Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium polysulfide batteries”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Lithium-sulfur battery with lithium polysulfide catholyte

A liquid catholyte for a Li-S battery comprises a non-aqueous solution of at least one lithium polysulfide of formula Li 2 S x (wherein x is selected from 4, 6, and 8) and an anion receptor compound capable of complexing with polysulfide anion. The non-aqueous solution typically is composed of the Li 2 S x and the anion receptor compound dissolved in a non-aqueous solvent (e.g., one or more organic ether or fluorinated ether solvents). The anion receptor compound typically is present in the catholyte at a concentration of about 0.1 M to about 4 M. Li-S batteries comprise a metallic lithium anode; a porous conductive substrate; a separator membrane between the anode and the porous conductive substrate; and the liquid catholyte composition within pores of the substrate.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Rational Design of a Ni 3 N 0.85 Electrocatalyst to Accelerate Polysulfide Conversion in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Slow kinetics of polysulfide conversion reactions lead to severe issues for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries, for example, low rate capability, polysulfide migration, and low Coulombic efficiencies. These challenges hinder the practical applications of Li–S batteries. Here, we proposed a rational strategy of tuning the d-band of catalysts to accelerate the conversion of polysulfides. Nitrogen vacancies were engineered in hexagonal Ni 3 N (space group P 6 3 22) to tune its d-band center, leading to the strong interaction between polysulfides and Ni 3 N. Because of the greater electron population in the lowest occupied molecular orbital of Li 2 S 4 , the terminal S–S bonds were weakened for breaking. Temperature-dependent experiments confirm that Ni 3 N 0.85 demonstrates a much low activation energy, thereby accelerating the conversion of polysulfides. A Li–S cell using Ni 3 N 0.85 can deliver a high initial discharge capacity of 1445.9 mAh g –1 (at 0.02 C) and low decay per cycle (0.039%). The Ni 3 N 0.85 cell can also demonstrate an initial capacity of 1200.4 mAh g –1 for up to 100 cycles at a high loading of 5.2 mg cm –2 . The high efficiency of rationally designed Ni 3 N 0.85 demonstrates the effectiveness of the d-band tuning strategy to develop low-activation-energy catalysts and to promote the atomic understanding of polysulfide conversion in Li–S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Flexible 2D Boron Imidazolate Framework for Polysulfide Adsorption in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

We report the "polysulfide shuttle," a process initiated by the dissolution of polysulfides, is recognized to be one of the major failure mechanisms of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. Much research effort has been dedicated toward efficient cathode additives and host materials to suppress the leaching of polysulfide species. Herein, we report a new 2D metal-organic framework constituted by a tritopic ligand, boron imidazolate ([BH(Im) 3 ] - , Im = imidazole), and Co 2+ ions for lithium polysulfide adsorption. The cobalt imidazolate framework (CoN 6 -BIF) contains octahedrally coordinated Co centers that form two-dimensional layers in the a,b plane. Composite cathodes containing CoN 6 -BIF exhibited high sulfur utilization and capacity retention, resulting in improved specific capacity and cycle life compared to sulfur/carbon controls. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that CoN 6 -BIF linkers are rotationally flexible, allowing the framework to accommodate polysulfide in the expanded pores. This unusual property of BIFs opens up new avenues for exploring flexible metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their applications to energy storage.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Cation-doped ZnS catalysts for polysulfide conversion in lithium–sulfur batteries

Catalytic conversion of polysulfides is regarded as a crucial approach to enhancing kinetics and suppressing the shuttle effect in lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. However, the activity prediction of Li-S catalysts remains elusive owing to the lack of mechanistic understanding of activity descriptors. Here, we report a volcano-shaped relationship between polysulfide adsorption ability and catalytic activity. In conjunction with theoretical analysis, we distinguish catalytic and anchoring effects to delineate the role of adsorption and emphasize the passivation of catalysts. These findings enable us to develop a composite catalyst, Co0.125Zn0.875S, which shows higher performance than simple binary compounds. Such a fundamental understanding of the intrinsic link between polysulfide adsorption and catalytic activity offers a rational viewpoint for designing Li-S catalysts and tuning their activities.

