Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “filler metal”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

AN INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE CREEP-RUPTURE STRENGTHS FOR WELDMENTS WITH ALLOY 800H BASE METAL AND ALLOY 617 FILLER METAL

In Section III, Division 5 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Alloy 800H is qualified for elevated-temperature nuclear construction for temperatures up to 760°C (1,400°F) and a maximum service life of 300,000 hours. There are two permissible filler metals for Alloy 800H weldments specified in Division 5: ENiCrFe-2 (Alloy A) and ERNiCr-3 (Alloy 82). Low creep-rupture strengths of these weldments at the upper limits of the qualified temperatures and service lives may restrict the design envelope for elevated-temperature nuclear construction with Alloy 800H. As a result, an alternative filler metal is desired to improve the creep-rupture strengths of Alloy 800H weldments for the qualified temperatures and service lives. This work investigates an overmatched filler metal. Specifically, a weldment with Alloy 800H base metal and Alloy 617 filler metal fabricated by semiautomated gas tungsten arc welding is investigated. A scoping creep-rupture test program was conducted of cross-weld specimens at temperatures ranging from 750 to 1,000°C (1,292 to 1,832°F). Preliminary results on the creep-rupture strengths of the Alloy 800H weldment with Alloy 617 filler metal do not show significant improvement compared to the filler metals currently qualified in Division 5 for Alloy 800H weldments. Consequently, work is in progress to investigate a matching filler metal.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Assessment of UTP A 2133 Mn as a Matching Filler Metal for Alloy 800H in Section III, Division 5 Applications

Six alloys are qualified in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) for elevated-temperature nuclear components. Due to reactor design alloy restrictions and motivation to improve operational efficiency and plant lifetimes, it is necessary to maximize the usefulness of qualified alloys. One of these alloys is Alloy 800H, which is qualified for a maximum temperature of 760°C and a maximum 300,000-hour service life. However, the welding filler metals qualified to join Alloy 800H have stress rupture factors that reduce the allowable weldment strength by factors as low as 0.59 times the Alloy 800H base metal. In an effort to improve the weldment creep-rupture performance, or to increase the stress reduction factor, non-code qualified filler metals are under investigation by the Department of Energy?s Advanced Reactor Technologies program. For this investigation, UTP A 2133 Mn filler metal (Fe-Cr-Ni-Mn-Nb) was used to join 0.5 in. thick Alloy 800H plate to demonstrate passing an ASME BPVC Section IX weld qualification. The multi-pass, pulsed GTAW process showed successful weld qualification results, and additional property measurements were conducted to compare previous analyses of Alloy 82 and Alloy 617 filler metals. Future work will evaluate the cross-weld creep-rupture performance of the UTP A 2133 Mn in comparison to Alloy 82 and Alloy 617 filler metals.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
NASA NTRS1975

Several braze filler metals for joining an oxide-dispersion-strengthened nickel-chromium-aluminum alloy

An evaluation was made of five braze filler metals for joining an aluminum-containing oxide dispersion-strengthened (ODS) alloy, TD-NiCrAl. All five braze filler metals evaluated are considered suitable for joining TD-NiCrAl in terms of wettability and flow. Also, the braze alloys appear to be tolerant of slight variations in brazing procedures since joints prepared by three sources using three of the braze filler metals exhibited similar brazing characteristics and essentially equivalent 1100 C stress-rupture properties in a brazed butt-joint configuration. Recommendations are provided for brazing the aluminum-containing ODS alloys.

Gyorgak, C. A.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Study of austenitic stainless steel welded with low alloy steel filler metal

The tensile and impact strength properties of 316L stainless steel plate welded with low alloy steel filler metal were determined. Tests were conducted at room temperature and -100 F on standard test specimens machined from as-welded panels of various chemical compositions. No significant differences were found as the result of variations in percentage chemical composition on the impact and tensile test results. The weldments containing lower chromium and nickel as the result of dilution of parent metal from the use of the low alloy steel filler metal corroded more severely in a marine environment. The use of a protective finish, i.e., a nitrile-based paint containing aluminum powder, prevented the corrosive attack.

