Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “geothermal fluids”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Exergy of air, CO 2 , and H 2 O for use as geothermal fluids

Geothermal energy refers to the thermal energy naturally stored in the hot rock formation buried deep beneath the Earth’s surface. To harvest this source of energy, a fluid is pumped down in a set of injection wells, circulates through the hot rock and then is collected via a set of production wells for heating or other purposes. Furthermore, the selection of this fluid is an important component of a geothermal system. In this work, we review, evaluate, and develop the fundamental equations that can reliably predict the thermodynamic and the transport properties of air, CO 2 , and H 2 O. Using these equations, we characterize and compare the heat extraction and exergy carried by these fluids as they circulate through a hot rock reservoir to determine which fluid offers better functionality for geothermal heat harvesting applications. The results indicate that, in terms of heat extraction and exergy, air is a better fluid compared to CO 2 and water.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2011

Arsenic speciation and transport associated with the release of spent geothermal fluids in Mutnovsky field (Kamchatka, Russia)

The use of geothermal fluids for the production of electricity poses a risk of contaminating surface waters when spent fluids are discharged into (near) surface environments. Arsenic (As) in particular is a common component in geothermal fluids and leads to a degradation of water quality when present in mobile and bioavailable forms. We have examined changes in arsenic speciation caused by quick transition from high temperature reducing conditions to surface conditions, retention mechanisms, and the extent of transport associated with the release of spent geothermal fluids at the Dachny geothermal fields (Mutnovsky geothermal region), Kamchatka, Russia -- a high temperature field used for electricity production. In the spent fluids, the arsenic concentration reaches 9 ppm, while in natural hot springs expressed in the vicinity of the field, the As concentration is typically below 10 ppb. The aqueous phase arsenic speciation was determined using Liquid Chromatography (LC) coupled to an Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS). The arsenic speciation in the bottom sediments (< 65 {mu}m fraction) of the local surface waters was analyzed using X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS). Arsenic in the geothermal source fluids is predominantly found as As(III), while a mixture of As(III)/As(V) is found in the water and sediment of the Falshivaia River downstream from the power plant. The extent of elevated arsenic concentrations in water is limited by adsorption to the bottom sediment and dilution, as determined using Cl{sup -} from the deep well fluids as a tracer. Analysis of the Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS) spectra shows that sediment phase arsenic is associated with both Al- and Fe-rich phases with a bi-dentate corner sharing local geometry. The geothermal waste fluids released in the surface water create a localized area of arsenic contamination. The extent of transport of dissolved As is limited to {approx}7 km downstream from the source, while As associated with bottom sediment travels {approx}3 km farther.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2012

Influence of Reservoir Heterogeneity on Geothermal Fluid and Methane Recovery from a Geopressured Geothermal Reservoir (Presentation)

Geopressured geothermal reservoirs are characterized by high temperatures and high pressures with correspondingly large quantities of dissolved methane. Two methods utilizing reservoir simulation techniques have been used to estimate recoverability factors of geothermal brine and methane based on well log data from a specific reservoir in Texas. The first assumes a simplified reservoir that hasthree layers: upper shale, sandstone, and lower shale with the sandstone layer thickness equal to the net sandstone in the reservoir interval. The second method uses a detailed reservoir model that accounts for multiple sandstone and shale layering. This method includes 12 layers of sandstone or shale with the layer depths determined from a well log. These two methods are used to answer thequestion on the sensitivity of the results to the level of detail that is included in the reservoir model. It was found that incorporating multiple thin layers of lower permeability sandstone can noticeably impact the results of the reservoir simulation. The heterogeneous model resulted in greater flow rates of both geothermal brine and total methane. Both models demonstrate that thegeopressured geothermal reservoir is capable of producing hot geothermal fluid at flow rates over a long duration that are sufficient for electricity production from binary power plants. The results indicate that simplified models of geopressured geothermal reservoirs that approximate actual reservoir details can be applied to give a reasonable, albeit conservative, estimate of the recoverableresource over broad areas using generalized data sets.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Lithium manganese oxide (LiMn{sub 2}O{sub 4}) nanoparticles synthesized by hydrothermal method as adsorbent of lithium recovery process from geothermal fluid of Lumpur Sidoarjo

