Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “direct acoustics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2009

Acoustically Induced Vibration of Structures: Reverberant Vs. Direct Acoustic Testing

Large reverberant chambers have been used for several decades in the aerospace industry to test larger structures such as solar arrays and reflectors to qualify and to detect faults in the design and fabrication of spacecraft and satellites. In the past decade some companies have begun using direct near field acoustic testing, employing speakers, for qualifying larger structures. A limited test data set obtained from recent acoustic tests of the same hardware exposed to both direct and reverberant acoustic field testing has indicated some differences in the resulting structural responses. In reverberant acoustic testing, higher vibration responses were observed at lower frequencies when compared with the direct acoustic testing. In the case of direct near field acoustic testing higher vibration responses appeared to occur at higher frequencies as well. In reverberant chamber testing and direct acoustic testing, standing acoustic modes of the reverberant chamber or the speakers and spacecraft parallel surfaces can strongly couple with the fundamental structural modes of the test hardware. In this paper data from recent acoustic testing of flight hardware, that yielded evidence of acoustic standing wave coupling with structural responses, are discussed in some detail. Convincing evidence of the acoustic standing wave/structural coupling phenomenon will be discussed, citing observations from acoustic testing of a simple aluminum plate. The implications of such acoustic coupling to testing of sensitive flight hardware will be discussed. The results discussed in this paper reveal issues with over or under testing of flight hardware that could pose unanticipated structural and flight qualification issues. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to understand the structural modal coupling with standing acoustic waves that has been observed in both methods of acoustic testing. This study will assist the community to choose an appropriate testing method and test setup in the planning stages.

Reverberant acoustic field↗
NASA NTRS1999

Direct Acoustic Test of QuikSCAT Spacecraft

A direct acoustic test was perfomed on the QuikSCAT spacecraft at Ball Aerospace Technology Corporation (BATC) in Boulder, Colorado, in October 1998. The QuikSCAT spacecraft was designed and built by BATC in an accelerated, one-year, program managed by the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

force↗
NASA NTRS1977

Aerodynamic and directional acoustic performance of a scoop inlet

Aerodynamic and directional acoustic performances of a scoop inlet were studied. The scoop inlet is designed with a portion of the lower cowling extended forward to direct upward any noise that is propagating out the front of the engine toward the ground. The tests were conducted in an anechoic wind tunnel facility at free stream velocities of 0, 18, 41, and 61 m/sec and angles of attack from -10 deg to 120 deg. Inlet throat Mach number was varied from 0.30 to 0.75. Aerodynamically, at a free stream velocity of 41 m/sec, the design throat Mach number (0.63), and an angle of attack of 50 deg, the scoop inlet total pressure recovery was 0.989 and the total pressure distortion was 0.15. The angles of attack where flow separation occurred with the scoop inlet were higher than those for a conventional symmetric inlet. Acoustically, the scoop inlet provided a maximum noise reduction of 12 to 15 db below the inlet over the entire range of throat Mach number and angle of attack at a free-stream velocity of 41 m/sec.

Abbott, J. M.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Acoustic Directivity of the DGEN Aero-propulsion Research Turbofan at Multiple Farfield Array Locations

The NASA Glenn Research Center's DGEN Aero-propulsion Research Turbofan (DART) is based on the Price Induction DGEN380 a small, ~500-lbf thrust class, high-bypass, geared-turbofan engine with a separate flow nozzle. The general characteristics of the DART make it an ideal candidate for utilization as a test bed for engine aeroacoustic research in a relevant performance environment. To provide a baseline acoustic profile for the DART, the system was tested in the NASA Glenn Research Center's Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory. Acoustic measurements from multiple external arrays locations were acquired over the nominal fan operating range of 50-95%. The acoustic data are evaluated and reported in terms of overall, broadband, and tonal components. The existence of interaction tones (a result of the physics of the dual-spool interactions) are noted and presented. The symmetry of the acoustic directivity was measured in preparation for potential testing in other facilities.

Turbofan Engine↗
NASA NTRS2018

Acoustic Directivity of the DGEN Aero-propulsion Research Turbofan at Multiple Farfield Array Locations

The NASA Glenn Research Center's DGEN Aero-propulsion Research Turbofan (DART) is based on the Price Induction DGEN380 - a small, ~500-lbf thrust class, high-bypass, geared-turbofan engine with a separate flow nozzle. The general characteristics of the DART make it an ideal candidate for utilization as a test bed for engine aeroacoustic research in a relevant performance environment. To provide a baseline acoustic profile for the DART, the system was tested in the NASA Glenn Research Center's Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory. Acoustic measurements from multiple external arrays locations were acquired over the nominal fan operating range of 50-95%. The acoustic data are evaluated and reported in terms of overall, broadband, and tonal components. The existence of interaction tones (a result of the physics of the dual-spool interactions) are noted and presented. The symmetry of the acoustic directivity was measured in preparation for potential testing in other facilities.

