SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “fuel cycle options”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Parametric analyses of single-zone thorium-fueled molten salt reactor fuel cycle options
Analyses of fuel cycle options based on thorium-fueled Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) have been performed in support of fuel cycle screening and evaluation activities for the United States Department of Energy. The MSR options considered are based on thermal spectrum MSRs with 3 different separations levels: full recycling, limited recycling, and 'once-through' operation without active separations. A single-fluid, single-zone 2250 MWth (1000 MWe) MSR concept consisting of a fuel-bearing molten salt with graphite moderator and reflectors was used as the basis for this study. Radiation transport and isotopic depletion calculations were performed using SCALE 6.1 with ENDF/B-VII nuclear data. New methodology developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) enables MSR analysis using SCALE, modeling material feed and removal by taking user-specified parameters and performing multiple SCALE/TRITON simulations to determine the resulting equilibrium operating conditions. Parametric analyses examined the sensitivity of the performance of a thorium MSR to variations in the separations efficiency for protactinium and fission products. Results indicate that self-sustained operation is possible with full or limited recycling but once-through operation would require an external neutron source. (authors)
Completion of Population of and Quality Assurance on the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog.
An Evaluation and Screening team supporting the Fuel Cycle Technologies Program Office of the United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy is conducting an evaluation and screening of a comprehensive set of fuel cycle options. These options have been assigned to one of 40 evaluation groups, each of which has a representative fuel cycle option [Todosow 2013]. A Fuel Cycle Data Package System Datasheet has been prepared for each representative fuel cycle option to ensure that the technical information used in the evaluation is high-quality and traceable [Kim, et al., 2013]. The information contained in the Fuel Cycle Data Packages has been entered into the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog at Sandia National Laboratories so that it is accessible by the evaluation and screening team and other interested parties. In addition, an independent team at Savannah River National Laboratory has verified that the information has been entered into the catalog correctly. This report documents that the 40 representative fuel cycle options have been entered into the Catalog, and that the data entered into the catalog for the 40 representative options has been entered correctly.
Thorium Fuel Cycle Option Screening in the United States
As part of a nuclear fuel cycle Evaluation and Screening (E&S) study, a wide-range of thorium fuel cycle options were evaluated and their performance characteristics and challenges to implementation were compared to those of other nuclear fuel cycle options based on criteria specified by the Nuclear Energy Office of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The evaluated nuclear fuel cycles included the once-through, limited, and continuous recycle options using critical or externally-driven nuclear energy systems. The E&S study found that the continuous recycle of 233U/Th in fuel cycles using either thermal or fast reactors is an attractive promising fuel cycle option with high effective fuel resource utilization and low waste generation, but did not perform quite as well as the continuous recycle of Pu/U using a fast critical system, which was identified as one of the most promising fuel cycle options in the E&S study. This is because compared to their uranium counterparts the thorium-based systems tended to have higher radioactivity in the short term (about 100 years post irradiation) because of differences in the fission product yield curves, and in the long term (100,000 years post irradiation) because of the decay of 233U and daughters, and because of higher mass flow rates due to lower discharge burnups. Some of the thorium-based systems also require enriched uranium support, which tends to be detrimental to resource utilization and waste generation metrics. Finally, similar to the need for developing recycle fuel fabrication, fuels separations and fast reactors for the most promising options using Pu/U recycle, the future thorium-based fuel cycle options with continuous recycle would also require such capabilities, although their deployment challenges are expected to be higher since such facilities have not been developed in the past to a comparable level of maturity for Th-based systems.
