Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “level 2”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Opacity on NIF: Anchor 2 Iron (Level 2 Milestone 7118 Report)

In FY2020 we fulfilled the exit criteria of milestone 7118. We fielded iron opacity experiments at higher densities and temperatures approaching anchor 2 conditions and made good progress on overcoming the problems that we found. This report describes in detail the progress that has been made. We presented the results in a LANL seminar on August 10 and we gave two talks on our results to the National Opacity Workshop Series, one on July 9 and the other on September 14. Before discussing the anchor 2 measurements, we present an update of the NIF anchor 1 data. We did a new analysis of the anchor 1 data and compared the results to a series of calculations using the LANL ATOMIC code. Figures 1 and 2 compare the data with the best-fit to calculations. This result is significantly improved over the result published in Atoms. The differences are small for the iron quasi-continuum between 8-9.5 Å and for the Mg Heα and Lyα lines. The opacities near the centers of the iron bound-bound features also match fairly well in the 9.5-12.5 Å range. However, the opacity windows between the large iron bound-bound features are deeper in the Atomic predictions than the measurement. Furthermore, large discrepancies exist for the Mg He β, γ, and δ lines and for the short-wavelength quasicontinuum. The experiment and analysis refinements described below have set the stage for unraveling these discrepancies. Specifically, we can repeat the Anchor 1 experiments using improved backlighter, hohlraum, and spectrometers to obtain reduced backgrounds and better spectral resolution. Exploiting the AlMg calibration experiments and repeating the Anchor 1 measurements multiple times will enable formal and rigorous uncertainty determination. This well-defined path gives us confidence that high quality opacity data can be obtained on NIF.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

COMPASS-FME Synoptic Sites Level 2 Sensor Data v2-1

This is the version 2-1 Level 2 (L2) data release for COMPASS-FME environmental sensors located at our synoptic field sites. COMPASS-FME is studying sites in two distinct regions, the Chesapeake Bay and the Western Lake Erie Basin. We established the network at seven "synoptic" (observational) sites along the Chesapeake Bay and Lake Erie coastlines, collectively generating over three million observations per month, to track and comprehend environmental changes where land and water intersect. Additionally, the two regions provide an interesting contrast of saltwater and freshwater coasts that allow us to differentiate the impacts of inundation and coastal water chemistries in two nationally important coastal systems. Level 2 (L2) data consist of sensor observations from the COMPASS-FME synoptic sites, TEMPEST, and DELUGE. Compared to the L1 data, these are more consistent (always 15-minute timestamps for the entire year); better QA/QC’d (out of bounds, out of service, and extreme outlier values are removed); and more complete, with a gap-filled time series available alongside the main observations, and additional derived (calculated) variables. L2 data are intended to be rapidly and easily usable in analyses and simulations. However, algorithmic outlier identification always carries the risk of removing valid data, and Level 1 data may be more suitable for analyses that focus on variability or extreme events. This dataset includes: - An overall dataset README file that describes the current version, gives citation and contact information, etc. - Site- and year-specific folders, each holding variable-specific Parquet (a high performance, space efficient format; see https://parquet.apache.org) data files for each site and plot in that year. - Metadata files within each site-year folder provide full information on data units, expected ranges, contact information, detailed flood times, as well as a general description of the site. - Environmental sensor types that appear in the data files include weather (ClimaVUE50, CS, RM Young, and LI instruments in the graphs below); soil conditions (TEROS12); soil redox state (Redox); groundwater variables (AquaTROLL200 and AquaTROLL600); open water sondes (Exo); tree sap velocity (Sapflow); and system voltage and state (Datalogger). Data are reported every 15 minutes. Data files are in Apache Parquet, a high performance, space efficient format for tabular data. These files can be read using R's `arrow` package (https://arrow.apache.org/docs/r/), with similar tools available in other languages. Please see v2-1 L2 Sensor Package QStart.pdf for detailed information on data package structure, temporal coverage, and versioning.

EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATU↗

COMPASS-FME Terrestrial Ecosystem Manipulation to Probe the Effects of Storm Treatments (TEMPEST) Experiment Level 2 Sensor Data v2-1

This is the version v2-1 Level 2 (L2) data release for COMPASS-FME environmental sensors located at our Terrestrial Ecosystem Manipulation to Probe the Effects of Storm Treatments (TEMPEST) experimental site. This manipulative, ecosystem-scale TEMPEST experiment addresses the potential for freshwater and estuarine-water disturbance events to alter tree function, species composition, and ecosystem processes in a deciduous coastal forest in MD, USA. The experiment uses a large-unit (2000 m2), un-replicated experimental design, with three 50 m × 40 m plots serving as control, freshwater, and estuarine-water treatments. Level 2 (L2) data consist of sensor observations from the COMPASS-FME synoptic sites, TEMPEST, and DELUGE. Compared to the L1 data, these are more consistent (always 15-minute timestamps for the entire year); better QA/QC’d (out of bounds, out of service, and extreme outlier values are removed); and more complete, with a gap-filled time series available alongside the main observations, and additional derived (calculated) variables. L2 data are intended to be rapidly and easily usable in analyses and simulations. However, algorithmic outlier identification always carries the risk of removing valid data, and Level 1 data may be more suitable for analyses that focus on variability or extreme events. This dataset includes: - An overall dataset README file that describes the current version, gives citation and contact information, etc. - Site- and year-specific folders, each holding variable-specific Parquet (a high performance, space efficient format; see https://parquet.apache.org) data files for each site and plot in that year. - Metadata files within each site-year folder provide full information on data units, expected ranges, contact information, detailed flood times, as well as a general description of the site. - Environmental sensor types that appear in the data files include weather (ClimaVUE50, CS, RM Young, and LI instruments in the graphs below); soil conditions (TEROS12); soil redox state (Redox); groundwater variables (AquaTROLL200 and AquaTROLL600); open water sondes (Exo); tree sap velocity (Sapflow); and system voltage and state (Datalogger). Data are reported every 15 minutes. Please see v2-1 TEMPEST L2 Sensor Package Quick Start.pdf for detailed information on data package structure, temporal coverage, and versioning. Data files are in Apache Parquet, a high performance, space efficient format for tabular data. These files can be read using R's `arrow` package (https://arrow.apache.org/docs/r/), with similar tools available in other languages. The TEMPEST flood events occurred on the following dates. They lasted for ~10 hours each day and delivered ~80,000 gallons to each plot; many data streams are available at 1 or 5 minute frequency during these periods. * Tests: Aug 25 (fresh plot) and Sep 9 (salt plot), 2021 * TEMPEST 1: June 22, 2022 * TEMPEST 2: June 6-7, 2023 * TEMPEST 3: June 11-13, 2024

EARTH SCIENCE > ATMOSPHERE > ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATU↗

A Coupled Deep Learning Model for Estimating Surface NO 2 Levels from Remote Sensing Data: 15-Year Study Over the Contiguous United States

This study proposes a novel two-step deep learning (DL) model for estimating surface NO 2 concentrations using satellite data over the contiguous United States (CONUS) from 2005 to 2019. The first phase of the model uses partial convolutional neural network (PCNN), an advanced DL model that accurately imputes gaps between surface NO 2 stations and creates 5,478 daily-mean NO 2 grids (PCNN-NO 2 ) of the 2005-2019 period over the study area. We then feed the PCNN-NO 2 , along with other predictor variables, into a deep neural network (DNN) to estimate surface NO 2 levels, achieving exceptional performance with a correlation coefficient of 0.975 to 0.978, a mean absolute bias of 0.99 ppb to 1.38 ppb, and a root mean square error of 1.47 ppb to 1.97 ppb. Spatial cross-validation results also indicate strong spatial performance of PCNN-DNN surface NO 2 estimates. In addition to its accurate estimates, the PCNN-DNN model consistently generates estimated NO 2 grids without any missing values, improving the quality of various applications such as emission reduction strategies and public health studies. Between 2005 and 2019, the 5,478 daily estimated NO 2 grids over the CONUS reveal significant reductions in NO 2 levels in fourteen major urban environments: Washington D.C. (-43%), New York (-45%), Los Angeles (-38%), Chicago (-25%), Boston (-43%), Houston (-34%), Dallas (-40%), Philadelphia (-41%), Phoenix (-38%), Detroit (-20%), Denver (-23%), Atlanta (-0.7%), Cincinnati (-38%), and Pittsburgh (-56%). Furthermore, the study shows that the denser urban regions that in-situ stations are installed in, the higher the difference between in-situ observations and regional-mean NO 2 levels.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Bioverse: A Comprehensive Assessment of the Capabilities of Extremely Large Telescopes to Probe Earth-like O 2 Levels in Nearby Transiting Habitable-zone Exoplanets

