Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “direct solver”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Batched sparse direct solver design and evaluation in SuperLU_DIST

Over the course of interactions with various application teams, the need for batched sparse linear algebra functions has emerged in order to make more efficient use of the GPUs for many small and sparse linear algebra problems. In this paper, we present our recent work on a batched sparse direct solver for GPUs. The sparse LU factorization is computed by the levels of the elimination tree, leveraging the batched dense operations at each level and a new batched Scatter GPU kernel. The sparse triangular solve is computed by the level sets of the directed acyclic graph (DAG) of the triangular matrix. Batched operations overcome the large overhead associated with launching many small kernels. For medium sized matrix batches with not-so-small bandwidth, using an NVIDIA A100 GPU, our new batched sparse direct solver is orders of magnitude faster than a batched banded solver and uses less than one-tenth of the memory.

Boukaram, Wajih↗
DOE OSTI2023

Newly Released Capabilities in the Distributed-Memory SuperLU Sparse Direct Solver

We present the new features available in the recent release of SuperLU_DIST, Version 8.1.1. SuperLU_DIST is a distributed-memory parallel sparse direct solver. The new features include (1) a 3D communication-avoiding algorithm framework that trades off inter-process communication for selective memory duplication, (2) multi-GPU support for both NVIDIA GPUs and AMD GPUs, and (3) mixed-precision routines that perform single-precision LU factorization and double-precision iterative refinement. Apart from the algorithm improvements, we also modernized the software build system to use CMake and Spack package installation tools to simplify the installation procedure. Throughout the article, we describe in detail the pertinent performance-sensitive parameters associated with each new algorithmic feature, show how they are exposed to the users, and give general guidance of how to set these parameters. We illustrate that the solver’s performance both in time and memory can be greatly improved after systematic tuning of the parameters, depending on the input sparse matrix and underlying hardware.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

A graphics processing unit accelerated sparse direct solver and preconditioner with block low rank compression

We present the GPU implementation efforts and challenges of the sparse solver package STRUMPACK. The code is made publicly available on github with a permissive BSD license. STRUMPACK implements an approximate multifrontal solver, a sparse LU factorization which makes use of compression methods to accelerate time to solution and reduce memory usage. Multiple compression schemes based on rank-structured and hierarchical matrix approximations are supported, including hierarchically semi-separable, hierarchically off-diagonal butterfly, and block low rank. Here, in this paper, we present the GPU implementation of the block low rank (BLR) compression method within a multifrontal solver. Our GPU implementation relies on highly optimized vendor libraries such as cuBLAS and cuSOLVER for NVIDIA GPUs, rocBLAS and rocSOLVER for AMD GPUs and the Intel oneAPI Math Kernel Library (oneMKL) for Intel GPUs. Additionally, we rely on external open source libraries such as SLATE (Software for Linear Algebra Targeting Exascale), MAGMA (Matrix Algebra on GPU and Multi-core Architectures), and KBLAS (KAUST BLAS). SLATE is used as a GPU-capable ScaLAPACK replacement. From MAGMA we use variable sized batched dense linear algebra operations such as GEMM, TRSM and LU with partial pivoting. KBLAS provides efficient (batched) low rank matrix compression for NVIDIA GPUs using an adaptive randomized sampling scheme. The resulting sparse solver and preconditioner runs on NVIDIA, AMD and Intel GPUs. Interfaces are available from PETSc, Trilinos and MFEM, or the solver can be used directly in user code. We report results for a range of benchmark applications, using the Perlmutter system from NERSC, Frontier from ORNL, and Aurora from ALCF. For a high frequency wave equation on a regular mesh, using 32 Perlmutter compute nodes, the factorization phase of the exact GPU solver is about 6.5× faster compared to the CPU-only solver. The BLR-enabled GPU solver is about 13.8× faster than the CPU exact solver. For a collection of SuiteSparse matrices, the STRUMPACK exact factorization on a single GPU is on average 1.9× faster than NVIDIA’s cuDSS solver.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

