Dust Testing Standard Overview
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
dust mitigation↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “dust testing standard”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Hydrostatic testing of porous assemblies
Pores of the material were plugged with dust particles suspended in water. The plugging material used was a standard test dust prepared as a slurry in distilled water. This technique provides a permanent high-integrity seal for porous material without affecting its physical properties, yet permitting pressure testing to verify structural adequacy.
Bigelow, W. L.↗
An Overview of NASA-STD-1008: Classifications and Requirements for Testing Systems and Hardware to be Exposed to Dust in Planetary Environments
As we return to the Moon with Artemis, hardware will inevitably be exposed to lunar dust. Encountering the surface of a dusty planetary body brings significant hazards to the hardware. A team of subject matter experts across NASA were brought together to create a standard for addressing the best means of performing ground testing of hardware and systems to guard against the expected negative effects that dust may bring. This effort resulted in NASA-STD-1008: Classifications and Requirements for Testing Systems and Hardware to be Exposed to Dust in Planetary Environments. The NASA Technical Standard went through an Agency wide review and was approved for public release in September 2021.
lunar dust↗
FY21 Dust Mitigation Standards Dusty Environments Classifications & Testing Task Annual Review Presentation
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
dust; dust mitigation; technology development↗
Propulsion system filter sizing considerations for the Galileo spacecraft
Filtration capacity of the Galileo propulsion system has been investigated. Ground testing of flight spare components has been conducted to determine the representative number and size distribution of particulate matter collected in flow tests. For these tests and for filter qualification tests, a number of effects were examined. The influence of gravitational particle settling on ground test results vs the flight environment was considered. Centrifugal effects inherent in the test apparatus and/or the propulsion system could have an influence. Variability among particle sizing techniques was explored. The influence of size distribution, particle shape, and density in the choice of a particulate test material was studied. Characteristics for AC Coarse Dust (an industry standard filter test media), microscopic polymer beads, and aluminum oxide particulate test matter are listed. Filtration tests were conducted using AC Coarse Dust and mixtures containing components of AC Coarse Dust. These results are expected to be useful data for filter sizing of future spacecraft.
Jan, Darrell L.↗
Advancing Dust Tolerant Mechanisms for a Sustained Exploration of the Moon
Introduction: “I think dust is probably one of our greatest inhibitors to a nominal operation on the Moon. I think we can overcome other physio-logical or physical or mechanical problems except dust.”– Gene Cernan, Apollo 17 Technical Debrief The Apollo missions revealed the impact of lu-nar dust on mechanisms. Lunar dust particles are jagged and electrostatically charged, giving them the ability to bind or damage mechanisms and alter thermal properties. Reports documented clogged equipment and jammed mechanisms in every mission, regardless of surface duration, as well as clogged mechanisms in the Extravehicular Mobility Suit (EMS), including zippers, wrist and hose locks, faceplates, and sunshades [1-2]. Several astronauts remarked they could not have sustained surface activity much longer because clogged joints would have frozen up completely [2]. Effective dust mitigation strategies are need-ed to support longer duration stays on the lunar surface [3-4]. State of the Art: Technology for mechanisms able to operate in dusty enviroments is advancing rapidly due to the needs of both Mars rovers and the Artemis program. Vacuum-tight connectors are essential for spacesuits and habitats, and their performance can be dependent on cleaning technologies, which have proven difficult on the lunar surface. Several TRL 3-5 technologies are undergoing tests with the expectation to reach TRL 6 within 1-2 years. Some mechanisms will be infused and tested on the VIPER (Volatiles Inves-tigating Polar Exploration Rover) mission planned for mid-2020s. NASA Funded Efforts: NASA has recognized the need for dust tolerant mechanisms, and has partnered with industry to advance the state-of-the-art. At NASA GRC, KSC, and JSC, the Dust Tolerant Mechanisms Project is working to devel-op advanced actuator seals for rotary joints and rotary