Molecular oxygen is a strong indicator of life on Earth and may indicate biological processes on exoplanets too. Recent studies proposed that Earth-like O 2 levels might be detectable on nearby exoplanets using high-resolution spectrographs on future extremely large telescopes (ELTs). However, these studies did not consider constraints like relative velocities, planet occurrence rates, and target observability. We expanded on past studies by creating a homogeneous catalog of 286,391 main-sequence stars within 120 pc using Gaia DR3 and used the Bioverse framework to simulate the likelihood of finding nearby transiting Earth analogs. We also simulated a survey of M dwarfs within 20 pc accounting for η ⊕ estimates, transit probabilities, relative velocities, and target observability to determine how long ELTs and theoretical 50–100 m ground-based telescopes need to observe to probe for Earth-like O 2 levels with an R = 100,000 spectrograph. This would only be possible within 50 yr for up to ~21% of nearby M-dwarf systems if a suitable transiting habitable-zone Earth analog was discovered, assuming signals from every observable partial transit from each ELT can be combined. If so, Earth-like O 2 levels could be detectable on TRAPPIST-1 d–g within 16–55 yr, respectively, and about half that time with an R = 500,000 spectrograph. These results have important implications for whether ELTs can survey nearby habitable-zone Earth analogs for O 2 via transmission spectroscopy. Our work provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of the ground-based capabilities to search for life beyond the solar system.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

Exceedance Response Action (ERA) Level 1 Report and ERA Level 2 Action Plan

This report consolidates the requirements for an Exceedance Response Action (ERA) Level 1 and ERA Level 2 Action Plan for pH. A discharger’s baseline status for any given parameter changes to Level 1 status if sampling results indicate a Numeric Action Level (NAL) exceedance for that same parameter. NAL exceedance can be either of the following: (1) Instantaneous maximum NAL exceedance: Occurs when two or more analytical results for any single parameter within a reporting year exceed the instantaneous maximum NAL (for example for pH a value less than 6 or a value greater than 9); and (2) Annual NAL exceedance: Occurs when the average of all the analytical results for a parameter within a reporting year exceeds the annual NAL. A Discharger’s Level 1 status for any given parameter changes to Level 2 status if sampling results indicate a Numeric Action Level (NAL) exceedance for the same parameter while a Discharger is in Level 1.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Exceedance Response Action (ERA) Level 2 Technical Report Update

The Sandia National Laboratories, California (SNL/CA) site comprises approximately 410 acres and is located in the eastern portion of Livermore, Alameda County, California. The property is owned by the United States Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) and is being managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (NTESS). Operations at the SNL/CA facility consist of DOE statutory responsibilities for nuclear weapon research and design, development of energy technologies, and basic scientific research. Specific industrial activities occur in discrete buildings and include electroplating or anodizing, machine shop, permitted hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facility (TSDF), and a scrap yard. This report provides an update to the ERA Level 2 Technical Report Update previously submitted in June 2022 (2022 ERA L2 Technical Report Update) for iron, aluminum, and pH. In accordance with the California’s General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activities (IGP) Section XII.D.3.c, an ERA Level 2 Technical Report update is to be submitted with the annual report when a facility utilizing an Industrial Activity Best Management Practice (BMP) Demonstration (IABMPD) experiences additional exceedances of the numeric action levels.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

ChargePoint Level 2 Charging Data

This dataset contains charging data from the SWS Level 2 charger. This charger is exclusively used to charge the 220EV box truck. Data fields include charging duration (HH:MM:SS) and total energy charged during a session.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