GPU-resident sparse direct linear solvers for alternating current optimal power flow analysis

Integrating renewable resources within the transmission grid at a wide scale poses significant challenges for economic dispatch as it requires analysis with more optimization parameters, constraints, and sources of uncertainty. This motivates the investigation of more efficient computational methods, especially those for solving the underlying linear systems, which typically take more than half of the overall computation time. In this paper, we present our work on sparse linear solvers that take advantage of hardware accelerators, such as graphical processing units (GPUs), and improve the overall performance when used within economic dispatch computations. We treat the problems as sparse, which allows for faster execution but also makes the implementation of numerical methods more challenging. We present the first GPU-native sparse direct solver that can execute on both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs. We demonstrate significant performance improvements when using high-performance linear solvers within alternating current optimal power flow (ACOPF) analysis. Furthermore, we demonstrate the feasibility of getting significant performance improvements by executing the entire computation on GPU-based hardware. Finally, we identify outstanding research issues and opportunities for even better utilization of heterogeneous systems, including those equipped with GPUs.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
DOE OSTI2025

Hardware acceleration for HPS algorithms in two and three dimensions

We provide a flexible, open-source framework for hardware acceleration, namely massively-parallel execution on general-purpose graphics processing units (GPUs), applied to the hierarchical Poincaré–Steklov (HPS) family of algorithms for building fast direct solvers for linear elliptic partial differential equations. To take full advantage of the power of hardware acceleration, we propose two variants of HPS algorithms to improve performance on two- and three-dimensional problems. In the two-dimensional setting, we introduce a novel recomputation strategy that minimizes costly data transfers to and from the GPU; in three dimensions, we modify and extend the adaptive discretization technique of Geldermans and Gillman [1] to greatly reduce peak memory usage. We provide an open-source implementation of these methods written in JAX, a high-level accelerated linear algebra package, which allows for the first integration of a high-order fast direct solver with automatic differentiation tools. We conclude with extensive numerical examples showing our methods are fast and accurate on two- and three-dimensional problems.

Fast direct solvers↗
DOE OSTI2022

High performance sparse multifrontal solvers on modern GPUs

Here, we have ported the numerical factorization and triangular solve phases of the sparse direct solver STRUMPACK to GPU. STRUMPACK implements sparse LU factorization using the multifrontal algorithm, which performs most of its operations in dense linear algebra operations on so-called frontal matrices of various sizes. Our GPU implementation off-loads these dense linear algebra operations, as well as the sparse scatter–gather operations between frontal matrices. For the larger frontal matrices, our GPU implementation relies on vendor libraries such as cuBLAS and cuSOLVER for NVIDIA GPUs and rocBLAS and rocSOLVER for AMD GPUs. For the smaller frontal matrices we developed custom CUDA and HIP kernels to reduce kernel launch overhead. Overall, high performance is achieved by identifying submatrix factorizations corresponding to sub-trees of the multifrontal assembly tree which fit entirely in GPU memory. The multi-GPU setting uses SLATE (Software for Linear Algebra Targeting Exascale) as a modern GPU-aware replacement for ScaLAPACK. On 4 nodes of SUMMIT the code runs ~10X faster when using all 24 V100 GPUs compared to when it only uses the 168 POWER9 cores. On 8 SUMMIT nodes, using 48 V100 GPUs, the sparse solver reaches over 50TFlop/s. Compared to SuperLU, on a single V100, for a set of 17 matrices our implementation is faster for all but one matrix, and is on average 5X (median 4X) faster

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

xSDK-batched Subcontract - Ginkgo Batched Iterative Solver Development (Final Report)