bearing technologies for long-term sus-tained operation in lunar dust environments. An-other NASA project at NASA GRC, partnered with GSFC, JPL, and KSC is Motors for Dusty & Ex-treme Cold Environments (MDECE). MDECE is developing an unheated magnetically-geared mo-tor that can operate continuously for a long dura-tion at an ambient temperature of -243 ºC (33 K). NASA GRC has the capability to characterize the effects of dust on seals, mechanisms, and other mating surfaces and components under lunar conditions [5]. Through the SBIR/STTR program, NASA has funded several companies to advance dust toler-ant mechanisms via the Dust Tolerant Mecha-nisms sub-topic with applications in surface mobil-ity, spacesuits, connectors, joints, and more. LSIC and Community Efforts: The Lunar Surface Innovation Consortium (LSIC) Dust Miti-gation focus group has fostered collaborations across NASA, industry, and academia to develop solutions that minimizes the impact of lunar dust on robotic and human systems. Community ef-forts have included topical meetings on dust tol-erant mechanisms, featured technology presenta-tions, and feedback to NASA on potential gaps and needs. Testing: In 2021, NASA released NASA-STD-1008 [6]. This NASA Technical Standard estab-lishes minimum requirements and provides guid-ance for testing systems and hardware to be ex-posed to dust in planetary environments. The standard has specific sections dedicated to Mechanisms Testing (e.g. bearings, gears) as well as Seals and Mating Surfaces Testing (e.g. hatches, docking systems). Gaps and Needs: NASA is tracking dust tol-erant mechanisms as a gap in a cross-directorate analysis of capability areas needed to enable fu-ture human space-flight architectures. Two high-priority gap areas include additional facilities for testing mechanisms in lunar-surface conditions, and a better understanding of vulnerabilities to the smallest, nanometer-scale dust particles. Conclusion: Understanding and mitigating lu-nar dust is critical to successful, sustained opera-tions on the lunar surface – whether autonomous or otherwise. This presentation will discuss both the state-of-the-art and open needs in lunar dust tolerant mechanisms, technology impacts, mitiga-tion approaches, testing, LSIC community efforts, and more. References: [1] Gaier, J. R. (2020). The Im-pact of Dust on Lunar Surface Equipment During Apollo. Lunar Dust 2020. [2] GRC, & Gaier, J. R. (2005). The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Sys-tems During the Apollo Missions. [3] Johansen, M. R. (2020). An Update on NASA’s Lunar Dust Mitigation Strategy. Lunar Dust 2020. [4] ASI, CSA, ESA, JAXA, & NASA. (2016). Dust Mitiga-tion Gap Assessment Report. [5] Jimenez, N. et al (2022), LPSC Abstract 2572. [6] NASA-STD-1008, 2021.
J I Nunez↗
Repeatable Method for Conducting Chamber Studies of Aerosolized Lunar Simulant
The Artemis Mission goal of returning humans to the Moon requires new solutions to engineering problems posed by the extremely harsh environment of the lunar surface. Using the Apollo missions as historical evidence, dust will be a significant obstacle in the success of a sustained human and robotic presence. Hardware such as tools, machinery, extra-vehicular activity (EVA) suits, and components of landers and habitats will all be subject to various degrees of contamination by lunar dust, and each piece of hardware has its own considerations for performance under dusty conditions. Such hardware must be tested and verified for use during lunar missions under guidance from NASA technical standards. Aerosolized dust can be used to test and verify hardware in two ways: volumetric and surface area loading. Volumetric loading (measured in mass of airborne dust per volume of air) may cause hardware to malfunction via dust ingestion or other mechanisms. Surface area loading (measured in mass of settled dust per surface area) may cause hardware to malfunction by altering its thermal properties or by fouling optical surfaces such as camera lenses. This publication describes a method to achieve a stable, user-determined volumetric loading in an arbitrary chamber along with recommendations for how to use such chambers for customized hardware testing.
Benjamin J Sumlin↗
Classifications and Requirements for Testing Systems and Hardware to be Exposed to Dust in Planetary Environments
The purpose of this NASA Technical Standard is to establish minimum requirements and provide effective guidance regarding methodologies and best practices for testing systems and hardware to be exposed to dust in dust laden and generating environments. The intent is to facilitate consistency and efficiency in testing space systems, subsystems, or components with operations and missions in dusty environments.