Shen, Zihan↗
DOE OSTI2025

Tailoring Electrolytes by Decoupling the Roles of Li + and Lithium Polysulfides in Li–S Batteries

Understanding the distinct roles of lithium ions (Li + ) and lithium polysulfide intermediates, Li 2 S x (LiPS) is critical for designing electrolytes that can extend the practical cycle life of lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. Here, in this work, we decouple the solvation and solubility effects of Li + and LiPS and correlate them with electrochemical performance through a cosolvent strategy. Li + solubility and solvation primarily dictate the electrolyte’s ionic conductivity and the reversibility of lithium anode stripping/plating. In contrast, LiPS solvation governs the thermodynamics of sulfur (S 8 ), LiPS, and lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) interconversion, while the LiPS solubility determines their redox kinetics. By employing a fluorinated–glyme (F-glyme) cosolvent, specifically 1,2-bis­(2,2-difluoroethoxy)­ethane (F4DEE), that exhibits low LiPS solubility yet moderate Li + solvation, we designed an electrolyte that enhances lithium anode stability while maintaining sufficient sulfur cathode kinetics, thereby prolonging Li–S cell cycle life. This study provides mechanistic insights into the interplay between Li+ and LiPS in Li–S electrochemistry and offers design principles for next-generation electrolytes for Li–S batteries.

Yang, Jingtian [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL),↗
DOE OSTI2024

A Highly Effective Polysulfide-Trapping Approach for the Development of High Energy Density, Scalable Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are identified as one of the most promising next-generation battery technologies owing to their high theoretical specific energy, sustainability, and affordability. However, the commercialization of Li-S batteries has been hindered by severe technical challenges, including the lithium polysulfide (PS) dissolution/shuttling effect, a major cause of fast capacity degradation over cycling. We demonstrated that, for the first time, nanolayer polymer coated high surface area porous carbons (NPCs) were coated directly on sulfur electrodes (NPC-S), which led to a high specific capacity of ∼1,600 mAh g −1 approaching the theoretical specific capacity limit in the NPC-S based Li-S batteries. The NPC-S based Li-S batteries maintained their large initial specific capacity gain compared with the Baseline-S based Li-S batteries (control) over extended cycles. A follow-on study indicated that the NPC-S approach is a necessary and critical step to boost the near-theoretical specific capacity while being stabilized over long cycles with a synergistic strategy. Our experimental and computational results suggest that NPC coated on sulfur electrodes provides not only an effective and strong PS-trapping power but also an increased redox reaction kinetics for sulfur ↔ PS’s conversions during battery charge and discharge, rendering the realization of near-theoretical discharge specific capacity in the NPC-S based Li-S batteries. The findings presented in this study may inspire a new, simple, low-cost, and commercially scalable approach, without adding any appreciable dead weight or volume to the batteries, in the effort to tackle the technical challenges facing SOA Li-S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Hybrid polymer network cathode-enabled soluble-polysulfide-free lithium–sulfur batteries

Among the emerging 'beyond lithium-ion' technologies for maximized sustainability, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) is a favoured chemistry because of its exceptional energy density from the conversion of sulfur, an element in abundant supply. However, the dissolution of several intermediate polysulfides formed during conversion leads to rapid performance degradation over cycling. Here, in this study, we address this issue by sulfurizing a hybrid polymer network with polyphosphazene and carbon as a cathode for Li-S batteries. With rich sites to re-bond and adsorb dissociative sulfur species, this hybrid polymer network circumvents the formation of soluble polysulfides and enables a unique, reversible inserting conversion reaction. Thus, our cathode delivers both high capacity (~900 mAh g -1 cathode ) and excellent cycling stability in Li-S coin cells, with a pouch cell demonstration of projected energy density of ~300 Wh kg -1 and 84.9% capacity retention after 150 cycles. The strategy can be extended to other cost-effective, recyclable polymers, advancing sulfur-based batteries towards practical energy storage application.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Hybrid polymer network for soluble-polysulfide-free lithium-sulfur battery

The present disclosure relates to a sulfur-based cathode material for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries, and more particularly to a sulfurized hybrid polymer network. This invention addresses challenges associated with the dissolution of intermediate polysulfides during electrochemical cycling, which commonly result in rapid capacity fading and poor long-term stability in Li–S batteries.