Lumpur Sidoarjo is one of geothermal fluid types which has a great potential as source of lithium. Adsorption method with Lithium Manganese Oxide (LiMn{sub 2}O{sub 4}) as an adsorbent has been chosen for lithium recovery process due to low production cost and environmental friendly. LiMn{sub 2}O{sub 4} was synthesized by hydrothermal method at 200 °C for 24 hrs, 48 hrs, and 72 hrs. As prepared LiMn{sub 2}O{sub 4} powder is treated by acid treatment with 0.5 M HCl solution for 24 hrs. XRD test result reveals that all of as-prepared samples are indexed as spinel structure of LiMn{sub 2}O{sub 4} (JCPDS card no 35-0782) with no impurity peaks detected. SEM images show that LiMn{sub 2}O{sub 4} has nanoparticles morphology with particle size around 25 nm. The highest adsorption efficiency of adsorbent is obtained by sample hydrothermal for 72 hrs with 42.76%.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗
DOE OSTI2024

Utah FORGE: Geochemical Data for Cold Groundwaters and Produced Geothermal Fluids

Geochemical data for cold groundwaters and produced geothermal fluids around the Utah FORGE site. The data is compiled into four tables in the attached Excel File. Table 1 is a compilation of compositions (anions, cations, weak acids, oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon isotopes) for cold groundwaters and produced geothermal waters in the Milford valley, Utah. Table 2 is a compilation of noble gas (He, Ne, Ar) and He and Ne isotopic compositions for cold groundwaters and produced geothermal waters in the Milford valley, Utah. Table 3 provides values for calculated advective and diffusive fluxes of helium. Table 4 provides values of calculated subsurface stored heat between the Opal Mound fault and the Utah FORGE site, which are related to volumes of recently solidified magmatic heat sources.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Magnetic Nanofluid Rare Earth Element Extraction Process Report, Techno Economic Analysis, and Results for Geothermal Fluids

This GDR submission is an interim technical report and raw data files from the first year of testing on functionalized nanoparticles for rare earth element extraction from geothermal fluids. The report contains Rare Earth Element uptake results (percent removal, mg Rare Earth Element/gram of sorbent, distribution coefficient) for the elements of Neodymium, Europium, Yttrium, Dysprosium, and Cesium. A detailed techno economic analysis is also presented in the report for a scaled up geothermal rare earth element extraction process. All rare earth element uptake testing was done on simulated geothermal brines with one rare earth element in each brine. The rare earth element uptake testing was conducted at room temperature.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2017

Magnetic Partitioning Nanofluid for Rare Earth Extraction from Geothermal Fluids

Rare earth metals are critical materials in a wide variety of applications in generating and storing renewable energy and in designing more energy efficient devices. Extracting rare earth metals from geothermal brines is a very challenging problem due to the low concentrations of these elements and engineering challenges with traditional chemical separations methods involving packed sorbent beds or membranes that would impede large volumetric flow rates of geothermal fluids transitioning through the plant. We are demonstrating a simple and highly cost-effective nanofluid-based method for extracting rare earth metals from geothermal brines. Core-shell composite nanoparticles are produced that contain a magnetic iron oxide core surrounded by a shell made of silica or metal-organic framework (MOF) sorbent functionalized with chelating ligands selective for the rare earth elements. By introducing the nanoparticles at low concentration (≈0.05 wt%) into the geothermal brine after it passes through the plant heat exchanger, the brine is exposed to a very high concentration of chelating sites on the nanoparticles without need to pass through a large and costly traditional packed bed or membrane system where pressure drop and parasitic pumping power losses are significant issues. Instead, after a short residence time flowing with the brine, the particles are effectively separated out with an electromagnet and standard extraction methods are then applied to strip the rare earth metals from the nanoparticles, which are then recycled back to the geothermal plant. Recovery efficiency for the rare earths at ppm level has now been measured for both silica and MOF sorbents functionalized with a variety of chelating ligands. A detailed preliminary techno-economic performance analysis of extraction systems using both sorbents showed potential to generate a promising internal rate of return (IRR) up to 20%.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2014

