Tracking Extremes in Exascale Simulations Utilizing Exascale Platforms
There is a growing recognition in the literature that understanding variability and trends in hydrometeorological extremes relies on understanding variability and trends in the meteorological phenomena that drive these extremes. Such phenomenon-focused understanding relies critically on a robust methodology for identifying the occurrence of these phenomena in observations and model output, but a robust methodology does not currently exist. There are a variety of heuristic methods reported in the literature for identifying, and in some cases temporally tracking, meteorological phenomena. However, there have been several intercomparison projects (and resulting papers) indicating that there is a large uncertainty associated with choices in the identification methods; this is the case for extratropical cyclones (ETCs), atmospheric rivers (ARs), and even tropical cyclones (TCs); and we hypothesize that this is a general issue with heuristic identification methods altogether. These studies clearly show that this identification uncertainty leads to a large, and previously under-recognized, quantitative and even qualitative uncertainty in our understanding of these phenomena. In light of these issues, we suggest that the field could be advanced by addressing two overarching questions. First, can we explicitly quantify uncertainty associated with detecting hydrometeorological phenomena? Second, can we decompose detection uncertainty into reducible and irreducible parts?