Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “iterative solver”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

xSDK-batched Subcontract - Ginkgo Batched Iterative Solver Development (Final Report)

Iterative solvers are fundamentally different from direct solvers in terms of execution as they generally do not execute a pre-defined sequence of operations or steps, but adapt the number of iterations to the specific problem and the preset solution quality. Generally, the adaptation of the iteration count to the problem is realized by monitoring the solver convergence and stopping the iteration process once the monitored metric, e.g., the residual norm, hits a pre-defined threshold. When addressing a set of problems with different properties, it is necessary to monitor the threshold for each problem individually and break up the SIMD execution style to avoid excess iterations for “easier” problems. Ginkgo integrates a simple but customizable stopping criterion for the residual norm and generally uses a pre-defined (relative or absolute) residual norm as the stopping criterion. In order to avoid the overhead of launching a kernel at every iteration, the iteration convergence and iteration control is part of the solver kernel. Each thread maintains its own copy of the iteration count.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Asynchronous Iterative Solvers for Extreme-Scale Computing (Final Report)

This is the final report for the project: Asynchronous Iterative Solvers for Extreme-Scale Computing. This was a collaborative project. This report only covers the activities specific to Georgia Institute of Technology. The project investigated and developed iterative solvers that operate asynchronously, thereby avoiding the high cost of synchronization that is apparent when using standard, synchronous iterative solvers at extreme levels of parallelism.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

A family of independent Variable Eddington Factor methods with efficient preconditioned iterative solvers

We present a family of discretizations for the Variable Eddington Factor (VEF) equations that have high-order accuracy on curved meshes and efficient preconditioned iterative solvers. The VEF discretizations are combined with the Discontinuous Galerkin transport discretization from to form effective high-order, linear transport methods. The VEF discretizations are derived by extending the unified analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems presented by Arnold et al. to the VEF equations. This framework is used to define analogs of the interior penalty, second method of Bassi and Rebay, minimal dissipation local Discontinuous Galerkin, and continuous finite element methods. The analysis of subspace correction preconditioners, which use a continuous operator to iteratively precondition the discontinuous discretization, is extended to the case of the non-symmetric VEF system. Numerical results demonstrate that the VEF discretizations have arbitrary-order accuracy on curved meshes, preserve the thick diffusion limit, and are effective on a proxy problem from thermal radiative transfer in both outer transport iterations and inner preconditioned linear solver iterations. We demonstrate that the VEF solution converges to the S N transport solution as the mesh is refined on both problems with smooth and non-smooth behavior in angle. Parallel performance studies show that the interior penalty VEF discretization's linear solve weak scales out to 1024 processors and strong scales well on a single node. Particular attention is paid to the parallel performance of the VEF algorithm when used in combination with a parallel block Jacobi transport sweep.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Asynchronous Iterative Solvers for Extreme-Scale Computing

The Asynchronous Iterative Solvers for Extreme-Scale Computing (AsyncIS) project aims to explore more efficient numerical algorithms by decreasing their overhead. AsyncIS does this by replacing the outer Krylov subspace solver with an asynchronous optimized Schwarz method, thereby removing the global synchronization and bulk synchronous operations typically used in numerical codes. AsyncIS—a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-funded collaboration between Georgia Tech, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Temple University, and Sandia National Laboratories—also focuses on the development and optimization of asynchronous preconditioners (i.e., preconditioners that are generated and/or applied in an asynchronous fashion). The novel preconditioning algorithms that provide fine-grained parallelism enable preconditioned Krylov solvers to run efficiently on large-scale distributed systems and manycore accelerators like GPUs.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Performance of preconditioned iterative solvers in MFiX–Trilinos for fluidized beds

MFiX, a general-purpose Fortran-based suite, simulates the complex flow in fluidized bed applications via BiCGStab and GMRES methods along with plane relaxation preconditioners. Trilinos, an object-oriented framework, contains various first- and second-generation Krylov subspace solvers and preconditioners. We developed a framework to integrate MFiX with Trilinos as MFiX does not possess advanced linear methods. The framework allows MFiX to access advanced linear solvers and preconditioners in Trilinos. The integrated solver is called MFiX–Trilinos, here after. In the present work, we study the performance of variants of GMRES and CGS methods in MFiX–Trilinos and BiCGStab and GMRES solvers in MFiX for a 3D gas–solid fluidized bed problem. Two right preconditioners employed along with various solvers in MFiX–Trilinos are Jacobi and smoothed aggregation. The flow from MFiX–Trilinos is validated against the same from MFiX for BiCGStab and GMRES methods. And, the effect of the preconditioning on the iterative solvers in MFiX–Trilinos is also analyzed. In addition, the effect of left and right smoothed aggregation preconditioning on the solvers is studied. Finally, the performance of the first- and second-generation solver stacks in MFiX–Trilinos is studied as well for two different problem sizes.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Fast nonlinear iterative solver for an implicit, energy-conserving, asymptotic-preserving charged-particle orbit integrator

Here recently, an asymptotic-preserving (AP) particle orbit integrator has been proposed with remarkable properties including exact energy conservation, the ability to capture of all first-order drifts (including the ∇B-drift), the ability to capture trapped-passing boundaries with parallel velocity extremely close to the critical velocity, and the ability to transition from strongly to weakly magnetized spatial regions. The new AP orbit integrator is implicit, employing a Crank-Nicolson (CN) temporal discretization to ensure exact energy conservation. This, in turn, requires a local nonlinear iteration involving particle velocities and positions, and the local electromagnetic fields, to obtain the new-time solution. Ref. [1] did not attempt to provide an efficient solver for this system, and employed a brute-force GMRES-driven Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov (JFNK) solver to invert the particle orbit equations at every timestep for expediency. While JFNK is robust and reliable, it is also expensive and very intrusive for practical implementations of the method (it requires having the JFNK machinery available and solving a 6 x 6 Jacobian system iteratively once per iteration per particle).

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Initial Exploration of the Use of Mixed Precision in Iterative Solvers (B639388 Subcontract Quarter I Report)

The first quarter of the project was primarily spent identifying potential projects at the intersection of finite precision analysis, mixed precision computation, and Krylov subspace methods. We summarize our findings in the remainder of the document. Other activities include attending biweekly xSDK meetings as well as contributing material to the technical report and journal versions of the multiprecision landscape paper. The subsequent quarter will be spent selecting a subset of the described projects to focus on, performing initial numerical experiments to evaluate the potential for the use of mixed precision, and developing initial theoretical analysis.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Quarter 4 Report: Report on Final Findings and Opportunities for Future Work in the Use of Mixed Precision in Iterative Solvers

The fourth quarter of the project was spent developing an error analysis of the s-step Lanczos and CG algorithms. Our theoretical bounds and numerical experiments show that the numerical behavior of the algorithm can be significantly improved by using extra precision in a small part of the computation related to the computation and application of the Gram matrix. We have published a technical report which includes all steps of the analysis [8]; a shortened version for journal submission is in preparation. We plan to submit this paper in the following weeks. Activities related to this also include a collaboration with Ichitaro Yamazaki on gathering performance results for these new mixed precision s-step Krylov subspace methods using single/double precision on GPUs. Namely, we would like to obtain performance results that show that the performance overhead of using double the working precision in these select computations is minimal. Other activities include attending biweekly xSDK meetings and presenting a pitch talk on this work to the group on February 25, 2021. In the remainder of the document, we summarize our findings on the potential for mixed precision in classical Krylov subspace methods and s-step Krylov subspace methods, as well as key opportunities for future work.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