Transition to Uranium-Based Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Options
An Evaluation and Screening (E and S) study of nuclear fuel cycle options was recently conducted for the U.S. Department of Energy to identify promising fuel cycle options with the potential for achieving substantial improvements compared to the current nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S. This study considered the entire fuel cycle, i.e., the complete nuclear energy system from mining to disposal including both once-through and recycle fuel cycles. The E and S study considered performance at steady-state when evaluating the potential benefits and challenges to achieving that eventual end state. Based on the steady-state findings from the E and S, a set of four fuel cycle options (FCOs) were identified as most promising, in terms of offering the most benefits compared to the current cycle. These FCOs have natural uranium (or existing stocks of uranium such as depleted uranium) as the makeup feed sent to the fast reactor (FR) fleet combined with two dimensions. The first dimension is whether the FR is a single-stage (produces just enough fuel resources to sustain operation and growth of the FR fleet) or a two-stage (produces additional fuel resources to also sustain a companion fleet of thermal reactors) fuel cycle. In all four cases, all of the uranium is continuously recycled. The second dimension is whether only the plutonium is co-extracted and recycled with the uranium (with minor actinides disposed as waste) or all transuranic elements are co-extracted and recycled. The four most promising options are: 1) single-stage FR recycling of U/Pu (EG23), 2) recycling of U/TRU in single-stage FR (EG24), 3) recycling of U/Pu in two-stage FR/thermal reactors (EG29), and 4) recycling of U/TRU in two-stage FR/thermal reactors (EG30). (authors)
Analysis of Synergistic Fuel Cycle Options with Thorium and Heavy Water Reactors
Fuel cycle options (FCOs) with thorium-based fuels have characteristics that may have benefits for meeting certain objectives, such as transuranic actinide inventory management and overall natural resource utilization. Neutron irradiation of thorium and uranium-233 results in negligible production of transuranic actinides. This advantage is compromised, to a degree, when thorium fuels are used in conjunction with uranium-238; however, strategic reprocessing and fuel use (e.g., recycle of plutonium and/or minor actinides) can be used to manage this problem. Furthermore, thorium FCOs with reprocessing can extend the availability of natural nuclear resources by breeding new fissile material, recovering and recycling unused material, and achieving high burnups. In instances where natural thorium is more readily available than uranium, FCOs which use thorium may be preferable from sustainability and energy security perspectives. However, many hybrid uranium-thorium FCOs struggle to perform well in this regard, since large amounts of external fissile material (and therefore natural uranium) are required to breed the required uranium-233. DOE's evaluation and screening effort reports that for every metric ton (MT) of U-233 bred in a light water reactor for reuse, about 1000 MT of natural uranium are required to support such breeding, much of which is used inefficiently due to enrichment. The combination of HWRs and thorium-based fuels has the potential to reduce this consumption of natural uranium resources. Because heavy water moderates neutrons without significant absorption, fissile material requirements are lower compared to those of LWRs. This has enabled conventional 'once-through' HWRs to operate with only slightly-enriched or even natural uranium. Also, HWRs can be combined with LWRs in multistage FCOs where used LWR fuel can be processed and the remaining fissile content is sufficient to support use as fuel in HWRs in spite of the presence of neutron poisons (e.g., uranium-236); this concept has been demonstrated at a research scale in Korea. Thus, additional energy is extracted from the same initial natural uranium feed and uranium enrichment effort. Another consideration with using thorium-based fuels in HWRs is the current limited operational experience of the reactors and associated fuel cycle facilities using these fuels. However, work continues internationally towards gaining further experience. For example, at equilibrium the third stage of India's planned Three-Stage Nuclear Power Program uses thorium/uranium-233 or thorium/plutonium fuels with a fissile supply from second-stage fast reactors. Further, China plans to experiment with low-enriched uranium (LEU)-Th CANFLEX fuel bundles in a once-through configuration in its HWRs and a long-term objective is to transition to thorium use in a closed HWR FCO. Vanderbilt University (VU) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) are characterizing multi-stage, thermal-reactor FCOs that incorporate thorium and examining their potential performance. This paper presents insights from the examination of FCOs which consider the synergy of HWRs and thorium. Two multi-stage FCOs which incorporate thorium-based fuels in HWRs have been examined for their potential, one which uses recycled PWR uranium oxide fuel in conjunction with thorium in an HWR, and another that uses recycled HWR fuel in an MSR which also includes thorium. Both of the systems studied offer resource utilization improvements as compared to a once-through LWR fueled with low-enrichment uranium and highlight the potential synergy of thorium and HWRs. (authors)
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog FY15 Improvements and Additions.
The United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Fuel Cycle Technology Program sponsors nuclear fuel cycle research and development. As part of its Fuel Cycle Options campaign, the DOE has established the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog. The catalog is intended for use by the Fuel Cycle Technologies Program in planning its research and development activities and disseminating information regarding nuclear energy to interested parties. The purpose of this report is to document the improvements and additions that have been made to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog in the 2015 fiscal year.
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog: FY16 Improvements and Additions
The United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Fuel Cycle Technology Program sponsors nuclear fuel cycle research and development. As part of its Fuel Cycle Options campaign, the DOE has established the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog. The catalog is intended for use by the Fuel Cycle Technologies Program in planning its research and development activities and disseminating information regarding nuclear energy to interested parties. The purpose of this report is to document the improvements and additions that have been made to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog in the 2016 fiscal year.