Burns, F. A.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Method for eliminating runout of braze filler metal during active brazing

Nanometers thick conformal coatings deposited by atomic-layer deposition (ALD) onto the metal surface of an active braze joint modifies the surface chemistry to eliminate excess braze filler metal flow. Unlike other means used to prevent braze filler metal runout, the thin ALD coating does not hinder next assembly processes, does not require post-braze cleaning, and does not alter the base material mechanical properties.

Goeke, Ronald S.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Weldability Investigation of Crack Resistant Aluminum Filler Metals Developed for Large Scale Additive Manufacturing and Industrial Welding Applications

In this study the NASA MSFC welding and manufacturing team investigated a new-age aluminum filler wire designed for welding and additive manufacturing (AM) of high strength aluminum alloys. High strength aluminum alloys are known to exhibit hot cracking and hot tearing issues during fusion welding operations. The goal of this investigation was to determine whether this new-age family of alloys can suppress the hot cracking and hot tearing issues exhibited during welding of high strength aluminum alloys and to do an initial characterization of the mechanical performance of welds created using these filler wires. This study focuses on fusion welding of aluminum alloy 6061 and compares the weldability characteristics of five aluminum filler metals and two forms of 6061 base material. The MSFC team utilized manual gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) to conduct all welding operations and carried out metallographic analysis accompanied with mechanical testing to evaluate the performance of the welds created during this study. During the study it was observed that the new-age filler wires facilitated grain refinement in the weld fusion zone and were capable of creating crack free welds in aluminum alloy 6061 while exhibiting properties that met or exceeded conventional off the shelf aluminum filler metals.

Welding↗
NASA NTRS1972

Improved TIG weld joint strength in aluminum alloy 2219-T87 by filler metal substitution

The results of an investigation on weld joint characteristics of aluminum alloy 2219-T87 are given. Five different alloys were utilized as filler material. The mechanical properties of the joints were determined at ambient and cryogenic temperatures for weldments in the as-welded condition and also, for weldments after elevated temperature exposures. Other evaluations included hardness surveys, stress corrosion susceptibility, and to a limited extent, the internal metallurgical weld structures. The overall results indicate that M-943 filler weldments are superior in strength to weldments containing either the standard 2319 filler or fillers 2014, 2020, and a dual wire feed consisting of three parts 2319 and one part 5652. In addition, no deficiencies were evident in M-934 filler weldments with regard to ductility, joint strength after elevated temperature exposure, weld hardness, metallographic structures, or stress corrosion susceptibility.

Poorman, R. M.↗
DOE OSTI2024

In Situ Alloying Enabled by Active Liquid Metal Filler for Self‐Healing Composite Polymer Electrolytes

Abstract Solid inorganics, known for kinetically inhibiting polymer crystallization and enhancing ionic conductivity, have attracted significant attention in solid polymer electrolytes. However, current composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs) are still facing challenges in Li metal batteries, falling short of inhibiting severe dendritic growth and resulting in very limited cycling life. This study introduces Ga 62.5 In 21.5 Sn 16 (Galinstan) liquid metal (LM) as an active liquid alternative to conventional passive solid fillers, aiming at realizing self‐healing protection against dendrite problems. Compared to solid inorganics, for example silica, LM droplets could more significantly reduce polymer crystallinity and enhance Li‐ion conductivity due to their liquid nature, especially at temperatures below the polymer melting point. More importantly, LMs are unraveled as dynamic chemical traps, which are capable of blocking and consuming lithium dendrites upon contact via in situ alloying during battery operation and further inhibiting dendritic growth due to the lower deposition energy barrier of the formed Li‐LM alloy. As a proof of concept, by strategically designing an asymmetric CPE with the active LM filling, a solid‐state Li/LiFePO 4 battery achieves promising full‐cell functionality with notable rate performance and stable cycle life. This active filler‐mediated self‐healing approach could bring new insights into the battery design in versatile solid‐state systems.