Iterative solvers are fundamentally different from direct solvers in terms of execution as they generally do not execute a pre-defined sequence of operations or steps, but adapt the number of iterations to the specific problem and the preset solution quality. Generally, the adaptation of the iteration count to the problem is realized by monitoring the solver convergence and stopping the iteration process once the monitored metric, e.g., the residual norm, hits a pre-defined threshold. When addressing a set of problems with different properties, it is necessary to monitor the threshold for each problem individually and break up the SIMD execution style to avoid excess iterations for “easier” problems. Ginkgo integrates a simple but customizable stopping criterion for the residual norm and generally uses a pre-defined (relative or absolute) residual norm as the stopping criterion. In order to avoid the overhead of launching a kernel at every iteration, the iteration convergence and iteration control is part of the solver kernel. Each thread maintains its own copy of the iteration count.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Large-scale harmonic balance simulations with Krylov subspace and preconditioner recycling

The multi-harmonic balance method combined with numerical continuation provides an efficient framework to compute a family of time-periodic solutions, or response curves, for large-scale, nonlinear mechanical systems. The predictor and corrector steps repeatedly solve a sequence of linear systems that scale by the model size and number of harmonics in the assumed Fourier series approximation. In this paper, a novel Newton–Krylov iterative method is embedded within the multi-harmonic balance and continuation algorithm to efficiently compute the approximate solutions from the sequence of linear systems that arise during the prediction and correction steps. Further, the method recycles, or reuses, both the preconditioner and the Krylov subspace generated by previous linear systems in the solution sequence. A delayed frequency preconditioner refactorizes the preconditioner only when the performance of the iterative solver deteriorates. The GCRO-DR iterative solver recycles a subset of harmonic Ritz vectors to initialize the solution subspace for the next linear system in the sequence. The performance of the iterative solver is demonstrated on two exemplars with contact-type nonlinearities and benchmarked against a direct solver with traditional Newton–Raphson iterations.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Considering computational speed vs. accuracy: Choosing appropriate mesoscale RVE boundary conditions

Modeling a material’s microstructure using continuum theories allows for inspection of the relationship between coarse scale and fine scale behaviors. Computational limits generally require selection of a sub-volume from a bulk sample in order to directly model the microstructure. Boundary conditions are applied to the sub-volume to mimic the excluded bulk material. Appropriate selection of boundary conditions helps effectively determine the appropriate spatial scale required of the sub-volume. Applicable boundary conditions include direct displacement, periodic, and uniform traction. While direct displacement and periodic boundary conditions are commonly used, uniform traction boundary conditions have seen limited use due to rigid body stability issues in simulations of compression or shear deformation. A new application of uniform traction boundary conditions was developed through linear constraint equations, similar to approaches employed by direct displacement and periodic boundary conditions, to quench rigid body motions with minimal interference of the relative deformation of the model. These boundary conditions were tested by compressing several synthetically generated periodic microstructures using the finite element method. Evaluating the effective stiffness along the compression axis, the direct displacement boundary condition produced the stiffest response, whereas the uniform traction boundary condition produced the most compliant. Periodic boundary conditions produced the same response for all volumes analyzed and both the direct displacement and uniform traction boundary conditions trended toward the periodic response as the domain volume increased. Computational performance was also evaluated for each boundary condition using implicit and explicit solvers. Direct displacement boundary conditions presented the lowest computational cost of all of the boundary conditions followed by periodic then uniform traction. The computational expense of periodic and uniform traction boundary conditions limited the viable spatial scale and mesh resolutions able to be simulated. Selection of appropriate boundary conditions for specific uses need to be a balance between allowable computational expense and accuracy of the method. Techniques for evaluating which boundary conditions to use are discussed.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Batched Sparse Linear Algebra (Final Report for Subcontract B648960)