Assessment for advanced fuel cycle options in CANDU
The possible options for advanced fuel cycles in CANDU reactors including actinide burning options and thorium cycles were explored and are feasible options to increase the efficiency of uranium utilization and help close the fuel cycle. The actinide burning TRUMOX approach uses a mixed oxide fuel of reprocessed transuranic actinides from PWR spent fuel blended with natural uranium in the CANDU-900 reactor. This system reduced actinide content by 35% and decreased natural uranium consumption by 24% over a PWR once through cycle. The thorium cycles evaluated used two CANDU-900 units, a generator and a burner unit along with a driver fuel feedstock. The driver fuels included plutonium reprocessed from PWR, from CANDU and low enriched uranium (LEU). All three cycles were effective options and reduced natural uranium consumption over a PWR once through cycle. The LEU driven system saw the largest reduction with a 94% savings while the plutonium driven cycles achieved 75% savings for PWR and 87% for CANDU. The high neutron economy, online fuelling and flexible compact fuel make the CANDU system an ideal reactor platform for many advanced fuel cycles.
Final Report on Two-Stage Fast Spectrum Fuel Cycle Options
This report presents the performance characteristics of two “two-stage” fast spectrum fuel cycle options proposed to enhance uranium resource utilization and to reduce nuclear waste generation. One is a two-stage fast spectrum fuel cycle option of continuous recycle of plutonium (Pu) in a fast reactor (FR) and subsequent burning of minor actinides (MAs) in an accelerator-driven system (ADS). The first stage is a sodium-cooled FR fuel cycle starting with low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel; at the equilibrium cycle, the FR is operated using the recovered Pu and natural uranium without supporting LEU. Pu and uranium (U) are co-extracted from the discharged fuel and recycled in the first stage, and the recovered MAs are sent to the second stage. The second stage is a sodium-cooled ADS in which MAs are burned in an inert matrix fuel form. The discharged fuel of ADS is reprocessed, and all the recovered heavy metals (HMs) are recycled into the ADS. The other is a two-stage FR/ADS fuel cycle option with MA targets loaded in the FR. The recovered MAs are not directly sent to ADS, but partially incinerated in the FR in order to reduce the amount of MAs to be sent to the ADS. This is a heterogeneous recycling option of transuranic (TRU) elements
Promising Fuel Cycle Options for R&D – Results, Insights, and Future Directions
The Fuel Cycle Options (FCO) campaign in the U.S. DOE Fuel Cycle Research & Development Program conducted a detailed evaluation and screening of nuclear fuel cycles. The process for this study was described at the 2014 ICAPP meeting. This paper reports on detailed insights and questions from the results of the study. The comprehensive study identified continuous recycle in fast reactors as the most promising option, using either U/Pu or U/TRU recycle, and potentially in combination with thermal reactors, as reported at the ICAPP 2014 meeting. This paper describes the examination of the results in detail that indicated that there was essentially no difference in benefit between U/Pu and U/TRU recycle, prompting questions about the desirability of pursuing the more complex U/TRU approach given that the estimated greater challenges for development and deployment. The results will be reported from the current effort that further explores what, if any, benefits of TRU recycle (minor actinides in addition to plutonium recycle) may be in order to inform decisions on future R&D directions. The study also identified continuous recycle using thorium-based fuel cycles as potentially promising, in either fast or thermal systems, but with lesser benefit. Detailed examination of these results indicated that the lesser benefit was confined to only a few of the evaluation metrics, identifying the conditions under which thorium-based fuel cycles would be promising to pursue. For the most promising fuel cycles, the FCO is also conducting analyses on the potential transition to such fuel cycles to identify the issues, challenges, and the timing for critical decisions that would need to be made to avoid unnecessary delay in deployment, including investigation of issues such as the effects of a temporary lack of plutonium fuel resources or supporting infrastructure. These studies are placed in the context of an overall analysis approach designed to provide comprehensive information to the decision-making process.