Wu, Kai↗
NASA NTRS2012

Evaluation of Brazed Joints Using Failure Assessment Diagram

Fitness-for service approach was used to perform structural analysis of the brazed joints consisting of several base metal / filler metal combinations. Failure Assessment Diagrams (FADs) based on tensile and shear stress ratios were constructed and experimentally validated. It was shown that such FADs can provide a conservative estimate of safe combinations of stresses in the brazed joints. Based on this approach, Margins of Safety (MS) of the brazed joints subjected to multi-axial loading conditions can be evaluated..

Flom, Yury↗
NASA NTRS1991

An evaluation of GTAW-P versus GTA welding of alloy 718

Mechanical properties were evaluated to determine statistically whether the pulsed current gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW-P) process produces welds in alloy 718 with room temperature structural performance equivalent to current Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) welds manufactured by the constant current GTAW-P process. Evaluations were conducted on two base metal lots, two filler metal lots, two heat input levels, and two welding processes. The material form was 0.125-inch (3.175-mm) alloy 718 sheet. Prior to welding, sheets were treated to either the ST or STA-1 condition. After welding, panels were left as welded or heat treated to the STA-1 condition, and weld beads were left intact or machined flush. Statistical analyses were performed on yield strength, ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and high cycle fatigue (HCF) properties for all the post welded material conditions. Analyses of variance were performed on the data to determine if there were any significant effects on UTS or HCF life due to variations in base metal, filler metal, heat input level, or welding process. Statistical analyses showed that the GTAW-P process does produce welds with room temperature structural performance equivalent to current SSME welds manufactured by the GTAW process, regardless of prior material condition or post welding condition.

Gamwell, W. R.↗
DOE OSTI2022

GCR: Development of Improved Alloy 800H Weldment

In Section III, Division 5 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Alloy 800H is qualified for elevated-temperature nuclear construction for temperatures up to 760°C (1400°F) and a maximum service life of 300,000 hours. There are two permissible filler metals for Alloy 800H weldments specified in Division 5: ENiCrFe-2 (Alloy A) and ERNiCr-3 (Alloy 82). Low creep-rupture strengths of these weldments at the upper limits of the qualified temperatures and service lives may restrict the design envelope for elevated-temperature nuclear construction with Alloy 800H. As a result, an alternative filler metal is desired to improve the creep-rupture strengths of Alloy 800H weldments for the qualified temperatures and service lives. This work investigates an overmatched filler metal. Specifically, a weldment with Alloy 800H base metal and Alloy 617 filler metal fabricated by semiautomated gas tungsten arc welding is investigated. A scoping creep-rupture test program was conducted of cross-weld specimens at temperatures ranging from 750 to 1000°C (1292 to 1832°F). Preliminary results on the creep-rupture strengths of the Alloy 800H weldment with an Alloy 617 filler metal do not show significant improvement compared to the filler metals currently qualified in Division 5 for Alloy 800H weldments. Consequently, work is in progress to investigate a matching filler metal, UTP A 2133 Mn.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
NASA NTRS2002

Weld repair of directionally solidified articles

A directionally solidified nickel-base superalloy article has a defect therein extending parallel to the solidification direction. The article is repaired by removing any foreign matter present in the defect, and then heating the article to a repair temperature of from about 60 to about 98 percent of the solidus temperature of the base material in a chamber containing a protective gas that inhibits oxidation of the base material. The defect is filled with a filler metal while maintaining the article at the repair temperature. The filling is accomplished by providing a source of the filler metal of substantially the same composition as the base material of the directionally solidified article, and melting the filler metal into the defect progressively while moving the source of the filler metal relative to the article in a direction parallel to the solidification direction. Optionally, additional artificial heat extraction is accomplished in a heat-flow direction that is within about 45 degrees of the solidification direction, as the filler metal solidifies within the defect. The article may thereafter be heat treated.

Smashey, Russell W.↗