This report finalizes design specifications for developing batched kernels for small tensor operations for unassembled matrix-free iterative solvers, batched solvers for partially assembled operators, and batched solvers with support for various sparse formats. The outcome of the project milestones is a set of interfaces to Batched Sparse LA solvers running on hardware accelerators for use in ECP Libraries and Applications. It is part of the development of sparse batched kernels, solvers/preconditioners as well as creating interoperability in xSDK libraries with sparse and dense batched functions to benefit ECP applications. The participants included representatives from ECP libraries (not limited to the xSDK project), applications, and vendors (AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA). Batched sparse linear algebra solvers form the new frontier for algorithmic development and performance engineering. Many applications (ECP and non-ECP alike) require simultaneous solutions of small linear systems of equations that are structurally sparse. To move towards high hardware utilization, it is important to provide these applications with appropriate interfaces to efficient batched sparse solvers running on modern hardware accelerators. We present interface designs in use by HPC software libraries supporting batched sparse linear algebra and the development of sparse batched kernel codes for solvers and preconditioners. We also address the potential interoperability opportunities to keep the software portable between the major hardware accelerators from AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA. The presented interface specifications includes batched band, sparse iterative, and sparse direct solvers. This report summarizes progress in Kokkos Kernels and the xSDK libraries MAGMA, Ginkgo, hypre, SUNDIALS, and SuperLU_dist.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

PyAMG: Algebraic Multigrid Solvers in Python

PyAMG is a Python package of algebraic multigrid (AMG) solvers and supporting tools for approximating the solution to large, sparse linear systems of algebraic equations, Ax = b, where A is an n × n sparse matrix. Sparse linear systems arise in a range of problems in science, from fluid flows to solid mechanics to data analysis. While the direct solvers available in SciPy’s sparse linear algebra package (scipy.sparse.linalg) are highly efficient, in many cases iterative methods are preferred due to overall complexity. However, the iterative methods in SciPy, such as CG and GMRES, often require an efficient preconditioner in order to achieve a lower complexity. Preconditioning is a powerful tool whereby the conditioning of the linear system and convergence rate of the iterative method are both dramatically improved. PyAMG constructs multigrid solvers for use as a preconditioner in this setting. A summary of multigrid and algebraic multigrid solvers can be found in Olson (2015a), in Olson (2015b), and in Falgout (2006); a detailed description can be found in Briggs et al. (2000) and Trottenberg et al. (2001).

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Milestone 49 Report: Batched Sparse LA Phase 5 Implementation

Batched sparse linear algebra operations in general, and solvers in particular, have become the major algorithmic development activity and foremost performance engineering effort in the numerical software libraries work on modern hardware with accelerators such as GPUs. Many applications, ECP and non-ECP alike, require simultaneous solutions of many small linear systems of equations that are structurally sparse in one form or another. In order to move towards high hardware utilization levels, it is important to provide these applications with appropriate interface designs to be both functionally efficient and performance portable and give full access to the appropriate batched sparse solvers running on modern hardware accelerators prevalent across DOE supercomputing sites since the inception of ECP. To this end, we present here a summary of recent advances on the interface designs in use by HPC software libraries supporting batched sparse linear algebra and the development of sparse batched kernel codes for solvers and preconditioners. We also address the potential interoperability opportunities to keep the corresponding software portable between the major hardware accelerators from AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA, while maintaining the appropriate disclosure levels conforming to the active NDA agreements. The presented interface specifications include a mix of batched band, sparse iterative, and sparse direct solvers with their accompanying functionality that is already required by the application codes or we anticipated to be needed in the near future. This report summarizes progress in Kokkos Kernels and the xSDK libraries MAGMA, Ginkgo, hypre, PETSc, and SuperLU.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Xyce(™) Parallel Electronic Simulator v.7.5

The Xyce Parallel Electronic Simulator simulates electronic circuit behavior in DC, AC, HB, MPDE and transient mode using standard analog (DAE) and/or device (PDE) device models including several age and radiation aware devices. It supports a variety of computing platforms (both serial and parallel) computers. Lastly, it uses a variety of modern solution algorithms dynamic parallel load-balancing and iterative solvers.! ! Xyce is primarily used to simulate the voltage and current behavior of a circuit network (a network of electronic devices connected via a conductive network). As a tool, it is mainly used for the design and analysis of electronic circuits.! ! Kirchoff's conservation laws are enforced over a network using modified nodal analysis. This results in a set of differential algebraic equations (DAEs). The resulting nonlinear problem is solved iteratively using a fully coupled Newton method, which in turn results in a linear system that is solved by either a standard sparse-direct solver or iteratively using Trilinos linear solver packages, also developed at Sandia National Laboratories.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2025

