Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lineloads”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

10 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

PCLAM: a Python Module for Computing Surface Lineloads and Moments

Lineloads serve a unique and important role in aerodynamic database development as well as configuration design and analysis. A new software suite was constructed which can compute lineloads rapidly enough that the calculations can run in tandem with high-fidelity fluid flow solvers. This enables the calculation of iteration- or time-dependent lineloads, which have thus far been too computationally costly to create for complicated systems like launch vehicles. The suite is organized into a standalone Python module named PCLAM (PCLAM Computes Lineloads And Moments) which can be imported into other software with minimal restructuring by the user or developer. The computed lineloads are integrated with a $C^0$ numerical quality and exhibit the expected sensitivity to underlying grid resolution. Even at low grid and lineload resolutions, the computed lineloads were found to be in strong agreement with several analytical test cases.

sectional loads↗
NASA NTRS2019

Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods Used in the Development of the Space Launch System Liftoff and Transition Lineloads Databases

The objective of this paper is to document the reasoning and trade studies that supported the selection of appropriate tools for constructing aerodynamic lineload databases for the Liftoff and Transition phases of flight for launch vehicles. These decisions were made amid the maturation of an evolving workflow for generating databases on variants of the Space Launch System launch vehicle, with most being based on results from brief developmental studies performed in response to specific, unforeseen challenges that were encountered in analyzing a given configuration. This report is intended to provide a summary of the results and the decision-making processes chronologically over the design cycles of various configurations, starting with isolated free-air bodies for the Block 1 Crew, then the Block 1B Crew and Cargo configurations, and most recently the Block 1B Crew configuration in proximity to the launch tower. The results from these analyses led to the selection of the CREATE-AV Kestrel flowsolver for simulating these problems. The need to accurately capture the expected leeward-wake flow field characteristics required the use of Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) method, for which the vorticity magnitude was employed as the solution Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) function over the off-body Cartesian grid region. In addition, the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model is used to account for the flow turbulence effects.

Ratnayake, Nalin A.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Unstructured Grid Development for the Space Launch System Liftoff and Transition Lineloads Computational Analysis

Production of aerodynamic lineloads databases for the Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle at Liftoff and Transition (LOT) conditions has required the development of a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) workflow capable of producing high-quality solutions for this unique phase of flight. Aerodynamic considerations included a wide range of flow angles (from 0°up to 90°total angle of attack), resulting leeside separation, and interaction effects between the three bodies of the integrated SLS vehicle, as well as the nearby launch tower. Computational mesh development for similar problems at the NASA Langley Research Center (such as for the Constellation/Ares launch vehicles) has primarily relied on in-house tools such as VGRID/POSTGRID, with grids designed for NASA-developed and maintained flow solvers such as USM3D and FUN3D. The workflow for such problems has evolved over the development of the various SLS configurations to incorporate new tools such as the Heldenpatch/Heldenmesh grid generator (Helden Aerospace) and CREATE-AV Kestrel (US Department of Defense) flow solver. This paper describes efforts to benchmark a grid generation approach for LOT problems using Heldenpatch/Heldenmesh and Kestrel, verified against prior best practices from VGRID/POSTGRID. Parameters studied include surface grid density, first-layer viscous cell height, and volume grid growth rate parameters. Resulting solutions are compared based on total force and moment values, sectional line loads, and surface pressures, all validated against existing wind tunnel aerodynamic databases where available for the SLS Block 1B Cargo configuration.

Space launch systems↗
NASA NTRS2024

Development of a Data Fusion Methodology for Lineload Aerodynamic Databases for a Launch Vehicle during Liftoff and Transition

The need for databases for the distributed loading on launch vehicles during the early portion of flight necessitates the use of expensive computational flows in regimes where wake effects dominate. While also being expensive, this is a regime that computational tools tend to historically have problems simulating accurately. To help tackle this problem, a method of data fusion to combine computational results to wind tunnel derived force and moment data is developed. Using this method, significant reduction in computational costs and increases in confidence of the final product is possible and has been used to generate several databases for the Space Launch System (SLS) at NASA. While the full details of database generation are not part of this work, the crucial method at its core is developed here. Two SLS geometries are used throughout the work to demonstrate the techniques. These are two of the larger geometries and represent both planned crewed missions to the Moon as well as potential cargo missions to deep space. The method uses principal component analysis (PCA) to generate a reduced ordered model (ROM) to help fill in the full parameter space. Other similar techniques are explored, but were not found to have a significant result on the predictions of the ROM. Because the full number of components are kept to generate the model, this lack of difference is expected. This method is then extended to ensure that predicted surfaces match trusted force and moment data derived from wind tunnel testing. This extension is done by setting up a constrained optimization problem in order to minimize the deviation from the surface resolved computational data while still integrating to the desired values. When generating the constrained optimization problem, a weighting factor to balance these competing needs is introduced. The work compares previously introduced weighting terms from similar work to the proposed terms and shows that the previously used terms do not have as desirable behavior in this flow regime. This method is then expanded by developing a technique to incorporate uncertainty quantification into the developed data fusion methodology. This expansion takes a two pronged approach. One examines transferring the uncertainties in the force and moment database and characterizes how those adjustments change the predicted lineloads. The second looks at model form error and looks how rebuilding the model using slightly different data changes the predictions. These two terms are then combined in order to create an uncertainty model that takes both effects into account. The limitations of the proposed methods is then discussed as well as possible techniques to address these shortcomings.