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Evaluation to Inform R&D Planning
An Evaluation and Screening (E&S) of nuclear fuel cycle options has been conducted in fulfilment of a Charter specified for the study by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy. The E&S study used an objective and independently reviewed evaluation process to provide information about the potential benefits and challenges that could strengthen the basis and provide guidance for the research and development(R&D) activities undertaken by the DOE Fuel Cycle Technologies Program Office. Using the nine evaluation criteria specified in the Charter and associated evaluation metrics and processes developed during the E&S study, a screening was conducted of 40 nuclear fuel cycle evaluation groups to provide answers to the questions: (1) Which nuclear fuel cycle system options have the potential for substantial beneficial improvements in nuclear fuel cycle performance, and what aspects of the options make these improvements possible? (2)Which nuclear material management approaches can favorably impact the performance of fuel cycle options? (3)Where would R&D investment be needed to support the set of promising fuel cycle system options and nuclear material management approaches identified above, and what are the technical objectives of associated technologies?
Economics of Future Fuel Cycle Options
Merits and Viability of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Technology Options and Waste Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Reactors
Summary of the Potential Impacts of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options on the Permanent Disposal of Spent Fuel in the U.S.
Abstract not provided.
Additional Capability Being Developed from UNF-ST&DARDS Unified Database: System Analysis and Fuel Cycle Option Analysis
The Used Nuclear Fuel Storage, Transportation & Disposal Analysis Resource and Data System (UNF-ST&DARDS) is being developed for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy by the national laboratories. An important part of UNF-ST&DARDS is the Unified Database (UDB), which contains information that can support a variety of activities including fuel storage, fuel transportation, and disposal-related system analysis. Currently, the main application of the UDB is to support evaluation of the characteristics of discharged spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from the U.S. commercial reactors. However, because of the extensive amount of data that has been collected and analyzed for UNF-ST&DARDS, there are many more applications that can utilize the UDB including system analysis with the Next-Generation System Analysis Model (NGSAM) and fuel cycle analysis with fuel cycle simulation codes such as ORION. Going forward, NGSAM and fuel cycle transition analysis with ORION integrate UDB data wherever possible in the UDB’s development plan. Finally, these advances in NGSAM and fuel cycle analysis can be used in conjunction with the UDB to help answer more complex questions about the optimization, utilization, storage, and eventual disposal of SNF.
An Approach for Assessing Development and Deployment Risks in the DOE Fuel Cycle Options Evaluation and Screening Study
Abstract One of the key objectives of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy R&D Roadmap is the development of sustainable nuclear fuel cycles that can improve natural resource utilization and provide solutions to the management of nuclear wastes. Recently, an evaluation and screening (E&S) of fuel cycle systems has been conducted to identify those options that provide the best opportunities for obtaining such improvements and also to identify the required research and development activities that can support the development of advanced fuel cycle options. In order to evaluate and screen the E&S study included nine criteria including Development and Deployment Risk (D&DR). More specifically, this criterion was represented by the following metrics: Development time, development cost, deployment cost from prototypic validation to first-of-a-kind commercial, compatibility with the existing infrastructure, existence of regulations for the fuel cycle and familiarity with licensing, and existence of market incentives and/or barriers to commercial implementation of fuel cycle processes. Given the comprehensive nature of the study, a systematic approach was needed to determine metric data for the D&DR criterion, and is presented here. As would be expected, the Evaluation Group representing the once-through use of uranium in thermal reactors is always the highest ranked fuel cycle Evaluation Group for this D&DR criterion. Evaluation Groups that consist of once-through fuel cycles that use existing reactor types are consistently ranked very high. The highest ranked limited and continuous recycle fuel cycle Evaluation Groups are those that recycle Pu in thermal reactors. The lowest ranked fuel cycles are predominately continuous recycle single stage and multi-stage fuel cycles that involve TRU and/or U-233 recycle.
Assessing Fuel Cycle Options for Elysium Molten Chloride Salt Fast Reactor from Spent Nuclear Fuel, Plutonium, and Depleted Uranium (Final CRADA Report)
Argonne National Laboratory performed calculations in order to determine the viability of various mode of operation and operating conditions for the reactor designed by Elysium Industry. The reactor description, operating conditions, startup fuel composition, and other relevant information were provided by Elysium to Argonne. The tools currently available at Argonne were used to perform the calculations and provide an assessment for the various cases agreed upon. The results were shared with Elysium.
An Integrated Fuel Depletion Calculator for Fuel Cycle Options Analysis
Bright-lite is a reactor modeling software developed at the University of Texas Austin to expand upon the work done with the Bright [1] reactor modeling software. Originally, bright-lite was designed to function as a standalone reactor modeling software. However, this aim was refocused t couple bright-lite with the Cyclus fuel cycle simulator [2] to make it a module for the fuel cycle simulator.