design, fuel cycle, and analytical results from the legacy versions of the ARC tool suite. The AL database contains the measured isotopic compositions of irradiated samples taken from core subassemblies. A new procedure was developed for the ARC tool suite to perform the EBR-II depletion simulation, as well as to perform more detailed isotopic calculations using ORIGEN-S calculations by coupling it with the ARC suite. Both the ARC and ARC-ORIGEN results were compared with the AL measured data for all relevant samples and showed good agreement for the major actinides. Good agreement with measured data was also achieved using the ARC-ORIGEN approach for several fission products.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Summary Report of the FY24 DOE Contributions to the GIF VHTR CMVB

The Generation-IV Forum (GIF) Very-High-Temperature Reactor-Computational Methods Validation and Benchmark (VHTR-CMVB) initiative, involving organizations from Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) (South Korea), Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology of Tsinghua University (INET) (China), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (U.S.), Joint Research Centre (JRC) (Europe), and Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) (Japan), is dedicated to the verification and validation of tools for High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors (HTGRs) analysis, using data shared by Computational Methods Validation and Benchmark (CMVB) signatories. For FY24, the US DOE CMVB has committed to several critical activities. Under WP1, led by the US, the integration of the High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor - Pebble-Bed Module (HTR-PM) Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) into the comparative PIRT is progressing, with a new draft of the comparison tables issued earlier this year and currently being utilized by INET for their contribution. Neutronic validation efforts under WP3 include the preparation of the burnup analysis benchmark, preliminary calculations, and the development of reference models and results. In WP2, a validation exercise for hot gas mixing in the lower plenum of HTR-PM is in progress, using experimental data from INET (China) to validate modeling approaches. A model of the experimental facility has been developed using StarCCM+, with initial calculations slated for presentation at the GIF CMVB meeting this fall. Another WP2 activity focuses on validating numerical models for air-cooled Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS) with experimental data from the Wisconsin Madison RCCS facility. A high-fidelity model, developed using NEK-RS, is currently being validated with available data from a low power forced convection test. These efforts are aimed at enhancing and confirming the accuracy of HTGR analysis tools, ensuring their alignment with experimental data and regulatory requirements.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

FY22 Progress on Computational Modeling of the Water-Based NSTF

This report summarizes the system-level modeling effort by Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) of the Natural convection Shutdown heat removal Test Facility (NSTF) in FY22. As an extension of the effort from FY21, this year’s work focuses primarily on the two-phase modeling of the NSTF using RELAP5-3D, particularly with the inclusion of the cavity model. The results from simulations were used to compare against experimental data for benchmarking purposes of the RELAP5 deck. Additionally, RELAP5 was used as a predictive tool to guide planned test operations and identify expected system behaviors. In the first part of this report, details are provided of the cavity omitted model where heat flux is applied directly as a boundary condition to the risers. The general trend predicted by the RELAP5 model matches that from the experimental data when a single-phase natural circulation flow is first established, followed by an oscillatory two-phase period and finally a stable two-phase flow. However, the onset of oscillations is predicted early by the model due to the smaller thermal mixing region in the tank. However, by expanding the simulated thermal mixing region in the tank, the onset of oscillations predicted by the model is able to match that from the experiment. These oscillations where studied in depth and are deduced to be flashing-induced instability. The model was then modified to simulate an accident scenario case where a representative heat load based on the full-scale Framatome’s 625 MW t SC-HTGR was applied directly to the riser channels. The simulated initial and boundary conditions were identical to those performed experimentally, facilitating direct comparisons between the predicted and experimental results. It was determined that the results showed some discrepancies remain, likely due to the overprediction of vapor generation rate by the computer model. In the second part of this report, the cavity model is re-introduced where it is observed that the RELAP5 prediction is now able to capture the major trends of the observed flow commonly observed during two-phase conditions. However, the onset of oscillations is once again predicted early by the model, possibly caused by the underprediction of heat loss from the heater and cavity. This is likely due to the omission of support structures in the cavity that can act as additional pathways for heat to escape to the environment. To overcome the underprediction of heat loss, part of the insulation surrounding the cavity side panels and the back of the heaters are removed to allow heat to escape directly to the environment, which then improves the RELAP5 prediction. Parametric studies are also performed to investigate the effects of heater power, tank inventory level, and tank gas space pressure on flow behaviors, also in direct comparison to conditions tested experimentally. User option-61 in the RELAP5-3D input deck, which changes the heat transfer coefficient correlations used for calculating the vapor generation, is also investigated where it is found that by enabling the option, the overall duration of oscillations is increased and matches that from the experiment better. The RELAP5 model is further benchmarked with a header inlet- throttling case where it is observed that the prediction from the model fails to capture some major features observed in the experiment. By using a modified loss coefficient curve for the valve, the accuracy of the prediction is improved where most of the major features observed in the experiment are predicted by the model. Lastly, the model is benchmarked with an inventory depletion scenario where it is observed that despite the modeling limitation of RELAP5, the prediction shows good agreement with the experimental data where major trends and features are captured by the model. Future work will see continued development of the current RELAP5-3D input deck of the NSTF to both improve the accuracy of the model’s predictive capability and continuing serving the experimental program. The mutually beneficial relationship between analysis and experimental efforts has become integral to the parent NSTF program, and the greater objective to fully understand and accurately predict the heat removal performance of a full scale RCCS concept.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Neutronic Characteristics of ENDF/B-VIII.0 Compared to ENDF/B-VII.1 for Light-Water Reactor Analysis

The Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF)/B-VIII.0 data library was released in 2018. To assess the new data during development and shortly after release, many validation calculations were performed with static, room-temperature benchmarks. Recently, when performing validation of ENDF/B-VIII.0 for pressurized water reactor depletion calculations, a regression in performance compared to ENDF/B-VII.1 was observed. This paper documents extensive benchmark calculations for light-water reactors performed using continuous energy Monte Carlo code with ENDF/B-VII.1 and -VIII.0 and neutronic characteristics of ENDF/B-VIII.0 are discussed and compared to those of ENDF/B-VII.1. It is our recommendation that ENDF/B data library assessment should include reactor-specific benchmark assessments, including depletion cases, such that these types of regressions may be caught earlier in the data development cycle.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Assessment of ORIGEN Reactor Library Development for Pebble-Bed Reactors Based on the PBMR-400 Benchmark

This report provides an evaluation of present SCALE capabilities for modeling depletion of pebble-bed reactor systems, using the PBMR-400 benchmark as a test case. A specific aim of this work is to understand the system characteristics required to generate production-quality reactor data libraries for rapid depletion calculations with ORIGEN. This report includes a discussion of present SCALE capabilities for modeling doubly heterogeneous fuels, prior SCALE work modeling pebble bed–type reactors, and a detailed neutronic analysis of the PBMR-400 core for both fresh and equilibrium-composition core conditions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Energy deposition model in STREAM with photon transport

Recent efforts have been taken to implement a photon transport module for the neutron transport analysis code STREAM, considering the explicit photon energy distribution in the problem instead of using the locally deposition assumption as employed in previous STREAM versions. The current energy release model in STREAM based on the On-the-fly energy released per fission model is modified accordingly to account for the photon energy deposition computed explicitly by this module. The impacts of the modified energy release model with photon transport in STREAM on the power distribution, fuel temperature and other core parameters during depletion with feedback calculations are studied on several problems from the VERA benchmark suit. Overall, the photon transport provides a better power map for depletion and feedback calculations, especially when strong gamma emitters are present. The fuel temperature, in general, is decreased when the photon transport is employed because fission gammas have been transported out of their birthplace. The new energy deposition model in STREAM with photon transport indicates that gamma energy accounts for about 9.7% of the total energy released in a fresh VERA5 2D core and rises to 10.5% at the End of Cycle. Around 2.5% of the total energy released will be deposited in the coolant in this 2D core. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

HTGR Simulation Methods & International Collaborations

ART-GCR “Methods” activity is split between Experimental Validation data from the ANL NSTF and OSU HTTF (next three presentations). HTGR core simulation (this presentation). International collaboration within OECD Generation-IV (Gen-IV) and USA/Japan bi-lateral agreements (this presentation) HTGR Simulation Methods No new NE-52 funding for HTGR Methods support in FY20; ~$200K FY19 carry-over funds only. Consists of international code-to-code benchmarks (IAEA CRP on HTGR UAM and OECD/NEA MHTGR-350) and refinement of a few-group Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) cross section (XS) generation methodology. Funding will be requested in FY21 to produce the final reports for the two benchmarks and continue the development of the PBR XS generation methodology. Additional (non-ART) HTGR-related support work at INL NEAMS: HTR-Application work package at INL Create a benchmark for the pebble shuffling and depletion algorithms being developed for NEAMS Griffin code. iFOA award with X-Energy: Develop independent Monte Carlo model of Xe-100 design. Independent design confirmatory analysis of Xe-100 design using NEAMS tools Griffin and Pronghorn. Support X-Energy design team to use their own legacy design tools (VSOP99 and MGT). Support NEAMS Griffin and Pronghorn development team for the iFOA needs (received $50K additional funding for required development).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Gamma and Neutron Measurement and Modeling of Irradiated TRISO Fuel

Given the unique characteristics of the PBR fuel cycle, both gamma and neutron measurements are expected to play important roles in performing and maintaining nuclear material control and accounting for spent pebbles to safeguard the fuel cycle. Given the lack of irradiated pebbles in the US, a variety of irradiated TRISO fuel samples with wide ranges of burnups and cooling times available at ORNL were used in this work. A large number of gamma and neutron measurements have been performed on these samples to collect data to test the various detectors and to benchmark the computer models to simulate the depletion and decay of the fuel and the measurements themselves. Two neutron detectors, including a custom-made detector and the Very High-Performance Neutron Multiplicity Counting, were used to measure the neutrons emitted by these TRISO samples. Three gamma spectrometry detectors, including an HPGe and the M400 CZT detector, were used to measure gamma-ray emissions from these samples. The M400 was recently adopted by the IAEA for fresh uranium measurements, but it was tested for spent fuel measurements prior to this project. Detailed MCNP models were developed to simulate these neutron and gamma measurements. Some GADRAS models were also developed to cross check the MCNP models for the gamma measurements. It was found challenging to perform neutron measurements in the hot cell due to the high background counts. Close agreements were observed between the simulated and measured neutron count rates in both detectors’ measurements of californium calibration sources. Both the HPGe and M400 detectors were able to measure the 604 and 662 keV peaks from these samples, which are the two most important peaks used to infer fuel burnup. Although the M400 detector did not have nearly good energy resolution and did not detect some of the minor peaks as the HPGe detector, it was found to be capable of handling significantly higher dose rates than HPGe. Given the complexities in the TRISO samples (e.g., different samples sizes) and uncertainties in the alignments between the detector and the TRISO fuel inside the containers, large scatters were found between the peak area rates and the samples’ burnups. However, the 604/662 peak ratios were found to trend well with the samples’ burnups among most samples in both measured and simulated results.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