Kristen Kathleen John↗
Martian and Asteroid Dusts as Toxicological Risks for Human Exploration Missions
As the lunar dust toxicity project winds down, our attention is drawn to the potential toxicity of dust present at the surface of more distant celestial objects. Lunar dust has proven to be surprisingly toxic to the respiratory systems of test animals, so one might expect dust from other celestial bodies to hold toxicological surprises for us. At this point all one can do is consider what should be known about these dusts to characterize their toxicity, and then ask to what extent that information is known. In an ideal world it might be possible to suggest an exposure standard based on the known properties of a celestial dust without direct testing of the dust in laboratory animals. Factors known to affect the toxicity of mineral dusts under some conditions include the following: particle size distribution, particle shape/porosity, mineralogical properties (crystalline vs. amorphous), chemical properties and composition, and surface reactivity. Data from a recent Japanese mission to the S-type asteroid Itokawa revealed some surprises about the dust found there, given that there is only a very week gravitational field to hold the dust on the surface. On Mars the reddish-brown dust is widely distributed by global dust storms and by local clusters of dust devils. Past surface probes have revealed some of the properties of dust found there. Contemporary data from Curiosity and other surface probes will be weighed against the data needed to set a defensible safe exposure limit. Gaps will emerge.
James, John T.↗
Materials for Extreme Environments: Paving the Way for Lunar Exploration
As humanity expands its ventures into lunar and planetary exploration, the demand intensifies for resilient materials capable of enduring extreme environmental and service conditions. The Moon’s surface presents numerous challenges, including ultra-high vacuum exposure, temperature extremes and intense radiation. Additionally, lunar regolith poses a significant threat to component durability and reusability due to its abrasive nature. Lunar dust particles scoring, adhering, or embedding into surfaces and within device-confined geometries, such as bearings, drive mechanisms and connectors, can cause premature component wear or failure. Furthermore, the interaction between the rocket plume and the surface during vehicle landings and ascents creates severe erosive conditions near critical vehicle components and adjacent infrastructure. A key barrier hindering materials discovery for lunar dust tolerant applications is a lack of standard laboratory methods to evaluate material properties and performance under representative operating conditions. A case will be presented for research activities supporting identification, processing and characterization of candidate materials in conjunction with innovations in standardized testing and qualification. Results will highlight current and emerging test methods for simulating lunar dust exposure and component degradation, paving the way for a new generation of robust materials and coatings for space exploration.
Lunar dust↗
Dust-Proofing the Future: Materials Challenges for Lunar Exploration
As humanity expands its ventures into lunar exploration, the demand intensifies for materials capable of enduring extreme environmental and service conditions. The Moon’s surface presents numerous challenges, including ultra-high vacuum exposure, temperature extremes and intense radiation. Additionally, lunar regolith threatens component durability and reusability due to its abrasive nature. Lunar dust particles scoring, adhering or embedding into surfaces and within device-confined geometries, such as bearings, drive mechanisms and connectors, can cause premature component wear or failure. Furthermore, the interaction between the rocket plume and surface during vehicle landings and ascents creates severe erosive conditions near critical vehicle components and adjacent infrastructure. A key barrier hindering materials discovery for lunar dust tolerant applications is a lack of standard laboratory methods to evaluate material properties and performance under representative operating conditions. A case will be presented for research activities supporting identification, processing and characterization of candidate materials in conjunction with innovations in standardized testing and qualification. Results will highlight current and emerging test methods for simulating lunar dust exposure and component degradation, paving the way for a new generation of robust materials and coatings for space exploration.
lunar dust↗
Validation Testing and Statistical Analysis of the Rotary Tumbler Fabric Abrasion Method
The Artemis space suit glove environmental protection garment (EPG) will be the first line of protection used to shield the crewmember’s hands from the environments encountered during extravehicular activity (EVA). As the Artemis missions will include more extreme environments than those experienced on the International Space Station, development, verification, and validation of gloves requires the development of new test methods. A previous paper focused on the development of a test procedure to characterize lunar EVA glove fabrics using ASTM standardized test methods and the design and validation of a new standardized test procedure for comparing abrasion resistance between fabrics using a dust and rock filled rotary tumbler. Preliminary results of testing were presented in that paper. This paper reports on the validation testing and statistical analysis of the newly developed tumbler abrasion test method.
