Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium dendrite”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Self-Healing Lithium Dendrites through Spontaneous Passivating Layer Formation for Stable Solid-State Lithium–Metal Batteries

All-solid-state lithium–metal batteries have attracted significant attention, owing to their high energy density and superior safety. However, lithium–metal penetration through the solid electrolyte, leading to short-circuiting, remains a critical failure mode that demands comprehensive mitigation strategies. Most existing strategies are effective only prior to the initiation of lithium-dendrite formation and fail once dendrites begin to propagate through the electrolyte. In this study, we propose a self-healing mechanism in which the penetrated lithium reacts with a self-healing agent to form a passivating layer along the particle boundaries. Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) was incorporated into a Li 6 PS 5 Cl solid electrolyte as the self-healing agent to suppress lithium-dendrite propagation even after dendrite formation initiated under high current densities. The self-healing induced by LiTFSI was verified through comprehensive experimental analyses and was further demonstrated in a full-cell configuration. Moreover, LiTFSI incorporation plays an important role in increasing the critical current density by reducing the overall electronic conductivity of the solid electrolyte and facilitating the formation of a robust LiF-containing solid-electrolyte interphase.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Lithium Dendrite-Free Li 7 N 2 I-LiOH Solid Electrolytes for High Energy Lithium Batteries

All-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) hold great potential to improve the safety and energy density of today’s lithium-ion batteries by using non-flammable inorganic solid electrolytes. Solid electrolytes (SEs) are believed to prevent Li dendrite growth because of high mechanical strength and high Li+ transference numbers. Significant advances in SE have been achieved, among which, Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) and Li2S–P2S5 (LPS) are the most promising SEs for bulk-type solid-state lithium batteries because of high ionic conductivities (>10-4 S/cm2). However, in contrast to our expectations, the growth of lithium dendrites is not suppressed but is facilitated in LLZOs and LPSs regardless of dopants, porosity, and crystallinity of the electrolytes. Despite the unity Li transference number and over two-times of shear modulus than that of Li metal, the critical current densities for Li plating and stripping in these SEs are less than 1.0 mA cm-2, which is one-fourth to one-tenth of that in liquid electrolytes at room temperature. The incompatibility between LLZO and LPS with Li metal seriously limits the energy density of all-solid-state batteries. The mechanism for lithium dendrite formation and growth in SEs are still disputable. Lack of understanding of the Li dendrite formation mechanism seriously impeded the development of solid-state lithium batteries. The development of the criterion for Li dendrite suppression is essential for the success of solid electrolyte lithium batteries. In this project, a criterion for Li dendrite suppression will be developed through thermodynamics and kinetics analysis of lithium dendrite nucleation/growth, which will guide the solid-state electrolyte design. Li7N2I-LiOH, Li5NI2-LiOH and Li3YCl6 solid electrolyte with high ionic conductivity and low electronic conductivity were used to validate the criterion for lithium dendrite suppression. Different surface modifications were also explored to enhance the dendrite suppression capability of SSEs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS1993

Dendrite preventing separator for secondary lithium batteries

Dendrites are prevented from shorting a secondary lithium battery by use of a first porous separator, such as porous polypropylene, adjacent to the lithium anode that is unreactive with lithium and a second porous fluoropolymer separator between the cathode and the first separator, such as polytetrafluoroethylene, that is reactive with lithium. As the tip of a lithium dendrite contacts the second separator, an exothermic reaction occurs locally between the lithium dendrite and the fluoropolymer separator. This results in the prevention of the dendrite propagation to the cathode.

Shen, David H.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Dendrite preventing separator for secondary lithium batteries

Dendrites are prevented from shorting a secondary lithium battery by use of a first porous separator such as porous polypropylene adjacent the lithium anode that is unreactive with lithium and a second porous fluoropolymer separator between the cathode and the first separator such as polytetrafluoroethylene that is reactive with lithium. As the tip of a lithium dendrite contacts the second separator, an exothermic reaction occurs locally between the lithium dendrite and the fluoropolymer separator. This results in the prevention of the dendrite propagation to the cathode.

Shen, David H.↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Modified Sand’s Time Incorporating Li-Ion Transport Across the SEI: Basis for Understanding Li Dendrite Formation and Li-Metal Battery Electrolyte Selection

Abstract Understanding the initiation of lithium dendrites remains elusive, largely due to the intricate role of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) which forms on the Li surface during electrodeposition. Many studies have utilized the classical Sand’s equation to estimate the onset time when lithium dendrites begin to form. The Sand’s equation provides the time when the cation (Li+) concentration at the electrode-electrolyte interface approaches zero under diffusion-limited conditions in galvanostatic Li electrodeposition. However, recent experimental studies have revealed that the observed lithium dendrite onset time deviates considerably from the Sand’s time. Here, we show that this deviation from classical theory is likely due to the transport of Li+ ions through the SEI - a transport limitation that is much more dominant in controlling dendrite formation. We develop a ‘modified’ Sand's equation, incorporating the SEI layer and the diffusional transport across it to predict Li dendrite onset times. To validate this approach, we conducted Li electrodeposition experiments at various current densities using two distinct organic electrolytes. Analysis of the results demonstrates that the modified Sand's equation provides a more accurate prediction of dendrite onset times, highlighting the importance of incorporating SEI into transport models of Li plating in next-generation rechargeable Li-metal batteries.