Wang, Donghai [Pennsylvania State Univ., Universit↗
DOE OSTI2022

Tailoring Mesopores and Nitrogen Groups of Carbon Nanofibers for Polysulfide Entrapment in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

In the current work, we combined different physical and chemical modifications of carbon nanofibers through the creation of micro-, meso-, and macro-pores as well as the incorporation of nitrogen groups in cyclic polyacrylonitrile (CPAN) using gas-assisted electrospinning and air-controlled electrospray processes. We incorporated them into electrode and interlayer in Li–Sulfur batteries. First, we controlled pore size and distributions in mesoporous carbon fibers (mpCNF) via adding polymethyl methacrylate as a sacrificial polymer to the polyacrylonitrile carbon precursor, followed by varying activation conditions. Secondly, nitrogen groups were introduced via cyclization of PAN on mesoporous carbon nanofibers (mpCPAN). We compared the synergistic effects of all these features in cathode substrate and interlayer on the performance Li–Sulfur batteries and used various characterization tools to understand them. Our results revealed that coating CPAN on both mesoporous carbon cathode and interlayer greatly enhanced the rate capability and capacity retention, leading to the capacity of 1000 mAh/g at 2 C and 1200 mAh/g at 0.5 C with the capability retention of 88% after 100 cycles. The presence of nitrogen groups and mesopores in both cathodes and interlayers resulted in more effective polysulfide confinement and also show more promise for higher loading systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Sulfur Loaded MS 2 Barrier for Control of Polysulfide Shuttling in Lithium Sulfur Batteries (Final Report)

The lithium/sulfur battery system provides the opportunity for high capacity and low-cost batteries, and addresses the several challenges facing this technology including the need for improved rate capability and capacity retention. The presence of both 2D MS 2 nanosheets and sulfur will provide several advantages to address the limitations, including enhanced conductivity to the inherently insulating sulfur by the inclusion of MS 2 nanosheets, as well as utilizing the nanosheets to entrap negatively charged polysulfide species to prevent polysulfide shuttling and extend cycle life meeting Battery500 Program goals.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

A Multidimensional Operando Study Showing the Importance of the Electrode Macrostructure in Lithium Sulfur Batteries

Lithium sulfur batteries are one of the most promising next-generation energy storage technologies, because of their impressive theoretical energy density, low materials cost, and relative safety. However, incomplete understanding of their underlying operation mechanisms has hindered their further development and commercialization. In this work, to gain a better understanding of the operation mechanisms in the lithium sulfur battery, three macroscopically different (woven and nonwoven) and microscopically similar (made from the same carbon fibers) free-standing carbon felts are used as the conductive matrices to show how the macrostructure influences the redox reactions and the electrochemical performance. Additionally, an operando radiography and simultaneous in situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study are performed to highlight the differences of the carbon hosts and how they compare electrochemically in a lithium sulfur battery. The electrochemical results show that the carbon host with a more open structure results in increased capacity as well as a higher diffusion coefficient. The operando radiography shows that the open structures are more conducive to efficient redox reactivity in forming solid sulfur species, mostly in the form of elongated needlelike structures identified as β-S8, near the end of charge, which is corroborated by the impedance data. The data also reveal a “breathing” mechanism, where the polysulfides are pushed to the edges during discharge and pulled back during charge. Furthermore, it is also revealed that the “breathing” process is a limiting factor in the high rate performance. Overall, this study shows that there is a close relationship between the macrostructure of the carbon matrix and the electrochemical performance of the sulfur cathode.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

A Fluorinated Lewis Acidic Organoboron Tunes Polysulfide Complex Structure for High–Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Many challenges in lithium-sulfur (Li–S) batteries are associated with the radical change in lithium polysulfide (LPS) solubility during cycling, but chemical approaches to address such inconsistency are still lacking. Here, the use of a strong Lewis acidic fluorinated organoboron, tri(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) borate (TFEB), is reported as a multi-functional mediator to simultaneously overcome multiple technical barriers in practical Li–S batteries. TFEB acts as an anion acceptor and forms strong molecular complexes with Lewis basic LPS. The TFEB-LPS complexes have consistent solubility across the full polysulfide spectrum and deliver several times improved better redox kinetics, unlocking a true redox catalytic mechanism that covers the majority of redox events in thick sulfur cathodes. As a result, Li–S batteries evaluated under practical conditions exhibit significantly improved discharge capacity, rate capability, and cycling stability with the addition of the TFEB additive. More importantly, TFEB also contributes to the stabilization of lithium anode in the presence of polysulfides by generating strong interfacial film. These attributes significantly improve the cycling stability of practical Li–S pouch cells, which are assembled with a unit energy density of 219 Wh kg –1 . Finally, the results provide new molecular insights on the design of unlocking solvation networks of practical Li–S systems.