Robert J Jones↗
Electrostatic Precipitation in Nearly Pure Gaseous Nitrogen
Electrostatic precipitation was performed in a nearly pure gaseous nitrogen system as a possible remedy for black dust contaminant from high pressure 6000 psi lines at the NASA Kennedy Space Center. The results of a prototype electrostatic precipitator that was built and tested using nitrogen gas at standard atmospheric pressures is presented. High voltage pulsed waveforms are generated using a rotating spark gap system at 30 Hz. A unique dust delivery system utilizing the Venturi effect was devised that supplies a given amount of dust per unit time for testing purposes.
Buhler, Charles↗
Development of Challenge Aerosols for Testing Filters in Spacecraft Air Revitalization Systems
The common means for reducing particle concentrations in air in enclosed spaces, including in space habitats, are source prevention and particle removal by air filters. While air filtration and testing is a well-established discipline and industry, testing and classifying filters according to commonly used standards rely on a test aerosol that is often arbitrary and chosen for the convenience of the test method. In space habitats, the particle size distributions are expected to be quite different than the particle size distributions prescribed in test standards, due to the partial or low gravity environment affecting sedimentation of large particulates like hair or cloth fibers, or the introduction of planetary dust to the pressurized volume. This means that the efficacy of the filter will be quite different in the space habitat than specified according to a prevailing standard. This paper will present a means to specify and generate a “composite” test aerosol that is similar to the measured and reported particle sizes utilizing the International Space Station (ISS) as an example. Application of this test aerosol is expected to yield filter efficiencies and loading effects closer to what one can expect on the ISS and to be useful in determining filter lifetime and replacement cycles. The method can be tuned, within reason, to match other particle size distributions one may encounter, such as the intrusion of Lunar dust for a Lunar lander or habitat.
Filtration↗
Lunar Dust Simulant in Mechanical Component Testing - Paradigm and Practicality
Due to the uniquely harsh lunar surface environment, terrestrial test activities may not adequately represent abrasive wear by lunar dust likely to be experienced in mechanical systems used in lunar exploration. Testing to identify potential moving mechanism problems has recently begun within the NASA Engineering and Safety Center Mechanical Systems Lunar Dust Assessment activity in coordination with the Exploration Technology and Development Program Dust Management Project, and these complimentary efforts will be described. Specific concerns about differences between simulant and lunar dust, and procedures for mechanical component testing with lunar simulant will be considered. In preparing for long term operations within a dusty lunar environment, the three fundamental approaches to keeping mechanical equipment functioning are dust avoidance, dust removal, and dust tolerance, with some combination of the three likely to be found in most engineering designs. Methods to exclude dust from contact with mechanical components would constitute mitigation by dust avoidance, so testing seals for dust exclusion efficacy as a function of particle size provides useful information for mechanism design. Dust of particle size less than a micron is not well documented for impact on lunar mechanical components. Therefore, creating a standardized lunar dust simulant in the particulate size range of ca. 0.1 to 1.0 micrometer is useful for testing effects on mechanical components such as bearings, gears, seals, bushings, and other moving mechanical assemblies. Approaching actual wear testing of mechanical components, it is beneficial to first establish relative wear rates caused by dust on commonly used mechanical component materials. The wear mode due to dust within mechanical components, such as abrasion caused by dust in grease(s), needs to be considered, as well as the effects of vacuum, lunar thermal cycle, and electrostatics on wear rate.