Predicting Flow in Fracture Networks With Quantum Algorithms

Uncertainty quantification plays a crucial role in the modeling of subsurface flow. For instance, uncertainties in the properties of geologic fracture networks significantly impact flow, requiring numerous simulations to accurately estimate quantities of interest. However, each simulation is computationally expensive because it requires solving a large linear system to capture features that involve both small and large fractures. An example is in percolation, where the interaction of many small fractures (which cumulatively can have a large surface area) with the rock matrix must be modeled precisely. Quantum computing is an emerging tool with the potential to address this issue. Quantum algorithms offer a significant speedup in solving linear systems, achieving efficiencies that are challenging to match with classical approaches. These classical approaches include direct solvers, such as LU decomposition, and iterative methods, notably preconditioned conjugate gradient, commonly used in subsurface modeling to solve large sparse systems. However, applying quantum algorithms to geologic fracture flow requires careful attention to algorithmic and problem-specific constraints to fully realize this quantum advantage. In this work we describe a quantum algorithm for generalized Monte Carlo applications with a quadratic speedup over the classical approaches which can be combined with the quantum speedup, currently under investigation, for solving quantum linear systems for subsurface flow. We show that for quantum algorithms the computational cost of estimating a quantity of interest for a statistical ensemble of networks is roughly the same as that of a single realization, essentially implying that one can get uncertainty quantification for free.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2026

Linear complexity

We present factorization and solution phases for a new linear complexity direct solver designed for concurrent batch operations on fine-grained parallel architectures, for matrices amenable to hierarchical representation. We focus on the strong-admissibility-based $\mathscr{H}^{2}$ format, where strong recursive skeletonization factorization compresses remote interactions. We build upon previous implementations of $\mathscr{H}^{2}$ matrix construction for efficient factorization and solution algorithm design, which are illustrated graphically in stepwise detail. The algorithms are ‘blackbox’ in the sense that the only inputs are the matrix and right-hand side, without analytical or geometrical information about the origin of the system. We demonstrate linear complexity scaling in both time and memory on four representative families of dense matrices up to one million in size. Parallel scaling up to 16 threads is enabled by a multi-level matrix graph coloring and avoidance of dynamic memory allocations thanks to prefix-sum memory management. An experimental backward error analysis is included. We break down the timings of different phases, identify phases that are memory-bandwidth limited, and discuss alternatives for phases that may be sensitive to the trend to employ lower precisions for performance.

Boukaram, Wajih↗
DOE OSTI2022

Tacho

SAND2022-7470 O Tacho is a performance portable sparse direct solver for use with various sparse matrix problems which typically arise from finite element methods. The code relies on the Kokkos parallel programming model porting to both CPUs and GPUs. It is also part of the Trilinos library. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525.

Kim, Kyungjoo↗
DOE OSTI2024

Rethinking materials simulations: Blending direct numerical simulations with neural operators

Abstract Materials simulations based on direct numerical solvers are accurate but computationally expensive for predicting materials evolution across length- and time-scales, due to the complexity of the underlying evolution equations, the nature of multiscale spatiotemporal interactions, and the need to reach long-time integration. We develop a method that blends direct numerical solvers with neural operators to accelerate such simulations. This methodology is based on the integration of a community numerical solver with a U-Net neural operator, enhanced by a temporal-conditioning mechanism to enable accurate extrapolation and efficient time-to-solution predictions of the dynamics. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this hybrid framework on simulations of microstructure evolution via the phase-field method. Such simulations exhibit high spatial gradients and the co-evolution of different material phases with simultaneous slow and fast materials dynamics. We establish accurate extrapolation of the coupled solver with large speed-up compared to DNS depending on the hybrid strategy utilized. This methodology is generalizable to a broad range of materials simulations, from solid mechanics to fluid dynamics, geophysics, climate, and more.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