77 NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Spatial Progression of Polysulfide Reactivity with Lithium Nitrate in Li–Sulfur Batteries

LiNO 3 is a commonly used electrolyte additive in Li-S batteries, but the intricacies of its stabilizing effect on these batteries are not well-understood due to the complex chemical nature of Li-S electrolytes. This complexity often hampers clear characterization and interpretation of data. In this study, we explore the reactivity of LiNO 3 in Li-S batteries through in operando sulfur K-edge spectroscopy. To remove ambiguities, a sulfur-free electrolyte with LiNO 3 as the sole salt is used. This allows a precise elucidation of the reaction mechanism between LiNO 3 and polysulfides. Here, we observe that the reaction is chemical in nature and progresses spatially, influenced by the polysulfide concentration gradient across the electrolyte. Polysulfides are electrochemically generated in situ on the cathode side, leading to high local concentration. As a result, they cannot be fully oxidized by LiNO 3 and forms sulfites initially which are gradually further oxidized into sulfonates and sulfates. Conversely, polysulfides on the anode side have lower local concentration as they are not generated in situ but diffused from the cathode side. Their reaction with LiNO 3 leads to highly oxidized species like sulfonates and sulfates. These reaction products are not reduced during electrochemically cycling, suggesting their capabilities of passivating the electrodes and contributing to the cycle stabilities of Li-S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Deciphering the Dynamic Balance Between Solvation Strength and Polysulfides Reaction Heterogeneity in Practical Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries

Achieving stable interfacial chemistry in lithium–sulfur batteries under practical conditions remains a key barrier to commercialization. Here, we demonstrate that interfacial dynamics can be effectively regulated by coupling solvation-power control with intrinsic heterogeneity of sulfur redox chemistry through the introduction of a weakly solvating fluorinated cosolvent, LIB 1200ET (1200ET). Compared with conventional fluorinated ethers, 1200ET efficiently shifts Li + solvation environment toward a more non-coordinated configuration at low volume fractions, enabling substantial solvation modulation without significantly impairing sulfur redox kinetics. This solvation transition weakens Li + –solvent interactions while strengthening Li + –anion and Li + –lithium polysulfide (LPS) coordination, suppressing LPS solubility and promoting reconstruction of solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI). Regulated LPS chemistry, together with 1200ET, leads to formation of a S 4+ -rich, LiF-reinforced SEI with enhanced ionic conductivity and mechanical robustness. Spatially resolved sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy on pouch cells reveals pronounced current-density-dependent chemical heterogeneity, distinguishing kinetically dominated and solvation-controlled regions. Under practical conditions (3.7 mg cm −2 sulfur loading, E/S = 6 µL mg −1 ), a single-layer pouch cell delivers 527 mAh g −1 over 200 cycles at C/3, while an Ah-level multilayer pouch cell achieves an energy density of 358 Wh kg −1 . These results establish non-coordinating cosolvent-driven solvation engineering as a scalable strategy for practical Li–S batteries.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

A Dual–Phase Electrolyte for High–Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Dissolution of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) is essential for fast cathode kinetics, but detrimental for anode stability, especially under lean electrolyte conditions. Here in this work, the phase separation phenomenon between solvents with different polarities (tetramethyl sulfone [TMS] and dibutyl ether [DBE]) is utilized to enable the design of a dual-phase electrolyte. High-polarity, high-density TMS–lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide–ammonium trifluoroacetate as the cathode electrolyte strongly solvates LiPSs, which propel the sulfur redox reaction. Moreover, the composite of DBE and a polymeric ion conductor serves as the anode electrolyte. The addition of DBE in the anode side effectively prevents the crossover of corrosive species (LiPSs and ammonia trifluoroacetate), enabling a significant improvement in Li-metal anode stability. The electrode-specific dual-phase electrolyte design provides electrochemical performance superior to conventional electrolytes. Without additional electrode engineering, pouch cells assemble with the dual-phase electrolyte cycle under a lean electrolyte (4 µL mg –1 ) and low-Li-excess condition (N/P = 3) for 120 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