Ma, Yuanman (ORCID:0000000200444811)↗
DOE OSTI2024

Phase Field Modeling of Pressure Induced Densification in Solid Electrolytes

Adoption of dense and homogeneous solid electrolytes can possibly mitigate the propagation of lithium dendrites and enable lithium metal anodes. Application of external pressure helps to minimize the sintering temperature in oxide ceramics and can potentially densify softer sulfide electrolytes even under room temperature conditions. Here, a previously developed phase field-based computational scheme for predicting the high-temperature sintering-induced densification of oxide ceramic solid electrolytes is extended in the present context to capture the influence of external pressure for densifying solid electrolytes. Two different bulk deformation mechanisms, namely, "reorganization" and "creep deformation," are dominant under external pressure, which is different from the surface and grain-boundary diffusion-induced densification of solid electrolytes that occurs during high temperature sintering. External pressure also increases the points of contact between the particles, which further enhances the propensity of diffusion-induced sintering process. Results obtained from simulations indicate that densification under external pressure is independent of the solid electrolyte particle morphology. Finally, a phase map is generated between applied pressure and temperature for achieving complete densification of oxide ceramics, which can possibly guide the synthesis of thin and dense solid electrolyte separators.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Developing a model for the impact of non-conformal lithium contact on electro-chemo-mechanics and dendrite growth

Lithium dendrite growth hinders the use of lithium metal anodes in commercial batteries. We present a 3D model to study the mechanical and electrochemical mechanisms that drive microscale plating. With this model, we investigate electrochemical response across a lithium protrusion characteristic of rough anode surfaces, representing the separator as a porous polymer in non-conformal contact with a lithium anode. The impact of pressure on separator morphology and electrochemical response is of particular interest, as external pressure can improve cell performance. We explore the relationships between plating propensity, stack pressure, and material properties. External pressure suppresses lithium plating due to interfacial stress and separator pore closure, leading to inhomogeneous plating rates. For moderate pressures, dendrite growth is completely suppressed, as plating will occur in the electrolyte-filled gaps between anode and separator. In fast-charging conditions and systems with low electrolyte diffusivities, the benefits of pressure are overridden by ion transport limitations.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Methylation enables the use of fluorine-free ether electrolytes in high-voltage lithium metal batteries

Lithium metal batteries represent a promising technology for next-generation energy storage, but they still suffer from poor cycle life due to lithium dendrite formation and cathode cracking. Fluorinated solvents can improve battery longevity by improving LiF content in the solid-electrolyte interphase; however, the high cost and environmental concerns of fluorinated solvents limit battery viability. Here, for this work, we designed a series of fluorine-free solvents through the methylation of 1,2-dimethoxyethane, which promotes inorganic LiF-rich interphase formation through anion reduction and achieves high oxidation stability. The anion-derived LiF interphases suppress lithium dendrite growth on the lithium anode and minimize cathode cracking under high-voltage operation. The Li + -solvent structure is investigated through in situ techniques and simulations to draw correlations between the interphase compositions and electrochemical performances. The methylation strategy provides an alternative pathway for electrolyte engineering towards high-voltage electrolytes while reducing dependence on expensive fluorinated solvents.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Incombustible Polymer Electrolyte Boosting Safety of Solid–State Lithium Batteries: A Review

Lithium-ion batteries with their portability, high energy density, and reusability are frequently used in today's world. Under extreme conditions, lithium-ion batteries leak, burn, and even explode. Therefore, improving the safety of lithium-ion batteries has become a focus of attention. Researchers believe using a solid electrolyte instead of a liquid one can solve the lithium battery safety issue. Due to the low price, good processability and high safety of the solid polymer electrolytes, increasing attention have been paid to them. However, polymer electrolytes can also decompose and burn under extreme conditions. Moreover, lithium dendrites are formed continuously due to the uneven charge distribution on the surface of the lithium metal anode. A short circuit caused by a lithium dendrite can cause the battery to thermal runaway. As a result, the safety of polymer solid-state batteries remains a challenge. In this review, the thermal runaway mechanism of the batteries is summarized, and the batteries abuse test standard is introduced. In addition, the recent works on the high-safety polymer electrolytes and the solution strategies of lithium anode problems in polymer batteries are reviewed. Finally, the development direction of safe polymer solid lithium batteries is prospected.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Developing an In-situ Formed Dynamic Protection Layer to Mitigate Lithium Interface Shifting: Preventing Dendrite Formation on Metallic Lithium Surface to Facilitate Long Cycle Life of Lithium Solid-State Batteries

