Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “eNMR experiments”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Transference Number of Electrolytes from the Velocity of a Single Species Measured by Electrophoretic NMR

Accurate measurement of the cation transference number is critical for designing batteries with a given electrolyte. A promising approach for measuring this parameter is electrophoretic NMR (eNMR). In the standard approach, the average cation, anion, and solvent velocities under an applied electric field are used to estimate the cation transference number with respect to the solvent velocity, ${t}_{+}^{0}.$ Here, in this study, we show that ${t}_{+}^{0}$ can be determined from measurements of the electric-field-induced velocities of individual species. The ${t}_{+}^{0}$ values obtained from eNMR experiments on a model electrolyte (LiTFSI/tetraglyme) based on single species velocities are consistent with the standard approach. An important parameter that enters into the analysis is the velocity of the electrode–electrolyte interface which must be finite in an eNMR experiment. Agreement is only obtained after accounting for this velocity. The single-species approach is particularly valuable when one or more components of the electrolytic mixture are not easily accessible by NMR, for example zinc and magnesium cations.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Quantifying selective solvent transport under an electric field in mixed-solvent electrolytes

Electrolytes in lithium-ion batteries comprise solvent mixtures, but analysis of ion transport is always based on treating the solvents as a single-entity. We combine electrophoretic NMR (eNMR) measurements and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to quantify electric-field-induced transport in a concentrated solution containing LiPF 6 salt dissolved in an ethylene carbonate/ethyl methyl carbonate (EC/EMC) mixture. The selective transport of EC relative to EMC is reflected in the difference between two transference numbers, defined as the fraction of current carried by cations relative to the velocity of each solvent species. This difference arises from the preferential solvation of cations by EC and its dynamic consequences. The simulations reveal the presence of a large variety of transient solvent-containing clusters which migrate at different velocities. Rigorous averaging over different solvation environments is essential for comparing simulated and measured transference numbers. Our study emphasizes the necessity of acknowledging the presence of four species in mixed-solvent electrolytes.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Toward Establishing Uniqueness of Experimentally Determined Transference Numbers

The passage of current through a battery results in the development of concentration gradients in the electrolytic phase. For a fully characterized binary electrolyte, where the conductivity, salt diffusion coefficient, cation transference number, and the thermodynamic factor are known, concentration and potential gradients in the electrolytic phase can be modeled using Newman’s concentrated solution theory. We report two methods for measuring the transference number: the standard method based on electrochemical measurements ( t + , echem 0 ) and electrophoretic NMR ( t + , eNMR 0 ). The electrochemical approach requires combining measurements from multiple experiments; the equations used to determine the cation transference number and the thermodynamic factor are coupled, nonlinear algebraic equations. In the electrophoretic-NMR-based approach, however, the equations used to determine the cation transference number and the thermodynamic factor are decoupled. We find for a liquid electrolyte comprised of a lithium salt dissolved in tetraglyme, the values of the transference numbers obtained by these two methods are distinct. For example, at 30 °C, t + , echem 0 = −1.02 ± 1.11 and t + , eNMR 0 = 0.25 ± 0.04. The corresponding thermodynamic factors are also different. While the magnitude of the predicted concentration gradients based on the two sets of parameters are different, the predicted current-voltage relationships are similar.

Hickson, Darby T. (ORCID:0000000251339755)↗

Continuum Description of the Role of Negative Transference Numbers on Ion Motion in Polymer Electrolytes

New experimental techniques such as electrophoretic NMR (eNMR) are emerging as powerful methods for directly measuring ion velocities in electrolytes under applied electric fields. The aim of this theoretical study is to predict the spatial- and temporal-dependence of these velocities of ions as a function of the magnitude of the applied field and salt concentration. It has recently been shown that mixtures of poly(ethylene oxide)-based (PEO) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI) electrolytes exhibit negative cation transference numbers in a certain salt concentration range. In this range, the cation motion at early times is directed to the positive electrode at all locations in the cell; ion migration dominates in this regime. As time progresses, the cation velocity in finite zones near both the electrodes changes sign. These zones grow rapidly with time, reflecting the increasing importance of diffusion, and a point in time is reached beyond which the cation velocity in the entire cell is directed toward the negative electrode. Overall, our work reveals the limited time window over which the results of eNMR can be used to determine the transference number. More importantly, it shows how to account for the effect of diffusional flux in such experiments.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