Jett, T.↗
Three-Body Abrasion Testing Using Lunar Dust Simulants to Evaluate Surface System Materials
Numerous unexpected operational issues relating to the abrasive nature of lunar dust, such as scratched visors and spacesuit pressure seal leaks, were encountered during the Apollo missions. To avoid reoccurrence of these unexpected detrimental equipment problems on future missions to the Moon, a series of two- and three-body abrasion tests were developed and conducted in order to begin rigorously characterizing the effect of lunar dust abrasiveness on candidate surface system materials. Two-body scratch tests were initially performed to examine fundamental interactions of a single particle on a flat surface. These simple and robust tests were used to establish standardized measurement techniques for quantifying controlled volumetric wear. Subsequent efforts described in the paper involved three-body abrasion testing designed to be more representative of actual lunar interactions. For these tests, a new tribotester was developed to expose samples to a variety of industrial abrasives and lunar simulants. The work discussed in this paper describes the three-body hardware setup consisting of a rotating rubber wheel that applies a load on a specimen as a loose abrasive is fed into the system. The test methodology is based on ASTM International (ASTM) B611, except it does not mix water with the abrasive. All tests were run under identical conditions. Abraded material specimens included poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), hardened 1045 steel, 6061-T6 aluminum (Al) and 1018 steel. Abrasives included lunar mare simulant JSC- 1A-F (nominal size distribution), sieved JSC-1A-F (<25 m particle diameter), lunar highland simulant NU-LHT-2M, alumina (average diameter of 50 m used per ASTM G76), and silica (50/70 mesh used per ASTM G65). The measured mass loss from each specimen was converted using standard densities to determine total wear volume in cm3. Abrasion was dominated by the alumina and the simulants were only similar to the silica (i.e., sand) on the softer materials of aluminum and PMMA. The nominal JSC- 1A-F consistently showed more abrasion wear than the sieved version of the simulant. The lunar dust displayed abrasivity to all of the test materials, which are likely to be used in lunar landing equipment. Based on this test experience and pilot results obtained, recommendations are made for systematic abrasion testing of candidate materials intended for use in lunar exploration systems and in other environments with similar dust challenges.
Kobrick, Ryan L.↗
Comparative lubrication studies of OH-58A tail rotor drive shaft bearings
Comparative lubrication tests were run with OH-58A helicopter tail rotor drive shaft bearings. The tests were run in an outdoor environment with ambient temperatures ranging from 10 to 75 F. Dust was periodically applied to the bearings to simulate field conditions. The cause of bearing failure was associated with dust penetration. Rotor shaft failure was found to be caused by the shaft rotating in the standard rubber collar due to seizure of the bearings. Bearings with a positive rubbing seal having a MIL-G-81322 grease produced lives greater than with bearings having labyrinth seals and a mineral oil paste lubricant. An elongated collar prevented failure of the rotor shaft during bearing seizure. In a limited test, installation of tail boom shrouds over the bearings which excluded dust and water resulted in bearing lives in excess of 1800 hours or 1200 hours greater than the current 600 hours TBO, regardless of the lubricant-bearing combination used.
Dietrich, M. W.↗
Abrasive Effects of Lunar Regolith on Material Wear for Long-Term Lunar Applications
Long-term operations on the Moon’s surface require materials that can withstand the harsh lunar environment. Lunar dust and regolith pose significant threats to the long-term durability of materials used in lunar applications. Lunar dust, easily perturbed and dispersed, adheres and abrades materials due to its rough and irregular grain morphology. More closely representing this abrasion action through experimental laboratory testing is critical in assessing the durability of potential lunar candidate materials used in mechanical, sensor, and human-based systems. In this study, the performance of materials using Taber abrasive wheels made from lunar regolith simulant was assessed and compared to results obtained using standard ceramic-based abrasion materials. The results highlight a difference in the abrasive wear rates between the lunar regolith simulant and the standard ceramic-based abrasive. Utilizing the mechanisms and testing capabilities of this two-body abrasive interaction leveraging regolith-based abrasives may more closely represent the interplay between materials and lunar dust, which is vital for assessing the long-term viability of materials for extended lunar missions. Improved lunar testing capabilities may also enhance evaluations of the long-term performance degradation of passive and active dust mitigation methods.
Zachary Stein↗