Turbofan↗
DOE OSTI2025

Towards more accurate sound field verification using directional acoustic filtering

Attributing omnidirectional sound levels to a specific source in the ocean can be challenging when there are multiple competing sources of sound such as boats, or biological activity. Here, we present a method to directionally filter acoustic measurements based on vector measurements of acoustic pressure and particle velocity. The directional discrimination is applied to estimate sound energy from two marine energy sources: sound generated during the decommissioning of an oil platform and those from an operating tidal energy converter. The application of a directional mask leads to distinctly different spectra and some differences in energy, relative to the unmasked scenarios.

Barosin, Emily (ORCID:0009000765495939)↗
DOE OSTI2020

Assessing the Vulnerability of Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Directed Acoustic Energy

The increasingly large payloads of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs) are exponentially increasing the threat to the nuclear enterprise. Current mitigation using RF interference is effective, but not feasible for fully autonomous systems and is prohibited in many areas. A new approach to UAS threat mitigation is needed that does not create radio interference but is effective against any type of vehicle. At the present time there is no commercial counter-UAS system that directly assaults the mems gyros and accelerometers in the Inertial Measurement Unit on the aircraft. But lab testing has revealed resonances in some IMUs that make them susceptible to moderate amplitude acoustic monotones. Sandia's energetic materials facility has enabled a quick and thorough exploration of UAS vulnerability to directed acoustic energy by using intense acoustic impulses to destabilize or down a UAS. We have: 1) detonated/deflagrated explosive charges of various sizes; 2) accurately measured impulse pressure and pulse duration; 3) determined what magnitude of acoustic insult to the IMU disrupts flight and for how long and; 4) determined if the air blast/shock wave on aircraft/propellers disrupts flight.

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRS1976

Directional acoustic measurements by laser Doppler velocimeters

Laser Doppler velocimeters (LDVs) are used as velocity microphones to measure sound pressure level in the range from 90 to 130 dB, spectral components, and two-point correlation functions for acoustic-noise source identification. Close agreement between LDV and microphone data is observed. Directional sensitivity and the ability to measure remotely make LDVs useful tools for acoustic measurement where placement of any physical probe is difficult or undesirable, as in the diagnosis of jet noise.

Mazumder, M. K.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Directional acoustic measurements by laser Doppler velocimeters

Laser Doppler velocimeters (LDVs) were used as velocity microphones to measure sound pressure level in the range of 90-130 db, spectral components, and two-point cross correlation functions for acoustic noise source identification. Close agreement between LDV and microphone data is observed. It was concluded that directional sensitivity and the ability to measure remotely make LDVs useful tools for acoustic measurement where placement of any physical probe is difficult or undesirable, as in the diagnosis of jet aircraft noise.

Mazumder, M. K.↗
NASA NTRS1974

High-directivity acoustic antenna

Acoustic antenna with unique electronic steering control is used to identify and define aerodynamic noise sources in free field, particularly in wind tunnel which is quite reverberant. Provision is made for high directivity as well as improved discrimination against unwanted background noise such as reverberation or echoes.

El-Sum, H. M. A.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Acoustic Directivity and Insertion Loss Measurements of Advanced Liners Installed the Inlet of the DGEN Aeropropulsion Research Turbofan

The NASA Glenn Research Center’s DGEN Aeropropulsion Research Turbofan (DART) is based on the Price Induction DGEN380—a small, ~500-lbf thrust class, high-bypass, geared-turbofan engine with a separate flow nozzle. The general characteristics of the DART make it an ideal candidate for utilization as a test bed for engine aeroacoustic research in a relevant performance environment. The DART was used to document the efficacy of acoustic liners installed in the inlet of the DGEN380. An advanced multi-degree-of-freedom liner (MDOF) was designed and tested, along with a traditional single-degree-of- freedom liner (SDOF), and those results compared to a hard-wall baseline inlet. Farfield acoustic data were acquired from an external array, evaluated, and reported here-in terms of overall, broadband, and tonal components of the insertion loss.

Noise Reduction↗
NASA NTRS2012

Reverberant Acoustic Testing and Direct Field Acoustic Testing Acoustic Standing Waves and their Impact on Structural Responses

The aerospace industry has been using two methods of acoustic testing to qualify flight hardware: (1) Reverberant Acoustic Test (RAT), (2) Direct Field Acoustic Test (DFAT). The acoustic field obtained by RAT is generally understood and assumed to be diffuse, expect below Schroeder cut-of frequencies. DFAT method of testing has some distinct advantages over RAT, however the acoustic field characteristics can be strongly affected by test setup such as the speaker layouts, number and location of control microphones and control schemes. In this paper the following are discussed based on DEMO tests performed at APL and JPL: (1) Acoustic wave interference patterns and acoustic standing waves, (2) The structural responses in RAT and DFAT.

vibro-acoustics↗