Small Scale Electrical Power Generation from Heat Co-Produced in Geothermal Fluids: Mining Operation

Demonstrate the technical and economic feasibility of small scale power generation from low temperature co-produced fluids. Phase I is to Develop, Design and Test an economically feasible low temperature ORC solution to generate power from lower temperature co-produced geothermal fluids. Phase II &III are to fabricate, test and site a fully operational demonstrator unit on a gold mine working site and operate, remotely monitor and collect data per the DOE recommended data package for one year.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2019

Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Geothermal Fluids through Bacterial Cell Surface Adsorption

The increasing demand for rare earth elements (REEs) in the modern economy motivates the development of novel strategies for cost-effective REE recovery from nontraditional feedstocks. We previously engineered E. coli to express lanthanide binding tags on the cell surface, which increased the REE biosorption capacity and selectivity. Here we examined how REE adsorption by the engineered E. coli is affected by various geochemical factors relevant to geothermal fluids, including total dissolved solids (TDS), temperature, pH, and the presence of specific competing metals. REE biosorption is robust to TDS, with high REE recovery efficiency and selectivity observed with TDS as high as 165,000 ppm. Among several metals tested, U, Al, and Pb were found to be the most competitive, causing >25% reduction in REE biosorption when present at concentrations ~3- to 11-fold higher than the REEs. Optimal REE biosorption occurred between pH 5-6, and sorption capacity was reduced by ~65% at pH 2. REE recovery efficiency and selectivity increased as a function of temperature up to ~70 °C due to the thermodynamic properties of metal complexation on the bacterial surface. Ultimately, these data define the optimal and boundary conditions for biosorption and demonstrate its potential utility for selective REE recovery from geofluids.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2019

Western USA Assessment of High Value Materials in Geothermal Fluids and Produced Fluids

This report documents the results of investigations dealing with the concentrations and availabilities of strategic, critical and valuable materials (SCVM) in produced waters from geothermal and hydrocarbon reservoirs (50-250° C) in Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, and Utah. Analytical results were obtained for water samples from 47 production wells in 12 geothermal fields. Results were also obtained for samples from 25 oil/gas production wells in the Uinta and Paradox Basins and Covenant oil field, from 14 groundwater wells in the Tularosa play fairway (New Mexico), and from 20 groundwater wells and hot springs in the Sevier Thermal Belt (southwestern Utah). Most SCVM concentrations in produced waters range from <0.1 to 100 ug/kg. Lithium is the only element, which has much higher concentrations and which ranges from 10 to 26,000 ug/kg. Relatively high concentrations of gallium (10-80 ug/kg geothermal; 10-10,000 ug/kg Uinta Basin), germanium (1-70 ug/kg geothermal; 10-500 ug/kg Uinta and Paradox Basins), scandium (0.1-2.0 ug/kg geothermal; 5-10 ug/kg Paradox Basin), selenium (1-100 ug/kg geothermal; 10-20,000 ug/kg Uinta and Paradox Basins), and tellurium (0.1-10 ug/kg geothermal; 1-500 ug/kg Uinta and Paradox Basins) are measured too. Geothermal production waters contain very low concentrations of REEs, below analytical detections limits of 0.01 ug/kg, but the concentrations of some REEs (lanthanum, cerium, and europium) range from 0.05 to 5 ug/kg in Uinta Basin waters. Among the geothermal fields, the Roosevelt Hot Spring reservoir appears to have the largest endowments of germanium (20,000 kg) and lithium (7 million kg), the Patua reservoir appears to have the largest endowments of gallium (25,000 kg), selenium (47,000 kg), and tellurium (2500 kg), and the Raft River reservoir appears to have the large endowment of scandium (700 kg). By comparison, the Uinta Basin has larger inventories of gallium (>100,000 kg). These estimates are provisional, and they were calculated using geologically reasonable values for reservoir volumes and porosities. The concentrations of gallium, germanium, lithium, scandium, selenium, and tellurium in produced waters appear to be partly controlled by reservoir temperature and concentrations of total dissolved salts. The relatively high concentration and large endowment of lithium occurring at Roosevelt Hot Springs appears to be related to hot water interaction with crystalline granitic rocks, which host the reservoir and the hydrothermal system, and elevated concentrations of TDS. Analyses of calcite scales from Dixie Valley show that cobalt, gallium, gold, palladium, selenium and tellurium are depositing at deep levels in production wells due to boiling. Comparisons with SCVM mineral deposits suggest that brines in sedimentary basins or derived from lacustrine evaporites enable aqueous transport of gallium, germanium, and lithium.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2014