After extensive research on various system, a fully lithiated Si anode material (Li 3.75 Si) was synthesized. The high energy density, long cycle life anode demonstrated no apparent dendrite growth in an all-solid-state Li battery. A flexible solid-state electrolyte film with a thickness less than 50 μm was developed. All-solid-state Li full batteries were built and tested with NMC811, organic, organosulfide and sulfur cathode. Energy density of 1140 Wh/Kg at material level and 376 Wh/Kg at electrode level were demonstrated for over 500 cycles and with no apparent dendrite formation on the Li anode.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Tackling issues of lithium metal anodes with a novel polymeric lithicone coating

Lithium metal (Li) has been hindered from as anodes in commercial batteries for over 50 years, due to two main issues: continuous formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and lithium dendritic growth. In this work, we report a new strategy to tackle these issues, i.e., using molecular layer deposition (MLD) to grow an ionically conducting but electrically insulating polymeric lithicone coating, an Li-containing triethanolamine (LiTEA). Our electrochemical tests revealed that this LiTEA coating could serve as an exceptional protection layer over Li anodes. Consequently, the LiTEA-coated Li electrodes could achieve a superior cyclability of > 10000 Li stripping/plating cycles at a current density of 5 mA cm -2 and a long cyclability of > 5500 cycles at 2 mA cm -2 in Li||Li symmetric cells without failures, under a fixed areal capacity of 1 mAh cm -2 . Characterizations using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron microscopy verified that Li + ions could be easily extracted through and deposited under the LiTEA coating during the stripping/plating processes. Consequently, this LiTEA coating significantly inhibited the formation of SEI and Li dendrites. This underlies the long cycling lifetime of the LiTEA-coated Li||Li cells. Coupling with the nickel-rich LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathodes, more encouragingly, the LiTEA-coated Li anodes could remarkably extend the cyclability and sustainable capacity of the resultant Li||NMC full cells. Finally, we also demonstrated that the performance of Li||NMC cells could be further improved through combining an LiTEA-coated Li anode with an Li 2 S-modified NMC811 via atomic layer deposition (ALD). Thus, this study is inspiring for developing high-energy Li||NMC lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Nontraditional Approaches To Enable High-Energy and Long-Life Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

In this study, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are promising for automotive applications due to their high theoretical energy density (2600 Wh/kg). In addition, the natural abundance of sulfur could mitigate the global raw material supply chain challenge of commercial lithium-ion batteries that use critical elements, such as nickel and cobalt. However, due to persistent polysulfide shuttling and uncontrolled lithium dendrite growth, Li-S batteries using nonencapsulated sulfur cathodes and conventional ether-based electrolytes suffer from rapid cell degradation upon cycling. Despite significant improvements in recent decades, there is still a big gap between lab research and commercialization of the technology. To date, the reported cell energy densities and cycling life of practical Li-S pouch cells remain largely unsatisfactory. Traditional approaches to improving Li-S performance are primarily focused on confining polysulfides using electronically conductive hosts. However, these micro- and mesoporous hosts suffer from limited pore volume to accommodate high sulfur loading and the associated volume change during cycling. Moreover, they fail to balance adsorption-conversion of polysulfides during charge-discharge, leading to the formation of massive dead sulfur. Such hosts are themselves electrochemically inactive, which decreases the practical energy density. In contrast, a series of nontraditional approaches, paired with advances in multiscale mechanistic understanding, have recently demonstrated exciting performance outcomes not only in conventional coin cells but also in practical pouch cells. In this Account, we first introduce our novel cathode design strategies to overcome polysulfide shuttling and sluggish redox kinetics in thick S cathodes via selenium-sulfur chemistry and cathode host engineering. Next, we gain a mechanistic understanding of Li-S batteries in various types of electrolytes via a series of spectroscopic, nuclear magnetic resonance, and electrochemical methods. Meanwhile, a novel cathode solid electrolyte interphase encapsulation strategy via nonviscous highly fluorinated ether-based electrolyte is introduced. The established selection rule by investigating how solvating power retards the shuttle effect and induces robust cathode/solid-electrolyte interphase formation is also included. We then discuss how the synergistic interactions between rational cathode structures and electrolytes can be exploited to tailor the reaction pathways and kinetics of S cathodes under high mass loading and lean electrolyte conditions. In addition, a novel interlayer design to simultaneously overcome degradation processes (polysulfide shuttling and lithium dendrite formation) and accelerate redox reaction kinetics is presented. Finally, this Account concludes with an overview of the challenges and strategies to develop Li-S pouch cells with high practical energy density, long cycle life, and fast-charging capability.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