Launch Vehicles↗
NASA NTRS2011

A Quasi-Steady Flexible Launch Vehicle Stability Analysis Using Steady CFD with Unsteady Aerodynamic Enhancement

Launch vehicles frequently experience a reduced stability margin through the transonic Mach number range. This reduced stability margin is caused by an undamping of the aerodynamics in one of the lower frequency flexible or rigid body modes. Analysis of the behavior of a flexible vehicle is routinely performed with quasi-steady aerodynamic lineloads derived from steady rigid computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, a quasi-steady aeroelastic stability analysis can be unconservative at the critical Mach numbers where experiment or unsteady computational aeroelastic (CAE) analysis show a reduced or even negative aerodynamic damping. This paper will present a method of enhancing the quasi-steady aeroelastic stability analysis of a launch vehicle with unsteady aerodynamics. The enhanced formulation uses unsteady CFD to compute the response of selected lower frequency modes. The response is contained in a time history of the vehicle lineloads. A proper orthogonal decomposition of the unsteady aerodynamic lineload response is used to reduce the scale of data volume and system identification is used to derive the aerodynamic stiffness, damping and mass matrices. The results of the enhanced quasi-static aeroelastic stability analysis are compared with the damping and frequency computed from unsteady CAE analysis and from a quasi-steady analysis. The results show that incorporating unsteady aerodynamics in this way brings the enhanced quasi-steady aeroelastic stability analysis into close agreement with the unsteady CAE analysis.

Bartels, Robert E.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cross-Validation of Computational and Experimental Distributed Surface Pressures on the Space Launch System

This paper presents a new workflow for comparing experimental pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) data to computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations by way of mapping data from corresponding grids utilizing interpolation methods. In addition to generating quantitative and qualitative point-to-point comparisons between PSP and CFD data, this workflow extracts sectional loading data from both grids and generates lineload comparison charts for corresponding PSP and CFD runs. Experimental PSP data presented in this paper were taken from a 2016 NASA Ames Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel 11- by 11-Foot Transonic WindTunnel Facility test of the NASA Space Launch System. CFD simulation data for comparison purposes were generated using the FUN3D code. Overall, interpolation onto PSP grids versus CFD grids yields comparable surface pressure fields. However, lineload comparisons are easier to make on the CFD grid-mapped data due to the grid topology and the current capabilities of the lineload analysis tools at NASA Langley Research Center. This workflow is written using contemporary software (Python, Tecplot, PyTecplot), is compatible with existing tools at NASA Langley, and is developed to be adaptable depending on the situation.

SLS↗
NASA NTRS2015

Detached Eddy Simulation Results for a Space Launch System Configuration at Liftoff Conditions and Comparison with Experiment

Computational simulations for a Space Launch System configuration at liftoff conditions for incidence angles from 0 to 90 degrees were conducted in order to generate integrated force and moment data and longitudinal lineloads. While the integrated force and moment coefficients can be obtained from wind tunnel testing, computational analyses are indispensable in obtaining the extensive amount of surface information required to generate proper lineloads. However, beyond an incidence angle of about 15 degrees, the effects of massive flow separation on the leeward pressure field is not well captured with state of the art Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes methods, necessitating the employment of a Detached Eddy Simulation method. Results from these simulations are compared to the liftoff force and moment database and surface pressure data derived from a test in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Wind Tunnel.

Computational fluid dynamics↗
NASA NTRS1996

Meshing of a Spiral Bevel Gearset with 3D Finite Element Analysis

Recent advances in spiral bevel gear geometry and finite element technology make it practical to conduct a structural analysis and analytically roll the gearset through mesh. With the advent of user specific programming linked to 3D solid modelers and mesh generators, model generation has become greatly automated. Contact algorithms available in general purpose finite element codes eliminate the need for the use and alignment of gap elements. Once the gearset is placed in mesh, user subroutines attached to the FE code easily roll the gearset through mesh. The method is described in detail. Preliminary results for a gearset segment showing the progression of the contact lineload is given as the gears roll through mesh.

Bibel, George D.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Kestrel Results at Liftoff Conditions for a Space Launch System Configuration in Proximity to the Launch Tower

Aerodynamic data books for Space Launch System vehicles require databases for the integrated forces and moments and section loads during liftoff and transition to the ascent phase of flight. While the force and moment database can be generated from wind tunnel results, computational analyses are necessary to provide the extensive surface information required to generate proper lineloads. Of the two flight regimes, the liftoff problem is the more costly and complex situation to simulate, as it requires modeling of the vehicle in proximity to the launch tower. The effects of massive separation on the leeward pressure fields of both the tower and vehicle are not well captured with RANS methods, necessitating the use of more advanced methods, such as Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation, in conjunction with computational grids sufficiently refined to resolve the wakes. Details on the computational setup for employing the Kestrel flow solver to address the liftoff problem are presented. The methodology involves the use of independent unstructured near-body grids for the vehicle and the tower, overset by a solution adaptive Cartesian off-body grid. Results from the simulations are compared to experimental results from a test in the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel.

Computational fluid dynamics↗
NASA NTRS2024

Computational Techniques to Generate Space Launch System Aerodynamic Databases

This document describes the reasoning and trade studies used to evaluate tools for constructing the aerodynamic lineload databases for the liftoff and transition phases of flight for the Space Launch System. Three computational fluid dynamics codes (USM3D, FUN3D, Kestrel) were investigated with various turbulence models, as well as detached eddy simulation variants for the launch vehicle in free air and in proximity to the tower. Decisions were made mostly based on results from brief developmental studies performed in response to specific, unforeseen challenges that were encountered in the analysis of a given configuration. The need to develop databases in a timely manner, as well as accurately capture the expected leeward-wake flowfield characteristics, led to the selection of the Kestrel flow solver with its delayed detached eddy simulation method, the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model, and the adaptive mesh refinement capability in the off-body Cartesian grid region.

Karen A. Deere↗