Technologies for Extracting Valuable Metals and Compounds from Geothermal Fluids

Simbol Materials studied various methods of extracting valuable minerals from geothermal brines in the Imperial Valley of California, focusing on the extraction of lithium, manganese, zinc and potassium. New methods were explored for managing the potential impact of silica fouling on mineral extraction equipment, and for converting silica management by-products into commercial products. Studies at the laboratory and bench scale focused on manganese, zinc and potassium extraction and the conversion of silica management by-products into valuable commercial products.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2018

Western USA Assessment of High Value Materials in Geothermal Fluids and Produced Fluids

This submission includes the following: - Field Characteristics: Describes the geological and production field characteristics of sampling sites - Geochemistry of Produced Fluids Idaho-Nevada-New Mexico-Oregon-Utah: Summarizes the all the analytical results for aqueous samples collected from geothermal production wells, hydrocarbon production wells, and hot springs. - Geochemistry of Reservoir Rocks & Calcite Scales Nevada-Utah: Analytical results of trace element analyses of reservoir drill cuttings from Beowawe, Dixie Valley, Roosevelt Hot Springs, Uinta Basin, and Paradox Basin (Aneth field); also includes analyses of Dixie Valley calcite scales and rocks in the Sevier Thermal Belt, Utah. - Lithology and mineralogy of drill cuttings from Beowawe, Dixie Valley and Roosevelt Hot Springs: Lithological and mineralogical characterization of drill cuttings from Beowawe, Dixie Valley and Roosevelt Hot Springs - Geological Settings of Critical Element Mineral Deposits: Brief summary and references regarding the geological settings of critical element mineral deposits

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2018

Selective Recovery of Critical Materials from Geothermal Fluid

This project, funded by the DOE Small Business Voucher program, assisted the partner with the development of ion-imprinted adsorbents for the selective extraction of rare earth elements (REE) from geothermal brines. This effort seeks to utilize a currently untapped resource thus diversifying the U. S. REE market. The initial stage of the program focused on the adsorbent developed by partner and optimization of the adsorbent. The adsorbent was based upon an ion imprinted ligand that was copolymerized with a crosslinker to generate the REE selectivity. During this task, the adsorbents were irradiated via electron beam at the NEO Beam Electron Beam Crosslinking Facility (Mercury Plastics, Middlefield, OH) to induce further crosslinking. The irradiation crosslinked adsorbents exhibited no difference in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic (FTIR) analysis suggesting inefficiency in the crosslinking. In the later stage of the effort, a new method was proposed and studied at ORNL involving a new partnership between the partner and a commercial polymer vender. This resulted in a new material being developed which allows the partner to utilize a commercial support and integrate the synthesis into a production-ready product stream. This will enhance the route to commercialization for the partner resulting in a quicker market penetration for the product. The new adsorbent exhibits selectivity for REE over transition metals commonly found within geothermal brines. Further optimization is required for enhanced selectivity, capacity, and intra-lanthanide separations.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2017

Systems and methods for multi-fluid geothermal energy systems

A method for extracting geothermal energy from a geothermal reservoir formation. A production well is used to extract brine from the reservoir formation. At least one of nitrogen (N.sub.2) and carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) may be used to form a supplemental working fluid which may be injected into a supplemental working fluid injection well. The supplemental working fluid may be used to augment a pressure of the reservoir formation, to thus drive a flow of the brine out from the reservoir formation.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